1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Doggie Style Classic Pale Ale - Flying Dog Brewery

Not Rated.
Doggie Style Classic Pale AleDoggie Style Classic Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

2,184 Ratings
THE BROS
85
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 2,184
Reviews: 985
rAvg: 3.63
pDev: 12.95%
Wants: 32
Gots: 162 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Flying Dog Brewery visit their website
Maryland, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 08-17-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Doggie Style Classic Pale Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 2,184 | Reviews: 985 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Neehan
3.45/5  rDev -5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A ruddy amber appearance with lacing that speckles the glass on the way down. Hops come through in the flavor, but in a very mild manner. Very smooth and enjoyable, but with a little less pizaz than I was expecitng. Just a calm and mellow beer through and through. Would make a good session ale.

Neehan, Feb 06, 2007
Photo of BeerSox
3.7/5  rDev +1.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

12oz bottle into pint glass.

Deep amber color with a little bit of a red tint. Thick off white head that settles to a bubbly and foamy cap. Sticky lacing along the glass.

Sharp hops pierce the creamy and sweet aroma of the malt. The malts aren't overpowered.

Smooth wheat greeted by a citrusy and bitter hop flavor. A little bit of cream is repeated in the taste. Citrus flavors, such as lemon and orange, can be tasted in the background. Medium bodied with good carbonaion. The finish has a slight hint of creaminess with some lingering malt grain and hop bitterness.

Pretty much your standard American Pale Ale, maybe this one has a little more malt presence. Worth a try.

BeerSox, Feb 05, 2007
Photo of terrabyte
3.4/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a light copper-brown color with a small white head that leaves some decent lacing.

Aroma is a light and airy wheat smell.

Taste is full of grassy wheat, airy, and a hint of sour lemon. Easy to detect, lasts a long time in the mouth. Seems quite solid.

Mouthful has lower than average carbonation, which seems to work here. It's not very crisp, however.

Drinkability is just fine. I'm not a big fan of sour/wheat beers, but this one is well put together with plenty of flavor. Only thing missing is a refreshing finish that begs to have another drink. I didn't get that from this one.

terrabyte, Jan 30, 2007
Photo of dickroop
3.85/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a light copper amber, slightly hazy. This bottle foamed overflowing when I popped the cap, had a big tan-colored head that cooled down to a ring and partial cap that lasted and left some lacing. The aroma was hop-dominated with malt sweetness also present, it showed some aroma notes of pine resin.

The taste was piney with a little floral aspect on the side, then lots of toasty malt flavor. There is both sweetness and bitternes together and it's pretty good. The finish is only a little bitter, counterbalanced with bready sweetness. The mouthfeel is medium-light body, a little malt stickiness.

The drinkability is pretty good, it's one cut above ordinary for a PA. I enjoyed it and will enjoy the rest of this sixer, but I'd have to see a good price to want to buy a repeat sixer. This ale's from Denver, we've got some very good local beers (PA-MD-DE) that are just as good and deserving of my business.

dickroop, Jan 28, 2007
Photo of dmamiano
3.48/5  rDev -4.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

This beer poured a deep amber almost red color with a nice head-two finger, and fairly floral nose. Slight hop presence in the nose but not as much as expected.
The taste was fairly nice with a decent malt flavor balancing the "hidden" hops.Mouthfeel was also decent.
This beer is more balanced than the normal American stye pale ales, but also is lacking the upfront hops I am used to in an a.p.a.

Overall, a good session beer. Its is worth a try for sure.

dmamiano, Jan 28, 2007
Photo of TheSarge
2.35/5  rDev -35.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This pale ale has frragrances of sweet malt aromas with a tip of hops. Floral and fruity. Dark amber in color and produces moderate amount of head, and turns into fine lacing. This sample may had possibly suffered a little oxidation. Overall, this feels very watery and almost too flat. Not too bad, but I've had a lot better.

TheSarge, Jan 27, 2007
Photo of BeerBelcher
3.7/5  rDev +1.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This is not an extreme APA, but I thought it quite approachable and solid all the way around. It won't blow your sox off (it is not a "big" beer), but it is still good.

Appearance is a sparkling red color, with pretty good head formation.

Aroma is a very light citrusy-sweet aroma.

Taste is sweet and citrusy on the nose, with some maltiness to provide balance in the finish.

Mouthfeel is fairly light for an APA<,which makes this beer very drinkable. I could have a handful of these at a sitting.

BeerBelcher, Jan 20, 2007
Photo of mentor
1.45/5  rDev -60.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

Stamp on the bottle reads 355A06. Pours a one finger copper tan head over a nearly clear dull copper liquid. Smells potently of cardboard. Woody and oranges from hops. Musty. Like this beer was infected during fermentation.

Tastes cardboard and fouled malt. Like an IPA I once made that got something awful growing in it. That flavor is awful, beer will be dumped when I get the mouthfeel. Md-thick which is unpleasant because it keeps the flavor around. Blech!

mentor, Jan 18, 2007
Photo of Reneejane
3.75/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Nicely carbonated with a great mouthfeel. The smell is a bitter hoppy aroma. The first taste is a kick of hops, very bitter, somewhat fruity, with a surprising lingering. Even more surprising is the malt finish. It's nice that it comes in and balances out this beer. The malt is a nutty malt. You can see the effect of the maltiness in the color which is a nice clear amber color. I really like this one.

Reneejane, Jan 17, 2007
Photo of shivtim
3.95/5  rDev +8.8%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a clear red/orange with a thin white head that fades quickly. Looks like raspberry iced tea. Nose is strong hops and sweet bread with a malty backbone. Taste is still hoppy but not as strong as the nose. Instead, strong malts come through in the middle, and the hops come back for the finished. Nice balance. Mouthfeel is good and full, a bit tangy. Drinkability is good.

shivtim, Jan 14, 2007
Photo of theopholis
3.4/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance- Pours a nice, clear deep amber. Has an off-white head with no staying power a just a little lace.

Aroma- Very sweet for a pale ale. Not just malty sweetness. something else to. Maybe a hint of oranges. Also had a subtle floral scent.

Taste : Fore-taste started malty sweet followed quickly by a slightly sour / bitter finish. Very interesting for a pale ale. Tasted more like an English pale ale than an American pale ale. Not nearly hoppy enough for the latter.

Mouthfeel-Medium mothfeel for style. Good carbonation level. Clinged to mouth slightly.

Drinkability-Quite nice. Not as good as some pale ales, but better than most.

theopholis, Jan 02, 2007
Photo of pmatz2
3.2/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

This brew pours a clear reddish amber color.

There was about 1 finger of white head with large bubbles. However it disappeared rather quickly. Lacing did last the entire drink.

The aroma had a subtle floral and sour scent

Taste : started malty sweet followed quickly by a slightly sour / bitter finish

The mouth feel was very thin. Light carbonation made this one go down quite easy.

Thought this was more British Pale Ale than American Pale ale. (More Malty / sweeter less hoppy than I would have expected.

Overall not a bad beer, however it doesnt really stand up to other beers in this category.

pmatz2, Jan 01, 2007
Photo of jscottku21
3.98/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

This is an excellent representation of an American Pale Ale, although not my favorite of the style. A strong taste of hops dominates this brew, as is the case in most Pale Ales. I certainly would enjoy a session or two with this solid product from Flying Dog. Cheers!!

jscottku21, Dec 28, 2006
Photo of auxiliary
3.7/5  rDev +1.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A - Amberish color with a nice head
S - Smells good, just like a pale ale. Hoppy smell to it.
T - Nice and balanced.
M - Not a heavy beer, like mentioned, balanced.
D - Not a beer that I can drink a lot of. Not a bad beer. Nice pale ale though. I bought it as a single and not a 6 pack.

auxiliary, Dec 25, 2006
Photo of MuenchenerKindl
3.68/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from a 12 oz bottle to a pint glass. The liquid is a dark amber, with good carbonation. the head is 2 fingers, light tan and leaves nice lace.

The smell is main stream IPA. Piney, grapefruit.

The taste follows the nose, Grassy pine and big grapefruit.

The mouthfeel is good, medium body and good carbonation, very refreshing.

The drinkability is good, a better then average example of the style. MK

MuenchenerKindl, Nov 25, 2006
Photo of pmcadamis
3.7/5  rDev +1.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A - Clear bronze brew with a half finger dishwater head. Many large bubbles on top, and the head comes right back with a good swirl. Wet arcs of lace line the glass.

S - Pungent hop aromas of grapefruit along with other acidic fruits...sour green grapes and kiwi. .

T - Extremely hoppy. This is pushing the hop envelope of a pale ale...more IPA-ish IMO. Bitter and tart dry-hopped flavor...with grapefruit and kiwi. Tastes alot like it smells. Although the hops are the star of the show, there is a nice firm malt backdrop of hard biscuit flavors.

M - Medium bodied and somewhat chewy with a dry tart finish and loads of bitter hop-bomb aftertaste.

D - Excellent. The bitter acidic citrius flavors may overwhelm some, but this is right up my alley. This is a damn good brew.

pmcadamis, Nov 21, 2006
Photo of Schwarzbart
3.68/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: A decent finger high head that receded to a thin creamy ring. Decent cling and orange in color.
Smell: A grainy malt flavor and sweetness like tamarind. Hop notes with a smoky aroma. This is weird, but it reminds me of a steak with A-1 sauce.
Taste: Not nearly as much taste as the nose leads on. A sour maltiness with an earthy hop flavor with a tad of tamarind a raison flavor. After reading some of the other reviews I may have to try this one again because mine seemed to take on quite different qualities than others noted.
Mouthfeel: Smooth with just a little bite from the hop.
Drinkability: A good beer.

Schwarzbart, Nov 18, 2006
Photo of mattd017
3.53/5  rDev -2.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a nice brown-gold with a decent head which disappears quickly. Has a citrusy, hoppy scent. Has a thick, rich mouthfeel with small carbonation. Nice malty, flavor underwritten by a very slight hoppy bite. Good flavor, good pale ale, but not the best

mattd017, Nov 12, 2006
Photo of crayphish
3.1/5  rDev -14.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a bottle into a pint glass. Clear amber liquid with little carbonation rolls to a decent head. Very nice lacing. Smell is disappointing in that there isnt much.Taste starts off with bland malt and finishes a bit hoppy. The dry finish saves this beer for me. I found it to be a very drinkable pale ale, mostly because of the finish. Probably not worth the money I'm paying.

crayphish, Nov 12, 2006
Photo of MrHungryMonkey
3.73/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Rich golden amber color – clear and crisp – small head – not lively, looks sedate.

Bitter hoppy smell, nice citrus scents – a little fruity sweetness – mostly hops.

The bitter hop flavor dominates; it is very good – tastes like a toned down IPA – no other flavors are coming out.

Not too thick, or smooth – a little carbonated.

Drinkability is pretty good. I can’t drink it too fast, and I don’t hesitate to come back for another drink.

Doggie Style is ok, not too standoutish and not too bad. The taste is a one-channeled hoppy bitterness. I would like it better if there was a richer pallet. Can’t beat the cool art on the labels.

MrHungryMonkey, Nov 02, 2006
Photo of baxterbrew
4.55/5  rDev +25.3%
look: 5 | smell: 3 | taste: 5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

Poured from a bottle with a nice foamy head (about 1/4inch) that never went away. The color is a deep, very pretty dark amber. This is a beautiful beer.

The smell is malty, very mild. Mouthfeel is thick, rich, almost creamy. There is a hint of oil on the back of the throat. The taste is GREAT. Noticeable hops but not overpowering. This is an extremely balanced, flavorful brew. Maybe my 2nd favorite Pale Ale (after my own). The aftertaste is minty, hoppy, crisp. I love this beer. I could drink a bunch! My favorite of the Flying Dog line so far.

baxterbrew, Oct 28, 2006
Photo of Budlum
2.7/5  rDev -25.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

This ale pours with modest amounts of white head that lasts a little over one minute. The body is a lightly hazed, amber loaded with orange colors.

The beer presents a lightly-hopped nose with a balancing malt presence. Slightly citrusy when cold with touches of lemon.

Naturally, this ale starts moderately hoppy with only a faint malt sweetness. The finish is loaded with hop spice and unforunately, a slightly metallic flavor. Sharp, bitter flavors rise as it warms.

Mouthfeel is just barely carbonated, spicy and a little slick.

Drinkability is slightly below average due to the metallic and overly bitter flavors. Nothing to see here. Move along to much better examples.

Budlum, Oct 27, 2006
Photo of barefootbrewer
3.35/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This beer poured a clear golden color with a thick persistent head. No real lacing to speak of. The taste is a bit sweet with bitter hop aftertaste. The mouthfeel is light and carbonated. The drinkability of this is fairly good, however I don’t think I could drink several in one sitting.

barefootbrewer, Oct 22, 2006
Photo of mnfinnkidd
3.98/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

From 12oz bottle with hidden freshness date: 339A06 thinking...Dec 5th, 06

Poured into 16oz pint glass, served at 44.5F

A: Reddish Orange huge, very pleasing to the eye with a light tan 1/4 head on top that quickly faded. Carbonation is very light

S: Almost no aroma but a slight pale ale..

T: Lightly hopped with some sweetness.

D: I find it to be very drinkable. I don't find myself having to force my selve to drink this one...I'm quite glad there was four of this one in the FlyDog Litter pack I bought. Definitely enjoyable...

mnfinnkidd, Oct 17, 2006
Photo of tastybeer
3.7/5  rDev +1.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Orangy amber appearance with a good sized soapy beige head. Head fades fast but retention is good. Bits of lace too. Nose is biscuity and caramel with some grapefruit candy-like cascade hops around. The smells fit nicely together. Taste is decent. It matches the smell in hops and malts and both could use a little more of everything I think. Light body and extended bitterness through the finish. It fades just in time for another sip. Good drinkabillity. All in all it goes down easy.

Not a bad choice.

tastybeer, Sep 22, 2006
Doggie Style Classic Pale Ale from Flying Dog Brewery
82 out of 100 based on 2,184 ratings.