1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Zywiec Beer - Zywiec Breweries PLC (Heineken)

Not Rated.
Zywiec BeerZywiec Beer

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

664 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 664
Reviews: 357
rAvg: 3.06
pDev: 19.61%
Wants: 10
Gots: 22 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Zywiec Breweries PLC (Heineken) visit their website

Style | ABV
Euro Pale Lager |  5.60% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Todd on 10-08-2001)
View: Beers (14) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Zywiec Beer Alström Bros
Ratings: 664 | Reviews: 357 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of mdagnew

United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)

3.03/5  rDev -1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

500ml bottle bought from The Vineyard, Belfast...

Poured a light golden yellow colour... White head poured quite foamy and faded to thin layer...

Aroma - Very light maltiness. Some sweetness, metallic notes, salty, corn, some lemon hints...

Taste – Light sweetness, some maltiness and some light hops. Some citrusy notes...

Feel - Quite smooth. Light bodied. Pretty drinkable...

Overall - A very average beer... worth a try maybe once....

Serving type: bottle

01-30-2006 12:15:59 | More by mdagnew
Photo of JohnW

United Kingdom (England)

3.83/5  rDev +25.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours pale with decent fairly tight head, aroma hints at being crisp and dry. Light refreshing texture, drier than some with a slightly floral hint from the yeast I guess, and no vices in the aftertaste. Have tried this from bottle and can, and think its better in the bottle, seems to have more character, a bit thinner in texture in the can.

It is rather over carbonated, and tastes a lot smoother and richer if you get the 'fizz' out by stirring or shaking. Can be bought a lot cheaper here in UK than the usual Macro brewers pretend lager and is preferable to them too. Not a great beer, but would make a decent session beer well chilled on a hot summer day, especially after getting the 'fiz' out!

John W
Bham UK Dec 2005

Serving type: bottle

01-01-2006 11:55:38 | More by JohnW
Photo of allergictomacros

Ontario (Canada)

2.6/5  rDev -15%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

500ml brown bottle. 5.5% abv. Clear, light gold with a small head and a few small bubbles coming up. Looks alright. Smells a bit hoppy, with a faint cirtus smell - limey. A bit of a weird floury/cornstarchy smell.

Bland-ish. Not a lot of bitterness or sweetness. I guess it's balanced... haha... A little bit of a peppery finish. (not a lot, just a wee bit, and gone in an instant)

Feels ok in the mouth - cold, crisp, medium carbonation. Drinkable but nothing special.

Serving type: bottle

12-28-2005 21:17:25 | More by allergictomacros
Photo of CrazyMike

Alberta (Canada)

3.75/5  rDev +22.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Out of all Polish beers, this has to be my favorite.

It's golden colour is just the begining to it's smooth malty sweet taste. Unlike a several bad experiances with beers from Poland, this did not have a metallic aftertaste, it was instead sweet and small.

I would recommend this.

Serving type: bottle

12-17-2005 17:30:53 | More by CrazyMike
Photo of alankwak


4.22/5  rDev +37.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: Pale yellow with good head, head rention and lacing. A very clear beer.
S: A slight aroma like that of a Pilsener. Pleasant indeed.
T: Very good, lightly hopped and a great balance with maltiness but on the side of the hops(Saaz I think). Very good. Clean, crisp and a fairly narrow flavor profile as would come from a good Lager.
M: Light but full for the style.
D: Awesome, I could throw many of these back. Not very filling and very enjoyable to drink.

My first Polish beer but not my last. In a way it reminds me of Grolsch....another European Pale Lager but a bit different. If you like Grolsch, you like this beer.:)

Serving type: can

12-08-2005 02:56:48 | More by alankwak
Photo of redmosquito


4/5  rDev +30.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This beer had a nice thermal label that changed color when the beer was the right temperature to drink. The beer poured a real pale straw color, clear with a dense white head. Strong sweet malt aroma, with faint floral hops and a little skunk, as it warms the malt aroma opens up with hints of Vienna or Munich malt. The flavor is malty sweet, not very bitter at all, and a touch of hops and a creaminess in the finish. The body is solid for a pale lager, and the sweetness stays around longer than most others. The malt flavor is amazing for such a pale beer, making this beer a must try.

Serving type: bottle

10-28-2005 21:29:06 | More by redmosquito
Photo of daliandragon

North Carolina

3.5/5  rDev +14.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Good times. That's what I remember of this beer. I once spent a year living in southwestern Poland and was able to visit the brewery twice since it was only a forty minute train away. This was their flagship beer, visible on pub signs and taps almost everywhere throughout the city. Poles worship vodka but they drink a lot of beer too, even if most of it isn't nearly as good as that in their western neighbors, the Germans and Czechs.
Pours a proper brilliant gold into a pint glass, retaining almost no head. The smell is very thin and barely present at all. The taste is crisp and light and reminsiscent of a Bohemian pilsner. A malty aftertaste is also present.
This is not a wonderful beer but it is among the best non Czech or Slovak beers in eastern Europe and a good example of this style of lager as well. It's also very good on tap and increasingly available in the states in bottles.
One note: although I was immune, many of the ex-pats I worked with in Poland avoided the beer for it's suppossed reaction on their bowel movements, giving it the nickname that rhymes with it's pronunciation of "JIVY-ITS" (Jivyshits). To be fair though, we drank an awful lot that year so I wouldn't neccesarily blame the beer, more the lifestyle. Give it a chance if you can find it. Nastrovia!

Serving type: bottle

10-21-2005 14:44:12 | More by daliandragon
Photo of Frozensoul327


3.58/5  rDev +17%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Not a bad beer at all. Has some nice aspects, but is far from being spectacular. Poured out to a nice golden color with a foamy white head. Some lace was in the glass, something that was quite a suprise considering the style. Aromas of malt and hops was appealing, but rather ordinary. Taste was pretty quaffable, flavors of malt, grain, corn and hops were in balance, with a touch of a sweet character toward the middle. Mouthfeel was slightly weaker than I would have cared for, but not what I would refer to as watery. Good drinkability, this is a decent beer at a decent price. This is what I would think of when the term "European Macro" was being used. Not bad, worth a try if you come across it.

Serving type: can

10-12-2005 22:17:55 | More by Frozensoul327
Photo of Backer2004

North Carolina

1.9/5  rDev -37.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

After going to a so called nice beer bar in Chicago, which I did not like at all, I stumbled upon a small Polish bar in Chicago's Wicker Park. The young bartendar barely spoke English and showed me this as one of the only beers available. What the heck, how many Polish beers will I drink?

Like many Euro lagers, this one was not impressive in anay catagories. One of the few beers I could not even finish, dropping it to one of my lowest reviews yet. Best part was the bar itself, not the beer.

Serving type: bottle

10-03-2005 01:49:37 | More by Backer2004
Photo of wl0307

United Kingdom (England)

2.93/5  rDev -4.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

BB 07/04/06, served chilled in a straight pint glass.

A: dark straw-ish hue, topped with a foamy white head supported by medium-fizzy carbonation mixed of big and tiny bubbles, leaving very fine but uneven lacing.
S: slightly acidic lemony and aromatic soft hops...toasted bread flavour of lager malts is kept to medium to low level. Overall, a bit timid and simplistic.
T: initially comes a soft and slightly sweet flavour of bready/toasted-grainy malts and some thin-bodied lemony sourness, gradually giving way to an increasing dry palate and a soft mouthfeel of lingering grainy flavour on top of faint hoppiness in the background. The finish shows a lightly bitter touch that however is insufficient to shine through.
M&D: the merit is the semi-lively fizzy palate turns more and more dry, whereas the mouthfeel inevitably feels thin-ish in the end due to the lack of body and a residual sugary undertone is not so much appreciated. Overall, quite easy-drinking this beer is, sitting in-between a dry-Pilsner in need of more assertive hop aroma and a Bavarian Helles requiring greater malt presence.

Serving type: bottle

08-15-2005 16:32:02 | More by wl0307
Photo of cypressbob

United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)

3.35/5  rDev +9.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

500ml bottle

Pours with a yellow body, off white head with good retention, some attractive lacing

Smell, some thick malt, a little bit of booze. Some fresh grassy hops

Taste, crisp hops, thick dry and malty body

Not a bad lager, but nothing spectacular. Not bad

Serving type: bottle

08-13-2005 19:52:57 | More by cypressbob
Photo of jarmby1711


3.45/5  rDev +12.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I thought this crystal clear pale gold lager with a snow white head was better than your average bottle shop Euro LAger.It smelt unexceptional but hada dry and crisp finish to the taste which seperated it from many that have a cloying malty sweeness.
I bought it in a 500 ml bottle for what most other 330mls cost ,so as well as being a pleasant drink is reasonably cheap.

Serving type: bottle

08-09-2005 04:43:23 | More by jarmby1711
Photo of karengarys


2.5/5  rDev -18.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

This almost 12oz bottle pours clear yellowish amber, leaving almost no white fluffy head. A ring remains after just a minute. The ring sticks to the glass a little.

Smell is fairly bland "beer". Some hop and malt is present, but very little.

Taste is fairly bland "beer". Some hop is noticable.

Mouthfeel is failry bland "beer".

The body is thin and watery, like a bland "beer".

Though it doesn't taste like fizzy water with a powerded beer packet added, it doesn't taste much like a real beer either. It is pretty much like any macro beer in America - Bud, Miller, whatever. I gave it a straight 2.5 because it is, to me, below average for what a beer should be. I didn't go lower because it is not going out of its way to be offensive - it is just bland and boring with no character.

If this was sitting next to Miller, I'd take this unless it cost more.

Serving type: bottle

08-06-2005 22:02:10 | More by karengarys
Photo of Noxious26

Saskatchewan (Canada)

3.23/5  rDev +5.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

500ml bottle poured in a pint glass. Best Before 08-12-2005. Beer Thermometer on the back label... logo appears when bottle is cold enough (proper temperature).

Clear, dark straw-pale gold yellow in colour. Dense, white head is 1/2 inch at the pour, but recedes to ring around the edge. By midglass there is no head at all.

Very little aroma. Perhaps a little mild malt.

A somewhat interesting flavour profile. At the swallow it's malty amid pin pricks of carbonation on the tongue. As the carbonation relaxes, sweetness slashes it's way in before disappearing quickly. Grassy hops kick in for balance in the second half, then begin to dominate as the maltiness fades into a dry aftertaste. There is some alcohol feel.

Light-medium bodied. Moderate carbonation. Leaves an oily feeling in the mouth in the end.

This is a decent beer that won't blow your socks off, but does display an interesting battle between the malt and hops throughout the profile. While there isn't anything wrong with this, I'm sure I can probably find something cheaper that is as pleasing, or something the same price that is more satisfying.

Serving type: bottle

07-26-2005 01:49:26 | More by Noxious26
Photo of paterlodie


1.5/5  rDev -51%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

BB 10-4-06. Good poorout with lasting head and nice and clear golden beer. Nose is lot less; very papery, sweetish, oxidised and a far from fresh maltarome. Taste is as the smell, oxisidised maltiness, sweetish empty and hardly any bitterness. Empty watery and unfresh mouthfeel makes drinkability to undrinkable. One of my worst lager expiriences recently; one to avoid!

Serving type: bottle

07-06-2005 19:12:15 | More by paterlodie
Photo of Phyl21ca

Quebec (Canada)

2.53/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Bottle: Poured a golden color lager with a large head with minimal retention. Aroma of crispy malt is quite enjoyable. Taste is constituted of crispy malt with some floral hops. Very refreshing beer but this bottle version may have not travelled that well overseas since there was a subtle skunkyness to be found at the end.

Serving type: bottle

06-06-2005 13:34:25 | More by Phyl21ca
Photo of BDTyre

British Columbia (Canada)

2.73/5  rDev -10.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Looks neat: lots of bubbles, foamy heady, good colour.

Smell: smells like malted milk. Like some sort of malted candy. No hops, no anything else. No skunkiness I sense in most lagers.

Taste: Kind of like Malteasers without the chocolate. Taste is this wierd milky malt taste. There's a bit of hops in there, with some grassiness I sometimes taste in lagers, but mostly its that strange milky maltiness.

This is easy to drink, but I think it might be an acquired taste. The beer thermometer is a fairly useless invention, but neat none-the-less. Would I buy this again? Maybe. Its not bad, but it could stand to be better.

Serving type: bottle

05-11-2005 07:02:04 | More by BDTyre
Photo of Weizenmensch


2.95/5  rDev -3.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

500mL bottle that claims it's a pint (568mL). Two jovial Polish folks in traditional dress mazurka around the shield that says "1856".

Appearance: Foaming curls top this voluptuous bleach-blonde lady. Straw-yellow, like Marilyn Monroe. Not bubbly like some, rather more mature in fact. Good head.

Smell: Adult and sophisticated. Smells like she works in a brewery, but still pretty clean and crisp.

Taste: Different from your average eurotrash bawd, but ones like this are all the same, aren't they? Slightly chalky like Queen Elizabeth I, but also a little bitter and bland, like Queen Elizabeth II.

Mouthfeel: Creamy and lascivious. The extent of her desire to get you drunk, however, leads to a bad taste in your mouth. Still, not a bad mouth to feel.

Drinkability: She's pretty easygoing now, but think about the future. You don't want this one hanging around until you're pushing up daisies from the floor of the pub. Who can say no to a flaxen-haired Pole?

Overall: Much like Heineken really. Buy this for the folk-dancing mascots only.

Serving type: bottle

05-09-2005 12:06:13 | More by Weizenmensch
Photo of mynie


3.6/5  rDev +17.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

DARK gold with a large, soapy head.

Strong fruit smells: Apricots and raisins. Very deep but not very complex.

Very ripe taste of fruity malts in the front, big on plums and more apricots. Strong and very sweet. They fade quickly into adjunct grainyness, though, and there's almost no aftertaste.

This is a pretty nice beer, and it sure as hell warms you up with its 5.7 ABV, but it's nothing to write home about.

Serving type: bottle

03-16-2005 03:11:40 | More by mynie
Photo of BuckeyeNation


2.7/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Clear, bright gold with pale lemon accents. The large, off-white head is softly creamy and leaves short-lived, soap sudsy foam on the glass. It's a better than decent look for the style.

Since the nose is full of floral hops, I'm assuming noble bloodlines. I can also appreciate untoasted grain, light citrus and a whiff of pleasant muskiness. Not bad at all. Things are still hummin' along at just above average.

The beer isn't as hoppy or as flavorful as I had hoped after assessing the nose. It's light on pale malt with a bitter, slightly metallic top end. Unfortunately, it becomes even more metallic on the short finish; a development that's made even more bothersome by the relative lack of beer-related flavors. The finish is lightly sweet rather than crisp, and the mouthfeel, which started out thin, ends on a watery, undercarbonated note.

Zywiec is an average EPL, making it a below average beer in general. More hops would help, but if it's been brewed since 1856 (with the same recipe, one would guess), then it's doubtful that we can expect a change at this late date. Besides, maybe there are those who love this stuff and buy it by the case. It isn't for me though.

Serving type: bottle

03-08-2005 15:20:20 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of brewQ


3.35/5  rDev +9.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Clear gold color with a well constructed off-white head.
Decent head retention but no lacing.

Not much aroma- which for a Euro Pils may be a good thing!
Perhaps evidence of the value of the can as an import package.
Just a hint of grain in the nose.

The taste is balance and enjoyable, with a bit of hops at the end to keep you sipping.

Quite a drinkable brew brought to us by Stanley Stawski from the biggest Polish city outside of Warsaw (Chicago).

Serving type: can

03-05-2005 21:43:53 | More by brewQ
Photo of ybnorml

Rhode Island

3.5/5  rDev +14.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A clean golden yellow beer. Has abig bright white foamy head. There is a sweet grassy aroma with a light biscuty background. The flavor is a little light sweetness at first with abit of grainy smoothness in the middle and a nice even hops bite on the finish. There is a good clean refreshing mouthfeel to this beer which makes it easy to enjoy.

Serving type: bottle

02-28-2005 23:17:57 | More by ybnorml
Photo of aaronh


3.33/5  rDev +8.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This isn't a bad beer at all. A bit of a hop aroma, sort of mineral-like as well. Medium gold body with a tight white head. The flavor follows the nose, with crisp hops and a mineral-water finish. Mouthfeel is decent, ad the beer is overall refreshing. Not an impressive beer, but not something I'd refuse like most BMC products. I wouldn't buy it, but I'll drink it.

Serving type: bottle

02-25-2005 23:27:20 | More by aaronh
Photo of Sixpack595


3.33/5  rDev +8.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Not at all bad for what it is. Compared to a typical macro type import it stands up well. Its a pale lager, what do you want? Good clear body and a frothy head. Aroma is very muted. Flavor is fair, a bit bland but there is a tiny note of bready malt and a touch of spicy hop finish. Strongly carbonated. Fairly refreshing beer, I could put them away all night, but there are better beers I'd rather be drinking.

Serving type: bottle

02-02-2005 09:09:56 | More by Sixpack595
Photo of Padron4KM


2.93/5  rDev -4.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

500ml bottle with a "beer thermometer" on the lable.
Pours clear golden yellow with a smallish short lived pale head. light carbonation.
grainy malt aroma, with some mildly floral hop aromas in the background.
Flavor is malt, ceral grains, light hops. slightly hoppy finish.
Not as good as the porter, but not too bad. average, but still refreshing beer.

Serving type: bottle

01-29-2005 04:03:04 | More by Padron4KM
Zywiec Beer from Zywiec Breweries PLC (Heineken)
71 out of 100 based on 664 ratings.