1. Don't miss our 7th annual American Craft Beer Fest featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers this May 30 & 31 in Boston, MA! Buy your tickets now!
  2. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Schlafly Bourbon Barrel Aged Imperial Stout - The Schlafly Tap Room

Schlafly Bourbon Barrel Aged Imperial StoutSchlafly Bourbon Barrel Aged Imperial Stout

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

696 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 696
Reviews: 374
rAvg: 4.08
pDev: 11.03%

Brewed by:
The Schlafly Tap Room visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
Russian Imperial Stout |  10.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Our Bourbon Barrel Aged Imperial Stout is brewed with a big malt flavor, plenty of hop bitterness for balance and roasted barley that imparts notes of dark chocolate. As a finishing touch, the beer is transferred to freshly-emptied Kentucky bourbon barrels and aged before being carbonated and bottled. The barrel aging gives the beer a spicy, vanilla character and a pleasant, warming finish.

In the 18th Century, Imperial Stout was first brewed in London for export to the court of Catherine II of Russia. The beer had to be robust enough to maintain during transport.

This beer will continue to age well in a cool dark place for several years, but it is ready to enjoy now.

40 IBU

(Beer added by: Todd on 11-23-2006)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Schlafly Bourbon Barrel Aged Imperial Stout Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 696 | Reviews: 374 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of Arbitrator


2.05/5  rDev -49.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

2008 vintage, chilled bottle into a glass. Generously shared by ramnuts while we watched The Big Lebowski. Thanks Frank.


Re-review: 2007 vintage, received in a trade from MiguelMandingo. Thanks Mike.

A: Not opaque in the glass, but it's a very dark brown-black body that lets only the slightest hint of light through at the edges. Its dark tan head rises to a finger, but vanishes quickly and leaves no film or lacing behind. No legs. About what I'd expect from an RIS.

S: Chocolate, oxidation, bourbon, and still (somehow) booze sting, bordering on solventy.

T: Chocolate and bourbon, again. The oxidation is pretty overwhelming, though; and it's not a complex sherry oxidation, just more of a straight earthy cigar bitterness. Strong tannic character toward the finish. Vanilla is very light. It's initially solventy when I pour it, though it is tamed a bit as the beer warms.

M: Surprisingly thin, with muddled and simple flavors. It could stand to be thicker and more complex. The booze is poorly disguised.

D: I liked the 2008 vintage that ramnuts shared far more than the 2007 one. I purposely got this with the intention of introducing newbies to craft beer. It was shared at a Wii party that included bourbon aficionados, in fact. Most commented that other barrel-aged beers I had shared in the past were far better; absolutely no one liked this.

If this beer is this uneven, I don't think I'll gamble on other bottles.

Serving type: bottle

06-26-2010 00:10:00 | More by Arbitrator
Photo of LilMatrix


2.25/5  rDev -44.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Big thanks to Cobrakai22 for sharing this one!

A - Pours oily with little head. Light penetration that reveals a dark red hue.

S - Alcohol, brandy, bourbon, and sweetness. Surprised by the missing roasted characters (cocoa, coffee, chocolate) usually found in imperial stouts.

T - Brandy sweetness, candy, bourbon, cough syrup, boozy and alcoholic.

M - Rather thin bodied for an imperial stout and kinda flat.

D - I can't finish this one... This is way too boozy for me. Each drink gets a more and more of a cough syrup taste... think cherry flavored robitusson.

Serving type: bottle

01-20-2009 18:53:12 | More by LilMatrix
Photo of bobhits


2.48/5  rDev -39.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 3

Thin body look, you can see bubble in this barrel aged stout? Built a decent head that really quickly goes away. Deep brown around the edges. Looks like this will be pretty thin stuff, 2

Bourbon aroma sweetened by the malt. Some vanilla and oak and perhaps a touch of chocolate. The smell is a touch soft compared to many of the better bourbon barrel aged stouts. 2.5

Huge shot of bourbon, a very sweet bourbon, then full of really sweet sugary malt. Almost sickeningly sweet and the alcohol really kicks in this one. 2.5

The mouth is thin like it looks. The carbonation leaves before the beer is finished and this leaves and odd kinda sugary water like mouth feel.

I had no problem drinking it surprisingly really. Everything about this beer is below average. That said an interesting attempt and well hell who doesn't love bourbon in their stouts?

Serving type: bottle

09-23-2010 08:49:06 | More by bobhits
Photo of jrallen34


2.55/5  rDev -37.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

2009 vintage, 750ml bottle poured into my Darkness snifter...The beer pours a light black, brown on the edges and in light. A very light tan head rises about a finger and half but then it falls way to quick to only leave a thing ring. So-so lacing...The aroma is way to light, almost boring. A hint of bourbon, a little vanilla, sweet mostly. A hint of chocolate. This really has to be knocked down...The taste is equally disappointing, you can barely tell this was barrel aged. Light oak, really boring bourbon, a hint of roast, and chocolate. Not bad or offensive, just such a high bar for barrel aged stouts and this isn't there...The feel is a little hot with a rough coffee quality that just doesn't fit.

I can't recommend this.

Serving type: bottle

01-28-2011 01:46:47 | More by jrallen34
Photo of johnnybgood1999


2.68/5  rDev -34.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

I kept drinking the Barley Wine Special Reserve without trying the Bourbon Aged Stout because I really loved the BW. This ale was a disappointment in comparison, though I'm not saying it is a horrible beer or anything. Just not as good.

A: Poured syrupy and pitch black. Virtually no head. Like oil out of a beer bottle! Not a bad omen for a stout.

S: A sweet chocolate caramel aroma with whiskey apparant up front.

T: Other reviews have stated oak is more the flavor than bourbon and I would have to agree. A very sweet stout. The sweetest stout I've had to date. Plenty of chocolate and plain sugary tast. Maybe some toffe as well. Honestly a little too sweet for me. I'm also getting no carbonation like fellow reviewers, but I would actually prefer a good bit more.

D: I rated this rather low becasue of the sweetnessand total lack of carbonation. It was so sweet I could not take more than a glass. The Barley Wine Special Reserve is much more drinkable and that's what I had expected out of this stout. I can only take this in small amounts.

Serving type: bottle

01-10-2009 21:56:41 | More by johnnybgood1999
Photo of corby112


2.73/5  rDev -33.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

From notes:

2007 vintage. Pours pitch black and completely opaque without even the slightest hint of lighter color when held to a light source and a half finger tan head that quickly settles into a thin ring. Minimal spots of lacing left behind.

Earthy aroma with pleanty of oak/wood character as well as hints of roasty chocolate malt, bourbon and sweet alcohol.

Suprisingly thin bodied and watered down with lots of oak and peaty bourbon notes. The maltiness from the aroma is there bu once again it's kind of disappointingly faint. The flavor is overly dominated by bourbon/alcohol sweetness and heat. This beer was way too young at this stage(sampled when fresh).

Serving type: bottle

12-25-2010 01:16:13 | More by corby112
Photo of Jeffo


2.75/5  rDev -32.6%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

In a trade with Craytonic many moons ago. Thanks for the brews man.

From a 750ml bottle into a snifter.
Vintage: 2008

APPEARANCE: Pours out a very light and transparent brown. Yields a one finger, medium-thin looking. light tan head with half decent retention, fading down to a full wisp and ring. Black body with little carbonation evident. A splotchy wisp and ring remain leaving some dots of lacing down the glass. Too light and thin for the style, and the head was underwhelming as well.

SMELL: Mild nose of roasted malts and light barrel notes. Bourbon, oak and vanilla notes are there, as well as some faint milk chocolate and licorice. Pleasant, yet too mild to be memorable.

TASTE: Mild flavors as well. Roasted and caramel malts up front, then the barrel kicks in midway. Bourbon, vanilla, and oak are there. Medium and lingering aftertaste of barrel notes and some sweet milk chocolate as well. Very mild bitterness at the finish. Nice flavors, but not as bold as needed. Comes out a little after the swallow, but needs more up front to move it up a class.

PALATE: Medium-thin body and not creamy or smooth enough. Higher levels of prickly carbonation on the palate, goes down prickly and finishes slightly sticky on the palate. While it fills out a little as it sits, it begins too thin, prickly, and not creamy enough.

OVERALL: This is an average bourbon barrel aged stout at best, and the thinner look and feel certainly don’t help. I’d heard good things about this beer, but then again, I’ve heard good things about a lot of average beers. A worthy brew that would be good to share with friends, but not something worth getting worked up about. Thanks again for the opportunity to give this one a go Craytonic.

Serving type: bottle

08-16-2011 15:11:52 | More by Jeffo
Photo of Erdinger2003


2.9/5  rDev -28.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

The appearance has a pretty good head with a good lacing. The smell is very light with a slight molasses and coffee flavor. The taste was pretty nice, but there was a giant alcohol flavor that turned me off, a kind of bitter sweet combonation. The mouthfeel was kind of alright. However, overall I might try this again, but outlook is bleek.

Serving type: bottle

01-13-2007 05:30:25 | More by Erdinger2003
Photo of 4DAloveofSTOUT


2.93/5  rDev -28.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

really excited to try this beer! this will be my second Schafly brew that I have tried really enjoyed the first which was a Coffee & Raspberry Stout. Expectations are high!

Vintage 2009.

here we go...
poured into tulip glass.

Appearance: Opaque Black bodied beer with a Khaki/Tan head. Head is about one and a half fingers high. Receeds into heavy lacing on side of glass.

Smell: dry bakers cocoa, milk chocolate, and bourbon. Getting an overipe dark fruit notes that are moderately sour smelling. The nose was good until this showed up; makes the beer smell unpleasant even though the sour smell is not overpowering everything.

Taste: Just as I feared. It tastes sour, just like it smells. Getting strong black licorice and molasses notes. Getting a mild milk chocolate flavor and a little bit of the bourbon burn. Mild dark fruits in background as well. This beer is off; its either infected or just past it prime; its confirmed by nose and taste. The sour taste ruined it for me on this one! Almost a wine like taste, kind of vinious when you look at the whole picture of flavors coming out of this beer.

Mouthfeel: Medium bodied beer with lower end of moderate carbonation. Mouthfeel is mildly creamy and a little slick. A little bit better than average mouthfeel.

Overall: This beer bummed me out. I might have expected too much, but I could not drink even half the bottle. I just think its past it prime or it might be infected.

Serving type: bottle

09-29-2011 03:39:35 | More by 4DAloveofSTOUT
Photo of Ryan011235


2.95/5  rDev -27.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured into a snifter on 4/12/10; shared with two friends

2008 vintage

Thanks to Freethyhops

The color is a dark, cola brown that settles darker. The pour yielded ¼ inch of tan-colored foam which dissipated to a thin skim in short order. A slightly thicker ring of bubbles hangs on the inside perimeter. The occasional swirl allows for some retention but it always thins out. There are several small, tightly-arranged splotchy strings of drippy lace.

The smell is certainly that of a two year old beer; it's quite smooth & blended at this point. The bourbon comes through upfront but it isn't harsh or even too prominent. Lots of smoothed-over roasted malts. It tends toward sweetness, though there is a touch of bitterness to offset it. Notes of bakers chocolate & vanilla; maybe a touch of licorice. There are earthy undertones - oak & nuttiness. There are a few effervescent hints of dark fruits.

Not surprisingly, the taste is rather smooth as well. The penchant is definitely leaning in the direction of roasted malts with a few decent notes of near-burnt sugars: caramel, brown sugar & molasses. The chocolate isn't as appreciable as the nose. Wood notes, vanilla, bourbon & a touch of alcohol heat are on the finish. One guy says it calls to mind flat Coke that was left out all night in a cup that previously contained coffee, with a hint of nutmeg & vanilla, topped off with a shot of bourbon. The sweeter aspect of the beer become more apparent as it warms.

Reasonably full bodied with appropriately low carbonation. It's smooth without being particularly slick. Way in the back is a little bit of grittiness. Bourbon & mild notes of dry bitterness linger on the finish. The alcohol heat mentioned above isn't too powerful but it's definitely warming.

The beer isn't bad by any means, but I think it may not have benefited from this much age. It just seems to have lost some of the luster that is implied by the bolder bourbon notes toward the finish. It seems a little thin overall, or at least thinner than it was intended. Not bad; I just wish I had drunk it sooner.

Serving type: bottle

04-24-2010 22:29:46 | More by Ryan011235
Photo of websherpa


2.95/5  rDev -27.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Vintage 2010

Appearance: The beer looks very thin around the edges. Almost like flat cola. I think an Imp Stout should be a good deal darker.

Smell: The main thing to note how heavy the bourbon barrel influence is. The barrels really shine through with almost a cork like presence.

Taste: The barrel aging gives this beer some great flavors. Unfortunately I found the beer itself to be on the weak side. I feel like the barrel aging should compliment the beers natural flavors. Instead they overshadowed a thin and weak flavored beer.

Mouthfeel: Just way too thin for an Imp Stout.

Drinkability: The beer is not bad but it's not really a winner for me. The flavors just are not big enough for style. The barrel aging delivered, but the rest of the beer did not. Perhaps some age would mellow the barrel aging components and this beer could balance out.

Serving type: bottle

02-22-2011 21:05:46 | More by websherpa
Photo of kdahnke123


3.01/5  rDev -26.2%
look: 2.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3

2013 Vintage. Poured into a snifter. The color was a little muddy and the head was very light. The smell is of the bourbon with light roasted malt. The taste is light with the bourbon coming through later. On the whole a very light stout with a small amount of bourbon. Not to be repeated.

Serving type: bottle

02-10-2014 22:41:24 | More by kdahnke123
Photo of biglite351


3.13/5  rDev -23.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A - a lot of Ted around the edges. Tight tan head that leaves some lacing.

S - vanilla, malts, bourbon, mild chocolate... but not very stout-like which is odd for an Imperial Stout.

T - heavy vanilla and mild bourbon. A little bit of malt in the mix; but much like the scent, not much like an Imperial Stout.

M - medium coating. Lots of tingle all over the tongue. Alcohol burn in back of throat.

D - much milder that most bourbon stouts. The bourbon flavor is not in your face like most others. However, it slight lack of Imperial Stout flavor is a negative. Quite drinkable if it is there, but quite passable as well.

Serving type: bottle

11-02-2010 10:59:19 | More by biglite351
Photo of mikeyv35

New York

3.23/5  rDev -20.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Date: 06/07/2010
Type: 750ml. Boxed Bottle
Vintage: 2007
Glassware: Portsmouth Tulip

Poured a light black in color w/ a 1/4 finger off-white head that left little to no lacing on the glass. Appears a bit thin. Nose was of dark fruits, oak, vanilla, light bourbon, and roastiness. Taste was of bourbon, oak, vanilla, and then a medicinal almost oxidized taste. Mouthfeel was way too thin for the style, would have even been a bit too thin for a Baltic Porter. Drinkability was majorly hindered by the strong medicinal and slightly oxidized aftertaste. I had had enough after only half a glass. Finish to me tasted of light cough syrup.

Overall, I don't know if I got a bad bottle or this brew is on the way down hill. In any case, I did not enjoy this one and was very disappointed, as I really liked the Barleywine Reserve.

Serving type: bottle

06-07-2010 14:55:07 | More by mikeyv35
Photo of cosmicevan

New York

3.25/5  rDev -20.3%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

2008 vintage enjoyed from a schlafly tulip.

a - opened the box, ripped the cap off wax n all and filled my glass. Brew poured a watery brown that settled in the glass a bit darker. medium build head of grey foamy bubbles that didn't hang out but left some chunky lacing and a skin of bubbles on the surface.

s - nose boasts syrupy dark fruit with some boozer infused chocolate. Smells rich and a bit sweet. Brown sugar.

t - a bit oxidized and likely past its prime. Dark chocolate and booze notes over an almost hybrid stout and brown ale. Nothing too crazy.

m - surprisingly thin and watery for such a big beer.

o - overall this vintage had probably seen its day. A bit thin and the stout base seems to be lacking balls, but this is fairly old for a stout.

Serving type: bottle

02-15-2014 00:33:44 | More by cosmicevan
Photo of assmasterson


3.3/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A: Dark as the night. Head is thick, brown and full, taking forever to recede.

S: Some dark chocolate, some hops, some bourbon.

T: At first, comes off as extremely sweet, a little too sweet, perhaps. Almost like a glass of whiskey with some beer added. The aftertaste however turns slightly bitter with a touch of unsweetened chocolate.

EDIT: This thing is way too sweet for me. I was expecting something that tasted like biting into a hop plant, but I was wrong. I couldn't even come close to finishing this as the sweetness was too strong.

M: A little too thin for a brew this extreme. I would have preferred it to have a little more coarseness.

D: Easy to drink, but way too easy to go overboard with its' 10.5% ABV. It would be best to split it with someone.

Serving type: bottle

03-27-2008 01:42:55 | More by assmasterson
Photo of charlesw

New York

3.35/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 3

Deep dark brown to black. Very opaque. But no head at all at all. Suckage. Smells faintly chocolaty and smoky. Not much gong on. Ah. But it tastes pretty good. Sweet chocolate milk. Some coffee. Smoke thrown in like, hmm. Like coals from the fireplace. Interesting, complex, subtle. Largely well balanced. No carbonation. Suckage. So... To make this the beer for me you need a bit of bitterness in that balance, carbonation and head. Carbonation to help balance out the sweetness. But I'im sure it would if it were there. Sadly, this bottle is nearly flat. Bleh.

Serving type: bottle

01-24-2009 00:19:00 | More by charlesw
Photo of nrbw23


3.35/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A- Pours a dark brown almost black color with a tan head. Head becomes a thin layer of bubbles after a few minutes and leaves a bit of layered lacing here and there.

S- Smell is bourbon, quite a bit of sweetness, soy sauce, bit of wood, roasted malts and vanilla.

T- Bourbon is pretty solid, alcohol is here, a bit of darker fruits, wood, roasted malts, coffee and chocolate. Nothing really followed well here its just kind of a mess.

M- Medium in body and thinner than I expected. Also carbonation seemed ok.

O- Seemed kinda of a mess. I struggled drinking this one.

Serving type: bottle

03-29-2011 21:47:02 | More by nrbw23
Photo of smakawhat


3.35/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Hello!? What's this on a shelf? Vintage 2008 sitting all alone for 8.99? YOINK grabbing that! Into my Dogfish Head snifter you go!

A very short lived head that is light tan sitting on a dark walnut brown and red hued edge body. As dark as it is, it's farily see through and you can see some carbonation along the edges.

A nose of barleywine fruit cherry, mild faint roast, but very fruit forward smelling. It smells alright, but it's also a little hot and doesn't give the impression of a stout so much, it's lacking malt richness in particular.

Upon taste there is the similar notes taken from the nose, but the body is quite thin. A small lingering hop like dark fruit cherry, but not giving off much barrel aging character. Wet character as well on the palate.

Overall, this is not a bad tasting beer, but sort of a letdown for a barrel aged beer in this style I think.

Serving type: bottle

01-06-2012 03:04:55 | More by smakawhat
Photo of mulder1010


3.38/5  rDev -17.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

2010 version into a tulip, served at brewery
on Jim Beam Barrels for nearly 6 weeks, told at brewery

A-- Poured a dark cola color and settled black with just hints of red here and there. No visib le carbonation at all. A few strands of white lacing to replace head but not much else really. Served a bit cold I thought. Better after it warmed up. A half finger of near milk chocolate head the quicky disappeared to film again.

S-- Oak, bourbon, vanilla, carmel and chocolate. Very oak and bourbon forward smelling.

T-- Prickly carbonation up front followed by Oak, bourbon, vanilla, chocolate, and Carmel. Taste got richer as it warmed.

M-- Medium feel and high medium carbonation. Some traces of silkyness but on the boozy side really. ABV is very obvious as it warmed. Vanilla and oak finish. Bourbon got more apparent as I drank on.

O-- Not bad but needs time to develop. Base beer was a bit hard to find at times. Very young and thought the older vintages would be more developed. Worth cellaring.

Serving type: bottle

07-09-2011 01:25:02 | More by mulder1010
Photo of TheWhiskerReview


3.4/5  rDev -16.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

2010 Vintage tasted.

Pours a dark brownish-black with a small and quickly receding tan head. Very minimal lace.

Nose has a small malty core that's completely sopping with bourbon flavors- bigtime coconut, maple syrup and terriyaki soaked beef jerky smells. A touch of chocolate too.

The palate is full-bodied with an added syrupy texture from the bourbon- minimum carbonation and enough hops to balance but remain silent. The sweetness nullifies the alcohol and then some, providing length to the milk chocolaty finish which turns toward dark caramel towards the end.

In it's extreme youth, this is a bit awkward of a beer, but it shows immeasurable potential to benefit from age. It's a touch sweet and sopping with oaky bourbon- as evidenced by that huge coconut aroma- but the combination of the sweet and smoky meat flavors should be brilliant and mellow in 5-6 years. Overall, not a bad brew at all. Glad I got just a taste this time, and next time I'll cellar one for some years.

Serving type: bottle

05-09-2011 02:49:07 | More by TheWhiskerReview
Photo of ColdPoncho


3.4/5  rDev -16.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

Found a 2008 on the shelf last night, so it seemed like it'd be good to try.

A - A really light brown body for the style. Pretty opaque in the glass, but the pour looks more like a porter. Head was a good color but small and quick to go away

S - Good nose, nice balance of chocolate, vanilla, bourbon notes. No booze to speak of. Very pleasant nose.

T - Pretty good here too. Chocolate, bourbon, vanilla, some wood. A surprising amount of alcohol, though. Good flavor, too much booze.

M - super thin, kind of dry. Pretty disappointing.

O - It tastes good, but is too boozy and too thin.

Serving type: bottle

08-21-2011 14:08:46 | More by ColdPoncho
Photo of n2185

North Carolina

3.43/5  rDev -15.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

2008 vintage

A: Pours black with a finger of light tan head that quickly recedes into a thin ring with almost no lacing.

S: Sweet vanilla, oak, and bourbon dominate the smell. There are some hints of the roasted malts and slight chocolate aromas, but they're pretty faint.

T: Similar to the aroma, this beer is all vanilla, oak, and bourbon flavors. The roasted malt presence is very slight. The finish has some toffee flavors as well as a decent alcohol burn.

M: Thick body with little carbonation, this beer thankfully is not too sweet or too alcoholic.

O: Overall, not a bad beer, but this beer tastes more like the barrel it was aged in than the beer that went into the barrel. It at least avoids being cloyingly sweet or extremely alcoholic like some other bourbon barrel stouts.

Serving type: bottle

03-26-2011 22:09:18 | More by n2185
Photo of BarrelO


3.45/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

750ml bottle poured into a goblet. 2008.

A: Dark reddish brown, could be mistaken for black by the untrained eye. Tan head fades quickly but leaves a lot of lacing.

S: Roastiness, vanilla, a bit of chocolate.

T: Gaaah! The pain! I can't really make out anything other than an extremely harsh alcohol burn. Fine, Schlafly. You win. I'll take smaller sips. Upon adopting this strategy, I pick out some nice vanilla and bourbon notes. In other words, it tastes...like bourbon. Damn it. I wanted a beer with bourbon accents, not a bourbon with hints of beer. That wasn't part of our deal, Blackheart!

M: Way too thin for an imperial stout. Hell, this is too thin for a regular stout (except maybe Guinness).

D: Very disappointing. Heresy and Old Rasputin XII had convinced me that barrel/bourbon aged imperial stouts were pretty much foolproof. This beer did a nice job of disabusing me of that notion.

Serving type: bottle

07-24-2009 02:19:44 | More by BarrelO
Photo of ThoreauLikeAGirl


3.45/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

2008 Vintage.

Poured a very deep dark brown, almost black. Creamy 1 finger off-white head.

Smell: big time bourbon. Some roastiness. Nothing much else there.

Taste: Creamy and full-bodied. Bourbon. Heat from the alcohol. Finishes with some dark chocolate / cocoa powder. Very boozy. The heavy body of this beer definitely helps. I'm not sure if i could drink it if it were thinner than this.

Would think it would mellow out with some age, but this bottle was already 3 years old.

Serving type: bottle

05-13-2011 14:28:14 | More by ThoreauLikeAGirl
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Schlafly Bourbon Barrel Aged Imperial Stout from The Schlafly Tap Room
91 out of 100 based on 696 ratings.