1757 'gw' Beer - Cottrell Brewing Co.
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 17 | Reviews: 9 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by mttaylor1066:
1.98/5 rDev -29%
I met the owner/brewmaster of this beer at a local grocery store. Nice fellow from Greenwich, CT.
He has this recipe brewed on contract for him.
I bought a six pack (at $10!!) because I was expecting a rich, malty ale from a bygone era.
I was sorely disappointed. During our conversation, the owner mentioned that the "tweaks made to the recipe bring it into the range of 90% of beer drinkers' preferences."
I guess that means taking a good recipe and watering down until it is almost Budweiser or Miller Lite.
This is a very disappointing brew. It is neither fish (Budweiser) nor fowl (name a craft beer). I'm sorry to say I will never buy another bottle of this beer, even if it were priced below Old Milwaukee in a can.
03-07-2012 20:21:32 | More by mttaylor1066
More User Reviews:
3.48/5 rDev +24.7%
Poured from a bottle into a pint glass. Picked up as a mix a six.
Pours a hazy orange tinged copper with little foam but active bubbles citrussy smell. Latent background. Taste is light malt, very thin, lagery. Subtle lemon flavor. Simple.
Clever concept to use this old recipe.
08-26-2012 15:08:18 | More by KTCamm
3.7/5 rDev +32.6%
From the 12 fl. oz. bottle with Mar 2012 clipped off the label. According to the the label is is based on George Washington's handwritten recipe. It is a typical straw yellow pale lager pour with a lot of long lasting head and excited carbonation. It does not smell like a beer from 1757. It smells more like a modern Adjunct with grainy, light roasted malts and sugar. The body is thin. The taste is also very much like barkey malts, slightly sweet, and crispy fresh at the end. An innocuous, likeable, and drinkable pale lager.
11-20-2011 19:34:19 | More by puboflyons
2.23/5 rDev -20.1%
I will be straight forward here...this tasting is of a sample poured at a local liquor store. I dont usually review from such a small sample but this one really sparked its own review. Its almost insulting to call this a "craft" beer (and a pale ale). Just because its made in a local brewery, doesnt make it craft. This tastes like a tecate or a run of the mill macro. Just plain avoid this brew...
At least dont call it an APA, and just tough it up and all it a light or adjunct lager, then I would up a few points...
08-19-2012 22:33:18 | More by DrinkSlurm
3.6/5 rDev +29%
12oz bottle. Pours a translucent straw color with very little head. Minimal lacing. Aroma is of grains, earth and some sweet malts. Taste is slightly sweet and tangy. Malts and grains most prevalent flavors. Light and crisp. Tangy finish. While this isn't the most flavorful style of beer, it's a decent brew. Tastes like a better than most Adjunct Lager. Overall, nothing special but good enough to grab again.
12-13-2011 04:25:44 | More by PicoPapa
2.9/5 rDev +3.9%
Purchased by my wife, new ct beer!
Pours a golden clear yellow with a thick off white head. Tight bubbles. Looks like a pbr
Aroma of straw and light roasted grains. No hops really. A bit of bready malt and sweetness like an aal.
Taste starts slow with a sweet flaked and toasted malt flavor. Slightly sweet like a tiny bit of honey. There's a hint of hop bitterness in the middle, but it quickly yields to more adjunct-like/flaked corn sweetness.
Mouthfeel is light bodied, super high drinkability.
Not a bad beer by any means but nothing here that makes me long for another. It actually tastes more like a low hopped cream ale rather than an American pale ale. Or an actually good aal. Really easy to drink and not bad tasting, but just not for me.
The disappointing part (other than the run of the mill type flavor profile) is the fact that this stuff was 9.99 a six pack! If I can get Sierra pale ale for that price or less, why would I buy this? If the price point was better then I'd probably consider a rebuy to give to moderate craft fans when they come over.
06-21-2012 20:38:10 | More by Thads324
3.08/5 rDev +10.4%
Decent starting head, but it dies out to a rim level of bubbles. No lace. Gold color with a slight cloudiness.
Strong graininess of freshly cut grass. Near lawn mower quality.
Starts off sweet but quickly becomes sour. Raw grain is the predominant flavor. Nearly no hop taste which leaves the aftertaste flat and lifeless.
06-30-2012 18:57:20 | More by smcolw
2.89/5 rDev +3.6%
Pours a light yellow with a white head that fizzes pretty quick. The smell was mostly just wheat although I did pick up a little bit of citrus. The taste was okay with mostly simple hop and malt flavor although it had a little skunk in the aftertaste. Overall it was simple and enjoyable, but not by any means amazing.
06-11-2014 15:45:30 | More by WhiteHillsStore
3.25/5 rDev +16.5%
12 oz. brown bottle. Has freshness date notched on side of label.
A: Pours a cloudy light yellow. Small bubbly head with little lacing.
S: Sweet with the typical adjunct aroma. A little wheat is also mixed in.
T/M: Tastes different than the smell. Much more of a malt heavy taste. Can't detect any of the typical adjunct ingredients as the malty wheat taste really takes over. Fizzy feel with a semi-dry finish.
O: Based on George Washington's own recipe. I'm happy he kept his day job. Still, not too bad as a simple lager. Worth a try.
12-23-2011 21:15:57 | More by mnrider
1757 'gw' Beer from Cottrell Brewing Co.
72 out of 100 based on 17 ratings.