1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Nine Man Ale Golden Ale - Cooperstown Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Nine Man Ale Golden AleNine Man Ale Golden Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
78
okay

104 Ratings
THE BROS
81
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 104
Reviews: 71
rAvg: 3.38
pDev: 13.31%
Wants: 1
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Cooperstown Brewing Company visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
American Blonde Ale |  4.30% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 04-13-2002)
View: Beers (7) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Nine Man Ale Golden Ale Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 104 | Reviews: 71 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Sammy
Sammy

Ontario (Canada)

3.08/5  rDev -8.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

aggressive carbonation. A lot on fizzy gas, little on taste, which gives a middle mouthfeel with an uncomfortable graininess. Tad of tartness more than bitterness and drying sweetness and not very satisfying. Little head, beer and skunky smell, but still fresh, little interest.

Serving type: bottle

03-16-2005 04:14:02 | More by Sammy
Photo of brentk56
brentk56

North Carolina

2.65/5  rDev -21.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: Pours a hazy amber color with a soda pop head that fizzes away in about five seconds

Smell: Smells a bit like a combination of day old spilled beer and buttery toffee

Taste: Bready, up front, but with a growing butter toffee flavor from the diacetyl; after the swallow, there is a modest earthy hop presence that adds some balance

Mouthfeel: Light to medium body but way too fizzy

Drinkability: The poor carbonation quality ruined what would otherwise be an average, but drinkable, beer

Thanks, jjayjaye, for the opportunity

Serving type: bottle

07-02-2009 23:02:41 | More by brentk56
Photo of RblWthACoz
RblWthACoz

Pennsylvania

3.5/5  rDev +3.6%

10-21-2012 17:11:51 | More by RblWthACoz
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

3.25/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a light gold color, with a large off-white head that fades slowly and leaves a thin lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is spicy along with some caramelized malts, touches of fruit and hops in the background.

T: The taste is decently balanced with sweet flavors of caramel, spice and fruit, a mild hops bitterness, a bit of smokiness and a malt character that is light but is enough to provide a little substance. The after-taste is slightly sweet.

M: Crisp and a little smooth, light-medium body, medium-high carbonation, clean finish.

D: A little tasty, goes down easily, not filling at all, mild kick, its flavor is slightly different from others in the style, but there isn't enough here to make me choose it unless my available selections were limited.

Serving type: bottle

06-15-2008 01:32:57 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

3.68/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Presentation: 12 oz. brown long neck with a baseball motif label and cap. No freshness date.

Appearance: Rich golden hued brew with a clinging white lace.

Smell: Light malty caramel and buttery diacetyl make for a toffee like aroma, mild esters appear also.

Taste: Crisp with a very mellow rustic earthy flavour from a mix of the hops and Ringwood yeast strain, some dehydrated pear in the middle also. Definitely on the dry side with a grainy undertone. A herbal/orange hop twang towards the end helps to finish this brew off with a small amount of residual dextrins.

Notes: A pretty good brew , though peculiar tasting, the Ringwood strain is a bit of a distraction for this Golden Ale Style ... perhaps a cleaner stain would have been more suitable unless you are accustomed and enjoy the Ringwood traits?

Serving type: bottle

04-13-2002 04:02:02 | More by Jason
Photo of WesWes
WesWes

New York

4.05/5  rDev +19.8%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

This beer pours a light golden color. It's nose is of sweet malt character with a grain base grain, probably 2-row American barley. It's mouthfeel is very light, which I think adds considerably to it's drinkability. It has little in the line of alcohol, but is a beer that tastes great in the summer when it's hot and you feel like drinking a ton without getting fall down drunk. One of my favorite beers. It's a guilty pleasure. There is little hopping present, probably noble ones like Fuggle and Kent Goldings. I don't hold it's light character against it. I don't usually care for light beers, but this one slips under the radar.

Serving type: bottle

06-02-2003 12:14:25 | More by WesWes
Photo of Rifugium
Rifugium

Pennsylvania

3.3/5  rDev -2.4%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.25

First had: on tap at Cooperstown Brewing, Milford, NY

Pours straw-yellow with a little white head that dissipates rather quickly. Crisp, grainy aroma, and crisp, grainy taste, with light grassy hops following. Simple. Very light and crisp, not big on taste, but highly drinkable nonetheless. I could easily spend a summer night drinking this, but there's nothing amazing going on here.

Serving type: on-tap

04-29-2011 18:10:36 | More by Rifugium
Photo of smcolw
smcolw

Massachusetts

3.23/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Insane head, like an overcarbonated homebrew. I have a 20 oz glass for a 12 oz beer and I've had two gentle pours that have filled my vessel. I still have half a beer to pour! Slight haze. Definitely darker than a "golden", more like a light amber.

Slight sourness to the smell. Clear and crisp, some fruity esters.

Overcarbonated (not surprising, given the pour). Good body but not enough to overcome the carbonation. Slightly sour taste. Not as "crisp" as I would like. Slightly sweet, very low bitterness.

As a homebrewer, I know this is one of the hardest beers to make. The fruity esters and the carbonation prevent this one from being a great golden ale.

Serving type: bottle

09-09-2006 19:21:47 | More by smcolw
Photo of Gavage
Gavage

New Jersey

3.5/5  rDev +3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: clear light orange in color with a 1" head. The head falls to a surface foam relatively quickly.

Smell: for this style, there is actually a decent aroma of mild citrus and caramel candy.

Taste: very basic ale, as mild caramel, grapefruit, and soft bitterness are well balanced but slightly dull. A hint of a metallic tone hits the back of the tongue during the swallow.

Mouthfeel: lightly crisp and dry at the start and finish. Relatively clean aftertaste. Light-medium in body.

Drinkability: not bad, but this is a little dull - I would like to see a little more citrus tones to brighten this up.

Serving type: bottle

02-13-2006 13:07:11 | More by Gavage
Photo of tempest
tempest

Pennsylvania

3.6/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

This beer is most easily described as ringwood-light. No it's not a lite beer, but it has trademark ringwood taste, but is lighter than others of the same yeast. Gold colored and smelled of light fruits. Tasted of apple and orange with a slight grassy bitterness. The bitterness didn't seem to fit for me. I'd keep this one malty, that is unless you like your blonde ales hoppy.

Serving type: bottle

12-13-2006 02:16:47 | More by tempest
Photo of akorsak
akorsak

Pennsylvania

3.3/5  rDev -2.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This is a 12 oz bottle of Nine Man Ale served in a tumbler. The ale is cool.

Appearance: The ale is golden in color with good lacing and no sign of haze.

Smell: There is a distinct biscuity nose of malts but no hops to be found.

Taste: The malts give the ale a definite sweetness and the complete lack of hop nose and aroma cuts out the bitterness factor.

Mouthfeel: I would like some hop character to assert itself.

Drinkability: The ale tastes good on its own, so I recommend it for a hot summer afternoon outside.

Serving type: bottle

07-27-2006 01:39:52 | More by akorsak
Photo of DrunkinYogi
DrunkinYogi

Connecticut

3/5  rDev -11.2%

10-13-2012 00:37:30 | More by DrunkinYogi
Photo of jdhilt
jdhilt

New Hampshire

3.25/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours with a white two-fingered head that fades and leaves a reasonable lace. Light bodied and light-medium bodied. Not hoppy like a lot of golden ales has more of a balance of hops and malt with just a little sweetness coming through but a slightly bitter finish. $1.75 for a 12oz bottle.

Serving type: bottle

04-23-2004 22:20:50 | More by jdhilt
Photo of plaid75
plaid75

New York

3.65/5  rDev +8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured a light copper hue with a two finger frothy white head. There was very good retention and lacing.

The smell featured a light sweetness and a moderate biscuity malt.

The taste consisted of a sweet malt, a slight diacytl and a light flowery hop.

The mouthfeel was toward the fuller side for the style.

Overall a tasty and easily quaffable ale.

Serving type: bottle

02-29-2008 01:50:29 | More by plaid75
Photo of mdaschaf
mdaschaf

Washington

3.23/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thanks to THECPJ for this bottle.

A: Pours a slightly hazy orange color with a massive white head, tok a while to pour the entire beer as the foam rose all the way to the top quickly. However, it reduced just as fast and there was nothing left on top and no lacing within moments.

S: Actually has a little funk to it, very surprising. A little bit of grains and a bit of citrus, but the funk dominates.

T: Again, slightly funky/sour. It dominates the flavor profile and I can't really get much else out of it.

M: Medium bodied with moderate carbonation. Rather slick.

O: Very confusing with the funk/sourness. Can't really imagine why it smells and tastes like it does. I like it, but reviewing to style is what will keep it low.

Serving type: bottle

08-11-2011 03:26:32 | More by mdaschaf
Photo of DmanGTR
DmanGTR

Florida

3.5/5  rDev +3.6%

01-29-2013 02:58:34 | More by DmanGTR
Photo of Reagan1984
Reagan1984

Massachusetts

2.17/5  rDev -35.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

This is really not a very good beer. I don't say that because it's a lighter style. It's just not good.

Poured with a foamy head that immediately vanished. The beer was a light golden color with a touch of visible carbonation. No lacing at all.

Aroma was like a stick of butter. A sense a diacetyl bomb coming on.

Unfortunately, I was right. This is a butter nightmare. There is a slight grain flavor with little hop character and no finish. It's just the butter flavor that sticks with you.

Mouth feel of slick and oily. Also no finish....

Drain pour. Not worth 125 calories. Sorry.

Serving type: bottle

11-02-2008 18:26:20 | More by Reagan1984
Photo of tgbljb
tgbljb

Pennsylvania

3.83/5  rDev +13.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured a slightly hazy brilliant golden color with a massive head that overflowed the glass. Too much carbonation. I tghink I have seen this problem with other beers from this company.
Smell is lightly fruity wuth some peach notes present.
Taste is also moderately sweet with an almost honey-like character.
Finish is a bit dissapointing with little taste retention.
An easy drinking beer. Would be great for a hot simmer afternoon.

Serving type: bottle

02-23-2007 00:54:22 | More by tgbljb
Photo of jaxon53
jaxon53

Connecticut

3.25/5  rDev -3.8%

06-25-2013 23:35:38 | More by jaxon53
Photo of jfcaa193
jfcaa193

Connecticut

2.5/5  rDev -26%

02-19-2012 02:13:20 | More by jfcaa193
Photo of david18
david18

New York

3.88/5  rDev +14.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I actually enjoyed this beer a lot. The person at the bar didn't know what style it was, what the abv was, anything. I would have guessed a blonde or golden ale and I guess I was right. It was very sessionable and really quite enjoyable. Not much on the aroma, but the flavor was great, the drinkability and mouthfeel were also very good. Don't know how available this beer is but if you see it, it's a good one.

Serving type: on-tap

08-15-2009 15:24:37 | More by david18
Photo of tclapper
tclapper

North Carolina

4/5  rDev +18.3%

11-18-2011 00:12:08 | More by tclapper
Photo of Todd
Todd

Colorado

3.43/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Presentation: 12oz brown bottle. No freshness date, but it's got a cut bottle-cap that looks like a baseball.

Appearance: Rich, bright golden hued beer topped with a frothy white head which retains well and trails the glass.

Smell: Pretty empty in the nose, with some hints of apple-skin.

Taste: A bit coarse on the palate, with a tight, spritzy, scrubbing and sharp-ish carbonation that creams up in the mouth, providing a bit of smoothness on the palate. Body is quite light. Major blast of zesty bitterness, with a watery citric character to it. Touch of cheesy hops. Sweetness is low, with notes of saccharin. Touch fruity berries, apple, pear and plenty of Ringwood yeast character (which may be odd for some). Dry, grainy and ashy in the finish.

Notes:A tasty ale. Uncomplicated, easy drinking and quite the refresher. The Ringwood yeast is a bit powerful though, and perhaps a bit too dirty and dominant.

Serving type: bottle

08-26-2004 01:11:25 | More by Todd
Photo of RonfromJersey
RonfromJersey

New Jersey

3.68/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Golden body with some carbonation streams, topped by several fingers of off-white medium size bubbles and a fuzzy soft top.

Pleasant hay/grass aroma, with a bit of bakery biscuits thrown in too.

Moderately sweet beginning, followed by some earthy, herbal hops which balance nicely and then steal home in the finish with a enjoyable hop snap that lingers gently in the aftertaste. Bit overly grainy in the finish though.

Mouthfeel is light plus. Not watery like too many goldens, though still below medium/pale ale levels.

Good drinkability. Could have a few during a day game and still feel good to go in the evening.

Good sessionable golden ale for a summer afternoon.

Serving type: bottle

07-14-2006 22:10:21 | More by RonfromJersey
Photo of rlee1390
rlee1390

Indiana

3.5/5  rDev +3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A-Cloudy yellow, some carbonation, lots of sediment, three finger head that dissipates quickly.

S-Lots of grass and spice, some wheat as well, even some cherries...

T-Starts with grain/straw with grassy hops and spice, something is off though that I can not place.

M-Very light and very carbonated.

O-Something was off in the taste couldn't place it. And as the beer warms it loses what luster it had.

Serving type: bottle

06-18-2012 16:23:52 | More by rlee1390
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Nine Man Ale Golden Ale from Cooperstown Brewing Company
78 out of 100 based on 104 ratings.