1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Doggie Style Classic Pale Ale - Flying Dog Brewery

Not Rated.
Doggie Style Classic Pale AleDoggie Style Classic Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

2,056 Ratings
THE BROS
85
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 2,056
Reviews: 976
rAvg: 3.64
pDev: 12.64%
Wants: 30
Gots: 101 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Flying Dog Brewery visit their website
Maryland, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 08-17-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Doggie Style Classic Pale Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 2,056 | Reviews: 976 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of circus_cat
circus_cat

Virginia

2.25/5  rDev -38.2%

01-13-2013 16:56:08 | More by circus_cat
Photo of Brewfocker
Brewfocker


2.25/5  rDev -38.2%

06-18-2012 03:26:05 | More by Brewfocker
Photo of mwar
mwar

Kentucky

2.25/5  rDev -38.2%

11-27-2012 16:26:57 | More by mwar
Photo of FriedGold2112
FriedGold2112


2.25/5  rDev -38.2%

05-03-2012 05:57:57 | More by FriedGold2112
Photo of TheSarge
TheSarge

Virginia

2.35/5  rDev -35.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This pale ale has frragrances of sweet malt aromas with a tip of hops. Floral and fruity. Dark amber in color and produces moderate amount of head, and turns into fine lacing. This sample may had possibly suffered a little oxidation. Overall, this feels very watery and almost too flat. Not too bad, but I've had a lot better.

Serving type: bottle

01-27-2007 16:31:41 | More by TheSarge
Photo of charlatan
charlatan

United Kingdom (Scotland)

2.38/5  rDev -34.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

This one was slightly redder than one would expect a pale ale to be and had a significant head.

It smelled of banana and vinegar - not a great start!

This tasted more like a hefeweizen than a pale ale. Hopefully I was unlucky and got an old bottle (the bottle says 235A05 whatever that means), but the flavour here seemed to be dominated by yeast rather than malt or hops. The hops became apparent after a while, but yeast was the overwhelming player.

Serving type: bottle

05-23-2005 05:09:11 | More by charlatan
Photo of Brew33
Brew33

Ohio

2.42/5  rDev -33.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Wow.... I'd love to find something nice to say about this but I just can't. It's watery and lacks any real body, flavor or aroma. It has an odd aftertaste similar to the Golden Ale. I can't put my finger on it but it isn't good. I noticed the same "funk" with Molson beers. Yikes, avoid at all cost.

Serving type: bottle

04-28-2009 14:38:45 | More by Brew33
Photo of jmcrofts
jmcrofts


2.48/5  rDev -31.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Got this in a custom 6-pack since I've seen it everywhere and finally felt like giving it a shot.

Appearance - Nothing of note, looks like your standard ale with unremarkable head

Smell - Weak. Nothing really interesting here, and smells too 'grainy', almost like a pale lager.

Taste - Starts off well with some decent hop character, but too weak. Very unappealing metallic aftertaste as the hops fade away altogether.

Mouthfeel - Too light and watery. Pretty good carbonation though, which I appreciate.

Overall - Definitely not impressed with this one. Nothing particularly appealing about it, and the taste wasn't very enjoyable. Not terrible, I wouldn't refuse this beer if offered, but for your money there are much better choices out there.

Serving type: bottle

11-05-2012 06:50:30 | More by jmcrofts
Photo of dgfool
dgfool

Ohio

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

09-13-2013 06:15:17 | More by dgfool
Photo of Danflurry
Danflurry

Texas

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

12-28-2012 15:31:28 | More by Danflurry
Photo of bonbini26
bonbini26

New Jersey

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

01-10-2012 17:21:25 | More by bonbini26
Photo of BGsWo22
BGsWo22

New York

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

03-20-2013 23:11:40 | More by BGsWo22
Photo of Lwkerr
Lwkerr

Oklahoma

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

06-16-2014 22:39:47 | More by Lwkerr
Photo of ATXRyan
ATXRyan

Texas

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

04-25-2012 21:47:15 | More by ATXRyan
Photo of carteravebrew
carteravebrew

Colorado

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

06-20-2012 16:16:14 | More by carteravebrew
Photo of enginero
enginero

Florida

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

12-26-2011 21:53:37 | More by enginero
Photo of Thullin187
Thullin187

Tennessee

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

12-21-2011 10:59:01 | More by Thullin187
Photo of ToddThompson
ToddThompson

North Carolina

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

10-16-2013 15:51:44 | More by ToddThompson
Photo of aklude
aklude

Indiana

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

02-19-2014 11:07:23 | More by aklude
Photo of Agold
Agold

Pennsylvania

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

11-15-2011 07:06:43 | More by Agold
Photo of dudecandle
dudecandle

New York

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Wow, this was disappointing.

A: Light orange-brown body with small cap on the pour, which disappeared quickly, and therefore could leave no such thing as lacing.

S: Light citrus with underwhelming hop presence.

T: Slightly hoppy with some nutty malt, but overwhelmingly grainy with a slight citrus. The skunk of this beer was shocking. Not that it was overwhelmingly macro-esque, but for a Flying Dog product, it was too much.

M: Mediocre at best.

D: This was the first on-tap beer in a long time that I have not finished. I was shocked, appalled, and most relevantly, disgusted.
I want to blame the bar, but they're normally good with their taps. I'll give it a second chance when possible, but for now, this stands.

Serving type: on-tap

08-31-2009 01:42:45 | More by dudecandle
Photo of stcules
stcules

Italy

2.53/5  rDev -30.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Cherry color. Light foam. Good perlage.
In the smell american hop, grapefruit, and, overall, piney resin.
At the first sip, it tends to slip away. You can expect some more, considering the intensity of the smell.
Malt, light caramel, a light body, and a strong hoppiness in the aftertaste.
A light balsamic note. Piney resin. A little unbalanced. It is like to walk in a pine wood.
The monotone smell tends to make it a little boring.

Serving type: bottle

04-09-2007 09:39:10 | More by stcules
Photo of Erdinger2003
Erdinger2003

Iowa

2.55/5  rDev -29.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Appearance is pretty good actually. The head is nice, but the lacing doesn't stick. Brown in color.

Smell is hoppy and slightly fruity.

Taste is a little watery and a little skunky.

Mouthfeel is pretty watery, but I guess even water can be good.

Drinkability isn't so great.

Serving type: bottle

04-12-2006 05:33:43 | More by Erdinger2003
Photo of RedChrome
RedChrome

Connecticut

2.55/5  rDev -29.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured a fantastic blend of ruby and copper. It is almost like looking at a shiny penny in the sunlight. Very little head but what did pour stayed quite nicely. The head had an off-white color very similar to french vanilla ice creamm.

The odor was laced with more of a yeast odor then I expect, but I noted a slight aroma of sour apple. I really had to struggle to note the apple over the yeast.

The first taste hit my palate and struck me as very disappointing. I didn't find much of a taste at all. It was almost like drinking water. On a second sip, I did catch a big taste of the yeast I noted in the aroma. This beer had more aftertaste then actual taste.

While I was seriously let down from apperance and aroma to odor, the beer did have a good feel in my mouth. I was pleased that it wasn't a watery pale ale.

Overall, I can't recommend this beer to anyone who wants to do anything except try it just to see for themselves. I won't go as far as to say I won't drink it ever again, but it would have to be one of a limited selection of big brewery macros, such as Bud Light or Coors, for me to choose it.

Serving type: bottle

05-11-2006 06:33:49 | More by RedChrome
Photo of mattcrill
mattcrill

Ohio

2.55/5  rDev -29.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Aroma: Doughy and fresh yeast aromas up front. I don't mind it but the yeast smell is bordering on overpowering and I can get anything other than that. No esters or hop aroma. Odd.

Appearance: Slightly cloudy rich amber pour with sticky off-white head. Head retention is good.

Flavor: Some initial earthy bitterness, some mild pine tar resin, and a touch more doughy bread character. Balance is slightly bitter. Finish is clean and dry.

Mouthfeel: Medium-light body with lively, high carbonation. No warmth, creaminess, or astringency.

Overall impression: Had a hard time getting past the yeasty aroma. May have been an old sample but no way to tell. Won't try again.

Serving type: bottle

10-07-2012 18:57:18 | More by mattcrill
Doggie Style Classic Pale Ale from Flying Dog Brewery
82 out of 100 based on 2,056 ratings.