1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Scarenbecca Kriek - Hanssens Artisanaal bvba

Not Rated.
Scarenbecca KriekScarenbecca Kriek

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

140 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 140
Reviews: 64
rAvg: 3.87
pDev: 16.54%
Wants: 13
Gots: 37 | FT: 4
Brewed by:
Hanssens Artisanaal bvba
Belgium

Style | ABV
Lambic - Fruit |  6.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
Lambic brewed with wild Belgian Schaerbeek sour cherries.

(Beer added by: aerozeppl on 12-19-2010)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 140 | Reviews: 64 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of ehammond1
4.33/5  rDev +11.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Bottle

Best Damn Sour Fest
Bootlegger
San Diego, CA

Dark ruby and red with pink edges and a thin pink head. Leaves small spots and thin webs of lacing down the glass.

Wonderful aroma consisting of bright, vibrant, fresh cherries and lots of stinging sourness.

The flavor is very similar to the aroma, with the vibrant, tart cherry and sourness dominating the palette, though this beer has one of the driest finishes I've ever experienced.

Medium mouthful with high carbonation.

A delicious kriek. I would love to try this one again.

ehammond1, Nov 07, 2011
Photo of russwbeck
4.22/5  rDev +9%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 4.5

A: Ruby red pour with no head, absolutely no head. Really reminds me of a deep red wine the way it pours.

S: Huge notes of tart cherries are balanced by tartness, acidity, and barnyard funk. The smell is deep and complex, but balanced well.

T: The taste is almost like drinking the juice from the jar of tart cherries. It is so fruity and delicious. Heavily sour to make up for the fruit taste. The first sip give you a big smack in the face with sour.

MF: It is really flat. From the cork literally just pulling out of the bottle, to the lack of bubbles and had on the pour, to the taste. A bit thin and lacking in this area, my only knock.

O: This was delicious, balanced, complex, and interesting. Really glad I splurged for it and picked it up.

russwbeck, Oct 31, 2011
Photo of hooliganlife
3.73/5  rDev -3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

poured into a stemmed drie fonteinen glass

pours a deep ruby red. quite dark with hints of pink in the light. no head what so ever.

deep ripe fresh cherry. very light dry oak. not very complex but very nice cherry.

again, deep ripe cherry. very fresh tasting. barely sour up front with only a light sourness through the finish on the back of the tongue. very soft oak.

dead flat over all. it takes away from the flavor IMO.

good overall but NOT worth the $20 price tag.

hooliganlife, Sep 01, 2011
Photo of woosterbill
4.2/5  rDev +8.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

375ml bottle into a tasting glass at Ebenezer's Night of the Great Thirst. At $8 for 5oz, I think it's actually slightly cheaper than buying a bottle. Cool.

A: Still maroon liquid. No carbonation at all. Pretty boring, but I was expecting it.

S: Fantastic aroma of juicy sour cherries, oak, and clean grassy funk. Intense and terrific, with the fruit dominating without completely precluding complexity.

T: Follows the nose: ripe, sour cherries and bright, refreshingly clean funk. Delicious.

M: Still, smooth, fairly thick body. Sticky and chewy, which is a bit overbearing but does a decent job highlighting the major fruitiness. Not bad for being entirely uncarbonated.

O: This was a delicious beer, but be warned: the cherries are the star of the show, and if you're looking for the serious sourness and funk that Hanssens usually delivers then you'll be left disappointed. It's also rather overpriced; I'm glad I got to try a sample.

Cheers!

woosterbill, Aug 29, 2011
Photo of AleWatcher
2.75/5  rDev -28.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5

Reviewed from notes-- still trying to get caught up!
Shared by khazaduhm and served in Captain Lawrence tulip.

Looks like Wisconsin Belgian Red from New Glarus. Looks like red maraschino cherry juice. Like cherry grenadine. There is no carbonation at all-- it is completely flat. For $26 per 375 ml, I was expecting at least a little carbonation-- and I could handle missing some bubbles if the flavor made up for it...

My personal thought is this: if you're going to release a beer that's flat, mention it on the label. This is a style that generally DOES have carbonation, so when a flat batch arises, don't try to get away with something and sell it as though it came out perfectly. Own up to it. The customers will respect you more.
We did open 2 bottles of this, and I have since opened a third-- all were flat.

The smell is cherries... Very sweet. Just a hint of tartness. No real sour notes to speak of. The cherries aren't bad--- but they aren't enough here. This is way too much like drinking cherry juice and not enough like drinking a lambic from a professional brewery.
The taste is boring. Just sweet cherries. A slight tart bite, but again, not sour.
Overall-- meh. I won't be buying this beer ever again. Not worth the $13 per bottle that the regular Hansen's lineup costs, let alone double that!

AleWatcher, Aug 28, 2011
Photo of glid02
4.33/5  rDev +11.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Bottle purchased from Green’s on Ponce in Atlanta.

Pours a hazy dark ruby color with a cream-colored head that leaves decent lacing.

Smells of mildly dry medium malts with tart and musty cherry and currant aromas. Also present are mild amounts of vanilla and oak.

Tastes more robust than it smells. Smooth medium malts up front are joined almost immediately by moderately tart cherry and currants. Midway through hints of funk come into play before slight vanilla pushes the funk aside. Very slight oak comes in near the end, fading into a moderately tart ending. Mouthfeel is good, with soft carbonation.

Overall I really enjoyed this beer. It’s not as complex as Cantillon’s Schaerbeekse offerings but it’s not terribly far behind. Worth a shot even at the steep price.

glid02, Aug 25, 2011
Photo of popery
4.4/5  rDev +13.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Notes from 8/7/11. Pours a hazy, bright, deep red with absolutely no head. The beer is dead flat. Probably an 8/10 on the pucker scale. It’s nice and sour. The aroma is mostly sour cherries mixed with a decent dose of barnyard funk. It’s not a super complex aroma, but I like it. Taste is big sour cherries. Tried this right before NG Raspberry Tart, and I’ll take the Scarenbecca over that, any day of the week. This is a very nice sour cherry lambic, and I’d love to try it against 3F’s, some time.

popery, Aug 16, 2011
Photo of jcartamdg
3.6/5  rDev -7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Pours cranberry red in color with no apparent carbonation. Aroma of cherries, some funk and some leather. Taste follows the nose but man this is a tart kriek in the best way possible. I really love the taste but the complete lack of carbonation is disappointing. I like this but even with some mild carbonation I would love this!

jcartamdg, Aug 06, 2011
Photo of jsanford
3.3/5  rDev -14.7%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

375ml bottle poured into a Geuze glass.

A - Pours a completely still burgundy. No bubbles at all. I know many of the Hanssens offerings have low carbonation, but geez...
S - Big aromas of high-quality cherry, oak, brown sugar, and vanilla. Very nice, not quite as "bright" as the Cantillion or Boon offerings. Funk is definitely there, slightly cheesy.
T - Lots of tart cherry pie flavors, with a touch of that cheese funk, brown sugar, leather, and oak. Very smooth and drinkable, this is missing much of that acid burn finish I get from a lot of other Krieks (my reflux certainly is happy about this!).
M - The flat carbonation certainly hurts this for me. I'm well aware that not all Lambics need sharp, "spritzy" carbonation, but a little would have went a long ways for me here. Medium-bodied with a pretty slick mouth-feel.
O - Glad I tried it but definitely not worth the $25 I paid, especially when the 3F Schaerbeek Lambic runs about 7 bucks more for a 750. Just sayin.

jsanford, Aug 01, 2011
Photo of HopHead84
4.25/5  rDev +9.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

7/28/2011

375ml bottle purchased for $11.99.

Poured into a snifter. Bottle opens with a feeble pop.

A: Pours out flat with tiny fast fading bubbles that quickly settle to nothing. The beer is burgundy with some transparency.

S: Sweet and sour cherries remind me of cherry pie. Oak is evident with a little vanilla. Musty cherry skins accompany barnyard notes and a little leather. The fruit smells fantastic.

T: Immediately piquant, puckeringly so, with a vibrant cherry presence and a moderate lactic sourness. Oak is evident midpalate, accompanied by earth, light barnyard characteristics, and a faint leather presence. The beer is pleasantly acetic, with evident tannins and a moderate citric acidity. Vinegar is light in the flavor. The cherry profile is stellar. The dry finish is increasingly acetic with matching citric notes; the beer ends with a mouth puckering cherry tartness.

M: Medium body with essentially no carbonation. I don't mind a flat lambic, but the overall experience would have been improved with carbonation. The mouthfeel is dry, sticky, and tannic.

Overall: A delicious kriek, but carbonation would have made this exceptional. Recommended.

HopHead84, Jul 29, 2011
Photo of SFLpunk
3.28/5  rDev -15.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Purchased at Beverage Warehouse Winooski. 375mL green glass cork & cage. No date to be found but the first to ever make it to VT.

Pours still and deep Gothic red. Nose is classic for a nice Kriek, deep dark cherries, oak, woodland floor, leaves, acetic acid, etc. Palate is bracingly sour with a shot of sweetness midpalate that fades on the finish. Super dark cherry flavor, then oak boards, then cherry skins, then earth. No carbonation at all. Finish is sweet rather than drying (not tannic).

Note: Nice, but super pricey which leaves me wondering why I paid $22 for this. Not as good as the Experimental Cassis in my book.

SFLpunk, Jul 19, 2011
Photo of bluejacket74
3.55/5  rDev -8.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12.7 ounce corked and caged bottle, no date on it. Served in a tulip glass, the beer pours a hazy ruby red/purple color with no head at all. No lacing, either. Aroma is sweet and tart cherries, funk, and some oak. The taste is the same as the aroma, but not quite as nice. It's all cherries, funk and oak. Mouthfeel/body is medium, it feels flat with very low carbonation. It is pretty easy to drink. It's a decent enough brew, but it's certainly not worth the money I paid for this ($19.99 a bottle). Disappointing for the price.

bluejacket74, Jul 09, 2011
Photo of amccormi
4.65/5  rDev +20.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

The beer was deep crimson (red seems too podunk of a discription). There was no head as it was pretty much still.

Aroma of cherry (duh), a touch of vanilla or almond, a hint of nutmeg, and a bit of barnyard funk annd lactic acid in the background.

Flavor of sich cherry and vanilla/almond dominate. There is sourness, but compared to other Hanssens beer it is subdued.

The mouthfeel was incredibly smooth and I will say hands down this is the best Kriek I will never buy again, unless I become very wealthy, which would be great. The cherry and the funk blecd so well to creat this smooth rich flavor with all the complexity you could ever need. It hits the style right on the head.

amccormi, Jul 03, 2011
Photo of ktrillionaire
4.2/5  rDev +8.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Consumed with beersack in honor of his good grades in law school.

A - The pour is near-still, and is a deep red hue, akin to pomegranate juice or red wine. The look is menacing, at any rate, which is appropriate given the malicious level of sourness which is wrought upon the palate.

S - The aroma is much more faint than the taste, offering mostly fresh tart cherry notes, some oak, and a big dose of minerals (vitamins, actually.)

T - The taste first washes across the palate and expresses intense notes of cherry fruitiness; this appreciation is quickly obliterated by Hanssens' hallmark face-crushing sourness. Not that its a bad thing. If I wanted mellow, I wouldn't be grabbing Hanssens. I cannot say what kind of acidity it is, but it doesn't strike me as acetic or lactic, instead more likely tartaric, fumaric, citric, or malic acid; something akin to War Heads candy, though it retains a high degree of real fruit flavor. Oak is not particularly notable here for me, except for in a drying tannic sense, and the focus is generally split between the vibrancy of the cherries and the puckering pungency of the tart flavor.

M - Much more lively of a mouthfeel than the appearance might suggest. Good stuff, replete with a dry long dry finish.

O - Quite sour. Expensive, too. Overall, this is a very good beer that does not reach the highest of heights, but is not terribly far off either. I can see people being thrown off by 1. pricetag 2. pungency 3. low/no carbonation. I am not bothered by any of those things.

ktrillionaire, Jun 21, 2011
Photo of womencantsail
4/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Thanks to Chris for sharing this one and Arne for the harassment.

A: The beer pours dark red color with no bubbles or head.

S: Nice black cherry aroma with a mild funk and sourness. Some straw and grass with a mild lemon/lactic sourness. Light wood to the aroma, but overall sort of subtle.

T: More tartness than you would expect from the nose. Nice cherry flavor. Slight cherry pie flavor with a nice sourness, too. Some grass, lemon, and a slightly musty oak note.

M: Medium in body with little to no carbonation.

O: Quite a nice beer. Unfortunately, it's just too bad that it's so expensive.

womencantsail, Jun 18, 2011
Photo of jrallen34
2.9/5  rDev -25.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

bright, clear and dark blood red, stunning, but a a total lack of carbonation... the aroma is very light, the faintest hit of tart farm musk a little cherries, needs more going on, as it warms does become much muskier, not sweet enough or hefty enough... taste shows some nice tartness, almost makes me pucker, wine like, lots of oak, cherries show through in a sweet way, as this warms it becomes even sweeter tons of grape juice... weak mouthfeel, very flat finish... nothing I would get again.

jrallen34, Jun 15, 2011
Photo of sweemzander
4.38/5  rDev +13.2%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

12.7oz corked and caged bottle poured into a stemmed glass.

(A)- Pours the deepest and darkest crimson to almost plum color I have ever seen in this style. Despite a vigorous pour, just some transparent bubbles formed. Tiny bits of lace however did form afterwards.

(S)- A lovely rich combination of tart cherry, mild funky (lactic) oak, a kiss of an oaky vanilla. Finishes lightly acidic. The funk really brings it home; turns a subtle cheese/mushroom smell as it warms.

(T)- A nice acidic tart bite in the middle. Finishes with rich bits of cherry tartness and dry oak. Cleaner taste than the finish of the smell led me to believe, but the lactic acidity opening up is nice.

(M)- Just about flat, though the hefty acidity helps. A clean finish, though the opening and middle palate is very nice. This has a good sourness without being over the top as well.

(D)- If this had just a bit more carbonation to it, it really would benefit this immensely, however, everything else is really on point. Ridiculously expensive for a bottle of this. For just a few more dollars, you could buy a bottle of Lou Pepe. This one does offer a nice experience though, but this is far too expensive per ounce for a repeat purchase.

sweemzander, Jun 14, 2011
Photo of callmemickey
4/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: Deep blood red body. Only a few bubbles here and there. Looks like a Hanssens--still as wine.

S: Sour cherries, light fresh oak, and the slightest bit of wet hay.

T: Intense sour cherries. Highly acidic. Wine like tannins and some mild fresh oak. A bit of must.

M: Completely still--but I don’t think it hurts the beer at all. I know this will be a hang up for some though.

O: Overall, a nice Hanssens offering that provides a deep fruit flavor that is reminiscent of wine.

callmemickey, Apr 28, 2011
Photo of ThreeWiseMen
4.18/5  rDev +8%
look: 3 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

JustinA1 popped this one open last night. Thanks dawg.

Poured into a Cigar City snifter.

Appearance: No head - looks utterly flat. That flaw aside, the body's gorgeous: deep burgundy with light murkiness. No head means no lacing. I wonder if it's normally like this.

Smell: Red and black cherries all over the place! Jammy, earthy, and decidedly sour. I want to say I get lemonade (I get lemonade in a lot of sour lambics), but maybe not; this smells like pure cherry through and through. Awesome!

Taste: Black cherry, lemon juice, and that's about it. Pure kriek. Intensely sour with hardly any earthy or funky undertones. As with the aroma, this is excellent!

Mouthfeel: Pretty flat and thin without much character. Very sour, but also very watery.

Overall: Great taste and aroma, but the carbonation needs to be reworked. Could be more complex, but I like that this is such a pure kriek. Get some!

ThreeWiseMen, Apr 15, 2011
Photo of John_M
4.28/5  rDev +10.6%
look: 3 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

The beer pours a dark rose color with no head retention or lacing. The beer is completely still.

The nose is outrageous, but I love how the cherry and raspberry dominate the sour, barnyard funk. This beer doesn't smell nearly as disgusting as I was expecting. On the palate, this is such a complex beer. The sour barnyard funk is up front and personal, but there is a considerable amount of sweet fruit as well (though the sour dominates). Also, this beer has a considerable wine component to the flavor profile that is intriguing. Acidity seems very high, with a biting, tingling component. I also get a hint of salt as well (though it's subtle). Mouthfeel is light to medium bodied, with a long, smooth, sour funk finish. As for drinkability, this isn't drinkable at all. It's a nasty, sour, barnyard funk infused beer that should be poured down the drain rather than aged in innocent, inoffensive oak barrels. Disgusting... and yet, very, very impressive.

John_M, Apr 03, 2011
Photo of Gueuzedude
4.5/5  rDev +16.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Sampled at Redlight Redlight; January 2011
As expected this beer pours quite flat, though it does manage to scare up a bubble or two. The beer is a deep purple color that shows a lightly hazed, deep cranberry hue when held up to the light. The aroma smells musky, has a sort of musty foot note to it that hasn't quite gotten to rank levels, there are some definite plastic phenolic notes that mix in with a rustic animal like muskiness and it surprisingly doesn't really smell like cherries; there is a touch of tartness here, perhaps some cherry skin-like notes, but it doesn't have the bright cherry fruit character of 3 Fonteinen Schaerbeekse Kriek. It does have a touch of the floral character that the latter has with a touch of carnation and perhaps a touch of something like roses. As the beer warms up it becomes a bit more funky

The flavor is tart up front and it gets more tart with the cherry contribution as it rolls across the palate. It is near bone dry, but has a palate fullness to it from a certain viscous quality. The finish has a cherry flavor to it that reminds me of roses and cedar (of all things); the beer is definitely woody from the oak and it hints of a slight tannin character and astringency (which is likely muted by the lack of carbonation). The beer is very dry, yet it manages to have a cherry fruit character that comes through despite the lack of sweetness; flavors of cherry as well as a rich, though somehow not actually, fruitiness that is more floral than anything. As the beer warms up it picks up a hint of sweetness, which accentuates some more of the cherry flavors. The tartness here is contributed by a nice lactic note as well as a tartness from the cherries; it is not aggressive but just bracing and I definitely like it. I really like that this doesn't have the harsh acetic acidity that the two experimental Lambics had. The funkiness that is here provides some balance and complexity, which is really what this beer is all about; especially considering how integrated and soft the cherry character is. I am really enjoying this in the end, it is far better than the experimental Lambics from Hanssens.

Gueuzedude, Mar 26, 2011
Photo of craytonic
3.93/5  rDev +1.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Appearance: Dark crimson-purple pour, completely still

Smell: Tart cherries, light funk. Slighly sweet

Taste: Sour cherries with leather, light molasses, oak and light funk. Slightly sweet finish surprisingly. I am just not a fan of schaerbeek cherries I suppose. I'd go for the cantillon lou pepe or drie fonteinen schaerbeek kriek given the choice.

Mouthfeel: COmpletely still

craytonic, Mar 23, 2011
Photo of djmichaelk
4.38/5  rDev +13.2%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

375ml bottle from Whole Foods in Tampa, into a snifter. Drinking with a few cheeses, including aged parmesan, 5-year-old gouda, and some brie.

A -Pours a beautiful translucent cherry-red. Just a touch of cloudiness, but other than that it's fairly clear. No head or signs of carbonation, which is expected for an unblended lambic.

S - Unsurprisingly, tart cherries dominate. Elements of funky cheese, balsamic vinegar. Just a bit of sweetness lurks in the background.

T - The flavor falls just a bit short of the nose, but is still excellent. Very sour cherry, notes of vinegar and lactic acid. The oak is subtle, but it's there. Not nearly as sweet as the aroma might lead you to believe -- this is the antithesis of those artificially sweetened lambics that you see in most bars. The cheeses definitely bring the funkiness out and give it more depth.

M - Those who review this beer poorly based on a lack of carbonation should keep in mind that this style is generally expected to be still. It's reasonably full and round, with a medium dry finish. It drinks much like a glass of wine.

O - This is an excellent beer, and highly recommended. The price may scare some off, but if you can afford it it's worth the plunge, at least once.

djmichaelk, Mar 22, 2011
Photo of nniicckkww
4.22/5  rDev +9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Poured from a 375ml bottle into a chalice. No head or lacing. Still. Slightest bubbles appear if you tilt the glass and hold it up to the light. Deep ruby purple color. Just a bit of haze. Aroma of sour cherries, acid and funk.

Very sour with the first sip. Lots of cherries. Delicious. The most cherriest beer I've encountered. Just the right amount of wet hay/barnyard funk to make this beer interesting. The finish is dry and crisp and mouth-puckering. Grassy. Again, cherries. Yum. The sourness is less perceptible as you drink on. Very balanced yet aggressive at the same time.

Drinkability gets hit because it's $26 a bottle. Delicious beer and the best still beer I've ever had. I still think that some carbonation would make this brew epic.

My wife LOVED the cherry flavor. Big ups to her as I returned home after work with a surprise in the fridge: this beer accompanied by two bottles of 3F Oude Kriek. I have the best wife ever!!!

nniicckkww, Mar 21, 2011
Photo of UnknownKoger
2.83/5  rDev -26.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Like one of the reviewers down below, this is an odd review since it ranks high in a couple of categories, but low in others. I was really looking forward to this beer since I'm a fan of Hanssens Oude Gueuze. Also, this wasn't the cheapest bottle.

Uncaged and uncorked it, and there's no pop. Uhoh. Upon pouring, there is absolutely zero carbonation. Great. As a result, there was no head on this beer, but it seems there generally isn't according to the other reviews. The color is absolutely beautiful though. It looks like cherry juice.

Smell is interesting. You can definitely smell the tartness of the cherries and a little bit of sweet funk. And the taste? To me it was disappointing. It tasted like flat, over fermented cherry juice. I really tried to enjoy this beer but ultimately could not. Maybe if this was carbonated I might enjoy it some more, but there really wasn't much there to win me over.

I didn't feel like finishing the bottle, and it broke my heart to drainpour the last couple of ounces, but I really could not see myself finishing the bottle. Similarly, I can't see myself buying this beer again. Maybe I just had a bad bottle? I don't know

UnknownKoger, Mar 13, 2011
Scarenbecca Kriek from Hanssens Artisanaal bvba
87 out of 100 based on 140 ratings.