Wells Bombardier Burning Gold - Wells & Young's Ltd
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 42 | Reviews: 31 | Display Reviews Only:
3.25/5 rDev +5.2%
On Tap in London. Pours hazy golden with white head and nice lacing. Aroma is of citrus fruit, bready malt and yeast. Body is medium and smooth. Taste is of earthy, herbal hops, bready malt, some salt and green apples. Finish is long and earthy. OK session brew.
08-29-2014 20:25:16 | More by mikeg67
United Kingdom (Scotland)
2.78/5 rDev -10%
Appearance - poured amber with no head and little carbonation, very clear and crisp
Smell - average smell with slight sweetness, no distinct notes to speak of, very slight fruit.
Taste - again slight sweetness at the beginning with little fruit then a citrus bitterness which stays at the back of the tongue for a while. nothing much really stands out to speak of. overall tastes plain.
mouthfeel - this is a little watery and doesnt leave much of an impression, doesnt dry the mouth so is a little refreshing, could be doing with a little more carbonation which would make it a bit more interesting.
overall - nothing to get excited about, it is drinkable but i have tasted better but in saying that i have also tasted worse, would pick up if quite cheap on offer or faced with a mediocre selection.
06-18-2011 09:02:01 | More by shearer292
3.4/5 rDev +10%
Bottle into La Chouffe goblet in Galway, Ireland. Reviewed from notes. Acquired at McCambridge's in Galway (on shop street, for those of you interested).
A: Two finger head of nice thickness and a bit of cream. Above average retention. Clear gold colour.
Sm: Cream, light barley, hints of citrus.
T: Light and balanced body of the notes from the nose. Hints of butterscotch. The cream is masterfully handled - present in both the open and the finish. Tingling citrus on the finish as well.
Mf: Buttery and smooth; as always Wells knows how to handle their mouthfeel. Suits the taste and style brilliantly. A bit too light on the palate, however.
Dr: 4.7% ABV? You'd never know. A steep price. I wish it wasn't so damn light.
03-26-2011 00:29:37 | More by kojevergas
United Kingdom (England)
2.48/5 rDev -19.7%
A clear glass bottle with a best before date of Sept 2011. The name and appearance suggest a summer ale.
Poured into a Sam Smith's pint glass. A deep golden-amber colour with light carbonation. Small head which disappears rapidly; white and foamy with large bubbles. Smells of light malt and not much else - the odour isn't entirely agreeable.
Taste is weak and unimpressive. Some light malt and a hint of hops but it doesn't amount to much, tastes like beer mixed with dishwater. Smooth mouthfeel with mild tingling from the carbonation.
Overall, not a great beer - the flavour is simply too weak and bland. Perhaps it's better in summer but I rather doubt it. Wouldn't recommend this to anyone.
01-03-2011 23:48:58 | More by jazzyjeff13
United Kingdom (Wales)
3.05/5 rDev -1.3%
500ml clear glass bottle, B.B.E 23/01/11 poured into a young's pint pot.
A. Straw coloured ale with a 1cm thick white head that soon diminished to a thin foam layer.
S. Juicy malt, citrus fruit and the faintest whiff of banana.
T. Citrusy with a good hop presence. Fairly dry.
M. Medium bodied, slightly carbonated.
D. IMHO, an average beer, not as good as the 'true' Bombadier. Lacks somewhat on the palate.
09-21-2010 12:11:55 | More by AEK
3.03/5 rDev -1.9%
Beer bottle (50 cl.), tasted in 2010.
Appearance : golden color, with white small foam head (not persistent).
Smell : grass aroma (like a lager) and citrus.
Taste and mouthfeel : watery, citrus notes and bitter finish.
Drinkability : an average beer in the style English pale ale.
05-20-2010 17:37:25 | More by thierrynantes
2.95/5 rDev -4.5%
decants a shimmering orange-amber ale with a small rocky cap. Modest lacing.
Bready-sweet aroma with a wisp of grass and a rusted iron tone.
The wonderful malty smell is more pronounced in the aroma than taste. The breadiness is there but thinner, thin plate, lightly bitter (mostly long boil Goldings) no fruity esters to speak of, fast clean lightly bitter finish.
Mild, understated, approachable, good drinkability and a very clean tasting bitter but uninspired. Good for sessioning.
04-23-2010 01:48:56 | More by pootz
2.7/5 rDev -12.6%
500ml bottle 4.7% abv
Appearance: Clear golden colour, small white head, and little lace.
Smell: Almost no aroma, I am so disappointed. There is a slight malty sweetness but almost no hops.
Taste: As with the smell, disappointing. Very plain taste, slight malty sweetness, touches of citrus, but a lack of hop bitterness.
Mouthfeel: Light, reasonable carbonation.
Drinkability: Drinkable, yes, but far too plain to enjoy.
I had really high hops for this beer, as other beers from the brewery really impressed me; however this beer is just too plain.
03-04-2010 21:05:18 | More by Thehuntmaster
2.15/5 rDev -30.4%
Bottle: Poured a golden color ale with a medium white foamy head with good retention and some light lacing. Aroma of overcooked vegetables and grainy malt. Taste is not the most interesting with some overcooked vegetables and unrefined grainy malt notes. Body is about average with OK carbonation. Lacks of hops and a cleaner malt bill would have greatly improved this beer.
12-03-2009 03:39:53 | More by Phyl21ca
2.73/5 rDev -11.7%
I picked this up as soon as I saw it on the shelf at my local LCBO in hopes of getting to it before the contents were damaged due to the useless defensive properties of its clear bottle.
The name is bang on about one thing, this beer pours a crystal clear golden, amber/orange. Topping this off is a fine white head which quickly dissipates to a film of minute bubbles.
Aromas of ripe apples were the first thing that hit me though I must admit the nose is very subdued here. I managed to pick out hints of hop aroma and citrus zest as well as some unpleasant chlorine smells. Overall very bland smells here.
Bland hop bitterness mingles with corn syrup like malt tastes leaving a very astringent feel in the finish. Notes of burnt caramel pop with mass produced lager malt tastes, but everything is very muted. The alcohol becomes more apparent as the beer warms as well as a faint unpleasant taste of chlorinated water.
The body was overall light and watery easily drinkable but not very interesting.
This was a pretty lackluster beer I'll be sticking to the ESB in the future.
11-14-2009 22:49:42 | More by Reinheitsgebot71
2.3/5 rDev -25.6%
Deep gold with an anemic head that fizzles away to nothing almost instantaneously. No lace left behind, just a splotch of bubbles in the middle to show that there ever was head to speak of. The scent of skunk when the bottle is opened; damn these clear bottles. After pouring, it opens up a bit to reveal a muted aroma of caramel, grass, and a hint of lemon. Tastes of caramel with a touch of grass and lemon peel in the finish. Mild skunk. Light bodied with low carbonation. Feels thin and watery. Other than that little bit of skunk, its pretty inoffensive. It's easy to be inoffensive when you say nothing.
11-12-2009 00:24:40 | More by mintjellie
2.75/5 rDev -11%
Another 'why?' beer from the LCBO. Not sure how this summery blonde ale fits into the fall release theme. Sometimes I get the feeling that foreign brewers simply send their outdated overstock to Ontario, where its sold as something 'new' amidst even blander competition. Anyhow...
Pours a darkish golden yellow with one finger of white head and very little lacing. Smell and taste are akin to a macro lager: some skunk, light cereal grains and wheat malt, a pissy/apple juice aroma, muted English hops with minimal bitterness, and more grains in the aftertaste. No trace of citrus. My description makes this sound horrifying, but it's actually not that bad. It's just not good, either. Mouthfeel is crisp and medium bodied with lots of carbonation and a bit of spicy bite in the finish. Perhaps the only noteworthy aspect of this beer.
Overall, I don't hate this brew as I sometimes enjoy blonde ales. But this doesn't do the trick. Too bland and undistinguished; not much different from the better macros. I'll pass on Burning Gold in the future.
11-10-2009 06:07:07 | More by cratez
2.78/5 rDev -10%
Poured into an ale glass, leaving a very thin white head. A deep golden, one of the lightest pale ales I've had. The clear bottle does not bode well, however...
The smell is not pleasant, almost skunky. It reminds me of some of the mediocre Asian macro lagers (Pearl River, specifically). Hard to get anything other than faint hops and grasses here.
The taste is not much better, very boring, and too much like a lager. A bit of sweetness to the finish, but that's about it. Almost impossible to discern anything interesting about this brew. Can't believe this is classified as a pale ale, it's so lager-like!
Mouthfeel is very carbonated, thin.
Wow, so very disappointed. This brew did nothing for me. It wasn't offensive, however, I could drink the whole thing down, but it's not worth getting again, and certainly not worth paying the import bottle price. Pass.
11-10-2009 03:19:17 | More by JohnnyBarman
2.7/5 rDev -12.6%
Beer in a clear bottle? That's never a good thing. Neither is drinking beer brewed by Wells & Young's in my experience, but here goes...
Pours the color of apple juice with a head the diminishes almost instantly to a thin and spotty ring of foam.
There's not much going on in the nose. It's not skunky. That's lucky. And now that I'm over that hurdle and as for the rest, ascribing descriptors to the aromatics in this beer would be an insult to those beers that actually do go to the trouble of having an appealing aroma. There's nothing here beyond a hint of caramel and a bit of grass.
The taste is very light, with a slight herbal hop bitterness against some caramel malt. I'd say it hits all the marks of the style, but really it's more of a very timid, very light tap. A bit of lemon rind lingers in the finish.
The mouthfeel feels overly carbonated.
This isn't a bad beer only inasmuch as it's a very boring beer.
11-03-2009 00:50:34 | More by MeisterBurger
Wells Bombardier Burning Gold from Wells & Young's Ltd
74 out of 100 based on 42 ratings.