1. Rating beers by attributes (look, smell, taste, feel, overall) is back! Read the latest update ...
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Old Scratch Amber Lager - Flying Dog Brewery

Not Rated.
Old Scratch Amber LagerOld Scratch Amber Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

1,426 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,426
Reviews: 754
rAvg: 3.42
pDev: 14.62%
Wants: 28
Gots: 66 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Flying Dog Brewery visit their website
Maryland, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Lager |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 11-12-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Old Scratch Amber Lager Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,426 | Reviews: 754 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of jackndan
3.63/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Old Scratch: an amber lager from Flying Dog, and one that is not to bad.

Nice looking beer, deep amber, with an off white head, that leaves some lacing.

The aroma is extremely malty, nice and hearty.

The taste is more than decent, nice malt sweetness, with caramel tastes, not to much of a hop kick.

Nice brew, easy enough to drink, and a fine taste.

jackndan, Jun 06, 2003
Photo of Indybeer
3.9/5  rDev +14%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

12 oz bottle. Pours a dark amber, with a small head the quickly receded. Leaves bits of lace on the glass. The aroma of roasted malt is present, but no real hop aroma. You can taste the malt and it has a subtle hint of hops with a smooth finish Good carbonation. This is a good session beer

Indybeer, Jun 04, 2003
Photo of Loki
3.83/5  rDev +12%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Sampled in an American Pint glass from a rotational offering at 4th Street Filling Station in Winston Salem, NC.

Presented a deep amber with a faint head. I didn't watch them pour this beer so I don't know if it was the beer or the pour. The beer left ribbons of lacing throughout the sample with two 1" wide strips on each side that looked to be caused by some residual.

Smelled of roasted malt, carmel, and some floral hops. Nose was much more present via draft.

Tasted of roasted malt, hints of carmel, and a smooth hop finish. Very balanced, very crisp, and very clean. The draft had a little more body, and a biscuity taste via draft. Just a little more drinkability.

I rated the taste from both the bottle and the draft the same, however I think the draft tasted a little better but not enough to take it to a 4.5.

This good amber gets better on draft, but that is what you would expect. A great session beer and a great offering from Flying Dog.

Loki, Jun 03, 2003
Photo of GeoffRizzo
2.93/5  rDev -14.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a nice amber color with a thin soapy head. A faint, distant smell of fresh fruit and some hops, tough to detect. Very thin body, some hops and fruit to be noted, has a decent warming feeling. Just a thin and bland beer, not too many qualities, not one of the better Flying Dog brews.

GeoffRizzo, May 12, 2003
Photo of jlervine
3.43/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Amber in color, perfectly clear. Nice head, but fades quickly. Hops and caramel malt tickle the nose. Taste is subdued, malty on the finish. Mouthfeel is much more interesting - carbonation hitting here and there all over the tongue. Very drinkable, but boring.

jlervine, May 04, 2003
Photo of AtLagerHeads
3.58/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This was a real surprise. The pour created a cloudy amber look with a head that couldn't make it up to a finger even with much coaxing and teasing. The tan head retreated quickly and became a thin film that left small bits of lace. The nose was heavily malty with nary a trace of hops. Lots of grainy richness and bready notes. Yeasty. Not sweet, but not bitter either. Fairly dry tasting throughout with a substantial body that is not filling. Substantial residual tan oily residue.

AtLagerHeads, Apr 30, 2003
Photo of Boto
2.68/5  rDev -21.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Clear amber color, not too much head which dissapated rather quickly. I agree that this tastes like some form of a hybrid beer. Lager body, with some of the tartness and bitterness of an ale. I'm not quite sure how the brewer is calling this a "Steam Style" beer. Nothing about this reminds me of a steam beer. I'm guessing that the label art sells the beer. The art is quite good, but the beer is mediocre.

Boto, Apr 30, 2003
Photo of mickeymac
3.18/5  rDev -7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

It's amber with a brown tinge and little head. A metallic smell underlays the smell of butterscotch, making for a not completely pleasing combination of smells. The taste isn't much better. It's pretty bland with just enough going on to keep drinking it in the hope it comes together at some point. Unfortunately, it never really does. The Flying Dog stuff just doesn't really cut it.

mickeymac, Apr 27, 2003
Photo of AudioGilz
3.4/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

It's a clear amber color with hardly any head at all. The aroma is pleasant caramel maltiness. Caramel malts are pretty much the entire flavor as well, with a dry slightly hoppy finish. I find more of a toasty flavor in there as it warms. I enjoyed it, nothing exciting though.

AudioGilz, Apr 19, 2003
Photo of BeerBuilder
3.2/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours to an amber color with a big tan head. Leaves a bit of lacing when sipped down. The aroma was of sweet caramel malts, a bit of grain, and a slight fruitiness. The flavor had the sweet caramel maltiness with a fruity hop flavor. It was light-medium bodied beer, with a medium level of carbonation. It finished semi-dry and bitter. This was my second sampling out of their mix pack; overall it was a smooth, easy drinking beer.

BeerBuilder, Apr 10, 2003
Photo of johnrobe
3.35/5  rDev -2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

This brew pours a nice, clear burnt-orange amber with an off-white head that reduces to a cap but leaves lace rings nevertheless. The smell is of buttery toffee and tea-like hops. Light-medium bodied mouthfeel. The taste is of caramel malt with a nice dose of herbal/tea and mildly citrus hops and some fruity esters in the background. Unfortunately, a fair amount of diacetyl comes through in mid-palate. I guess this was done on purpose, but it seems wholely out of place...even for a California Common style brew. Fruitiness transforms into a somewhat dry/crisp finish which gives away its "steam" ale/lager heritage.

johnrobe, Feb 15, 2003
Photo of bditty187
2.83/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Orangey-amber hue, whitish head, ½ a finger’s worth, decent retention, pretty good lace. Rather fragrant bouquet, plenty of malt, hints of fruit, sweet caramel comes through as well. Surprisingly nutty taste, buttery, hints of tree-bark, malty… citrusy hops create the backdrop. Odd palate. Slightly sticky, yet bitter finish, not very dry. I can’t tell if Old Scratch is attempting to expand the realm of what is an Amber-Lager… or they have failed miserably at brewing an Amber-Lager. I tilt towards the latter. I don’t find this beer very impressive at all. I’d skip this one…

bditty187, Jan 14, 2003
Photo of TheLongBeachBum
2.93/5  rDev -14.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Flying Dog, Old Scratch Amber Lager, 5.32% ABV. 12 fl.oz Brown Bottle.

Dispensing the contents without a care in the world into my Imperial Pint Glass, this contributed to a massive (but wholly intentional) frothy, slightly off-white, rather yeasty looking, tanned head that was at least 3” deep. As the head settles it leaves a superb lace pattern that clings to the glass well. The perfect clear amber color, with the nicely developed head contributes to a good looking beer in the oversized Mug.
Nose is malty, with some caramel and not much else. The first mouthfeel was somewhat cold, as I had taken this beer straight from the fridge but it immediately revealed a sticky sweetness that I initially did not take to. As the beer warmed this became more prevalent and an aspect of the beer I did not care for too much. As the tastes develop, they are short lived but interesting at best, strange at worst. Thin mouthfeel. Has a caramel malt sweetness in the middle and one of those "sticky brown sugar" finishes that clings in the mouth, rather than lingers, if you know what I mean. I am always wary of beers that are listed with an ABV to more than one decimal place, guess I was right to be. Because, I am not enamoured at all by this, the first of my Flying Dog beers, to be honest.
A “well I tried it - but I don’t think I will go out of my way to have it again” beer.

Great label, shame about the beer – albeit strange, it is just “pretty average” for me.

TheLongBeachBum, Dec 16, 2002
Photo of Gusler
3.1/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

The beer pours a sparklingly clear deep amber color with a noble in size head that is creamy in consistency, the color a light tan with the lace a fine sheet to coat the glass. Nose is malt and slightly sweet with the start sweet and the malt profile fair to middling, top is light. Finish is sparingly acidic with the hops subdued and the aftertaste quite dry.

Gusler, Nov 15, 2002
Photo of budgood1
3.65/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

clear amber color. thin head and lace. toasted malt nose with some flowery hops. pretty full mouthfeel, very round and smooth...almost buttery....and then a lager crispness in the end...this leads to lingering ale like flavors on the tongue. lots of sweet caramel malt and oily hops make it very un-lagerish. a very interesting, if not schizophrenic brew, and one i found rather refreshing and fun to drink because there is stuff going on not normally associated with lagers. i'd like to try more steam beers to get a better understanding of the style.

budgood1, Oct 29, 2002
Photo of Bighuge
3.25/5  rDev -5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Clear amber in color. Posseses a thin and dense off-white head that is well retained. Leaves some nicely ringed lace. Nice caramel malt aroma with brown sugar mixed in. Pretty clean tasting. Caramel maltiness is the main player. But there is also some spiciness and dryness added by the hops. A little better than average if that.

Bighuge, Oct 25, 2002
Photo of ZAP
2.93/5  rDev -14.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Dark orange in color...a little lace...I get caramel maltiness on the nose, but it is very soft...the taste is of light caramel...a touch of ale like fruitiness....I guess this is a steam beer with lager yeast used at ale temperatures...it's decent...finishes dry surprisingly enough..just a little too tart on the finish for an amber lager, but it is definitely interesting...

ZAP, Oct 19, 2002
Photo of beernut7
3.28/5  rDev -4.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Initially this brew pours with a nice deep amber-orange color. The delicate lace sticks around for a little while. The aroma is very lightly malty. Overall the flavor is quite light as is the body. Slightly sweet maltgives way to a light, but sharp bitterness that disappears with a crisp finish.

beernut7, Sep 04, 2002
Photo of Thrasher
3.78/5  rDev +10.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This is the last of a sixer I bought 3 or 4 weeks ago. The 1st was the best, this is noticeably different. Definitely amber, approaching dark side of the spectrum, so they got that right. Head fizzled out and mouthfeel is flat but at the beginning I remember it being fine. Strong piney hops which are the appeal of this beer, giving it a unique character balanced by forceful caramel, buttery malts. Like others have noticed, some ale flavors. This is a good beer, filling and crisp, and it's changed my opinion of Flying Dog after I sampled their unpleasant yogurt-tasting Scotch ale a couple years back.

Thrasher, Sep 03, 2002
Photo of marc77
3.18/5  rDev -7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Dark copper in hue w/ brilliant clarity, topped by a one fingered persistent off white head. Attractive lace is left. The aroma is a combination of medium caramel malt and resiny citrusy hops, with a hint of sweet fruity esters. Biscuit notes become discernible as the brew warms. The flavor profile is clean overall and consists of dominant caramel sweetess and bready malt, with mild hop bitterness providing adequate contrast. Lightly bodied, but with a mouthfeel that's oddly slick and oily (See Portland Woodstock IPA) Finishes with caramel sweetness and more of the oily, tongue coating sensation lingering. Flavorwise, this is an enjoyable California Common / Steam (lager yeast fermented at ale temps) but the oily mouthfeel and finish was a bit offputting.

marc77, Sep 02, 2002
Photo of Jason
3.55/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Presentation: 12 oz brown long neck with an dog theme artsy label. No freshness date.

Appearance: Slightly hazy light copper in colour with an off white lace that sticks to the glass.

Smell: Hops hit the nose as a touch of esters make their way through also.

Taste: Hoppy oil, almost a bit citrusy, on top then it fades and a rounded toasty malt flavour and an even leafy hop bitterness rides into the after taste. Alcohol is quite warming. Faint esters and a mild fruitiness are noticable.

Notes: A pretty good brew, very flavourful but seems to have some ale qualities and finishes like an ale also with stronger than normal alcohol qualities.

Jason, Aug 08, 2002
Photo of John
3.35/5  rDev -2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Copper colored with a lightly toasted malt aroma. Good balance of subdued sweetness and spicey hop flavors. Pretty decent amber lager, although I would pick several others ahead of Flying Dog, namely Wagner, Saranac, SA Boston Lager, etc. Too bad many more worthy micros don't have the distribution resources that FD seems to.

John, Aug 06, 2002
Photo of StevieW
4.4/5  rDev +28.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Well the old doggie got me again, I had it in my head these beers would be lousy, but I really, really liked this one as well. Did I get an IPA in an amber lager bottle ? Nice copper color, big fluffy head with tiny hop bubbles coming through. Lots of hop smells and some slight sweetness. The taste is pleasantly hoppy, with an equal balance of malty sweetness. Unbelievably pleasant and drinkable, just the right body, balance, hops, and carmel sweetness. I must have got the best of the batch, this stuff was really tasty. Despite my doubts, this brewery is 3 for 3 with me. Just goes to show how many great beers are available, if you just look a little. I will buy it again.

StevieW, Jun 10, 2002
Photo of Pegasus
3.43/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Cloudy bronze in color with a rather full white head initially, fades fairly quickly, decent amount of sticky lace. Potent hops dominate the aroma, also slight fruit notes. Flavor is quite distinct, strong hops initially, with underlying tangy citrus flavors, then roasted malt and more hops towards the finish. A complex and satisfying beer.

Pegasus, May 03, 2002
Photo of Todd
3.58/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Clear, red-ish/amber colour, decent head. Aroma has a touch of sulfur in it and a soft noble hop. Semi-malty, not overly sweet character with light caramel, some roasted, some fruity. Light astringency and leafy feel on the palate. Hops are not bitter but have an interesting almost citrus quality to them, followed by a dry, crisp snap. Finish is a bit dry too, some woody notes. Wait ... what's this buttery flavour doing in my lager?

Other than that ... this is a pretty decent and drinkable beer.

Todd, Jan 31, 2002
Old Scratch Amber Lager from Flying Dog Brewery
78 out of 100 based on 1,426 ratings.