1. Rating beers by attributes (look, smell, taste, feel, overall) is back! Read the latest update ...
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Boddingtons Pub Ale - Boddingtons

Not Rated.
Boddingtons Pub AleBoddingtons Pub Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
73
okay

2,251 Ratings
THE BROS
54
awful

(view ratings)
Ratings: 2,251
Reviews: 1,050
rAvg: 3.18
pDev: 20.75%
Wants: 20
Gots: 121 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Boddingtons visit their website
United Kingdom (England)

Style | ABV
English Pale Ale |  4.70% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Todd on 10-20-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Boddingtons Pub Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 2,251 | Reviews: 1,050 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of UncleAl
3.05/5  rDev -4.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Ahhhh Boddingtons. I like to call it "Guiness Extremely Light." After exploding the nitro can on opening, the beer pours to a golden color, if not somewhat hazy, with excellent cascading. A thick, creamy head then forms and stays with the beer the rest of the way.

There are some hop and malt aromas here, but they are very light and somewhat metallic. Some citrous and fruity overtones. The beer is easy to drink, very light and creamy mouthfeel, although it can be considered somewhat flat and devoid of any punch.

Still, if you offer me one I will not turn it down. After the initial excitement, it's a mellow ale best suited for a mellow drinking session.

UncleAl, Sep 10, 2003
Photo of nixhecks
3.58/5  rDev +12.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This poured a rich golden color with spiraling lines of carbonation bubbles going up the sides of the glass. Head retains at about 1/4 inch for the entire length, and displayed a cascading effect while it was settling. The smell had some hoppiness, but mostly a light, mead-like crispness to it, with lemony citrus and grass. Taste was nice and smooth, very light with a hoppy crispness at the finish. Mouthfeel was also smooth, very creamy from the nitro. I was satisfied at the end.

nixhecks, Sep 09, 2003
Photo of UnionMade
3.45/5  rDev +8.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

The beer pours slowly from the nitro faucet, forming a rich yellow gold liquid that cascades and ripples, settling into a golden amber, topped with a pure white creamy nitro head. The head lasts forever, of course, with tons of ladder-like lacing.
Very little aroma, probably due to the nitro and the smoky bar. A light estery maltiness, with a good deal of apple and pear fruitiness. Light hopping, providing an excellent balance.
Flavor is much better, with a serious estery fruitiness. I love this flavor. Pronounced apple and pear mingling with a sweet pale maltiness. Light hops come in the middle, finishing the beer with a very light bitterness. A touch of peach towards the end, finishing with a slightly tinny nitro flavor. Smooth carbonation, light bodied, with some phenols and more hops coming out as it warms up.
Definitely a smooth drinkin' ale that you can down two at a time. Simple, yet effective. I wish this was available without the nitro, I think it hurts the flavor, with that deadening nitro pour.

UnionMade, Sep 04, 2003
Photo of slitherySOB
2.4/5  rDev -24.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Bought this can for a buck. Not bad a deal for a not bad a brew. Poured a frothy head upon an amber pond. Surely the nitro widget now banging around in the empty can effected the appearance immensely. Too bad it doesn't improve taste and smell. This was a very metallic brew. Is their no protective lining in the can? Or is this intentional? Some floral hops and odd smelling malt comes through the steel factory aroma. Taste. Hmm, not bad. If I was the tinman. Again, very metallic taste. But it's cold. After a while to warm, some bitterness comes through, so as not too disappoint. Creamy mouthfeel. Almost like an Irish creme. Though the taste is bad, the mouthfeel is good, allowing for a drinkable brew.

slitherySOB, Sep 03, 2003
Photo of clvand0
4.35/5  rDev +36.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

Had this at the local pub. Pours a yellow color with a surprisingly thick white head that sticks around. Loved the head on this one. The aroma is a little bread-like, but there's really not much aroma here. The flavor is very smooth and a little malty. There is a little sweetness and a little hops to keep things fun, but the drinkability of this beer is amazing. It is a little bitter, but just a little. Great beer.

clvand0, Aug 27, 2003
Photo of Redrover
3.65/5  rDev +14.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I had this one on tap at Fitz's ale house in Elmhurst IL.

Beer served a proper 20z Imperial Pint. Beer is a light gold with nice head that sticks for the duration. Decent lacing.

Beer smells of malt, grass and a little bit of bread. Hard to pick-up much pure hop aroma. Beer is a little to clean smelling.

Taste is nice. Some malt sweetness and a bit of hops to keep things interesting. Beer is very soft in the mouth. I'm not sure if this is due to the water or the ingredients, either way it is an easy beer to drink. Great carbonation completes the package.

While not overwhelming in the taste department, I really enjoy this beer.

Redrover, Aug 25, 2003
Photo of leeenglewood
2.6/5  rDev -18.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

This is a weird looking beer and nitro cans should be reserved for stouts was my opinion after drinking it. First off the beer shot out of the can apon breaking the cans seal so make sure you have a glass within a seconds reaching after cracking the seal. Back to why pale beers shouldn’t be nitrogen induced was the appearance it looked like really weird whipped egg whites on top of a flat looking yellowish beer. Smells like bread dough not bad but not good either. Tasted decent but would do much better if it actually had some body to it with no carbonation it just tasted like flat beer with almost no flavor and became a task to finish. This beer would be much better having been bottle conditioned, force carbonated in the bottle or have been served from a tap that is non-nitrogen.

leeenglewood, Aug 24, 2003
Photo of SilentSabre
3.83/5  rDev +20.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

One of my favourite "widget can" brews from the U.K.. The appearance is a bit weak. The first word that comes to mind is "thin". The quality of the brew, however, is quite different. I really enjoy the head off of a fresh poured Boddingtons. I small glass of Boddingtons' foam would be great! The smell is quite mild mannered, but pleasant, a wee bit "yeasty" or bready. The taste itself is quite mild, too. It isn't near thirst quenching, like some brews I've had, but it is still quite good indeed. It has a nice "mouthfeel", also. The drinkability of Boddingtons is quite good, too. Overall, Boddingtons is a wonderful brew that smells good and is easy to drink with little aftertaste.

SilentSabre, Aug 23, 2003
Photo of hungryghost
2.75/5  rDev -13.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours with the frothy head you get with a Guiness nitro can. Obvious difference is the color. This is much lighter, a yellow with the thick white head. It does not smell like much, maybe a bit metalic from the can. I prefer not to drink from cans for this reason.
This is a light, creamy beer without much flavor, a good, cold, lager beer.
The creamy aspect is more mouthfeel than taste I think. The beer
is ok, nothing special, but no matter if I have one or three I get a hangover. Not sure why, but that is why I will not drink it anymore.

hungryghost, Aug 21, 2003
Photo of jcalabre
1/5  rDev -68.6%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

I originally sampled this beer on 29 October 2002. I am writing this review from my notes.
This beer is truly awful. It tastes like water with a foamy head. Budweiser has more (and better) flavor than this loser. This is the ultimate drain pour.
If this is the only beer available, seek out water or a soft drink

jcalabre, Aug 21, 2003
Photo of oberon
3.2/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Have had this many times either in the nitro can or nitro tap I had a few days ago at the Spring House Drafting Room.Pours a deep yellow with a very nice looking creamy head,not much smell to it somewhat metallic and a little biscuit malt but not much.The flavor is pretty bland and dry with some slight maltiness.It does not taste as good as it looks for sure.

oberon, Aug 15, 2003
Photo of Rumrunner
3.18/5  rDev 0%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Pint glass

Poured a beautiful deep yellow with a great thick white head. The head stayed throughout and the lacing was impecable. The scents are weak malt. Very shallow. Not much comes through at all.

The flavors are a mild malt with a small amount of hop bitterness. Not much else. There is also a watery quality which I think hurts the flavors.

There is a nice mouthfeel to this ale for the most part. Not much body and again the watery feel is there as well. It drinks extremely easy and would easily go down well with a meal.

Sadly, there is just not alot happening with this ale. Mild is the key word.

Rumrunner, Aug 15, 2003
Photo of Boilermaker88
3.2/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured a clear golden color once the cascade effect from the nitro ball settled. Big creamy tannish head.

Smell: sweet malt barely able to penetrate that thick head. Really not too much aroma.

Taste: started off with a nice malty flavor and faint fruity tone. Shifted rather abruptly to a hops taste and left a bitter taste on the tongue at the finish. Taste was not very pronounced, though.

Feel: nice, creamy feel. Medium-bodied.

Drinkability: not bad, just not great. I can think of any number of other beers in this style I'd rather drink. All in all, a pretty average brew.

Boilermaker88, Aug 11, 2003
Photo of freed
4.2/5  rDev +32.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 5 | overall: 5

Its possible this beer was meant to compliment the nitro pour system. Though its a fairly standard British Pale, it has a wonderful mouth-feel and drinkability due to its rich creamy body and clean taste. The attractive pour in an imperial pint, it sets a nice mood. Though the aroma is quite weak, possibly due to the thick foam, its still nice for the style. The taste is fairly standard, a creamy and malty taste with little hop presence. It certainly compliments fish & chips well, and it is entirely too drinkable.

freed, Aug 09, 2003
Photo of RenoZymurgist
3.45/5  rDev +8.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I live at an elevation of about 5000 feet above sea level and i guess this beer is for people at sea level because when i pulled the tab on this one it gushed out about 16 of the beer onto my counter top.
This beer has a beautiful upward cascade of nitrogen that contributes a creamy thick head and a little belgian lace as well. Medium golden colored brew is very clear.
Aroma is faint yet distinct as it reminds me of apples and a little sweet malt.
Taste is very smooth with a dry maltiness and a subtle character of english hops and apple-like esters from the yeast. Water character is a little salty but not nearly as much as bass.
Body is in the medium range as it is not heavy nor is it too lite.
Overall this beer is very drinkable and i would enjoy this one as a session beer or as a thirst quencher, one at a time.

RenoZymurgist, Aug 06, 2003
Photo of beerguy101
2.73/5  rDev -14.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Darker gold color. Large creamy head. Aroma is malty and sweet. A medium bodied English ale, mild taste, some hop bitterness. Full flavor, full body. Mouthfeel is creamy, full and round. Some malt sweetness. Finish is smooth. Aftertaste is very slightly bitter.

beerguy101, Aug 01, 2003
Photo of beerman599
2.17/5  rDev -31.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Cloudy orange in color with a very thick head. Lots of lacing on the glass. Aroma ( what their was of it) was slightly malty, but nothing to rave about. Taste was not too impressive ether. Rather bland and unimpressive. Mouthfeel was creamy, and this was the the flavor. i would rather drink water than have another one of these so I'll pass on this one in the future.

beerman599, Jul 31, 2003
Photo of SetarconeX
3.43/5  rDev +7.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 5 | overall: 3.5

This is a startlingly frothy beer. I'm instinctively nervous about anything floating in my drinks, sort of a holdover from campous where bugs fall into your water, but I really didn't mind the little nitro ball too much. The taste is fairly good, if not great, but this beers more about feel than the taste.

All in all, a decent ale that feels wonderful going down.

SetarconeX, Jul 31, 2003
Photo of JohnnyDuvel
2.85/5  rDev -10.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

I was pleasantly suprised by this. I knew the pour would be impressive after reading the reviews, but many seemed unimpressed with the taste. While I agree that it is a relatively mild tasting beer, that is more than made up for by the creamy mouthfeel and refreshing nature of this beer.Goes down so nicely, and there is nothing wrong with the taste. Even in the can, this blows away the "big three" on tap. If it's that much better in England, I would love to try it. I will be buying more of this (today!). Re-review - It's amazing how your opinion can change. As you can see, I really enjoyed this the first time. Must've been the hot day, drinking it outside? Tonight, it was so watery and bland that I poured it down the drain after two sips. Amazing. Maybe I'll like it more next time (if there ever is a next time!).

JohnnyDuvel, Jul 26, 2003
Photo of WesWes
3.4/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

The beer pours a pale golden color with a beautiful frothy white head. A perfect appearance! The nose is fruity. Their are smells of pale malts and yeast. The taste is very plain and dull. There is no complexity here. The mouthfeel is nice; not to carbonated. It is a light bodied ale. The drinkability is rough. The mouthfeel is right, but the head is too thick and the taste just isn't that good. This is not a favorite of mine.

WesWes, Jul 25, 2003
Photo of OldFrothingSlosh
3.4/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

On-tap at Sine' Irish Pub.

Cloudy orange in color with a very thick head. Lots of lacing on the glass. Aroma was slightly malty, but nothing to rave about. Taste was not too earth-shattering as well. Rather bland and unimpressive. Mouthfeel was creamy, and I think this covered up some of the flavor. Not really reaching for the glass for another pull with this one. I'll pass on this one in the future.

OldFrothingSlosh, Jul 18, 2003
Photo of TheDM
3.3/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This brew poured a long lasting creamy large white head of fine to medium sized bubbles. It has a light transparent golden brown body. It also has a mild malty/ hoppy aroma. It had a smooth full bodied hoppy taste with no bit and a slight tartness in its finish. There was nothing special about this brew, but it was just nice none-the-less.

TheDM, Jul 16, 2003
Photo of IronDjinn
3.35/5  rDev +5.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This is a mild, creamy ale through and through, nothing exceptional, yet nothing that makes it anything that bad either, no off flavours or rank smells. Pours a pleasing clear honey amber hue, creamy thick white head from the nitro can, and the head lasts the whole glass. Aroma is of muted malt, and so is the flavour. No discernable hops at all. Creamy mouthfeel and it goes down very smoothly. Would make a decent session beer in a pinch, it's easy enough to drink up, but I prefer something with a lot more flavour to offer. A lot more flavour.

IronDjinn, Jul 15, 2003
Photo of kindestcut
3.75/5  rDev +17.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Boddingtons is a beer I wanted to love, mainly since I am an incredibly big Anglophile. However,I liked it. I liked it quite a bit. But like ain't love.

The Boddingtons I had arrived with little to no head. I didn't see it poured so I can't really fault the beer for that. It could have been a bad bartender, which is absolutely possible. The beer looked nice, with a clear golden color.

The aroma is very slight with malt finding its way to the top of the glass. The taste is very clean and creamy with a faint hoppy, bready taste. I've had better bitters and I think the Boddingtons suffers from a lack of hop bitterness. The style doesn't suggest a great amount but a small increase in hops would do wonders.

All in all, this is a good, refreshing beer. I would have no problem drinking it at a pub, especially if it is on tap.

kindestcut, Jul 09, 2003
Photo of au1sec
2.9/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The widget makes the presentation very nice. I love to watch a beer with nitro settle out, and this one leaves a very nice, thick head on top that stays there, and the beer is crystal clear. Its downhill from there though. I smelled it...kinda fruity, a little sweet. I battled through the head to take the first drink, and there's frankly not much to taste. Its quite bland. Mouthfeel is nice..feels thick, but yet there is no malty thickness in the taste. Some bittering is present, so I know its not completely hop-free, but its pretty close. Its not a bad beer at all...its just boring.

au1sec, Jun 29, 2003
Boddingtons Pub Ale from Boddingtons
73 out of 100 based on 2,251 ratings.