1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Special Pale Ale - Wellington County Brewery

Not Rated.
Special Pale AleSpecial Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
78
okay

112 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 112
Reviews: 65
rAvg: 3.42
pDev: 12.28%
Wants: 1
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Wellington County Brewery visit their website
Ontario, Canada

Style | ABV
English Pale Ale |  4.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 08-16-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 112 | Reviews: 65 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by BeerClubNiagara:
Photo of BeerClubNiagara
3.75/5  rDev +9.6%

BeerClubNiagara, Jan 26, 2013
More User Reviews:
Photo of Popsinc
3.45/5  rDev +0.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a nice deep amber. small head. the nose is mild with light malts and some caramel sweetness. taste was mild. again, light malty sweetness, minimal hops, some caramel sweetness as well follwed up with a lemony twang on the finish. very light bodied, smooth and creamy texture. a little light all the way around for my liking but has good drinkability. probably best enjoyed on a warm summer's day when the goal is sit down and enjoy several. not a favorite of mine.

Popsinc, Apr 10, 2005
Photo of JohnnyBarman
3.68/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On tap at the brewery. I've had this brew many times before, but this is the first occasion I've had to put thoughts to paper.

Pours a crisp, dark amber. About an inch of creamy head, loads of lacing.

Nose is malt, bread, a bit of fruit. Typical pale ale fare.

The taste isn't complex, but man does this stuff go down easy. Light malts, a bit of biscuit and bread, dark fruits and bitterness to the finish. More fruit flavours here than in their Best Bitter, which makes for a smoother quaff. Very enjoyable.

Mouthfeel is medium thin, average carbonation.

The definition of a great session beer. I can drink this stuff all night, and I certainly have. A great introduction to the pale ale style, and a solid Ontario offering.

JohnnyBarman, Dec 16, 2009
Photo of Swedes21
2.98/5  rDev -12.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

473 ml served in a chilled glass..

Appearance - Beer pours with as a clear auburn colour and a slightly brown based head. Head is foamy while having a thick appearance. The carbonation levels almost not present and minimal lacing.

Smell - I would say almost too simple. Nice balance of caramel with roasted nuts in the taste. Nothing that blows me away, i was hoping for more...

Taste - I can taste the caramel but not much of a punch. The beer is actually a little bland to my taste buds. There is no aftertaste either, i found it to go down easy.

Mouthfeel - not a lot of carbonation is offered to this beer, it does not come alive and offers the same amount of taste in the mouthfeel.

Drinkability - Its almost light beer with a hint of caramel. There isn't much offered overall, but its not a bad beer. Just need to manage expectation when trying it.

Swedes21, Oct 28, 2010
Photo of WVbeergeek
3.15/5  rDev -7.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: Amber body cream colored head, minimal lacing. Aroma: Nice caramel toasted malts apparent with a kiss of hops there floating in the background. Taste: Grainy off note is apparent but the upside is there is a detectable succulent caramel tone to the malts with fair bitterness. Mouthfeel: Light to medium in body definitely meant to be a session ale. Drinkability: Not bad a tasty pale ale, however I desire more hops. After asking for a hoppy ale this is what they gave me, it's okay I enjoyed it.

WVbeergeek, Feb 18, 2004
Photo of MJ63
3/5  rDev -12.3%

MJ63, Oct 26, 2013
Photo of biboergosum
3.43/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

473ml can. The eponymous commander's campaign to Ind-ja is summed up pithily on the label.

This beer pours a clear medium golden amber colour, with two fat fingers of thin foamy, frizzy off-white head, which leaves some inconsistent arched lace around the glass in its wake. It smells of bready pale malt, and zingy, sharp floral, weedy hops. The taste is mildly toffee and caramel tinged bready malt, some faint nutty esters, and somewhat fruity floral hops. The carbonation is average, the body on the lee side of medium, and roughly smooth (I know), as a bit of what I'm guessing is a hop-oriented edge permeates. It finishes off-dry, the extended malt and hops making no unexpected u-turns.

A pretty faithful ode to the British style - yet a bit too mild, and not very challenging, or by non-condemning extension - rousing.

biboergosum, Sep 16, 2011
Photo of mdaschaf
3.53/5  rDev +3.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Thanks to korguy123 for this one

A: Pours a Clear copper color, small head that dissipates quickly, not real lacing.

S: Very nutty, lots of malts. I also get a good amount of caramel and toffee.

T: Dominated by malt. The nutty aroma comes through and is very strong. A slight hop flavor in the middle as well, but very brief.

M/D: Light to Medium bodied, but very little carbonation. Overall, not bad, but not special. Again, props for the tall boy can. Love those no matter what.

mdaschaf, Nov 16, 2010
Photo of Sammy
3.83/5  rDev +12%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A fine golden colour, some hoppy aroma, some flavour and cream, carbonation, altogether average however. In sip nuttiness, some bitter aftertaste. Not so pale, maybe name owes itself to cross-style with the cream, which is sugar biscuit in the dough, Bitter over sweet.

Sammy, Aug 08, 2004
Photo of cliff1066
3.5/5  rDev +2.3%

cliff1066, Dec 15, 2012
Photo of joemcgrath27
3.4/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A - a clear copper, decent off white head but it did not retain well
S - sweet molasses malty smell, floral and citrus hop notes, and a slight yeast scent
T - sweet and nutty flavours, the hop taste is more earthy and subtle that I expected, and I found mild tobacco hints
M - slightly thin but some richness of flavour, very little carbonation, in fact almost flat, a little dry bitter hoppiness
D - generally average, drinks fairly easily and flavours are decent, but to call it a pale ale was a bit of a stretch for me

joemcgrath27, Jul 15, 2010
Photo of DaveBar
3.29/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Purchased at the LCBO for $2.85 473ml can. Served at 6deg C in a draught glass

A- Very good. Opens well and pours amber dark. Not much head though

S- Ok. Basic British malt caramel and hops but none in anything to call anything special.... Ok I guess

T- Ok. Nothing special for me. Basic IPA

M- Ok. Nice and creamy, LOL

O- Your ok basic rendition of a British IPA.

Food Pairing

This ok IPA goes well with... Steak and kidney pie... I made it to try believe it or not!

Enjoy

DaveBar, May 31, 2014
Photo of Stocean1
3.45/5  rDev +0.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - poured a one finger lacy head with some retention onto an amber hued body - somewhat clear

S - light malt and floral hops and light fruit

T - light malt up front with the floral hops, biscuit, pepper, a little medicinal, apple and pear notes

M - light body with little carbonation, bitter and dry

O - a drinkable pale ale but nothing to blow you away - grabbed it because the pub had nothing else

Stocean1, Oct 08, 2011
Photo of emerge077
3.1/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Thanks Jay for sharing this beer. Served from a yellow can with a boot on it, into a tulip glass. Reviewed from quick notes.

Dark amber orange body, sharp clarity, ample foam on the surface that has an off white cream color to it. Retention is adequate, the foam leaves some spotty lacing around the edges here and there.

Smells a little off, funky yeast and musty wet grains. Some bready malt underneath, but overall not too appealing.

Flavor is better, malt dominant, toasted grain and multigrain bread. Light to medium bodied, slightly low carbonation. It's ok, but the smell is just odd. Not one i'd seek out when in Ontario.

emerge077, Jul 25, 2012
Photo of Phyl21ca
3.13/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Can: Poured a slightly hazy amber color ale with a medium size foamy head with average retention and some light lacing. Aroma consists of somewhat dry English style malt with light floral notes. Taste is also a mix between some floral notes with light dry malt notes. Body is about average with good carbonation. Not complex and easily drinkabale.

Phyl21ca, Sep 21, 2012
Photo of ThinkAgain
3.5/5  rDev +2.3%

ThinkAgain, Jan 24, 2012
Photo of ZorPrime
3.48/5  rDev +1.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Another beer from liamt07, sent to me in a recent trade.

Copper color beer, clear with a tiny foamy head (big bubbles) on top. I get some malts notes and earthy/woody hops in the nose. Not very tasty, I would have expected it to be a little bit more upfront on the taste side. Not bad. Light bitterness at the end. Woody in the taste with some malts too. So easy to drink and refreshing. This beer does the job. Not a tasty beer but a good damn refreshing beer.

ZorPrime, Sep 25, 2010
Photo of WillAndSarah
3.25/5  rDev -5%

WillAndSarah, Aug 29, 2013
Photo of IronDjinn
2.73/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

From a 473 ml can, part of a sampler 4-pack. Pours out a hazed amber hue, loose foamy off-white head that retains to a thick cap.

Dry toasty malt on the nose, a brief spike of sour veg, some leafy and grassy hops.

Toasty and sweetish malt up front in the flavour, mild notes of caramel, finishing with mild leafy hops.

Medium-bodied mouthfeel, although with a watery texture, but a moderate carbonation tends to save it.

Either I got some old product schlebbed off in a variety pack (although it's not showing serious signs of age), or Wellington is just phoning it in with this special pale ale, as for the most part it comes across as a sub-par offering.

IronDjinn, Feb 05, 2012
Photo of Antilochus
3.18/5  rDev -7%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Grabbed a sixer of this at a London ON LCBO. 341mL twist bottle, 4.50% abv. Fridge temp.

Even brownish amber body with a respectable cloudy white top.

Notes of metal, noble hop spice (!), lager yeast (!). Weird.

Aggresively carbonated mouthfeel stings... a bit foamy as well but it's still okay. Sweetness, metal on the palate, tastes like a decent lager with the noble hop spice. Finish is much better, caramel maltiness, a touch of hop astringency, less lagerness but noble hop + lager yeast combo is still perceptible.

Definitely easy drinking though.

Antilochus, Sep 16, 2008
Photo of baiser
3.4/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured a golden brown colour with yellow highlights. Minimal lacing. Some hop aromas.

Taste is alright, nothing special. Some sweetness to start. Some nuts. Middle is slightly metallic, and end is moderately bitter. It's a light and crisp beer, with lager like qualities. A bit doughy and biscuity.

This pale ale isn't really anything special. Lady at the brewery told me it was their best seller in and around Guelph. However, it's not one of their better beers.

baiser, Sep 12, 2004
Photo of patre_tim
3/5  rDev -12.3%

patre_tim, May 13, 2014
Photo of Roke87
3.43/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

341 mL bottle from the OCB spring discovery pack, chilled and poured into my trusty Ironspike pilsner glass.

Appearance- Pours a dark amber colour with two fingers of thick off white head that takes a little while to dissipate down to a nice bubbly top leaving average lacing throughout till finish.

Smell- Very heavy on the bready malts, and other than that not too much else going on in the smells for me.

Taste- It picks it up a little better in the tastes, although you do get that huge taste of bready malt in there right away, a mild sweet taste supplied by an almost caramel flavour on the palate.

Mouthfeel- Light to medium bodied, with an above average carbonation to the mouth feel although you can’t really see it at.

Overall- This one really reminds me a lot of Rogue’s dead guy ale, like it literally almost tastes the exact same, an overabundance of bready malts that is like eating a bowl of cambells chicken noodle soup, and some mild caramel flavours in there as well, that are all so reminiscent of a typical British pale ale. Not a huge fan of this one although it did not strike me in a bad note at all, probably would not pick it up had it not been in a taster pack, and definitely not the best offering from Wellington.

Roke87, Jul 22, 2011
Photo of spinrsx
3.48/5  rDev +1.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

341ml Bottle

Appearance – Clear copper colour with an above average size frothy and fizzy beige coloured head. There is a low amount of carbonation showing and there is some good lacing. The head lasted for 5 minutes or so before it was gone.

Smell – Malts, caramel, toffee

Taste & Mouth - There is an above average amount of carbonation and I can taste lots of malts and caramel. There is also quite a bit of a metallic taste and a bit of a tea flavour. the beer finishes with a malty and caramel sweet aftertaste.

Overall – At first the metallic taste really bothered me but it seemed to wear off as I progressed through the beer. The beer is very drinkable it just doesn't really have anything exciting going on taste wise. I'm happy I gave it a shot but I wouldn't buy it again.

spinrsx, Jun 03, 2011
Photo of StarshipPoopers
3.4/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A - Pours a deep ruby red. Nothing to note in terms of lacing and head retention, was non-existant when it arrived.
S - The smell was pretty average. Faint floral notes masked by a sort of biscuity and sweet caramel/toffee smell. Smells slightly more complex than a macro but it smells like it could very well taste like one.
T - Not much complexity or differentiation in the flavours. The hops are quite subtle and the taste is mainly of a sweet caramel/toffee and biscuit flavours (basically identical to the smell). By no means a bad beer to drink, but very average and nothing in the taste is noteworthy.
M/D - Decent mouthfeel, the lack of complexity in the taste coupled with the complete absense of head and sweetness/breadiness of the beer diminished the overall mouthfeel. Drinkability is good.

If this was offered to me again I would have one, but it's not memorable and I won't be seeking out another.

StarshipPoopers, Nov 20, 2010
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Special Pale Ale from Wellington County Brewery
78 out of 100 based on 112 ratings.