1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Doggie Style Classic Pale Ale - Flying Dog Brewery

Not Rated.
Doggie Style Classic Pale AleDoggie Style Classic Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

2,220 Ratings
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 2,220
Reviews: 986
rAvg: 3.63
pDev: 12.95%
Wants: 33
Gots: 172 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Flying Dog Brewery visit their website
Maryland, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 08-17-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Doggie Style Classic Pale Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 2,220 | Reviews: 986 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of zeff80
3.65/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A - 12 oz bottle poured out an amber hue with a 1 finger head. Highly carbonated. It left lacing as I drank it down.

S - Hops!!! Wow, it really is an overpowering hop aroma. There is a fainy grassy smell to it, as well.

T - It is very hoppy (not as strong as it smelled). It also has a good malt flavor.

M - It is light bodied and very crisp.

D - It is drinkable, but the hop flavors may overpower anything that you try to eat with it.

zeff80, Jul 25, 2006
Photo of gonzo138
3.73/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A- nice brownish amber color, good head with nice lacing and retention

S- nice and hoppy, very piney

T- very hoppy, kind of one sided but in a good way

M- smooth, kinda dry, moderate carbonation, taste lingers in mouth for a little while

D-goes down nice and easy

gonzo138, Jul 21, 2006
Photo of kimcgolf
3.38/5  rDev -6.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

Poured to a copper color, with off-white head that diminished quickly, yet left good lacing. Kind of a strange beer, regarding aroma and flavor. I detected aroma of hops and dark fruit (plums, figs), yet taste was what I expected more of a pale ale, citrus fruits, dominated by grapefruit. I enjoyed the flavor, yet the finish tended to be sour. May have ben a bit old. I’m sure I’ll have the opportuinity to have another, and will re-rate if finsih is markedly different. All and all, still a good beer-drinking beer.

kimcgolf, Jul 21, 2006
Photo of Frozensoul327
3.9/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A very nice APA. Pours out to a peppy light amber orange color with medium high carbonation and a nice 1/4 inch pillow of yellowish white foam. Aroma is highly dominated by floral hops and grassy notes. Some citrus and malt. Taste is medium bodied and rather classy; malt, citrusy hops, grass, a hint of bourbon, light wood. Interesting. Keeps the palate busy. Mouthfeel was refined and zesty. Drinkability is pretty good. More hoppy than most APA's. Worth trying. I'd like to see this cask-conditioned...

Frozensoul327, Jul 09, 2006
Photo of chilidog
4.03/5  rDev +11%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A fine Flagship brew, if its not, it should be.
It pours a nice,clear amber/rust color. The head, off-white tan tint, holds up very well and laces all glass long. The sticky lace comes as of the medium body is well carbonated, active in the glass with no fizz.
The aroma is citric hop and with floral cascades behind that. Don't think its overpowering.
The taste carries a soft load if hop with a nice malted balance.
The mouth is left crisp and slightly tart.
A Very good and tasty beer to quench a thirst, go with a meal or sip on awhile with others. The label can also give you something to talk about. cheers!

chilidog, Jul 08, 2006
Photo of Poser
3.53/5  rDev -2.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

The appearance is very average, a dark amber hue with a finger thick head. Smells and tastes strongly of hops and some spice.

This has been sitting in the back of my fridge for a little while, but it should still be fresh. It's a decent pale ale, worth a try.

Poser, Jul 07, 2006
Photo of FenwaySquid
4.2/5  rDev +15.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Presentation: 12 oz longneck bottle, no dating of any kind, poured into a pint glass.

Appearance: Poured a nice looking dark amber/copper color, very clear. The head formed about 1 finger thick of large bubbles and faded quickly into some lacing.

Aroma: Pine and citrus hops, a little strong but still appealing.

Taste: The hops explode on contact, very bitter but oh so good. I didn't get much in the way of malty flavors at all. The finish was bitter, leaving the desire for more.

Mouthfeel: A little watery, to be honest. Even still it's still good. The carbonation is in good balance as well.

Overall: If you like hops (as I do) you''ll love this brew.

FenwaySquid, Jul 05, 2006
Photo of pibbxtrasucks
3.85/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

beer poured with little to no head. I was a little disappointed, but it may have been a bad pour. its hard to say which smell is more powerful, the hops or the citrus. so I guess that means its a nice blend. tastes pretty hoppy at first but shortly after that a citrus taste takes over, not unlike the smell. the only "problem" I have with this beer is I think its a tad bit over carbonated... but thats just preference. over all I think this is a tasty beer which is very easy to drink.

pibbxtrasucks, Jun 19, 2006
Photo of weasbri
3.15/5  rDev -13.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I had this beer on tap at Les Halles in DC. They had it instead of Kronenbourg, which I haven't had in some time, so I can't comment on the wisdom of such a decision. Ironically, it was served in a Kronenbourg pint glass.
I don't want to criticize too much, as I think I'm just in a non-Pale Ale kind of place right now. The beer had a good level of hoppiness to it, I thought a bit too much bitterness left in the aftertaste. Nice color and decent aroma, but I rate it about an average Pale Ale.

weasbri, Jun 12, 2006
Photo of afinepilsner
4.03/5  rDev +11%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Doggie style pale ale is a slightly hazy, dark amber color. It has nice head with decent retention and good lacing. It has malty aroma with some hops. The taste is malt with a nice hop finish. It has medium body, is well balanced, and just plain good. This is one of the better pale ales I have found in this area.

afinepilsner, Jun 10, 2006
Photo of Brian700
3.88/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This one pours a dark pale color with a white head, minimal lacing.

The aroma is of pale malt and some citrus hops.

The flavor has some caramel malt presence with a decent addition of hops, nothing over the top but a very good and drinkable flavor.

The mouthfeel is medium bodied with medium carbonation.

This is a good drinkable beer, awesome session beer.

Brian700, Jun 10, 2006
Photo of cameraman
3.48/5  rDev -4.1%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a 20 oz. pint glass, a half inch head forms, leaving several rings along the glass a it dissolves away. The color is a clear amber color with a hint of orange along the sides. The aroma of malt starts off, followed by pine and earth scents. The hops found in the aroma dominate the taste, there is a malt flavor at the beginning, but does not really stand out. Medium bodied as it first crosses the palate and thins out from there, losing alot of the body it had started with. It is fairly drinkable beer, though the mouthfeel is a disappointment. It still has a good taste and aroma, not a bad choice for a session beer.

cameraman, Jun 09, 2006
Photo of cjgator3
3.63/5  rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours clear copper with a sticky one finger head. Smell is of citrusy hops (grapefruit in particular). In the taste you get much of the same citrusy hop tastes that are in the nose and a slight malty/bready flavor. A decent brew but a bit too thin with a lack of body.

cjgator3, Jun 07, 2006
Photo of BigRedN
3.58/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance: Pours from the 12 oz bottle into a standard US pint glass an orangy amber. A nice 1/4 inch head forms that slowly fades to a solid cover on the liquid. Good lacing as the beer is consumed. Before I even take a sip I imagine this is well carbonated as there are hundreds (if not a thousand) tiny bubbles streaming through the clear liquid.

Smell: Mostly hop related aromas. Floral and citrous scents. Not overly one dimensional, just not overly scented.

Taste: Starts out with some malted barley taste on the tongue, finishes with a citrousy burst, and the requisite hop bitterness, although this was less than kick me in the ass bitter.

Mouthfeel: Somewhat light in body, well carbonated. Light crisp and lively with a clean finish.

Drinkability: A good but not great Pale Ale. Easy drinker, close to sessionable. One I would have again if the price is right as I have only the two bottles that came in a mix 12 pack.

BigRedN, Jun 06, 2006
Photo of plaid75
3.63/5  rDev 0%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured a medium copper hue, with a one finger foamy head. There was decent retention and lacing.

The smell was a flowery hop with a bit of a citrus element. A good grain element as well.

The taste was evenly balanced. A clean hop bitterness accompanied by a noticable grain sweetness. Finished with a slight biscuit aftertaste.

The mouthfeel was normal. Good carbonation. Slightly dry finish.

A good and drinkable APA. I would have prefered a stronger hop presence, but overall a good example of the style.

plaid75, May 30, 2006
Photo of rhoadsrage
4.47/5  rDev +23.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

(Served in an American pint glass)

A- This beer has a hazy deep orange body with a thick off-white head that last a good while then turns to a film for the rest of the beer. The carbonation is a strong one with big bubbles keeping the head going.

S- The nice smell of green hops has a sweet perfume note to it and a nice caramel roasted malt blended in with the hops. This is well-balanced and smooth but with strong hops and malt smell.

T- The taste of green floral hops is what I notice right of the bat. They are smooth but fresh. After a few more sips I start to notice some lightly toasted sweet malt with a orange note to it. That orange note hangs on with a faint bitterness from the hops in the finish. As it warms there is a very light note of biscuit malt in the background.

M- This beer has a medium mouthfeel with no astringency or alcohol heat.

D- This is an APA done well. The smells and tastes are distinct and classic but this beer is smooth and quaffable for summers in the backyard. Flying dog surprised me on this one and I will have to hunt for this one on cask and in cases.

rhoadsrage, May 27, 2006
Photo of AaronHomoya
3.45/5  rDev -5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz brown bottle.

Pours an amber-red color with a nice, big off-white colored head. Aroma is hoppy with citrus. Taste is malty, sweet, with a touch of caramel and a pretty strong hops bitterness that gives an aftertaste that is somewhat unpleasant. Mouthfeel is fairly light. Drinkability is pretty good, but the taste limits its appeal a bit.

AaronHomoya, May 27, 2006
Photo of PBRstreetgang
3.83/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours clear, auburn in appearance? Off-white one and a half finger head of thick foam that holds well leaving spotty lace. Toasted malt with a very hoppy aroma of cascade and fruity chinook. Sweet crystal malt and biscuity pale malt flavor. Juicy alpha acid aftertaste; dry- with that distinctly american pine sap and grapefruit rind taste. Medium in body and carbonation, the mouthfeel is smooth and even but too hoppy even by west coast standards. The only flaw seems to be the overly hopped flavor, which halts any chance of diacetyl, but puts the finish a tad on the dry side.

PBRstreetgang, May 22, 2006
Photo of jockstrappy
3.35/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Pours an orange-copper tone with a thick and chunky white head that laced nicely. Aroma is citrus, grassy, and even some yeast I think. Taste is where this one kinda let me down, the hops up front were ok, but the overwhelming orange peel bitterness was what caught my tongue the most. Mouthfeel was ok, except for maybe being a bit flat. I love APA's, so I will give this one another try later on. Still way better most macros though.

jockstrappy, May 13, 2006
Photo of jasonpeckins32
3.98/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Pours a beautiful bronze color with reddish tones. I really love the color in this beer. The nose is of citrusy bitter hops, though not very pungent. The taste, though, is hops, hops, and more hops! Bittersweet and citrusy, the hops rule this brew. A lemony zest followed with a tangy twang across the palate in the finish. Great tasting beer. The intense bitter/tangyness makes this one a real sipper. Mouthfeel and drinkability are both enjoyable. A good pale ale here. Maybe not the most balanced, but an outstanding offering nonetheless.

jasonpeckins32, May 11, 2006
Photo of RedChrome
2.55/5  rDev -29.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured a fantastic blend of ruby and copper. It is almost like looking at a shiny penny in the sunlight. Very little head but what did pour stayed quite nicely. The head had an off-white color very similar to french vanilla ice creamm.

The odor was laced with more of a yeast odor then I expect, but I noted a slight aroma of sour apple. I really had to struggle to note the apple over the yeast.

The first taste hit my palate and struck me as very disappointing. I didn't find much of a taste at all. It was almost like drinking water. On a second sip, I did catch a big taste of the yeast I noted in the aroma. This beer had more aftertaste then actual taste.

While I was seriously let down from apperance and aroma to odor, the beer did have a good feel in my mouth. I was pleased that it wasn't a watery pale ale.

Overall, I can't recommend this beer to anyone who wants to do anything except try it just to see for themselves. I won't go as far as to say I won't drink it ever again, but it would have to be one of a limited selection of big brewery macros, such as Bud Light or Coors, for me to choose it.

RedChrome, May 11, 2006
Photo of HoboAGoGo
4.05/5  rDev +11.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Pours a rather good looking copper with a thick head that retained well. The nose was very yeasty, with some faint hops and a strange sour that wasn't detected on the tongue at all. In addition, the tongue is rather thin, but inoffensive, doesn't set the mouth on fire, but it has a nice bready element, with a bit of a sweet dryness. Very little aftertaste. Not bad, but not great.

HoboAGoGo, May 01, 2006
Photo of etenbus
3.68/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I remember several years ago when I first discovered Flying Dog's Doggie Style Pale Ale. The Denver-based brewery somehow got a distributor to ship its beer to Tallahassee. I was first intrigued by the Ralph Steadman artwork on the label and the verbage on the label that was inspired by the later gonzo-journalist Hunter S.Thompson. Steadman was the artist for most of Thompson's early books, including the classic Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. As far as I have seen, they have kept the Steadman hand for label art, which, by itself, is uniquely irrerevent enough for purchase. It became one of my refrigerator faves circa 1998-2001.

I also remember that when I popped the cap on those late 1990s Pale Ales, the hop aroma was so earthy and sticky and citrusy that we used to swear that the brewers weren't really using hops, but that more famous cousin of the hop plant.

This 2006 edition in western Missouri seems to have lost some of its inviting hop boquet; either that or my olfactory senses have been spoiled by heavier hop hitters like Goose Island IPA. (I also feel the same about the original hoppy west coast Pale Ale--Sierra Nevada). Don't get me wrong, the hops are there in the nose; they just don't bring the massive air assault they used to.

The beer pours an orange-copper colour, a little dark for a pale ale, but I'm not a stickler on color. The head was pillowy and left some lacing on the glass. The appearance most certainly beckons the discerning beer advocate.

One notices a soft and rounded mouthfeel on the sip. There is some sweetish malt up front but the hop bitterness executes a coup d'etat and is in control the rest of the way. A lingering dryness hits the back of the tongue and reminds you that this Flying Dog staple is about the hops, even if their aroma is not as illegal as it used to be. The carbonation is perfect for a drinkable ale. It goes down easily.

I have had this on tap at the Woody Creek Tavern in Woody Creek, Colorado--the tavern that was Dr. Thompson's lair until his suicide in 2005. It was perhaps fresher on tap and in Colorado.

etenbus, Apr 30, 2006
Photo of LarryV
4.1/5  rDev +12.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pours a tantalizing deep amber color with a frothy head. Floral hops dominate the aroma with a mellow graininess underneath. Hops come through in the flavor with a nice malty backbone to balance things out. I don't see this as an IPA as noted in some other reviews, I think it's a pretty well crafted pale ale as it states. It's a pretty tasty beer and quite easy to drink. Refreshing on a hot day with it's smooth creamy body.

LarryV, Apr 29, 2006
Photo of BadBadger
3.13/5  rDev -13.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Don't you just hate it when your pale ale becomes an IPA right under your nose? Dang it, I was looking for a pale ale. This brew pours an amber color, with minimal head formation. The smell is strongly of hops. The taste is overly hopped for my palate, especially when I am looking for less assertive bitter flavoring. There is a some what tasty citrus note, however. While not a horrific beer by any means, this beverage is not worthy of your hard earned dollar, when in search of a pale ale, when there are ample alternatives out there. As an IPA (which in this case was not wanted by the consumer), rather than a Pale Ale, this review would change ever so slightly, with a .5 increase for both taste and smell. If you enjoy IPAs and you know what you are getting with this in advance, you may want to give this a try.

BadBadger, Apr 29, 2006
Doggie Style Classic Pale Ale from Flying Dog Brewery
83 out of 100 based on 2,220 ratings.