1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Rauch - Valkyrie Brewing

Not Rated.
RauchRauch

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
70
okay

29 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 29
Reviews: 27
rAvg: 2.75
pDev: 22.55%
Wants: 2
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Valkyrie Brewing visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
Rauchbier |  ABV ?

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 05-29-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 29 | Reviews: 27 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by marcobrau:
Photo of marcobrau
3.83/5  rDev +39.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This beer looks beautiful in my stemmed tasting glass: a bright white head falls slowly, leaving lace down the sides of the glass in the shape of a crown.
The nose is full fresh woody smokiness, which is very inviting at first, but the delicate aroma fades and I'm a bit disappointed. There's not so much smokiness to taste in this beer; so much as woody accent to the crisp malt flavors. Hops and malt are in balance, with the hops being favored in a fairly spicy finish.
This certainly isn't Aecht Schlenkerla; it's a tasty lager with beech wood smokiness adding some complexity and an interesting aroma. This a very enjoyable and tasty lager with a peculier complexity, but nothing as smoky as a true rauch bier.

marcobrau, Nov 29, 2006
More User Reviews:
Photo of ADR
3.03/5  rDev +10.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Thin pour, head generates as a handful of soapy bubbles on one side of the glass. Lighter amber appearance. Miraculously generated pretty nice lacing. "Delicately smoked" but a decided smokiness to the aroma, woody but less than ashy. Weakly carbonated with medium body, perhaps the release of all carbonation is the cause of this. Flavor is a little lacking, slight honey and a balancing smoke that's quite diminished compared to the smell. A leafy tanginess is somewhat confusing and asserts at the close, mixes with the missing carbonation and an almost "homebrew" sense of flat lifelessness to generate a feeling that the beer seems a little unfinished in some qualities.

ADR, Oct 17, 2004
Photo of cokes
1.7/5  rDev -38.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Uggh...I've been impressed with all of Viking's stuff until this one...

Pours a decent hazy orange. Off-white head fades to a wisp, but stays around.
Just a little faint smoke on the nose (actually, a weird smokiness...not all that good).
Start off with minor smoke on the taste buds. Some grassy flavors here too. Switches to an odd citric sourness in the finish. Not good at all.
Soda-like body and carbonation do not help things.

Tastes like someone ashed a joint into a bottle of 7-up.
Stay away

cokes, May 29, 2002
Photo of dirtylou
2.9/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

12oz single, burning a hole in my cellar fridge

appearance: due to the horrible reviews i have delayed opening this and now serve it in a great taste taster glass....pour is a clear pale copper tone with a light beige cap and no retention

smell: burnt rubber? it sure as shit isnt a rauchbier but its heavy on the smoke, smoked sausage, smoked cheddar...this may sound good, but its not

taste: more of that burnt rubber...huge smoke traits dominate anything else... apple, pear and other light fruits. interesting, misnamed, but interesting

mouthfeel: smoked

drinkability: ehh

dirtylou, Apr 20, 2008
Photo of brewbucker
1.8/5  rDev -34.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Tasted on Nov 7, 2007. A pretty clear yellow gold with a faint head. Aroma and flavor was not good. Seemed sour and burnt plastic. Body was thin and it seemed as though they put a couple drops of liquid smoke in it and called it a day. Time to have a Big Swede.

brewbucker, Dec 16, 2008
Photo of deanis30
2.25/5  rDev -18.2%

deanis30, Mar 19, 2012
Photo of emerge077
3.23/5  rDev +17.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Once I tasted this, in my mind it instantly registered as being related to smoked Gouda and Swiss cheeses.

Label states this lager uses Beechwood smoked malts.

It poured a light hazy golden color, with 1/2 finger of bubbly foam. Smoked Gouda aroma, not to campfire intensity, more the soft residual smoke in the brown rind of a smoked cheese. Ring of lacing, and tiny particles of suspended sediment.

Light apple and astringent herbal note, vague smoke in the aftertaste. Not heavy like Schlenkerla, more like a lesser version of their Helles. Medium-bodied due to being unfiltered, but with a somewhat watery finish. This seems to be a common characteristic from Viking. In the body and taste, it falls a little short. Points for creativity here, since there aren't that many Smoked Helles out there.

emerge077, Jan 06, 2008
Photo of CWhite
4/5  rDev +45.5%

CWhite, Dec 01, 2012
Photo of weeare138
3.13/5  rDev +13.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thanks to hopdog for this...
Appears a dark gold with streaky lacing left from the quickly fading off white cap.
Smell is sweet, fruit salad, smokey beechwood.
Taste is of the same aromas, although I'm not sure if that's good.
The mouthfeel is light and watery.

weeare138, Oct 16, 2005
Photo of happygnome
3.83/5  rDev +39.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

a: pours a pale copper color with about a half inch of beige head that dissapears rather quickly leaving very little lacing towards the center of the glass
s: bready/earthy (maybe a little honey aroma) malts dominate the aroma with hints of smokiness
t: nice malty bready aroma, hints of smokiness and light hop presence that balances this out
m: medium bodied beer with almost a creamy feeling, little carbonation

overall, i enjoyed this beer but i dont think that its vikings best

happygnome, Mar 06, 2008
Photo of TastyTaste
2.7/5  rDev -1.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance: What's a Rauch supposed to look like? This beer isn't bad looking, hazy copper with a creamy white head.

Smell: Smells like woodsmoke, that's the only way I can put it. Slightly sweet, but earthy and sharp.

Taste: Not my favorite style, but comapred to Rogue Smoke, this beer is obviously lackluster and underpowered. Rogue gets bigger smoke flavors, hop and malt. This beer has an odd fruitiness in the background, though. As smoke beers go, it is good (mostly because it doesn't have comparatively as much smoke flavor, but if you are looking for a smoke beer, you might want to go something better. Still, I don't like it, the thought of smoke in a beer disagrees with my palate.

Mouthfeel: Fairly thin, but that doesn't make it a bad beer.

Drinkability: Haven't acquired a taste for these yet, but I could handle this one better than i did Rogue Smoke. For what it is, ok.

TastyTaste, Nov 03, 2005
Photo of objectivemonkey
2.53/5  rDev -8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Into a pint glass, pours a much lighter than expected golden orange, little white head and some lacing. Aroma is vague, kind of sour but a little smoky, slight citrus. Taste is a let down, the 'rauch' coming out more as a cameo than anything, but mostly sour and cardboard fill the gaps, with a somewhat sweet malt filling the rest out. Not so much boring as blech, its just another from Viking that signals "Chaange coourse, ye fookin skar bookets! Soomthin hars goon askeuu!"

objectivemonkey, Dec 19, 2006
Photo of OWSLEY069
2.83/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours a golden yellow color with a white head. In the aroma, small smoke and a sweet maltiness. In the taste, a dry maltiness and a small presence of smoke. A smooth mouthfeel and a small dry smoke in the aftertaste. Needs more smoke, yet smooth and OK.

OWSLEY069, Jan 03, 2008
Photo of Wisconsin
3.13/5  rDev +13.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

22 ounce bomber into a pint glass

This one has been tucked away in my refrigerator for over a year now. I should also note this is my first review and taste of a rauchbier.

A - Pours a quarter inch head that fades a lace within five minutes. The beer is a reddish, brown color that is quite hazy. In the instance of my beer, there are flakes of malts and grains floating around, but that is probably because it has been sitting for so long.

S - Smokey malts and grains first hit my nose. A stronger whiff brings about sweet, spiced apples comparable to hot apple cider with a stick of cinnamon.

T - Smoked malts and grains are present along with a bit of a wood taste. There is also a decent blend of apples and cinnamon in this beer. Light on carbonation and a medium body.

M - Smokey, wood taste along with the malts and grains up front. Weak amount of carbonation transitions okay, not great to an cinnamon spiced apple finish.

D - This is an interesting style of brew, something that I would like to try more of, but I feel I could only have a few of these in a sitting.

Overall I think the beer lacked the necessary carbonation and fullness of the cinnamon spiced apple to make this a good beer. If those two elements were improved I think this could be a much better beer.

Wisconsin, Aug 23, 2009
Photo of SykDoc
3.05/5  rDev +10.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a bottle into a pint glass. It pours a minimally hazy straw color. A 1/2 inch light tan head forms leaving very little lacing. Modest carbonation visible.

The aroma was the best part with an earthy hops blend mixed with a very light caramel malt background giving it a bready aroma. Minimal smoke in the aroma.

The taste is primarily a smoked malty flavor with some graininess. Reminds me of a lager with some smoke added.

The mouthfeel showed a medium body with light carbonation that does not highlight the flavor. It goes down clean leaving minimal aftertaste.

This beer is drinkable and can definitely enjoyed when the weather warms. However, there are multiple areas for improvement, starting with the intensity of each component.

SykDoc, Apr 01, 2010
Photo of brdc
1.9/5  rDev -30.9%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I was very hopeful for this beer, since I love rauchbeers.
What a disappointment!
Hazy golden with a thin white head, there is none of that great, powerful smell I learned to associate with rauchbiers. It smells like whiskey, corn and just plain alcohol.
It is a little hoppier on the palate than expected, with a very faint smoked taste deep down below (or am I looking too hard??).
This is uncharacteristic of the style, and very poor as a beer anyway.

brdc, Apr 02, 2007
Photo of Tballz420
3/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

This is a darker orange brew, lots of tiny cabonation bubbles floating about, with no head, some bubbles on the top. There is a slight smoke scent to it. There is not much to the taste of this, some light smokiness, which is nice, but it ends there. Touch of light malt, not much in the hop department. It seems like they stopped adding ingredients just when it was getting good.

Tballz420, Jan 09, 2005
Photo of BeerBuilder
2.58/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours to a hazy copper/orange color with just a rind for a head. The aroma is floral, fruity, and juicy. I don’t get any smoke in the aroma. The flavor is very unusual. It is floral and somewhat fruity, again no smoke. It is light bodied and easy drinking with minimal carbonation. A very unusual beer, needs more Rauch malts.

Sampled 5/17/04

BeerBuilder, Aug 06, 2004
Photo of tavernjef
2.17/5  rDev -21.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pale and hazed golden orangish color of peach skin, very loosely bubbled off white head, some bubbles stay around the edge as it thins out from the middle, minimal spots of lace stick.
Aroma is quite light with a traceable amount of moldy hardwoods, moss, and dirt with a slight hint of smoked meat.
Taste starts weak, builds a nudge to some strange fruityness thats past its prime, old or bruised apple and pear, some slight smokey meats are underneath coming through in some the finish. More like an iced tea with smoked hot dog juices, sounds yummy huh?
Feel is thin, empty, tinny in areas, bland to say the least. I don't know what the hell is going on with Viking but this is ridiculous. Another dud. How do they make the yummy 'Big Swede' then turn around and make this and a few others duds with such a blantant disreguard for character and respect for the end product? Hello...cutting corners are we?

tavernjef, Mar 03, 2004
Photo of aforbes10
2.68/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Orange, sediment particles throughout. Short layer of creamy bubbles. Smells clean, vaguely malty. Thin, almost watery taste. A little pilsner malt flavor. Non-aggressive smoky flavor....a lot like a watered down Schrelenka (sp.) light bodied, kind of flat mouthfeel. Drinks easily, but it's a one note song, and a watery one at that.

aforbes10, Jun 30, 2008
Photo of jeffboo
2.75/5  rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Hmmmm, it lokks pretty nice with a deep amber color and small white head. The aroma is cider,light smoke and slightly vegetable like. It is medium bodied with a smoked meat-like flavor and maybe a little caramel malt with a smokey finish. It's really lacking in malt base for the smokey flavor. Even the grilled food I ate with it didn't change my impression. Not horrible but definitely lacking.

jeffboo, Aug 01, 2003
Photo of budgood1
2.28/5  rDev -17.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

pours out a clear, perfect amber colour. very thin, fine head. ample lacing. it's perfectly clear now what the house yeast provides the drinker as far as aroma and taste. this beer again is all roasted pumpkin seeds. some hints of smoke and fire. the barley malt flavours are of the glazed caramel vareity...with the rest of the flavour profile seemingly a delicate balance of beechwood and that "pumpkin" taste. in fact it says on the bottle: "a delicate beechwood smoked beer". i swear to god, anyone that has carved pumpkins and oven roasted the seeds will attest to the fact that the marzen beer from viking and now this "rauch" or smoke beer is all about the pumpkins. i'm not kidding. in fact there seems little difference between the copperhead and the rauch. i'm not saying it's bad....just unique. tastes of gourds, squash, carrots and pumpkins. mouthfeel is medium to a bit thin...making for an easy drinking beer if you're into the flavour profile. actually the smoke notes are a bit lame; i'd prefer more of an intensity to my rauch beer. not really recommended.

budgood1, Dec 12, 2003
Photo of Bighuge
1.75/5  rDev -36.4%
look: 1 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

When I open it, the noise lets me know this is gonna be way overcarbonated. Loud "Pffft" sound. I was right. On the pour, I get 3/4 worth of head and 1/4 worth of beer. Smells phenolic and a little sour. Just not right. Mouthfeel is very gassy. Not enjoyable at all. Taste is not as bad as everything else, but it's still below average. Sourness mixes with too many smoky phenols. This is drainpour.

Bighuge, Jan 09, 2006
Photo of Mdog
3.83/5  rDev +39.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Appearance: Gold with millions of suspended particles, a fading head.

Smell: Light smoky smell.

Taste: Starts with a generic lager breadiness, but then transitions into a nice smoked flavor.

Mouthfeel: Light, with lasting smokiness.

Drinkability: Easy to drink, maybe even one to give to the macro drinkers.

I picked this up without reading any reviews. After I brought it home I checked the site and thought "This is not going to be good." However, I was pleasantly surprised, it's no Alaskan Smoked Porter or anything, but I definitely got a nice smoked taste out of it that is not overbearing but definitely present. I don't know if I got one of the good bottles and everyone else got bad ones, but I'd definitely have this again.

Mdog, Feb 11, 2007
Photo of Soneast
2/5  rDev -27.3%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

Pours a hazy amber color, with a 1/4 inch thick, watery, off-white colored head that dissipates quite rapidly to a bubbly ring.

Hidden somewhere behind all the faux smokiness there are some subtle malt aroma, mostly a tad bready and somewhat sweet.

The smokiness is relatively subdued in the flavor, but i don't think that helps at all, as it seems like a badly concocted oktoberfest, with the slight breadiness and slightly sweet malt flavors, but it is fairly ruined by an over abundance of yeasty esters, leading to a sort of smoked lemon flavor, leaving an acrid aftertaste on the palate.

Pretty lackluster, watery body and very thin carbonation, this just doesn't feel that good in the mouth, the smokiness does little to help, only succeeding in making the beer feel greasy. I was really looking forward to trying this "rauchbier" since I am still new to the style and have never tried any made by an American brewer. All in all, this was a big letdown unfortunately.

Soneast, Sep 23, 2009
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Rauch from Valkyrie Brewing
70 out of 100 based on 29 ratings.