1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Hahn Super Dry - Hahn Brewing Co. Pty. Ltd.

Not Rated.
Hahn Super DryHahn Super Dry

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

29 Ratings
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 29
Reviews: 17
rAvg: 2.25
pDev: 23.11%
Wants: 0
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Hahn Brewing Co. Pty. Ltd. visit their website

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.60% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: vancurly on 10-04-2006)
View: Beers (5) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 29 | Reviews: 17 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by Kulrak:
Photo of Kulrak


1.9/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Pours a bright golden color with white bubbly head that fades away pretty quickly, but laces the glass. Smells .. very faintly .. of nothing. The wife says it smells like bath salts. The taste is like water. Very balanced, the lack of sweetness is precisely offset by the lack of bitterness. Mouthfeel is watery with almost no carbonation, probably why the head didn't hold up. I guess it's drinkable, if you like water.

Serving type: bottle

06-11-2007 11:58:01 | More by Kulrak
More User Reviews:
Photo of Kroehny_Loves_Hops


1/5  rDev -55.6%

05-08-2014 02:03:16 | More by Kroehny_Loves_Hops
Photo of Bobhoya


2.25/5  rDev 0%

02-20-2014 18:19:35 | More by Bobhoya
Photo of Ricardo_Rosa


2.75/5  rDev +22.2%

02-06-2014 12:39:50 | More by Ricardo_Rosa
Photo of Vanz


1.25/5  rDev -44.4%

01-27-2014 21:05:56 | More by Vanz
Photo of BeardedBoffin

New Mexico

2.35/5  rDev +4.4%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.25

This macrobrew is a light golden with minimal cotton-white head. The aroma spews overcooked cauliflower and other adjuncts. The flavor is much in the same ilk---adjunct sweetness along with starchy overtones. Void of bitterness. Super dry? I'm not sure, but definitely a macrobrew.

Serving type: bottle

01-05-2014 00:26:54 | More by BeardedBoffin
Photo of MylesMac

Manitoba (Canada)

2.75/5  rDev +22.2%

12-18-2013 01:49:06 | More by MylesMac
Photo of no8


2.5/5  rDev +11.1%

11-25-2013 08:38:17 | More by no8
Photo of djbx


2.25/5  rDev 0%

10-20-2013 05:48:06 | More by djbx
Photo of GraduatedCashew


2.75/5  rDev +22.2%

08-29-2013 16:09:29 | More by GraduatedCashew
Photo of Jamestregenza


3.5/5  rDev +55.6%

08-15-2013 04:03:45 | More by Jamestregenza
Photo of adityashekhar


2.5/5  rDev +11.1%

06-16-2013 14:37:26 | More by adityashekhar
Photo of bwtodd

2.25/5  rDev 0%

08-26-2012 03:21:58 | More by bwtodd
Photo of dansmcd


1.95/5  rDev -13.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

A - Golden yellow amber with a bubbly head and no lacing. Audibly effervescent.

S - Corn, grass, very light on aroma and typically macro.

T - A hint of granny smith apple perhaps, water, wet bread, not too sweet.

M - Moderate to high carbonation and thin body. Dryish finish.

O - Slightly less terrible than the biggest players in the Aussie macro game.

Serving type: bottle

08-02-2012 07:36:35 | More by dansmcd
Photo of tbeckett

Ontario (Canada)

2.58/5  rDev +14.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

On tap while watching hockey. From notes.

A - Poured golden and bright. One finger of fluffy white head. Good carbonation, film of retention and good rings of lace.

S - Sweet grain, grassy hop note. Really mild.

T - Sweet grain, bread, an odd fruit-maybe peach or apple?

M - Good carbonation, light body, dry finish.

O/D - Nothing good to speak of. A pretty plain lager. Avoids corny sweetness of others but otherwise worth avoiding.

Serving type: on-tap

05-30-2012 04:56:42 | More by tbeckett
Photo of heygeebee


2.45/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

OK - this is a worry.

I am now reviewing my Most Currently Drunk beer. Why? Because they took Coopers Pale off at my local RSL, and this quite frankly is the best bet on tap. So thats 2 or 3 schooners on a Friday night. My Most Currenty drunk beer.

You know the score.

Looks like an Aussie, smells like nix cos it's too cold, tastes like an Aussie, only thing it does feel good in mouth. Good in summer, and not the worst macro by far.

All in all tho - I give up - maybe time to stay in?

Serving type: on-tap

04-20-2012 13:29:38 | More by heygeebee
Photo of dmorgan310


2/5  rDev -11.1%

02-02-2012 23:25:15 | More by dmorgan310
Photo of Finite


2.25/5  rDev 0%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Standard pale, fizzy soft drink appearance.

quite sweet on the nose, little to no hop aroma, little bit of phenol, wet dough, banana tones.

What do you expect, bland, nothing much to speak of from the taste compartment. Simple grain bill simple hops. Very soft drink like.

Seems like the brewers these days are just making the same old trash in different bottles with new labels and fancy names. Its not super dry at all so I have no idea what that indicates. I didn't have high expectations and rightly so.

Another bland and uninspiring offering from Australia's "big boys" brewers.

Better than some other main stream beers... just.

Serving type: bottle

10-31-2010 11:19:09 | More by Finite
Photo of lacqueredmouse


2.13/5  rDev -5.3%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a deep yellow colour, with just a filmy head of coarse bubbles. No lacing, and extremely filmy. It's a very, very uninspiring looking beer. I'm not enjoying the prospect of taking a sip.

Bit of banana phenols on the nose, but mostly bland. Indeed, it has quite a sweetness on the nose - I was expecting something crisp and dry -- perhaps there's a bit of grass or spice, but it mixes up with the sweetness into something terrible.

Bland, bland, bland on the palate. Clear again, but once again with that sweetness. Overall, it's hard to say anything more than watery, however. Carbonation is a bit too fizzy, leaving it bloating. It's really nothing, but it's not even dry, for a beer which claims as much.

Really quite terrible. It's so bland, but whatever characters it has are pretty awful. It doesn't even deliver what it promises. And I wasn't overly enamoured of that prospect anyway.

Serving type: bottle

09-03-2010 08:38:44 | More by lacqueredmouse
Photo of dgilks


2.88/5  rDev +28%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I'm going to be frank. I went into this thinking that I would hate it but found it to actually be a palatable drink. Nonetheless, as an essentially flavourless beer it won't be getting high marks.

It pours a light golden colour with a tiny head. Poor head retention.

The aroma isn't bad for the style with a faint malty note and a light spicy hop aroma.

The flavour is fairly empty, as one would expect from the style but I actually pick up a touch of malt and don't find it too bad. If this was the BJCP this beer would be doing okay.

The mouthfeel is very light (in fact the FG is 0.999) with high carbonation. I don't particularly like it but it is suitable for style.

As a lawnmover beer this is very good and I could drink this. Nonetheless, I wouldn't pay for one.

Serving type: bottle

08-08-2010 09:23:29 | More by dgilks
Photo of CrazyDavros


1.58/5  rDev -29.8%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Pours pale gold with a large head that quickly fades into a scum-like layer.
Nose shows loads of sweet vegetal and rice notes, with some faint spicy hops in the background, followed later by some clean malt.
Very little in the way of flavours, there's some cardboardy cereal malt before a short-lived bitterness kicks in.
Carbonation is too high.

Serving type: bottle

02-25-2010 07:25:22 | More by CrazyDavros
Photo of Cs1987


1.93/5  rDev -14.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 3

Appearance - Usual Oz macro colour with excessive carbonation. 1 finger of very bubbly head which reduced.

Smell - Surprisingly, some of the malty odours I expect in a lager are present, but they are so mild this only deserves a 2 in this category.

Taste - What taste? Like most low carb beers, even most of the pleasant grainy lager flavours have been stripped away in this, leaving only a dry metallic flavour.

Mouthfeel - Like mineral water, but also cloying.

Drinkability - Despite all it's faults, I tend to choose this over Australian brewed Heineken and other similar lagers as a session drink. Not sure why, though.

Overall - Even worse than Pure Blonde. Bleurgh.

Serving type: bottle

10-12-2009 09:29:48 | More by Cs1987
Photo of LittleCreature


2.15/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Appearance - 2.0
Poured a finger of white head that rapidly reduced to a thin, patchy layer over a clear body of deep straw.

Smell - 1.5
Metallic and sulfury, slightly sweet (white sugar) and alcoholic.

Taste - 2.0
Very, very bland. A little pale malt sweetness, Pride of Ringwood metal, low on bitterness and quite dry. And very bland.

Mouthfeel - 2.5
Rather thin in the mouth, fizzy at first but flattens quickly.

Drinkability - 3.0
Only as a lawnmower beer.

OVERALL - 2.05
Compared to their decent Premium Lager this is rubbish. Stripped of carbohydrates, bitterness and pretty much any flavour.

Serving type: bottle

09-10-2009 09:13:48 | More by LittleCreature
Photo of ADZA


1.63/5  rDev -27.6%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Once again another one of mr hahns inventions that i dont think that much of pours a slightly pale golden colour with decent carbonation that produces a decent two finger head,on the smell im not getting much of anything really maybe a weak hoppiness with a little malt thrown in,this beer tastes quite bland really def not how a good lager should be but in saying that probably alot better than hahn ice but not much else.

Serving type: bottle

07-03-2009 21:06:01 | More by ADZA
Photo of laituegonflable


1.88/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

Pours a pale golden colour with a good creamy white head, very densely compacted and fed by steady carbonation. Lots of very thick lacing. Looks like a lager should.

Fairly weak hops on the nose, mostly floral with a slight grassy edge. A malt hit, almost caramel malt, but not very well balanced as it's too dominant. No yeast though so it's not unpleasant.

Has a nasty bready character throughout the palate. Has very slight hop characters somewhere on the middle but they are overpowered by this carbolic soda water character which is far too prominent in the flavour. Mouthfeel is as abrasive as rubbing steel wool on your tongue and it has a very offensive bitter hang, the aftertaste is enough to put me off beer.

This seems skillfully crafted as far as ubiquitous macro brews go, but that isn't enough to erase the revolting adjuncts and chemicals that ruin any beer flavour here. A wholly distasteful drop.

Serving type: on-tap

04-20-2009 22:45:37 | More by laituegonflable
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Hahn Super Dry from Hahn Brewing Co. Pty. Ltd.
62 out of 100 based on 29 ratings.