1. Don't miss our 7th annual American Craft Beer Fest featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers this May 30 & 31 in Boston, MA! Buy your tickets now!
  2. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Totally Naked - New Glarus Brewing Company

Totally NakedTotally Naked

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
83
good

694 Ratings
THE BROS
98
world-class

(view ratings)
Ratings: 694
Reviews: 255
rAvg: 3.65
pDev: 15.07%


Brewed by:
New Glarus Brewing Company visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  4.25% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: cokes on 09-24-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Totally Naked Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 694 | Reviews: 255 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of mbrasi
mbrasi

Ohio

1.8/5  rDev -50.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Pours clear yellow golden with a light white head that dissipates fast. Very clear in glass I can actually see through this brew. I can't remember the last time I drank a beer that I could see through. It actually looks nice on first pour. Aroma is corn and some hops, not too unpleasant. Corn on the flavor, there is something promising in the flavor but it goes away fast..hops. Leaves that nasty watery grain finish in your mouth. I guess this is how a lager is supposed to taste though. Have to get ahold of one of those higher rated beers to know for sure. Not very carbonated and feels like slime in my throat. This is worse than drinking water because it has some flavor in it that I have to wash away using water. Drain pour.

Serving type: bottle

12-21-2008 23:19:47 | More by mbrasi
Photo of bashiba
bashiba

Iowa

2.05/5  rDev -43.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

This poured a macro like yellow with a fizzy white head.

The smell had a stale macro quality to it.

The flavor was a bit corny and flat with a light grassy hop finish, very much like a typical mass produced euro pils.

The mouthfeel was watery and thin.

Overall just not real good.

Serving type: bottle

06-01-2009 03:27:24 | More by bashiba
Photo of Winter
Winter

Wisconsin

2.1/5  rDev -42.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Poured a light golden color. White bubbly head thins but never completely disappears. Aroma is a big turn off, with a slighty pungent, unappealing scent. I coudn't really nail it down. Body is thin with a pleasant crispness. Hardly any after-taste, but something seemed oily. I would not buy this beer again and it's a shame because it's the first New Glarus beer to let me down. New Glarus has such a fine stable of flavorful beers, that Totally Naked leaves you Totally Unimpressed.

Serving type: bottle

11-03-2002 20:40:56 | More by Winter
Photo of scaliasux
scaliasux

Wisconsin

2.15/5  rDev -41.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Appearance - Clear, light gold. Bubbly. Thin soapy, white head. Looks like a macrolager.

Smell - Very faint malt and yeast. Pretty hard to detect - even for style.

Taste - Light but rich (a little caramel?) sweet malt flavor. One note, don't really notice any hops. Flavor is more full, and better, than any of the macrobrews. Even so, this is a bit uninspired.

Mouthfeel - Pretty good for a lager. Full and more foamy than bubbly. Not as astringent as many lagers.

Drinkability - I love most of the stuff made by New Glarus. This beer, though, is totally unnecessary. I hope New Glarus sells this stuff to the general public by the truckload, but I don't think I'll be a frequent quaffer.

Serving type: bottle

08-10-2006 02:06:18 | More by scaliasux
Photo of Arsenal04
Arsenal04

Minnesota

2.38/5  rDev -34.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours light gold in a Pilsner glass with a very active body full of carbonation and a busy two finger, foamy head that dissipated completely four minutes after pour. Smell is mildly underwhelming, malt and lemon stand out amongst a background of grain - nothing that catches my attention or stands out so far. Taste is malt driven with an aftertaste that reminds me of Michelob Golden Light or any other American-made Lager - coats the throat in a way that makes me think back to nights gone by where I would have far too many beers for my own good. I had a feeling going into rating this beer that with my limited experience in the craft beer world that I would find too many similarities to the standard Lager beers found in the US. Nothing I would go rushing out to get again.

Serving type: bottle

08-14-2009 01:39:33 | More by Arsenal04
Photo of turdinathor
turdinathor

Iowa

2.4/5  rDev -34.2%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

Appearance: golden color, No head, bland appearance.

Smell: not a lot of smell, maybe a little fruit but generally weak.

Taste: Boring, watery, bland, bitter

Mouthfeel: crip clean mouthfeel , very smooth.

Overall: would just like to state that this beer tastes like overpriced miller light. Also reminds me of moon man with out the strong flavor. stay away unless you like boring beer.

Serving type: on-tap

04-22-2011 02:24:07 | More by turdinathor
Photo of Oxymoron
Oxymoron

Colorado

2.45/5  rDev -32.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Co-ed Get Naked? Pours a mostly hazy off-lemony yellow color. Some darker highlights like a dirty blond. The head is light with a good pour left a nice head but did quickly dissipate. Although not completely, living a thin line around the edges.

The nose is overall light. Even for style there should be some grainy and malt hints, but really not much depth at all. There is a slight yeasty note but nothing off flavored. Do I smell DMS?

The taste is more definable then the nose. Pale malt flavor with some lighter grainy touches. A sweeter finish then an American lager but light for a blond. There is a spiciness that is light but reminds me of some peppery notes but could be the hops as there really is none that you can speak of. There is a off finish that reminds me of honey beers but the body is bigger so its off setting.

The body is not exactly big but definitely not crisp. The carbonation helps. Overall, rather simple. I know its easy to blame style but really this could be much better.

Serving type: bottle

11-08-2007 23:45:48 | More by Oxymoron
Photo of lester619
lester619

Wisconsin

2.48/5  rDev -32.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

Poured into a glass mug, pale yellow color about two inches of foam that doesn't last long. Not very impressive. Clean, grassy, somewhat bitter citrus smells. Not much to the smell. Not much to this beer at all really. I can't say I get this one. There's just not anything to it. I understand the concept, a summer thirst quencher that you keep ice cold and guzzle on a hot day. It does work for that purpose, but so does miller lite. And miller lite doesn't cost nine bucks a six pack. It's a little too much like water for something from a top-of-the-line brewery for the price.

Serving type: bottle

10-15-2009 19:29:22 | More by lester619
Photo of Phyl21ca
Phyl21ca

Quebec (Canada)

2.5/5  rDev -31.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Bottle courtesy of Monger: Poured a golden color beer with a big pure white bubbly head with minimal retention. Aroma of light sweet malt is quite weak with no noticeable hops. Taste is also dominated by sweet malt which at least is pure malt and not some kind of adjunct. Carbonation is medium with a nice body. I understand they wanted to brew something light but this is a bit too light – I suggest sticking to the Yokel if you want a refreshing lager.

Serving type: bottle

08-15-2007 14:32:07 | More by Phyl21ca
Photo of Scrumtralecent
Scrumtralecent

Illinois

2.58/5  rDev -29.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a bottle into a pilsner glass.

A - Light light yellow in color with very frothy, airy head. Quite transparent with carbonation bubbles rising upward from the bottom. Quite average.

S - Smell seems a little off to me and these are fresh. Slight hop in there but I have to search for it. Some barley and wheat, but maybe it's the fact that this smell reminds me of BMC products that is turning me off.

T - And...not much. I have to really dig deep to find slight hop, little barley. Very quick crisp taste, with no backend really to speak of.

M - Very light, though I think that was the intent of this one. Some sharp mouthfeel on the cheeks but that quickly fades.

O - This is a really light pilsner and I could see this being a session beer, or beer for a really hot day, but really I need more taste than this. More of really any ingredient. And at 4.25, it's going to take alot of these to get me totally naked.

Serving type: bottle

06-12-2011 05:33:23 | More by Scrumtralecent
Photo of ZAP
ZAP

Minnesota

2.65/5  rDev -27.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Not impressed with this at all....has a slight sour taste and finish...malt lends some slight bready/doughy notes but that's about it...Nose has a light graininess to it...just a bad aftertaste on this...I'll take a Milelr High Life over this any day

Serving type: bottle

06-22-2006 17:47:21 | More by ZAP
Photo of Dotcubed
Dotcubed

Arkansas

2.68/5  rDev -26.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

So far I've enjoyied the feNew Glarus beers I've had. I'm not really in to the yellow stuff, but everyone starts somewhere. I('ve had a lot of light styles, and I'd like to put this one towards the top if the pile.

Un-dated, so no telling how old the bottle is. It opened with a very satisfying decompression sound. Plesant head, good lace, and awesome bright yellow chrysanthimum color. Plesantly grassy floral smell.

Naked must really mean naked. This beverage has a watery sensation. Sweet beer-like liquid that falls flat. It's sad. I had such high hopes of a delicately hopped "wunder" beer with a balanced malt character. Instead it presents as a watery lager that tastes like it's been on the shelf too long.

Maybe the hopps were too expensive so they used less, maybe they were trying to create an artsy minimalist beer, or maybe the beer is just old. I'll never know. It's totally sad.

Use to deglaze with. Make a nice chicken sauce.

Serving type: bottle

12-17-2007 02:02:29 | More by Dotcubed
Photo of brewdoc75
brewdoc75

Minnesota

2.68/5  rDev -26.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A: Light yellow. A little too light. Strong carbonation. Lasting, small white head.

S: Slightly grainy and sweet. Hint of sulfur. Not impressed.

T: Flavors are really lacking. SLight sweetness from the malt followed by a hint of grains. No bad flavors, but not a lot of good ones.

M: Really light. Too light. Watery.

D: This is a very lackluster beer. Better than a macro lager, but not by much. Will not be picking up again.

Serving type: bottle

09-23-2009 23:57:23 | More by brewdoc75
Photo of Erdinger2003
Erdinger2003

Iowa

2.7/5  rDev -26%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

The crisp golden color is clear and the head is present and there is a slight lacing.

Smells like a lager with some spices and a little bit of a soapy flavor in it as well.

Tastes like a lager with a slight amount of spices.

Mouthfeel was smooth, the carbonation was gone, but that could've been because the storage place was the trunk of the car for a few days.

I will try this every year, but I will not go out of my way to grab some.

Serving type: bottle

05-19-2006 02:49:49 | More by Erdinger2003
Photo of samie85
samie85

Illinois

2.7/5  rDev -26%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Had this on tap at Uncle Mike's Hwy. Pub in Kenosha; reviewed from notes, originally 6/6/10.

A-Pours a light straw color with a white head.

S-Corny and grainy aromas dominant the nose on this one with maybe the slightest hint of floral hops.

T-Corny and grain upfront, very watery and no discernible bitterness. A little husky and dry on the finish.

M-Thin and pretty watery with carbonation on the heavy side of medium.

D-I mean, it goes down easy, but it's not a very flavorful beer. Definitely a gateway/lawnmower type of beer.

Serving type: on-tap

06-19-2010 15:17:43 | More by samie85
Photo of BeerLover99
BeerLover99

Illinois

2.7/5  rDev -26%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

A: clear, pale yellow, small head, sparse lacing in the glass.

S: very subtle grain, malt, and splash of citrus aroma.

T: clean, almost has a macro beer taste, too much grain and not enough body or flavor behind the carbonation.

M: light body, very prickly tongue, big carbonation feel.

D: This is nothing amazing. Great to support a good craft brewery over a big macro or get newbies interested in spreading their drinking wings, but not a must try.

Serving type: on-tap

12-28-2010 19:42:07 | More by BeerLover99
Photo of IntriqKen
IntriqKen

California

2.73/5  rDev -25.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

This one is what it is.
Pours a pale yellow with a smallish white head that melts rather quickly to a ring of white lacing and occassional stickiness.
Aroma is American Lager Yeast with soft sweet malt and floral hops.
Taste is initially sweet, then the floral hops peek out and try to take over only to be buried by the sweetness of the pale malts again.
Mouthfeel is slick and thick.
This impresses me as a craft version of a BMC.
Not bad...but not for me to go there again.

Serving type: bottle

10-14-2006 20:02:30 | More by IntriqKen
Photo of champ103
champ103

Texas

2.73/5  rDev -25.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I got a mixed twelve pack as a birthday present from my Aunt and her boyfriend. This is the first that I have opened.

A: Pours a perfectly clear macro like yellow color. A two finger white head forms, and leaves some lace behind.
S: The aroma is of toasted grains and cereal malt. A light grassy aroma. Though mostly macro like.
T: Follows the nose, but more of a sour, mineral flavor that reminds me even more of a macro lager. Grainy malt, and cereal again. Blah.
M/D: A light body that is thin and watery. Not hard to drink, but not something I am going to come back to.

Just to much like a macro lager to me. I get that this is suppose to be an easy to drink session, but pretty much like most macros. Maybe the first New Glarus that I just don't like.

Serving type: bottle

10-02-2010 20:36:14 | More by champ103
Photo of deaconblues
deaconblues

Wisconsin

2.73/5  rDev -25.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Oh. I suppose you could call this "New Glarus Lite." Such a surprisingly boring beer from such a good brewery.

It pours a very light straw yellow, with a small white head, and a little lacing. Nothing impressive to see.

The smell is quite faint, only a very light, sweet scent.

There is little to taste here. Very light malt, with a bit of hoppy bitterness in the end. Just a tiny bit of sweetness in the beginning.

The mouthfeel is about the only real strength of this beer. It is crisp and will go down easily, but there is nothing interesting about it. It would be a nice thirst quencher on a very hot day.

Overall, I am not impressed. What sets it apart from the macro-lagers is that it is less sweet and has a bit more hops. The taste is not much stronger, though. this would be a good beer to give to your friends who love Miller or PBR, but then again, why bother paying the extra cash?

Serving type: bottle

04-23-2011 20:01:18 | More by deaconblues
Photo of lakeviewmike
lakeviewmike

Wisconsin

2.75/5  rDev -24.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Looks like a typical lager, yellow-gold, small head, little retention.

Not much scent.

Taste is very mild. Light hops, light malts.

Mouthfeel is also light and refreshing.

This is drinkable like a Bud light is drinkable. Very light flavor, smooth and fizzy.

A good call? I guess if it is the only thing available besides Bud light.

Serving type: bottle

09-10-2007 17:10:20 | More by lakeviewmike
Photo of shivtim
shivtim

Georgia

2.78/5  rDev -23.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a very clear yellow, with an inch or so white foamy head. Smell is corn/grains and a bit metallic. The corn comes through in the taste, but with a little bit of spiciness. It's a bit thin, but not bad. Overall there's nothing malicious about it, it's just not that impressive.

Serving type: bottle

11-02-2006 04:28:40 | More by shivtim
Photo of Chugmonkey
Chugmonkey

Wisconsin

2.78/5  rDev -23.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Hmmm, not sure what they are trying to achieve here other than cornering the market on mediocrity.

Looks normal, tastes somewhat grainy with an aftertaste I can't quite put my finger on and leaves me totally unsatisfied.

And it's really annoying that they pawn these lackluster things off in their otherwise stellar variety 12packs. Keep moving along, nothing to taste here folks.

Serving type: bottle

09-16-2008 21:29:11 | More by Chugmonkey
Photo of Viciousknishs
Viciousknishs

Virginia

2.78/5  rDev -23.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A- pours straw yellow with a finger of bone white head. Ok retention.

S- buttery crackers with the faintest hint of aspirin floral hop.

T- light cracker malt flavor with a whisper of earthy floral hop. Astringent syrupy sweetness on the finish.

MF- slick oily mouthfeel with a light body. Fizzy carbonation.

D- below average drinkability.

Overall a beer that reminded me to much of high school and bad brew.

Serving type: bottle

12-17-2012 05:12:31 | More by Viciousknishs
Photo of schellsbeer
schellsbeer

Minnesota

2.8/5  rDev -23.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Thanks to my good friend Greggy for this one. Part of a 6 pack he put together for me.

Anyway...here is the review.

A - Classic beer look. Pale straw color. Small white head. Thin. Average looking. Many small bubbles.

S - Classic beer smell. Smells like beer, looks like beer, therefore, it must be beer. Hops, Malt, Barley - all there. Clean smell.

T - Tastes like beer. Plan and simple. Nothing too out of the ordinary. Doesn't suck...Doesn't impress.

M - Average. Beer feel. Better than Macro beers but not much.

D - Since this is not my style, I would have to say that the drinkability is low for me. Not bad by any means but just not for me.

Overall, a great American Pale lager that is there for the average beer drinker that wants a better tasting beer than the macro's can give but also comes with a higher price. Worth it? You be the judge.

1st and last of this one...unless Greg gives me another. Just not my style. But that's ok.

Thanks Greg.

Serving type: bottle

12-05-2008 23:16:40 | More by schellsbeer
Photo of Franziskaner
Franziskaner

Missouri

2.84/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Light gold in color. Moderate head of foam off of the pour. I smell...corn and a bit of a vinegar aroma. Not too enticing. The flavor is corn and a quick fade away. Drink this one cold for maximum enjoyment. The mouthfeel is pretty light, like drinking water.

Serving type: bottle

07-27-2013 03:29:09 | More by Franziskaner
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Totally Naked from New Glarus Brewing Company
83 out of 100 based on 694 ratings.