Boddingtons Pub Ale | Boddingtons

YOUR RATING = None |
BA SCORE
73
okay
1,103 Reviews
THE BROS
55
awful
Read the review
BEER STATS
Reviews:
1,103
Ratings:
2,701
Avg:
3.19
pDev:
31.97%
 
 
Wants:
46
Gots:
367
For Trade:
0
Boddingtons Pub AleBoddingtons Pub Ale
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Boddingtons
United Kingdom (England) | website

Style: English Pale Ale

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.70%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by Todd on 10-20-2001

View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Reviews: 1,103 | Ratings: 2,701
Photo of jpkoch1962
2.48/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Quite forgettable ale. Very light copper color with a dense white head. Faint aroma of fuggles in the background. Very thin body and mouthfeel. The front end and middle was oily with little to no malt character. Weak bitterness can be detected in the finish. Not worth the 7 bucks a 4-pack they ask for.

 303 characters

Photo of SubpoenaDeuces
2.48/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A: the head is a full two finger affair that subsides after a moment into some gentle lacing, nothing out of the ordinary, particularly for the belgium strong style. Strangely calm color, inbetween brass and copper, nothing too menacing here, a step above a pale ale in its appearance.

S: grapes (white), pear, a bit of honey dryness, clove, nothing musky or out of the ordinary. very sweet bouquet.

T: very sweet on the palate, no hoppy finish, almost sweet through and through, the finish is a mild crisp ginger almost, reminscient of a saison, not in the style of a belgium strong. the sweet fruit notes come through and linger shortly.

M: the straw appearance gives an upfront note as to what you will be expecting, a quick burn that doesnt coat especially well, but the yeast is present and allows the spiciness to gently pass. Upon tasting a creaminess develops to enhance the fruit notes, but again, passes rather quickly.

D: A solid blend between a saison style and belgium table ale, I feel the "STRONG" is a bit misplaced, but maybe my american palate is too jaded for extremes, however, this is made in Chicago, where are the meat packing houses and the spirit of the Jungle, the bitter cold, the inclement people? This is a solid Nissan Altima of belgium ales, very drinkable but not quite notable in any respect. In light of the pircetag, probably will not purchase again, pound for pound. The 7 percent is nice, but with the hops and ABV arms race out there, you can get pilsners in 7 percent so its particularly not a heavy hitter for its style.

Narrative: You said this would be the last time, you curse yourself, breath swilling cold in circlets from your lips, "you ARE A BLGIUM ALE" you told yourself that when you looked in the bezzled mirror, you told yourself when you fill up your handbag, dont sell yourself short, you can do this. A john approaches in a Mitsubishi Mirage, not exactly your market but hey, "Belgium strong, what's your pleasure" he looks displased...is it...my color? No...I look almost how I should.." YOU? You're a belgium strong? I had you pegged more for a French farmhouse girl...whats youre into?" He's judgmental, and I am nervous, he knows, he knows I am mediocre and he's smelling it as well "I am into whatever can foot the bill sweetie" He gestures knowingly that this baleful ale will be costly but ultimately fulfilling. The mighty 4 cylinder revvs towards consumption.

 2,428 characters

Photo of Lemke10
2.48/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a clear amber orange color with the perfect long lasting head. Scent is sweet with malts with some hints of grain. Taste is light almost like it lighter than water. Has this cheap grain taste while having a bitter crispness to it. It finishes with a chalky malt after taste. Not my kind of beer by any means.

 314 characters

Photo of Murrhey
2.48/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a nitro-can into a pint glass. Reviewed live.

A- Cascading head that dissolved into a finger and a half thick white head. Thick and creamy looking. Clear amber body, and fading carbonation. Soapy lacing.

S- Slight smells. Noble hops, golden malts. Nothing leaps out. Not impressive smelling beer.

T- Creamy, easy drinking but nothing stands out. Just...nothing here really.

M- Creamy and smooth. Just what was intended.

O- Not special. I like nitro-cans though.

 482 characters

Photo of cbutova
2.47/5  rDev -22.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A- Poured out of the can after a massive hiss into a pint glass. Dark-golden, clear body with a massive cascade of silky nitrogen bubbles which ends up being a head of about one finger with great retention. Nice thick lace spots here and there.

S- Not a ton going on. Light malts, honey sugars, light fruits remind me of white grape/apple and some floral hints. A tiny bit buttery. Strength dies with each minute.

T- Pretty much just like the nose but not as hard to pick up. A good deal of light cracker malts, honey sweetness, caramel, buttery popcorn kernel hints, light fruits like apple/white grape. There is a bit of a floral and herbal thing going on, I guess they added some hops.

MF- Pretty much just feels watery to me. There is a light bit of bubbles but overall it reminds me of almost flat soda. Slight bitterness in the finish.

I don't think the nitro aspect of this beer enhances it in any way. It just feels watery to me and that doesn't help the buttery, popcorn kernel flavor going on. Potential is there but it just doesn't work out for me.

 1,063 characters

Photo of harrymel
2.46/5  rDev -22.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Canned: unk
Pours golden with fleeting inverted foam infusion which rises to a half finger of fine foam. Smells sweet with some floral character and wheat tones. Taste follows through with a subtle profile of grain and artificial sweetener and a little bitterness on the finish. Medium bodied with fine, low carb. Overall, this is a drinkable beer when I simply want something to quench my thirst, but that's about it. Nothing worth seeking.

From notes verbatim on 10/7/10
A: Draught can pours as typical. Raining, fine foam which hangs out for quite some time. Brilliant clarity.
S: Not much to be said here. Sweet and grainy.
T: Grain. Sweet, okay ale. Not great, but drinkable.
M: Smooth, cask feel with little impact. Medium body, low carb.
D: I could pound this. It doesn't carry the profile for appreciating at a sit down.

 831 characters

Photo of callmescraps
2.46/5  rDev -22.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Another mix-pack offering. Haven't had one of these in years. Glad to try it again.

Appearance- Well, the nitro can ensures that it's going to look pretty nice. Starts off as a foamer. It's got a very light copper, sort of dirty hay color. The head builds as the nitrous bubbles foam toward the top. It settles into an incredibly rich, creamy 1/4 inch head. Sweet looking. The lack of lacing takes some points off.

Smell- Biscuity malt. Yeasty, like un-baked bread. A little bit of hop citrus bite. Grainy, with a strange metallic tang. Almost has a scotch-like hint.

Taste- Sweet biscuit malt. That strange metallic wang is back. Unfortunately it all put off again by a real grassy hop bitterness. Sort of a tea-like note. It's fine, and then an off note will hit. Either metallic or herbal hop. Unfortunate.

Mouthfeel- Really, really thin. That nitro can is just a body-killer. Even the lady friend, not one to analyze beers in this way, noted that the body is really disappointing.

Drinkability- If it would just be bland it'd be better.

This is a real disappointment. Not sure what went wrong here, but it seemingly all did. Really surprised how disappointed I was in this one.

 1,192 characters

Photo of decimator
2.46/5  rDev -22.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

440ml nitro can poured into a pint glass. ABV 4.7%.

A - Poured a clear gold with a 1cm head. Foam reduces to a thin layer and very little lacing is produced. Carbonation is visibly quite low.

S - Light grains, hint of something else.

T - Some sweetness, light bread, very light bitterness.

M - Medium body, very low carbonation, creamy, clean finish.

O - Inoffensive and bland. Slightly better on tap but that's not saying much.

 433 characters

Photo of chinchill
2.45/5  rDev -23.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

poured from can into 20oz. glass beer mug.

A. impressive, light tan creamy head extended nearly to the bottom of the glass! Head reduces to 1 finger in about 3 minutes (at least if one starts sipping before then), leaving a light amber colored ale, with bubbling still on inside surfaces of glass.

S. slightly metallic and not very attractive

T. Light with very subtle hops. Disappointing given the fine appearance, but better than the aroma indicates. Creamy head is nice while it lasts.

M. nicely effervescent; creamy.

D. see taste and smell comments.

 561 characters

Photo of elricorico
2.45/5  rDev -23.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Nitro-pour appearance, creamy two finger head sits on top and really lasts. The beer itself is a fairly normal pale ale colour, sort of a burnished gold.

Smells of sweet malt, a sort of butter toffee aroma. Light floral hop aroma mixes in. Tame, but not bad.

Taste is thin, slightly fruity and a little herbal. I know there are malts and hops in here, but it all just seems to run together as one bland flavour. The odd swallow makes me wince.

Mouthfeel, though boosted by the nitro can, is watery. Very faint carbonation as well. Thin and limp.

Not a beer I enjoy. Would try again in a different serving type, but I wouldn't be hoping for much.

 658 characters

Photo of originalsin
2.45/5  rDev -23.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Saw this interesting looking bottle in a local supermarket. A 1 pint draught-flow system...nitro-can. As soon as i cracked this can it spewed forth foam a fat geyser of foam that was almost perfectly white. Odd.

The beer itself initially was completely white almost but then the head rose to the top and the haze cleared to reveal an amber beer with a very creamy/fluffy white head. Head retention seems to be absolute--this foam isn't going anywhere. The pour was honestly awesome.

The smell is...I don't know. nothing. Very very subdued floral notes with a metallic tinge.

It's a light to medium bodied brew that's alll kinds of smooth going down. A product of the nitro-can I suppose. One thing though- It almost seems as though the nitro here really just kills...absolutely kills any flavor this beer has. It's so one dimensional and boring. I've had other beers that I feel had greatly benefited from nitro---Old Rasputin through a nitro-tap for instance is just superb, as far as I'm concerned. But then again that's an incredible beer however you pour it. The beer starts of so smooth and as it dries out you're sort of left wondering what you just drank. Why it tasted that way. What went wrong? Who knows.

When it comes to drinkability...this is a nitro can. What else did you expect. I just don't like it though.

 1,327 characters

Photo of donniecuffs
2.44/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Poured a golden-amber, with very little head or visible carbonation, and poor lacing. Some pear and apple in the nose, but exceedingly caramelly and malty. The taste confirmed this; very little balance in the flavor, with a thin finish. The feel overall was thin and watery, which I'm sure makes it good for sessioning, but the lack of flavor contradicts that.

 360 characters

Photo of IronCitySteve
2.44/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

A: A nice golden color, enjoyed watching the head take shape from the bottom of the glass all the way to the top.

S: If it smelled, I couldn't put a finger on it. Not very potent, what i could detect was smell of malt.

T: Very minor malt flavor, but like the smell, I was not tasting anything.

M: Extremely smooth and carbonated

D: Easy to drink many at a time, but for the price, I would not drink many.

 408 characters

Photo of thedindaniel
2.44/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

My goodness...

Like I'm sure many other people have... I once used to think I was drinking good beer when having this. Ah, the early years of my ventures into the beer-world. The only reason I have this now is because a friend of mine left a can behind in my fridge and it is a bit too late to crack into a better bottle that I wouldn't fully appreciate at this time.

Pouring this into a classic pub-type glass, I have to admit that it is picturesque. Very creamy-foamy white head perfectly sitting atop a crystal clear light yellow body. Even a child could pour this and get a perfect-looking pint. After that however, there is hardly anything going on in this beer. I can taste a small amount of very light malts and hardly any hops, nothing to sit around and take in, but you could definitely drink a lot of this in one night.

It's interesting to go back every once in a while and re-drink the old beers that your palate stopped by at some point in its development. I hate to say that Boddingtons is kind of like that old friend that you rarely see and you realize, it's because you outgrew it/him.

 1,104 characters

Photo of Bugsey
2.43/5  rDev -23.8%
look: 5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

The most remarkable thing about this beer is the way the head forms. I love to show my kids the glass and the foam separates from the beer and moves up. It's quite a cool science experiment.

That's the best part, because the taste is not so exciting.
The mouth feel and taste are very thin, almost like the beer was watered down. I just can't get past that. Sure there are other things to say, but they are minor compared to the wateriness.

 441 characters

Photo of rye726
2.43/5  rDev -23.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

This pours a golden amber color and has an average beige head. Not really much smell or taste. There are some really mild malts and faint hops. The body is nice initially, but turns too watery as the beers warms. Nothing bad here, just a light mild ale that drinks easy.

 270 characters

Photo of Sosh
2.43/5  rDev -23.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I really did not like this. It just seemed extremely watery. I dont' think this had any carbonation whatsoever. Maybe it was flat, who knows? But even if I got a bad brew I don't see how this would possibly be something I'd get time and time again. I could taste the hops towards the middle, but the beer got pretty nasty towards the bottom. I would never drink this again, unless it was free. I'm kind of upset I bought this.

 426 characters

Photo of goldbot
2.42/5  rDev -24.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pint-sized Draughtflow can.

A: Pours with the expected frothy, creamy, white head with loads of cascading bubbles. The head is retained indefinitely and coats the sides of the glass. The color is a clear copper with lots of carbonation.

S: Mostly grain, with a small hint of floral character there. Not much going on here.

T: Pretty much all grain/bread. Finishes with a metallic flavor, with the slightest hints of nut and caramel.

M: At first the frothy foam gives this beer a smooth, creamy texture. However, this quickly turns into a thin, watery feel going down.

D: It goes down fairly easy, but there's not much to really like about this one.

 653 characters

Photo of donkeyrunner
2.42/5  rDev -24.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 5 | overall: 2

Huge, cascading, milky white, foaming nitro-can head. Clear amber color.

Smells like malt extract and standing water.

Tastes like really smooth...nothing. No really, this beer doesn't tastes like anything. I was thinking honey for a second but I think that's just because the can has a couple bees on it. It's tasteless, but damn it's a creamy tastelessness!

 360 characters

Photo of shillzor
2.42/5  rDev -24.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.75

I had a random can of this in my fridge for months, and figured I'd drink it tonight to make some room for other beers. When I popped the top, it exploded all over my table. Not a good start.

Appearance: Starts off with a nice head, with bubbles streaming up the glass. Settles down to a single-finger of flat, white foam. Translucent, bronze color.

Aroma: Not picking up much on the nose. Hints of citric hops.

Taste: Mildly bitter up front, and then...nothing. A bit like weak lemon water.

Mouthfeel: It's extremely smooth, but doesn't make up for the non-existent flavor.

Overall: I'd take this over a Bud, Miller, or Coors, but that's about it. It's not bad, it just isn't good. At all.

 705 characters

Photo of Fnerk
2.42/5  rDev -24.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Well, another nitro-can that contains a mediocre swill.

Appearance - a nice dark gold, with a creamy head that's to be expected from the widget action.

Aroma - almost none, just an average malty sweetness.

Taste - ugh...watery. The malt would have been nice if there were a bit more of it. The hop bitterness overpowers the weakness of the malt to make for a less-than-satisfying drinking experience.

Mouthfeel - pretty uncarbonated, I guess I just don't like flat beer. :

Drinkability - I guess it's OK, if you're willing to put up with blandness all night.

 563 characters

Photo of slitherySOB
2.41/5  rDev -24.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Bought this can for a buck. Not bad a deal for a not bad a brew. Poured a frothy head upon an amber pond. Surely the nitro widget now banging around in the empty can effected the appearance immensely. Too bad it doesn't improve taste and smell. This was a very metallic brew. Is their no protective lining in the can? Or is this intentional? Some floral hops and odd smelling malt comes through the steel factory aroma. Taste. Hmm, not bad. If I was the tinman. Again, very metallic taste. But it's cold. After a while to warm, some bitterness comes through, so as not too disappoint. Creamy mouthfeel. Almost like an Irish creme. Though the taste is bad, the mouthfeel is good, allowing for a drinkable brew.

 709 characters

Photo of OWSLEY069
2.4/5  rDev -24.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Pours a clean orange-ish to yellow color with a white head. In the aroma, gingerbread like malt. In the taste, watery and a hint of gingerbread like malt. A smooth and medium to lighter bodied mouthfeel, with a semi dry, small malt in the aftertaste. Watery and not much flavor. Maybe a in between beer, but nothing exciting here.

 330 characters

Photo of TaylorIPA19
2.4/5  rDev -24.8%
look: 3 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.25

Yikes... Is this really considered good beer in England? If so than I am REALLY proud to be an American! Smells like astringent mixed with rubbing alcohol... The taste is awful... Not sure what piss tastes like but I imagine this is pretty close... If I was in a desert and this was the only liquid I had to drink I would rather die of dehydration... Awful... Just plain awful...

 381 characters

Photo of andrewbarrows
2.4/5  rDev -24.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

The best thing about this beer is the look. It has a cool falling head. It is also very creamy. Unfortunately the taste gets old by the end of the pint

 151 characters

Boddingtons Pub Ale from Boddingtons
73 out of 100 based on 1,103 ratings.