1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Punkin Ale - Dogfish Head Brewery

Punkin AlePunkin Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
89
very good

4,544 Ratings
THE BROS
91
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 4544
Reviews: 1914
rAvg: 3.96
pDev: 12.63%


Brewed by:
Dogfish Head Brewery visit their website
Delaware, United States

Style | ABV
Pumpkin Ale |  7.00% ABV

Availability: Fall

Notes/Commercial Description:
A full-bodied brown ale with smooth hints of pumpkin and brown sugar. We brew our Punkin Ale with pumpkin meat, organic brown sugar and spices. As the season cools, this is the perfect beer to warm up with.

28 IBU

(Beer added by: NeroFiddled on 09-26-2002)
View: Beers (138) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Punkin Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 4,544 | Reviews: 1,914 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of GooberMcNutly
GooberMcNutly

Florida

3.1/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle. Little head with no lacing. Less pumpkin aroma than I was hoping for, more ginger notes and citrusy hop aromas. Nutmeg and ginger and malt notes on the palate with shades of molassas and burnt sugar. Stayed malty, even with evident hop bittering. More a gingerbread beer than a pumpkin beer.

Serving type: bottle

11-14-2006 21:27:03 | More by GooberMcNutly
Photo of dauss
dauss

Colorado

3.1/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Presentation: Standard 12oz bottle. Bottled on 8/16/2007. Other than that not much else. Standard DFH labeling format.

Appearance: Light amber color with a light hint of orange. Almost nonexistent head, even with a vigorous pour and served at cellar temperature.

Smell: The smell is quite well balanced. None of the spices are overpowering in the aroma. Nutmeg, caramel, brown sugar, and a light touch of allspice.

Taste: Not much spice flavor in this beer. Just a standard malt body, slight hint of cinnamon and nutmeg, moderate hop bitterness, with pumpkin and alcohol in the finish.

Mouthfeel: The body is on the thin side with thin mouthfeel.

Notes: Not too bad of a pumpkin beer. I'm glad they didn't go overboard with the spices like a lot of other breweries do. The base of the beer is nice. Would be easier to drink if the alcohol wasn't so high.

Serving type: bottle

12-14-2007 02:52:22 | More by dauss
Photo of brantadid
brantadid

New Jersey

3.1/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured a clear amber color with a thin white head. No lacing to speak of.

Smelled of nutmeg and cinnamon. I really expected more out of the nose.

All I can taste in this beer is spice. Nutmeg, allspice, cinnamon. I personally feel it is over spiced. Very long, spicy finish.

Mouthfeel is light. Carbonation is moderate.

A four pack is enough. I look forward to trying next years release however.

Serving type: bottle

09-14-2008 21:31:27 | More by brantadid
Photo of Buebie
Buebie

Minnesota

3.1/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Bottle courtasy of Hogwildliquore.
Bottling date of 9/4/08

Poured from a 12 oz bottle into a snifter. 1 finger white fizzy head. Transparent copper amber in color. Spotty lace, most of it slips back into the beer.

Aroma is quite oaky, some pumpkin pie spice, but mostly oak aroma and some alcahol fumieness.

Flavor starts out sweet with a good dosage of carbonation, more bittering oak flavor. Some alcahol warming at the swallow. Pumpkin pie spice kicks in after the swallow with a hint of cinnemon. Cracked peppercorn hop flavor. Smooth and clean finish with a hint of hop bittering.

Kinda put off by the big oak flavor and the bitterness. I was hoping for somthing a bit more sweet and desert like. Didnt like that peppercorn flavor either. Not a total loss though at 7% it should warm me up. :)

Serving type: bottle

11-06-2008 21:34:53 | More by Buebie
Photo of TheKingofWichita
TheKingofWichita

North Carolina

3.1/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a deep orange color with a white head that lasts a while, some decent lacing.
Smells of deep spices -- some nutmeg, cinnamon, allspice and others. Some deep pumpkin notes and malts as well.
Tastes much the same but smells much better than it actually tastes.
Mouthfeel is medium with low carbonation.
Fairly drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

10-10-2010 20:31:14 | More by TheKingofWichita
Photo of Mkfitz
Mkfitz

New York

3.1/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Dogfish head is usually one of my favs but this year's batch showed to be a little weak. It was one of the 19 beers my friends and I sampled in a blind tatse test. It finished up in the middle of the pack. There were some real high scores this year. I posted the results at the Tristate Beer Blog : http://tristatebeerblog.blogspot.com/2011/10/great-pumpkin-tasting-results-and.html Enjoy!

Serving type: bottle

10-30-2011 22:14:57 | More by Mkfitz
Photo of mattbk
mattbk

New York

3.1/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A- Wow, this beer is very interesting looking, I've never seen anything like it. It's clear, and appears to have been filtered; but its filled with junk, which I'm assuming are spices, or maybe pumpkin. On second look, it may be yeast. Light brownish, slightly amber.
S- Subtle spice, mostly cinammon in the nose. Esters, almost seems like this could be a British yeast. Not very aromatic, was expecting a bit more.
T- Hmm. Not sure I'm a fan. The first taste was brown sugar, but followed closely by a burnt malt flavor, which was out of place and a bit off putting. Perhaps that was the pumpkin flavor. The fruitiness from the yeast comes though in the flavor too. Slight malt sweetness, becoming more evdient as the beer warms. A little bit musty. Some alcohol in the finish too, warming as it goes down. I don't find this to be pleasant.
M- This seems overcarbonated. The body is fairly light, not sure that makes sense with the beer either, I suppose the light body is trying to make it drinkable? Confusing.
O- Maybe I have a bad bottle? I don't think I would get this again. The beer is being trying to be bold and approachable at the same time, and it just winds up being confusing.

Serving type: bottle

09-17-2012 00:55:35 | More by mattbk
Photo of Crosling
Crosling

Colorado

3.08/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This is going to be a quality taste test meeting. I have a good feeling about this one. This Punkin ale pours a mixed fall season leaves. The head is a light tan.

Huge Root Beer aroma. Sudbtle nuances of pumpkin and nutmeg illustrate the nose as well. This also kind of smells like a coke/vodka combination. It is quite wierd. It smells...just not great at all.

Blah. I'm struggling to get this stuff down. This stuff is total destruction to my mouth. No lack of flavor just bad flavor and this stuff is way too carbonated.

Yuck

Down the Drain

Not So Fast

This stuff is beginning to taste alright. It calmed down quite a bit. More spices are starting to come about. More pumpkin in the front palate. The mid-palate is still pretty gross but the finish has calmed and grown to be quite complex and lovely with banana creme pie cast as the most prominent "actor" in the play called "To Please My Mouth."

The mouthfeel has also grown to be quite lovely. Very full in the mouth.

Quite "alcoholic" in its linger.

Serving type: bottle

02-25-2004 06:55:22 | More by Crosling
Photo of Lothore
Lothore

California

3.08/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A- Clear orange color with a small white fizzy head.

S- Smells spicy, perfumey and pumpkiny.

T- Tastes slightly of pumpkin and spices with alcohol apparent. A bit to aritifical for my tastes.

M- Thick with a medium amount of carbonation.

D- I feel done after only a few sips. Not a drinkable brew by any means but not hard to get down.

Serving type: bottle

10-18-2007 05:37:08 | More by Lothore
Photo of jmerloni
jmerloni

Massachusetts

3.08/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A - A gorgeous pumpkin orange. Translucent. Big bright white head that's quite sticky.

S - Spices. Cinnamon, nutmeg. Pretty mellow and dumbed down.

T - Mostly just spices again. Cinnamon and nutmeg and a some pumpkin. Not real hoppy or bitter at all.

M - Too thick for the style. Finish is nowhere near dry.

D - Probably wouldn't get this again. The viscosity is a little much for this kind of beer. There are a few better pumpkin ales out there.

Serving type: bottle

09-03-2010 15:55:56 | More by jmerloni
Photo of WonderWoman
WonderWoman

Pennsylvania

3.05/5  rDev -23%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

I had this beer on tap at the Grey Lodge.
It poured a dark golden with a small rim of head that lingered for a short time.
The smell was of chewing gum that you get from the gumball machine for a nickel and some really awkward spices that didn’t mesh well together.
It tasted of light subtle spices with a tangy afterthought followed by hints of bubble gum.
The mouth feel was smooth and it coated my mouth. It also had energetic carbonation.
I don’t think I would order this one again. I didn’t care for it in the bottle and I don’t care for it on tap.

Serving type: on-tap

09-04-2006 15:06:09 | More by WonderWoman
Photo of Gasp100
Gasp100

Delaware

3.05/5  rDev -23%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This pours a nice, clear copper color with nice rising tan head and mild lacing down the glass. There was some scent that just seemed off to me -- I could get the pumpkin pie smell, but also like burnt rubber or something... weird.
The taste was pretty subdued. Definitely nutmeg, spice, cinnamon bit not nearly as pronounced as I remember it from last year.
I wasn't impressed as much this year; it is ok and I don't mind that it's subdued, but just not enough going on to keep me interested.

Serving type: bottle

09-17-2006 20:51:25 | More by Gasp100
Photo of cproioi
cproioi

Ohio

3.05/5  rDev -23%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

The body of this beer was an orangish amber color with an off white head leaving decent lacing. No bubbles present in the body.
The aroma and taste of this beer was loaded with brown sugar, cinnimon, allspice and nutmeg. The pumpkin taste was extremely faint and hiding behind all the other tastes and aromas. The mouthfeel was sort of grainy, with bubbles present on the tounge. There was a slight alcohol feel to it also but rather slight. The finish was loaded with residual sugars that loaded the tounge down. The beer was alright but not really impressive.

Serving type: bottle

10-01-2006 03:45:13 | More by cproioi
Photo of astronaut888
astronaut888

Tennessee

3.05/5  rDev -23%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Came highly recommended at my local shop - pointed out to me on the last 3 visits by 3 different folks. Not too familiar with Pumpkin ales, but liked the idea of a 7% beer, so gave it a shot.

Appearance: Very pretty orange-amber (Like a Pumpkin!). Nice head for maybe 2 minutes - no real lacing to mention.

Smell: Regular "ale" aroma with hints of allspice especially as it warmed.
Not overwhealming pumpkin at all...kind of wanted more of a pumpkin smell

Taste: Decent ale, with maybe a hint of pumpkin spice...wouldn't have detected it if I hadn't known this was a pumpkin ale.

Mouthfeel: Pretty smooth with no alcohol bite at all for 7%

Drinkability: Very drinkable, if not remarkable....will certainly have no problem finishing this 4 pack - but probably wouldn't buy again....at least not until next fall!


Update...
While finishing the 6 pack over a few days, I realized something very odd...this beer REALLY has the aroma of a urinal cake!
Not bashing the beer, but it certainly has an odd aroma that I can only describe as the smell of urinal cake hitting yer nose when you walk into a public restroom...
Am I the only one who thinks this?

Serving type: bottle

10-06-2006 23:50:08 | More by astronaut888
Photo of jakon
jakon

Oregon

3.05/5  rDev -23%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12 oz. bottle purchased for $2.29 on 9-23-7 at Cedar Hills New Seasons.

Pours a clear dark amber color with an impressive white head featuring tightly compacted bubbles which immediately remind me of the Fred. Aroma is primarily of malt and spices such as clove and cinnamon. The taste is malt liquorish with a little pumpkin and spice. The alcohol is out in the open and noticeable. Mouthfeel is light and almost watery with restrained carbonation. Overall, this is ok and I'm enjoying it, but it's really not something I'll seek out in the future.

Serving type: bottle

09-24-2007 07:42:32 | More by jakon
Photo of tayner
tayner

Arizona

3.05/5  rDev -23%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

poured a very orange color with a 1 inch head that receeded down to a covering that laced decently.

it smelled of alcohol and pumpkin. i was expecting cinnamon but did not smell that at all

the label says pumpkin, brown sugar, allspice, cinnamon, and nutmeg. I could only pick out the pumpkin and allspice, that was all. i expect the brown sugar is now the alcohol flavor i taste, but i think it was lacking the cinnamon and nutmeg. i was hoping it would be more "pumpkin pie" like but it was not.

it was light, and refreshing, more so than i expected for a fall/winter seasonal beer. was quite carbonated as well.

if you are a big fan of pumpkin and allspice im sure you could session this beer, but i think it needs more of a cinnamon and nutmeg flavor to be a fall/winter choice for me.

Serving type: bottle

10-30-2007 02:28:57 | More by tayner
Photo of beerman21
beerman21

California

3.05/5  rDev -23%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

From the look of this beer i would not say this is a brown ale on appearence alone. Smell was not what i expected nothing pronouced some pumpkin and malty background hints of spice. Taste of this brew was pretty well balanced with a sweet malty flavor hints of pumpkin but not to overwhelming. It has a nice hoppy background as well, creamy texture. Not a big fan of pumpkin ales. i've always wanted to find a decent pumpkin brew but everytime i seem to be disapointed. Luckily this by far is the best one i have tried. Doesnt taste like a artificial pumkpkin soda its a beers ladies and gentlemen and pretty decent one. Not great but decent give it a try but my days of buying pumpkin beers are over.

Serving type: bottle

01-23-2009 01:14:52 | More by beerman21
Photo of seedsofchaos
seedsofchaos

Illinois

3.05/5  rDev -23%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

One of the few DFH beers that I hadn't had before so I decided to try one of their 2010 batches. I wasn't impressed with the first but now, here with a fresh palate, I shall review the second.

Copper with some hints of ruby pours with virtually no head. Lacing is non-existent.

Nose is of pumpkin with a smell that is suggestive of light spices and a bit meaty, oddly enough.

Malts up front but are balanced with hops and spice. Everything plays together nicely with none outdoing the other but a mediocre balanced beer is still mediocre even when balanced. I don't get any cinnamon but more on the spectrum of light allspice and nutmeg. No discernible hop flavor as I would expect from a typical pumpkin, but since there is no strong spice flavor I would want a little more. Definite malts and pumpkin without a whole lot else backing this up...

Mouthfeel is smooth and creamy. Great for the style.

I have to say that I'm very disappointed with this brew from DFH overall. There isn't anything that makes it stand out from other commercial offerings and with the flood of pumpkin ales for the holiday season this beer is little more than lackluster for my taste buds.

Serving type: bottle

10-12-2010 00:36:05 | More by seedsofchaos
Photo of GCBrewingCo
GCBrewingCo

North Carolina

3.03/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours crystal clear amber orange with hardly any head. The spice aroma, while present is fairly muted. Just a slight hint of clove/cinnamon. The flavor is vegetal and not especially pleasing. The bitterness is fairly high and overpowers the spice. There is little alcohol burn until the finish and then dry subtle spice lingers along with some bitterness. The body is a little light.

I expected more. Dogfish is generally about more of everything. I would have expected more pumpkin, more spice, more everything...

Serving type: bottle

11-21-2003 00:53:52 | More by GCBrewingCo
Photo of normZurawski
normZurawski

New Jersey

3.03/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Looks ok, nothing special, thin amber. Smells like beer I don't really care for. Over-spice is all you get. Tastes like it smells. Light bitter finish, not in a good way. Lacks bite in the mouth. Finish lingers but is hurt by over-spiced imbalnce. So-so drinkability. This is the kind of beer that makes people not like DFH so much.

Serving type: bottle

10-17-2006 11:40:31 | More by normZurawski
Photo of DoubleJ
DoubleJ

California

3.03/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pumpkin ales are a rare find here in California. This offering can't be found in Cali....yet. Bought when I was in Phoenix recently. Well, on to the beer:

It's a filtered copper orange...you can see the carbonation bubbles in the body. The head is soapy, sits about a 1/2 inch high before dropping into a thin sheet. Lots of nutmeg in the aroma. Mild pumpkin sweetness compliments the nutmeg and assorted spices. The taste, right of the bat, is very spiced. Not much of a malt base, which would help this beer. The first few sips are pleasant, but thereafter it takes a little work to get down. The beer leaves a numbling feel on parts of the palate, with a strong kick of spice as it goes down the throat.

This one packs a wallop of spice. The warming feeling feels nice, but the taste could be a little nicer.

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2009 03:24:38 | More by DoubleJ
Photo of scottfrie
scottfrie

California

3.03/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle into snifter. 2010 edition.

A: Pours a bright glowing orange with a thin short-lived fizzy head that vanished into a faint film and collar around the glass. Some streaks of wispy lace present.
S: Smells strongly of allspice, nutmeg, and maybe cinnamon. As I swirl the glass around I can pick out notes of pumpkin pie filling, but not much.
T: Again, lots of spices dominate a touch of pumpkin flavoring. Alcohol and a touch of hop spiciness rounds out the finish. Good flavor, but not great.
M: Fairly slick not quite watery mouthfeel over a medium-thin body. Carbonation is prickly and sharp and the alcohol isn't hid very well.
D: I was disappointed by this one. I could have sworn I loved this beer last year, but then again my palate has matured immensely. I'll lay down one or two bottles and see how they do with a little age.

Serving type: bottle

09-21-2010 01:45:03 | More by scottfrie
Photo of xnicknj
xnicknj

Pennsylvania

3.03/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

on tap at devils den in philly

Pours a clear auburn color with some lighter pumpkin colored hues. Light froth of off-white head rests on top, leaving a few spots of lacing on the glass.

A cornucopia of spice in the nose with cinnamon, nutmeg, and pumpkin notes. Faint hops and bready notes, caramel sweetness, light warmth.

Spicy and sweet up front with nutmeg and cinnamon. Pumpkin flavor with leafy hops. Caramel and bready backbone. Kind of a mix between pumpkin pie and a spice bomb. Finishes a bit warm and sticky.

Medium body, high carbonation, sticky and lingering on the tongue. This wasn't bad, but not exactly something I'd want again.

Serving type: on-tap

11-04-2011 15:05:49 | More by xnicknj
Photo of siege06nd
siege06nd

Virginia

3.03/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Poured into a Sam Adams Perfect Pint

A: This beer pours a slightly cloudy, light orange hue. Fades to a golden straw color on the sides. A little lighter than I am used to. About a finger of off-white head emerges and gradually settles to a quarter finger, idly resting atop the beer. Looks more like an IPA than a big, hearty pumpkin ale.

S: I admire the fact that the bouquet on Punkin' has a lot of roasted pumpkin. This isn't just a "Pie Spices in a Beer" pumpkin ale. I get a decent amount of the vegetable smell and I'm digging it. Just a hint of the brown sugar, clove, and cinnamon. Good job.

T: Roasted pumpkin, brown sugar, cinnamon, and allspice. Not pulling a lot in terms of malt or hop presence. The taste is certainly more spice forward, the vegetable notes take a step down here from the smell. Almost a medicinal finish.

M: I think this is were Punkin Ale suffers. Carbonation seems way too high for such a thin beer. The cinnamon (or is that allspice) really torches the back of my palate, too. Has a curiously dry, thin finish. Isn't a pumpkin ale supposed to be a savory treat? Mouthfeel here scream cheap and thin to me.

O: Not impressed. The beer smelled quite good, but the taste took a dive and the mouthfeel was poor. No malt presence to balance out the cloying and drying spices. Curiously high carbonation and an overwhelmingly thin feel. My guess is this would be a massive hit among the BMC drinkers, as it tastes like a Miller infused with pie spice. Not digging it.

Serving type: bottle

11-27-2011 17:07:35 | More by siege06nd
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

Texas

3.03/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

12 fl oz brown glass bottle with standard pressure cap served into a Uinta brewing pilsner glass in me gaff in low altitude Los Angeles, California. Reviewed live. Expectations are above average. Acquired as part of a four pack at the Cap 'N' Cork in Los Angeles a few hours ago.

Served straight from the refrigerator. Not paired with food.

A: Pours a four finger white head of nice cream, pretty good thickness, and good retention for the relatively high ABV. Colour of the body is textbook transparent copper. No yeast particles are visible. No bubble show. Fairly vibrant, but nothing special.

Sm: Brown sugar, spice (including distinct cinnamon), clean malts, light toasted malts, and pumpkin. Pumpkin is substantial - a good characteristic for the style (you'd be surprised how many pumkin beers I've had that featured very little pumpkin). I'm excited for it. Aroma is dry in character and average in strength.

T: Spice and pumpkin are the first thing I notice, with some texture-affecting brown sugar throughout. The foundation is comprised of clean bland malts. The spices don't feel all that balanced. It's got body, but mostly because of the mouthfeel rather than the flavour. No yeast comes through at all. The pumpkin is nice. The brown sugar comes through most on the climax, where I can almost feel it rotting my teeth. It's a pretty sugary build all around - a substitute here for Dogfish Head's usual trademark sweetness. Where their IPAs are sweet, this is sugary. Some limited subtlety, but little complexity or impressive layering. Indeed, there's nothing unique or special here. Feels manufactured and par for the course. No alcohol comes through. I do get cinnamon.

Mf: Surprisingly dry, with emergent wetness only coming roughly at the midpoint. A bit too thick. Smooth. The mouthfeel distracts from the flavour. Adequately carbonated.

Dr: Horribly overpriced for the disappointing quality. I expected no better from Dogfish Head. I wouldn't get this again. A bit rubbish. Drinkable but boring and bland. Rather simple. Hides its alcohol well.

Low C+

Serving type: bottle

09-30-2012 05:10:02 | More by kojevergas
Punkin Ale from Dogfish Head Brewery
89 out of 100 based on 4,544 ratings.