Dismiss Notice
Get 12 monthly issues of BeerAdvocate magazine and save $5 when you select "auto-renew."

Subscribe now →
Dismiss Notice
Join our email list →

And we'll send you the latest updates and offers from BeerAdvocate, because knowing is half the battle.

Sol - Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.

Not Rated.
SolSol

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
60
poor

376 Reviews
THE BROS
58
awful

(Read More)
Reviews: 376
Hads: 1,292
Avg: 2.48
pDev: 50%
Wants: 10
Gots: 238 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.
Mexico | website

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager | 4.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 02-18-2002

No notes at this time.
View: Beers (39) | Events
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Sol Alström Bros
Reviews: 376 | Hads: 1,292
Photo of Randygroves
4.76/5  rDev +91.9%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 5

Yes this is a real Mexican beer!!! That's the way it should be judged. If you are a fan of those grapefruit beers dont try to describe what a good Mexican beer is. If I was used to drinking a sour bitter IPA I wouldnt like this beer either.

I first had one on a bus ride in Mexico where they had a full cooler for the bus ride to pyrimids on the beach (Tulum). The whole time I was checking out the pyrimids I kept thinking back about greeting back on the bus for some more.

That was in 1987. Found it at ABC while picking up a variety of pumpkin ales. Still has the same taste as 27 years ago!
Taste- Like syrup is to pancakes this beer is to your tounge!

Having a hot day mowing the lawn or working in the yard? Live in Florida? This is the beer for you!!!

Grade beers for purpose. Not for preference...

 812 characters

Photo of Subliminal64
3.73/5  rDev +50.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

By far this is my favorite "brand name" imported Mexican beer.

Drank straight from the bottle with no lime.

Great colour. Very light golden colour.

Very faint sweet smell.

Lots of carbonation. Feels good on the tongue. Taste is a little light, but very refreshing with no aftertaste.

Not my favourite beer, but its one that I will have periodically throughout the year.

Give it a try.

MB

 394 characters

Photo of jjamadorphd
2.71/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Another Mexican beer, but unlike others that I have had, this one just didn't quite make the cut.

In the bottle and out, the beer has a beautiful golden color. It pours a very nice white head, but it has not lacing or staying power. I smelled hints of honey and even sugar, which I have to admit I found appealing. The beer unfortunately felt way too watery for my taste - it was as though I could have drank an entire six pack without thinking I was really having any beer. The watery-ness lent itself to the blandness of the beer, and although it wasn't the worst I ever had, it left me wanting for more.

 607 characters

Photo of Amish_Ambush
1.71/5  rDev -31%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 2 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

Appearance: Yellow, watery.
Smell: light bubble gum smell
Taste: The barest, faintest evidence of oranges. Nothing flavorful going on here. Still, this is something that I would drink over having a Corona.
Mouthfeel: Thin
Overall: Lawnmower beet. Nothing more.

 260 characters

Photo of NiceTaps
2.68/5  rDev +8.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.75

12oz can in an Imperial pint glass.

A- Crystal clear and clean light straw color with a big 2-finger white head. There's quite a lot of lacing, although it does not last very long. Lively carbonation.

S- Not too bad...some sweet corn and dry AAL grain. It strikes me as concentrate that I added hydration to make the finished product.

T- Not too good...very cheap unfinished alcohol dominated the adjuncts.

M- Poor...thin and watery . Some bite from the alcohol. Not pleasant.

O- Why bother?

 496 characters

Photo of Damian
1.98/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2

Drank from a 12 fl. oz (355 ml) bottle purchased at Downtown Wine & Spirits, Somerville, MA
Served in a pint glass

The beer poured a crystal clear, pale golden yellow. A one-inch tall, foamy, bubbly, bright white crown topped the liquid. Very impressive lacing. Thick, patchy sheets of froth coated the entire glass.

The aroma was very simplistic. Dry, powdery, lager yeast notes dominated. Crisp and grainy with a mild tartness. Some skunky notes were detectible as the beer warmed.

Like the nose, the flavor profile was rather unimpressive. It tasted very adjunct ridden and contained lots of raw, husky, grainy malts. Subtle lemon and hay notes appeared in the center. The finish was bracingly dry and bitter. It reminded me of a hoppy beer that had been completely sucked of any actual flavor.

Most adjunct lagers come across as being overly fizzy, but this one almost seemed a bit flat. Light and airy on the palate. The soft and mellow effervescence gave the liquid a slight creaminess.

In the realm of American adjunct lagers, Sol falls near the bottom of the pack. Though not quite as offensive as its Mexican brethren Pacifico, this beer had an odd, astringent, bitter quality on the finish that was likely the result of a poor quality hop extract. If you must drink this, definitely mask the flavor profile with a lime or two.

 1,341 characters

Photo of mjurney
3.18/5  rDev +28.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.25

Appearance:
Straw color, clear. Lots of small bubble rising up. Small frothy head.

Aroma:
Crisp and clean. Some sweetness, grainy and a little corn.

Taste:
Sweet corn, grainy, some cracker. Hop bitterness is minimal. Finish is very crisp and clean, a little dryness. Body is very light and thin, crisp, clean, refreshing, fizzy.

Overall:
It's a decent beer.

 360 characters

Photo of harpo111
2.09/5  rDev -15.7%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2

I picked up a 6 of this on a hot day....Thought the label looked cool...had never tried it. Will go back to Negro Modelo.
A: yellow pale in a cool looking bottle...bottle was cooler than the beer.
S: sort of grainy/corny...
t: some hops...but more gritty with an aftertaste that makes me go "I need something spicy to cut this"...some sweetness...
M: a little body
O: I am not a one to turn down beer...but if I had to choose between this and a Natural Light....I would take the Natural Light... this stuff has a sweetness like a Miller...but an aftertaste that just lingers...and I am not fond of it in the least... I had better hopes for it. I would rather have a Modelo or Negro Modelo in a split second.
It is drinkable...and is better than a lot of really cheap stuff...I just don't like the aftertaste and the fact that it is 6.99 a six vs 3.99 for Natty Light...or Miller ...two cheap beers that I would rate higher on the overall scale...

 948 characters

Photo of Brenden
2.12/5  rDev -14.5%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.25

There's lots of clarity in this pale yellow-gold brew. The head ends up being simply a ring of foam along the edges. It does leave some spotting, and at least that ring stays for the duration.
Fruity fusel and husky corn notes are strongest along with graininess.
This beer may be trying to out-adjunct the other adjunct lagers. Stale, mustly, corny and mildly metallic, there's actually a smidgen of hops bitterness...which turns the finish sour.
This beer is moderately carbonated. An effort is almost made for crispness, but it dies off. It might be a little smooth...at least it's clean. It could be slick, after all.

 623 characters

Photo of bmwats
2.17/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.25

Poured from a 12 oz bottle into a standard pint.

A: Golden hue. Rising effervescence. Pours a 1 finger, frothy, white head. Settles slowly. Lots of spider web lacing.

S: Pale grain, wheat, and wet cardboard.

T: White bread... not much else. Tap water, maybe...

M: Nothing. Light, shallow, vapid.

D: You can really power thru it, largely because there's nothing to it.

Atmosphere is okay. Actually a really nice head, and some strong lacing. Nose is light and pale, not much to it. Completely shallow, and devoid of any flavor. Overall, this is a pretty poor quaff. Not really a horrible, repulsive experience; just... nothing.

 632 characters

Photo of jettjon
2.27/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.25

I first encountered Sol around 2005 in Mexico, and apparently it was so bad then that I never bothered to review it. I encountered it again courtesy a "beers of Mexico" sampler pack at a friend's house.

From a can into a pint glass, one finger of fizzy white foam quickly fades, leaving a tiny bit of lacing. Some carbonation precipiates from a clear golden yellow body. Nose is grainy with corns and malt. In the mouth, big flavors of adjunct and a bit of artificial sweetener, off flavors and a hint of metal. Fizzy and watery in the mouth. Overall: A very poor macro adjunct lager.

 585 characters

Photo of woodychandler
3.09/5  rDev +24.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3.25

Leave it to my local, in-person trader, tone77, to find Sol in a CAN when it has been on my Want list probably longer than any other at this point. "Why would I want it?" you ask. Because it is beer in a CAN, which is the objective of The CANQuest (TM), a misguided attempt on my part to try EVERY beer in a CAN, EVER. No CANned beer is turned away and each and every one is given a chance to prove itself worthy of a full review and full CANsumption.

From the CAN: "Cerveza Importada"; "Exposition Universelle Inernationale Paris"; "Cerveza Especial"; "Desde 1899"; "Please enjoy Sol responsibly".

My Crack and subsequent inverted Glug produced a sudsy finger of bone-white head with limited retention. Color was a gorgeous sunshine-yellow with NE-quality clarity. Nose smelled of sol-heated and fermented silage. Now, before you take exception to that, please understand that AALs are the backbone of The CANQuest (TM) and as such, I CAN recognize the scent quickly. Mouthfeel was thin-to-medium and it had a slightly vinous flavor in addition to the usual melange of adjuncts, especially corn. Finish was semi-dry, slightly refreshing, but nothing terribly different from any of its brethren.

 1,198 characters

Photo of dogfishandi
1.99/5  rDev -19.8%
look: 2.75 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

12oz can at fridge temp poured into a pint glass.

Clear light yellow golden color, the slightest bit of weird stringy sediment. White head settles to a thin retentive layer, no real lace.

Not much aroma. Sweet corny grain and just a hint of mineral water.

Buttery corny grain, just a hint of mineral water. Bland.

Smooth slightly bitey high carbonation. Watery light mouthfeel.

Pretty much like most adjunct lagers, nothing going on. AVOID!

 445 characters

Photo of bbluemzbeer
1.47/5  rDev -40.7%
look: 1.75 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.25

Appearance : looks like a typical American adjunct lager

Smell: I only smell grains.

Taste: You can taste the healy adjuncty of corn , metallic. the aftertaste is long and horribly rotten. If you drank this quick it can be drankable.

Mouthful: Average carbonation with a light watery body

Overall : This is not a good beer . I would pick corona , tecate before this beer. Just not a godd beer to drank.

grain aroma.

 422 characters

Photo of GreesyFizeek
2.1/5  rDev -15.3%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 2

Bottle purchased and drank at Mariachi's Grill in Henrietta, NY.

A Corona knockoff that's a little bit better than Corona, but still pretty offensive.

It's a clear golden yellow, with a one inch fizzy, ugly looking head. Not much lacing.

Smells like essentially nothing. A tiny bit of skunk.

Tastes like basically nothing, either. A little bit metallic and skunky, with some cooked grain taste as well, and a little bit of citrus. Just weak, bland, and offensive flavors all around.

Light bodied, crisp mouthfeel and carbonation.

This one was a stinker, there are better beers to drink with Mexican food for sure.

 619 characters

Photo of GossageBrewery
2.32/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.25

Poured this American Adjunct Lager from a 12 oz bottle into a pint glass. It poured a pale yellow color, produced a decent white head, average retention and does leave a little lacing on the glass. The aroma consists of mostly corn- not very appealing. Light in body, the foundation is derived from corn and some husky grain. There is a slight bit of hop bitterness but overall, not very complex, not very flavorful.

 416 characters

Photo of StonedTrippin
2.57/5  rDev +3.6%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

bad, but not that that bad. its better than a corona, not better than a pacifico, in my humble opinion. the color is straight piss, it really looks pee from someone that's rather dehydrated. there is a decent head on it though, and with a lime wedge it can look appealing after a hot day of work. the flavor is obviously adjuncty, corn heavy, syrupy, metallic, and a little bit decomposing, but taken in a big gulp from the bottle, its passable in some ways. the aftertaste is long and rotten though, yikes. fine carbonation but a little thick for a beer that's supposed to be a summer slammer like this one is. I usually hold the fruit in all beers I drink, but this beer is really only tolerable in quantity with a lime wedge, otherwise its pretty foul. time and a place though, time and a place...

 800 characters

Photo of JayManSmith
3.96/5  rDev +59.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4

There are so many beer snobs these days that don't know what they are talking about.

Just because it can be found in a 40oz does not make it an inferior malt liquor. This beer is indeed a lager, so stop describing it as such.

This beer is solid gold without appearing to be too watered down.

Not too much to the smell but maybe it was because I was getting pretty lit up.

If I had to compare the taste of this beer to another beer, I would say it tastes slightly like a Rolling Rock Pale Ale but still not quite the same (in a good way).

It's lightly carbonated compared to other lagers.

The bottom line is that this lager is better than Corona Extra, better than Dos Equis Special, and better than Tecate. It's an awesome summer beer when you are from the upper Midwest.

 780 characters

Photo of mfnmbvp
2.28/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

12 oz. bottle, no bottled on date, just a code stamp which I'm not going to bother with. Poured into a Firestone Walker pint glass with a wedge of lime added to the glass about half way through drinking.

A - Clear transparent typical American adjunct lager gold. Looks exactly the same in a glass as it does in the clear bottle, as you could have probably imagined. Lots of bubble action, virtually no head, just a white foam that fizzles out into nothing within seconds.

S - Sweet corn & grainy malts. Virtually nothing happening here.

T - Wet cardboard water sweetened with some honey. Virtually pretty tasteless with the exception of some honey / corn syrup like sweetness. Extremely light bodied, and nicely balanced. Not very carbonated or bloating at all which is a sigh of relief when compared to the horrible adjunct lagers that are actually brewed in America. Squeezing a damn lime wedge into this thing.

M - Smooth clean refreshing. Not really anything else to say about this.

Overall, a beer that is probably best paired with some Mexican food on a hot summer day. A beer I would probably prefer to drink out of the bottle with a slice of lime rather than in a glass. Crisp and refreshing for those hot days, and with a nice low 4.50% abv you could definitely toss a couple of these back. Possibly a better pick than a Corona Extra, and definitely a better pick than Bud Light Lime or Miller Chill.

Sol ---2.5/5

 1,428 characters

Photo of dvmin98
2.73/5  rDev +10.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Sol is something that I tend to gravitate to when out at a Mexican restaurant or on a very hot day. No, its not the most flavorful selection, but when you add a fat wedge of lime and some picante comida de Mexicana, its damn good. And, you can drink several in a short period of time.

I found a place here in Charlotte that sells the 32 ounce bottles, so I bought a case and whenever I make my famous carne asada, I drink away.

I like it better than Corona, but not as much as Pacifico.

 489 characters

Photo of brewskifan55
2.56/5  rDev +3.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.5

Poured into a snifter

A: Clear gold with a slight white head and decent lacing.

S: Some corn aspects with a slight amount of malts

T: Kinda watery. Light malts with a corny finish.

M: Light to medium with low carbonation.

O: A decent "cut the grass" beer; sessionable, but not exciting.

 292 characters

Photo of xxxxxxxxxxxxx
3.03/5  rDev +22.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The bottle of Sol i saw had a $1.79 price. Purchased at "Food 4 Less" in Highland Park, CA, USA.

A: This beer looks like gold. This beer has a lot of foam. The foam reminds me of lemon meringue pie.

S: This beer has a grain aroma.

T: Sol has a vague grain taste with a hint of hops.

M: Sol has medium carbonation.

O: An economical beer that is easy to drink.

Sol has a a strong foamy presence. The irony is that Sol has medium carbonation. Sol has the grain and hop presence that can be recognizable. There are not any real strong flavours within Sol. There is no bitterness at all within Sol. I enjoy drinking Sol. I enjoy Sol because the price is right and the beer is easy to drink.

 692 characters

Photo of FLima
2.05/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Poured a yellow colour and made no head. Presented good carbonation though.
In the aroma corn and rice are predominant. Unfortunately, flavour follows aroma.
It has a rather metalic or oxidized ending which is not very pleaseant. It is a beer to drink very cold, or with some lemon to disguise its flaws.

 304 characters

Photo of eduardolinhalis
1.83/5  rDev -26.2%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

330ml bottle served in an ordinary glass.

A: Pours a clear and bright yellow color forming a medium bubbled white head. Low retention and few lacing left

S: Sweet. Adjunct malts, mainly corn. Some flowery hops in the very end

T: Sweet upfront, again, lots of corn. Watery as hell. Really weak. Lager yeasts. Bitterness is nonexistent

M: Extremely light and watery body. Faint carbonation. Sweet corn aftertaste

O: Low drinkability. One of the worst "beers" that I've ever had

 480 characters

Photo of dbrauneis
2.51/5  rDev +1.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A: Pours a crystal clear light to medium yellow in color with moderate amounts of visible carbonation. The beer has a finger and a half tall bright white head that reduces to a thin film covering the entire surface of the beer with a couple of small thicker patches and a thin ring at the edges of the glass. Moderate amounts of lacing are observed.

S: Very light aromas of grainy adjunct malts with a hint of rice

T: There are light to moderate flavors of grainy and adjunct malts (rice) but without a lot of sweetness. There is a light flavor of grassy hops with impart a slight amount of non-lingering bitterness.

M: Light bodied with moderate amounts of carbonation. Slightly thin and watery.

O: Very easy to drink and sessionable, would be a good beer for a cook out on a hot summer day or at the beach. Pairs well with just about any food style as it does not have competing flavors.

 893 characters

Sol from Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.
60 out of 100 based on 376 ratings.