1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Major Tom's Pomegranate Wheat - The Fort Collins Brewery

Not Rated.
Major Tom's Pomegranate WheatMajor Tom's Pomegranate Wheat

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
74
okay

369 Ratings
THE BROS
70
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 369
Reviews: 214
rAvg: 3.19
pDev: 16.93%
Wants: 4
Gots: 7 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
The Fort Collins Brewery visit their website
Colorado, United States

Style | ABV
Witbier |  4.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Beaver13 on 03-16-2005)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Major Tom's Pomegranate Wheat Alström Bros
Ratings: 369 | Reviews: 214 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of WACHUSETTblue
WACHUSETTblue

Georgia

3.28/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

not a bad beer pours leaving a about a finger of head that quickly dissipates leaving little to no lacing. is a light golden color similar to more generic beers like a Budweiser for say. taste is light but overall pleasing more of a watery feel very drinkable you could say , the pomegranate is very noticeable . I would defiantly recommend this beer to someone who likes fruity beers .

This is my first review on this site so please if you have any advice message me thanks

Serving type: bottle

04-06-2011 23:25:05 | More by WACHUSETTblue
Photo of rawfish
rawfish

California

2.65/5  rDev -16.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Bottle to NB globe pours honey gold with a bit of orange glow into the glass netting a film of forth with no lacing. Color is nice but nothing else really amazing.

Smell is all over the place, a lot of variety but not exactly pleasant. Dry grain, bready malts, fruit tartness and sweetness, though not pomegranate, more like berries followed by sulfur, yeah it's definitely sulfur, not rotten eggs strong or anything but a bit off putting.

Taste is of dried grain with a wheaty twang, not earthy at all but rather bright and bland. Not much sweetness to the fruit and a vinegar tart finish on the end of the drink. Tastes a little like a failed berliner wiesse. In addition the finish starts of drying with a little bit of grain husks then sulfur on the palate than lingers on through the dryness. What bitterness there is, is accompanied by drying sulfur.

Okay if you ignore the bad after taste the carbonation is lively and the drink is light bodied and easy. It even begins to dry pleasantly until the flavor kicks in. This would be fun if I didn't have tastebuds.

Not sure if I'm being harsh on this one but first of all this is not a witbeer, no orange, no coriander and no yeast character whatsoever. In addition that sulfite addition is not adding to the illusion of pomegranate in this. It's an average wheat beer exposed to a chemistry fair volcano. On the brightside, FCB finally proves to me they can produce a beer that is actually carbonated. * golf claps*

Serving type: bottle

04-02-2011 21:28:22 | More by rawfish
Photo of thagr81us
thagr81us

South Carolina

3.1/5  rDev -2.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Served from tap into a shaker. Poured a golden yellow with a one finger pure white head. Maintained excellent lacing throughout the glass. The aroma was comprised of sweet malt, wheat, spices, and orange zest. The flavor was of sweet malt, wheat, fruit, and subtle spices. It had a light feel on the palate with high carbonation. Overall this was a decent brew, but that was about it. It was slightly spicy for the style or at least what I'm used in this style. Wasn't really sure what to make of it, good or bad. I honestly wouldn't have guessed this to be a Witbier but rather a Spiced/Herbed style. Highly doubt I will be having this one again.

Serving type: on-tap

04-01-2011 13:37:16 | More by thagr81us
Photo of keethrax
keethrax

Minnesota

3.45/5  rDev +8.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a nice golden glass with a small head. Not a lot of aroma good or bad.

Fizzier than I would have expected, but not unpleasantly so with a lingering dry finish.

There's a bit of fruitiness to it, but it's hard to identify it as pomegranate. Not bad, just sorta "generic brightish fruit" instead of "hey! pomegranate".

Tasty and refreshing enough, but nothing special, and in particular no real pomegranate flavors.

Serving type: bottle

03-26-2011 00:10:00 | More by keethrax
Photo of Outchillen
Outchillen

Pennsylvania

1.83/5  rDev -42.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A friend let me try this, I dont know what I did to him

Im not one for bashing beers, but I didnt like this beer at all

A: Pale orange, light hazy, had red flakes floating in it? didnt look too much like a wheat beer to me, head dissipated right away

S:The biggest turn off was the smell, hard to even discribe

T:didn taste great, very unbalanced, didnt taste like Pom or wheat

overall if you'd like to try a pom wheat, i recommend Saranacs, ive heard FCB has good beers, but this missed the cut

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2011 22:30:21 | More by Outchillen
Photo of shand
shand

Florida

1.83/5  rDev -42.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Poured from a 12 ounce bottle into a pint glass.

This pours a clear golden colour with plenty of floaties suspended in the glass. The head was a nice inch and left some decent lacing ... what's with the floaties though? The aroma is fairly tart, no pomegranate to speak of, just general tartness over general "beeriness". The taste is just entirely non-descript. There's barely anything here beyond the generic beeriness and a touch of tartness. Very boring, there's really nothing here to enjoy.

The mouthfeel is fairly nice, it's crisp and well-carbonated. The drinkability? Eh, it's decent, but there's no reason. Overall? This is a bad beer. There's really nothing here to enjoy. I might have a bad bottle, because the floaties don't seem to be mentioned by any other review. I'd try it again, but wouldn't be fooled twice. Saranac's Pomegranate Wheat is much better.

Serving type: bottle

03-17-2011 02:15:08 | More by shand
Photo of LittleDon
LittleDon

Texas

3.43/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Golden with a bit of haze and plenty of carbonation. The head quickly disappears. Sweet honey like aroma. Good amount of carbonation on first sip. The fruit comes out in the middle with a bit of sourness. Nice amount of hops in the back. In the end the sour and bitter clash making for an odd finish. Medium body

Serving type: bottle

01-31-2011 22:02:46 | More by LittleDon
Photo of theboozecruise
theboozecruise

Louisiana

3.55/5  rDev +11.3%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

I've been seeing more of Fort Collins in the BR market... definitely a good thing. Pretty reasonable too, $9.99 for a 6-pack at the Bet-R.

I poured it from the 12 oz. bottle into a pint glass... it's a clear golden color with a white head and minimal retention and lacing... nothing special at all to look at.

The smell is full of wheat, but not a whole lot of pomegranate. It's pretty weak on the nose, hopefully more on the tongue.

There is definitely more pomegranate on the tongue, especially if you let the beer move around in your mouth and hit all the taste buds. It's pretty tasty actually, a good blend of fruit sweetness mixed with the body of the wheat and then some bitterness coming from the fruit as well on the end. Solid beer.

It's a little thin on the mouthfeel, but high marks for drinkability, this one goes down easy and I could definitely go for more.

Serving type: bottle

12-19-2010 00:57:11 | More by theboozecruise
Photo of ChangeBrewery
ChangeBrewery

Colorado

3.48/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A- A clear golden ale with decent lace down the glass.

S- The smell of beer was true to the wheat name with a floral aroma of the hops

T- A sharp bitterness on the approach followed by the crisp notes of the hops. The pomegranate is not overwhelming but very subtle.

M- Decent carbonation, average feel

D- Very drinkable and goes down easy.

Serving type: bottle

10-16-2010 16:47:19 | More by ChangeBrewery
Photo of WeezyBoPeep
WeezyBoPeep

Florida

2.25/5  rDev -29.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Live review. Poured from a bottle into a standard pint glass.

A: Slightly cloudy pale yellow with a tannish hue. Nice white foamy head. Laces well on the sides of the glass.

S: Super malty and hoppy and that's about it. Strange for a witbier. I detect light fruit but nothing else. Smells like an APA all the way, or a bad IPA.

T: How is this a witbier? Tastes like almost like an IPA with a light berry presence. Did I get an old bottle or something?

D: I can't really say I'd have more than one of these. If I was gonna drink a pomegranate ale I'd go with the Peak Organic.

Value: Pricey as heck for what it is.

Serving type: bottle

10-06-2010 23:23:55 | More by WeezyBoPeep
Photo of PorterLambic
PorterLambic

Florida

3/5  rDev -6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Seemed worth a try if for no other reason that the pomegranate aspect.
Pours a clear medium amber with a decent off-white head that drops quickly and leaves scant lacing.
Smell is hops, light fruit and malt.
Taste is malt, hops, fruit (tart) and vinegary.
A medium-bodied brew with a watery, dry finish. Medium effervescence. Overall, a decent beer but just a middle of the road one.

Serving type: bottle

09-21-2010 01:00:14 | More by PorterLambic
Photo of sauron681
sauron681

Wisconsin

1.68/5  rDev -47.3%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Pours a reddish blond color, with no head or lacing at all. Very clear, ( are you sure this is a wheat beer?)
Starts out lightly sweet, and finishes dry and chalky. Has a rancid aroma, with hints of lemon and citrus fruit. Has a very faint Hefe taste. I could not find no hints of pomegranate whatsoever.

Overall this was a disappointment, Not sure how a fruity "wheat" beer can be sweet and bitter? This could be better, pomegranate is a wonderful fruit to brew with. I use it once in a while in my homebrew witbier, and its great. With a little work they can greatly improve this beer.

Serving type: bottle

09-01-2010 02:55:35 | More by sauron681
Photo of beerthulhu
beerthulhu

New Jersey

3.23/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: The label claims a straw-blonde color, my eyes disagree and appeared more of a watery down orange with a bit of brass glow when backlit. The head was slight, bubbly and a bit soapy, quick to dissipate to a non-relevant status. Carbonation is light, amply spaced and fairly quick on the move. A lack of lacing offers little in the visual department not helping matters here.

S: Bits of tartness and pomegranate are evident. When agitated alcohol, sour green apples and wet hay and citrus are evident but don't necessarily play well together with a miss-mash of flavor that never gets going. Overall the strength was light.

T: Juicy pomegrante notes in the front, wet with a bit of apple juice follows up. There is a bit of wet tartness of lemon-lime, green apples and some sour pear fruitiness as well. The malting is barely worth mentioning, lightly dry and sweet, allowing the fruity nature of the drink to take over. Sweet and fruity upfront followed up by a sour twang of wet lemons on the finish.

M: The label claims it crisp, I claim it flat and boring, falling short of expectations and imaginative wishful thinking. Decent fluid viscosity, smooth with a juicy sweet fruitiness like appeal on the tongue. A light lemon tartness and green apple appeal ensures on the swallow.

D: Ones plenty for me thanks, even by style and not enough to recommend even a single purchase here.

Serving type: bottle

08-09-2010 22:55:23 | More by beerthulhu
Photo of BeerAdvocate
BeerAdvocate

Massachusetts

3/5  rDev -6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

From BeerAdvocate Magazine Volume II, Issue IV:

Pomegranate is still all the rage even though many people have claimed that several other fruits have more anti-oxidant qualities to it. Regardless, you have to consume a large amount of juice or actually eat the fruit in its natural form to get the true benefits. Word of warning about this beer, it oddly contains sulfites.

Healthy looking head with some clinging lace on the glass, clear golden color. Mild bready wheat aroma with a very distant and vague fruit tone and a faint whiff of sulfite. Graininess from the wheat comes off very bready, there is some astringent husk in the middle that doubles up with the modest hop bitterness and lively crispness. Light twang of fruit, can't really tell that it is pomegranate. Breath of sulfite up front. Finishes semi-dry with lots of hard lingering grain.

Not really sure where this beer was going, but it seemed to fall flat other than an OK American Wheat Ale flavor. As for the fruit and sulfites, the fruit missed the mark, and why are sulfites used? Keep that to wine and cider please.

Serving type: bottle

08-01-2010 14:40:03 | More by BeerAdvocate
Photo of jadpsu
jadpsu

Georgia

3.43/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours slightly hazy with a nearly white head that has good retention and execellent lacing.

Smell is of lemon peel. Taste has a litlle lemon that comes through. This brew is betterthan any wheat I have tried and for me that is favorable.

Not sure how true this is to it's wheat lable, as I don't care for wheat's and I find this one quite likeable.

Serving type: bottle

08-01-2010 03:04:13 | More by jadpsu
Photo of dstc
dstc

Florida

3.25/5  rDev +1.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a slightly cloudy gold with a big white head. Head falls fairly slow to a minimal one. Thin, even lacing.

Has a simple, mild wheat aroma. Fruit is buried on there as well.

Nice wheat taste. Ends with the flavor of the pomegranate and a sharp tartness. Lingering bitter, funky aftertaste that is a bit off-putting.

Medium bodied with mild carbonation and a slight bite.

So-so. Average wit but the pomegranate did nothing for me.

Serving type: bottle

07-15-2010 17:14:52 | More by dstc
Photo of DrDemento456
DrDemento456

Pennsylvania

3.53/5  rDev +10.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

My final brew I got in my variety case.

A - Poured a very light almost clear yellow with white head. Looks like a light beer.

S - Semi sweet Pomegranate with bitter wheat base.

T - Well it's not terrible but not great. It had a sort of off putting bitterness to it that made it hard to enjoy. It was OK for the style.

M - Light and refreshing

D - Well thankfully I only had four of them which were not much of a chore to consume but I really would have rather had Saranac Pomme offering.

Serving type: bottle

07-11-2010 04:45:00 | More by DrDemento456
Photo of Nesued
Nesued

South Carolina

3.3/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance - Very large head formed upon the initial pour. Resolved to a light ring with a bit of lacing on the pint glass. Clear (for a Witbier) with moderate carbonation continuing to feed the retained head.

Smell - Bright, sweet aroma with a tartness present as well.

Taste - Tart from the get go, but not a hoppy tart. A fruity component (I'm guessing the pomegranate concentrate...) takes center stage. The finish is very dry and crisp. Leaves you wanting another. A bit of a metallic bite as well. Not a natural feel.

Mouthfeel - Not much in the way of depth, but that's to be expected from a Witbier. Nice and light.

Drinkability - An obvious easy drinker. A bit too tart for me for a witbier, but I can see the appeal.

Serving type: bottle

05-15-2010 01:33:36 | More by Nesued
Photo of Rayek
Rayek

Colorado

3.05/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured into a Weizen glass.

A: Brilliant brass with stunning clarity and a steady stream of moderately sized bubbles. A small white cap is slow to form and quickly withdraws to a ring at the beer's edge. Leaves a light latticework of lace.

S: Smells like pomegranate on top of biscuits, with a light medicinal aroma.

T: Pretty malty at first, as cracker and straw flavors start things out. The pomegranate adds a nice fruity tartness in the middle. Bitterness is sharp and somewhat harshly metallic. Finishes tart, with some lingering pomegranate flavor.

M: The medium-light body is slightly syrupy and has the right amount of fizz.

D: This beer honestly didn't do much for me. A bit too harsh in the middle for me to truly enjoy it. The lightness; however, makes it go down quick.

Serving type: bottle

04-06-2010 00:16:12 | More by Rayek
Photo of tapman
tapman

Illinois

3.3/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Golden pilsner-like hue, perhaps a little darker ad is crystal clear. Is a brief one finger and the carbonation appears to be a little soft for the style.

Smells of biscuit malt, a little crystal malt, no hops except for a faint floral bitterness, and an extremely mellow pomegranate smell.

Big biscuit taste similar to a New Belgium brew. Pomegranate is earthy and not too tangy, though there is a pleasant tartness. I would have liked to see the use of pomegranate in this beer, while good in this recipe, paired with something lighter in the grain bill. For me too biscuity and not as refreshing as it could be. No hops except for slight floral note and a little bit of bittering.

Once again I find it too heavy on the palate with all the grain taste and I want it more refreshing.

I feel that these guys know how to make a great fruit beer, but this one isn't my favorite. I just wanted it lighter on the grain. Great use of pomegranate.

Serving type: bottle

04-05-2010 21:29:08 | More by tapman
Photo of SimplySinister
SimplySinister

Florida

2.8/5  rDev -12.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A - Truthfully, this ale resembles a typical macro a little too much. Totally transparent straw color, high carbonation, 1 inch fizzy snow head with poor retention, giving little lacing. Not a good start.

S - Hop notes are obvious with undertones of pomegranate. I can also pick up a little wheat bread as well. Though, all in all, very minimalist.

T - Malt party here. This brew is very bitter for a "wheat ale." I can taste hints of pomegranate present; although they are very subdued. This brew is actually reminiscent of some type of sour pomegranate flavored IPA.

M - Not very smooth and somewhat lingering on the palate. Not clean or crisp.

D - The drink-ability of this brew, for me at least, is poor. I'm not overly thrilled about this beer.

In summary, I don't really like this beer. I rarely say that, but in this case I feel that this brew warrants it. I disagree wholeheartedly with Fort Collins in classifying it as "sweet and tart." I find it to be rather bitter and sour. However, in this brews defense, the bottle that I received could very well be skunked.

Either way, I've said it before and I'll say it again. When a beer is mislabeled, or improperly categorized by the brewer, it will always receive low scores from me even if it does taste good. This is because if I'm in the mood for a stout, and I buy something labeled stout, I expect a stout. Likewise, I expected a wheat ale and I didn't get one. Therefore, I'm left disappointed. I don't mean this to offend, but its the truth. I honestly adore Fort Collins Brewery. Unfortunately, they have disappointed me with this offering.

Serving type: bottle

03-29-2010 21:18:42 | More by SimplySinister
Photo of FickleBeast
FickleBeast

New Jersey

3.28/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

12 oz bottle poured into a pint glass. Label has no useful information.

Pours clear yellow-amber with almost no head. I'm suprised it is not cloudy. Smell is sweet, fruity, but not yeast fruity. More like apples, or pomegranates, I suppose.

First sip is very sweet, with a bit of husky graininess on the aftertaste. No hops to speak of, not that they would be expected. Sweetness is very powerful, but not overpowering... there is a distinction. The pomegranate barely pokes through. There is a little too much residual sweetness for my liking, but I detect no off flavors or major negatives. This is just a beer that I only tried because I had it as part of a sampler. I wouldn't buy a sixer of this on its own, both before or after I've tasted it.

Serving type: bottle

03-27-2010 04:36:04 | More by FickleBeast
Photo of SamN
SamN

Colorado

2.75/5  rDev -13.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

A- First off, if a witbier is unfiltered, this ain't a wit. This is crystal clear. Like polished glass.

Anyways, like I said, this is a clear, amber brown color. Fairly good head, lace is already forming on my glass. Soapy white bubbles. Zero visible carbonation.

S- Tart fruits, pomegranate most likely, bing cherries, a sour hoppiness, more hops than I expected. Very slight wheat malts, mostly fruity hops. Not too bad.

T- Eh. Seems jumbled and busy, a bunch of flavors pushing through a narrow doorway. Very bitter hops, dry fruit, odd battle of flavors on the tongue. No real wheat character, this seems more like a pomegranate IPA. Too bitter and dry for me.

M- Light and thinner mouthfeel, less than average, no wheat smoothness.

For those of you keeping count, that is zero wheat beer characteristics.

D- Bitter and tart, no refreshing wheat character, and let me just say that pomegranate has no place in beer. This is pilot material, not the breweryflagship beer.

Serving type: bottle

03-06-2010 22:32:46 | More by SamN
Photo of Cyberkedi
Cyberkedi

Georgia

3.33/5  rDev +4.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a fairly standard clear amber with a fairly thick and fluffy white head - typical, but not off-putting. Aroma is yeasty and wheaty with a decided fruity overtone. Flavor is mainly of pomegranate, which I love, and has malty and yeasty undertones. It is slightly sweet and slightly hop-bitter. Texture is smooth and fairly fizzy, and it leaves an edgy, somewhat bitter aftertaste. Not great, but worth a try.

Serving type: bottle

03-04-2010 01:11:03 | More by Cyberkedi
Photo of GilGarp
GilGarp

Colorado

3.65/5  rDev +14.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Part of the lunchbox variety pack.

Served cold into a pint glass, it has a pale golden yellow color with great clarity and thin white head. It settles quickly leaving no lacing behind.

Aroma is pretty mild, hard to pick up much except a mild tropical fruit smell.

Flavor is surprisingly nice. Again very mild here but the pomegranate adds just the right amount of tartness.

Mouthfeel is light in body and appropriate carbonation.

Overall a pleasant surprise. It's not the predictable fruity wheat beer that I was expecting. A nice bit of bitterness and tartness gives it a real balance.

Serving type: bottle

02-25-2010 05:26:50 | More by GilGarp
Major Tom's Pomegranate Wheat from The Fort Collins Brewery
74 out of 100 based on 369 ratings.