1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Alexander Keith's Dark Ale - Alexander Keith's

Not Rated.
Alexander Keith's Dark AleAlexander Keith's Dark Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
66
poor

66 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 66
Reviews: 36
rAvg: 2.66
pDev: 23.68%
Wants: 1
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Alexander Keith's visit their website
Nova Scotia, Canada

Style | ABV
English Dark Mild Ale |  4.10% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Previously known as 'Alexander Keith's Stag's Head Stout'.

(Beer added by: matt7215 on 11-17-2008)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 66 | Reviews: 36 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of mooseisloose
3.23/5  rDev +21.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Big tall boy can, why waste time on a grenade? Smells of roasted malts but not much hopping. Pours to a river in the iron range, translucent dark root beer color with a big foamy head. Upon tasting the first thing that stands out is that the mouthfeel is watery and thin. The taste starts with some well roasted malts then gets into a chaullky chocolate taste with a mild hoppiness and metallic finish. Tasty beer but indeed quite thin. The head however is durable and gains bonus points for appearance. Drinkable but not a standout.

mooseisloose, Apr 11, 2010
Photo of allergictomacros
3.35/5  rDev +25.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - Dark indeed. Rich, ruby red with a solid head of foam.

S - Dark sugars and roasted grain, dark fruit, and caramel with a hint of nuttiness.

T - Flavour is weak for the aroma. Some roast and toast, light fruit, and mild bitterness. Some sweetness as well.

M - Some astringency combined in with a light body.

D - OK drinker, but lacks serious punch.

allergictomacros, Mar 26, 2010
Photo of ThatWineGuy
3.25/5  rDev +22.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Sudsy mocha head impressive with three finger height and diminished only slightly leaving spotty, sticky lace. Opaque to my surprize, black, and smells like nutty milk chocolate with a bit of butter pecan. The look and smell of a porter is reinforced by the taste that features sharp roasted chocolate malts and toast. Moderately carbonated, there is a smooth, creamy texture. The finish gets a bit earthy and the aftertaste seemed to be not up to scratch, taking a bit away from an otherwise alright taste experience. The 4.1 ABV makes it good session material but as much as I thought it was tasty, I doubt I'd want to drink it all night.

Overall, I found the appearance and smell surprizingly positive but the taste a bit too sharp and the finish too abrupt with an earthy aftertaste that detracted from a better overall score, the finish was lacking with a burnt coffee kind of thud that did not blend well with the rest of the experience. Still, for a mass marketed beer, it's well worth a try and I liked it better than their more popular brand that they call an IPA.

ThatWineGuy, Feb 27, 2010
Photo of TerryW
2.93/5  rDev +10.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Kudos to these guys for making such a fine looking beer. Great head, elegant lace, interesting to look at. After that just a regular macro style-rip ground out by the big boys trying to get a piece of the micro-styled market.

Some chalkiness and chocolate like you'd expect from the style, but understated. Thin mouthfeel. Slightly boozy nose without any of the other stuff you'd expect from a brew of this type.

Drinkable but uninspired. Too subdued.

TerryW, Feb 03, 2010
Photo of mintjellie
2.25/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Alexander Keith's Dark Ale is dark brown in colour, showing ruby highlights when held to the light. It's beige head doesn't last very long and doesn't leave much lace to show for it's presence. It smells slightly nutty & faintly roasty. It barely has a scent to it at all. It tastes like Keiths with hints of coffee and caramel. Light bodied with high carbonation; feels thin and watery. It's like they took the regular Keith's recipe and threw in some specialty malts. It tastes pretty bad and doesn't seem very well thought out.

mintjellie, Feb 01, 2010
Photo of Gosox8787
2.48/5  rDev -6.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Presentation: Pint can poured into a tulip glass in two parts.

Appearance is dark ruby red to dark brown with a huge three finger pillowy mocha head. Aroma is deep caramel sweetness with a little pale maltiness. Not much coffee or chocolate here. Flavor profile also starts with caramel sweetness. Slight bitter coffee, but the nuttiness of the caramel dominstes. No hop presence. Some light breadiness in there as well. A much lighter flavor profile than an average stout. Mouthfeel is medium bodied and a little cheey. Almost heavy compared with how the rest of the beer feels. Drinkability is pretty good. The flavors are light for a stout and the ABV is more than manageable.

Overall, this beer just doesn't come close to fulfilling my expectations of a stout. The flavors are too light and uninteresting. i don't hate this beer, but it is just not great in any respect.

Gosox8787, Jan 26, 2010
Photo of ludachris
1.73/5  rDev -35%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

Pours a deep cola brown with 2 fingers of frothy and sticky beige head that leaves sticky sheets of lacing down the glass. Really nice appearance.

Faint smell of roasted malts, nuts, biscuit, and a touch of caramel. Very bland and unoriginal.

Shew. This is bad. A quickly fading roasted nutty character was about the only thing going on in the taste, asides from light biscuit and a dash of caramel.

Mouthfeel is ridiculously watery and thin with a body that's on par with their light lager. I got through about a quarter of this before I poured the rest down the drain.

This marks the worst stout I've had to date. I truly wasn't expecting much from Keiths with this offering, but this fell much below my expectations. Avoid as best you can.

ludachris, Jan 24, 2010
Photo of MeisterBurger
1.55/5  rDev -41.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Pours a blackened cola color, very dark but clear when held up to the light, with ruby highlights. One inch of slightly off-white head tops things off and retains quite nicely. Laces okay.

Smells of faint grains and roast with a tinge of leafy green hops.

The taste is astringently roasty, tinny and metallic, harsh and unpleasant. Roasty and bitter and chemically. It tastes...fake. There's a cold coffee like aspect too it, but like really bad coffee from a machine. Or, worse: Tim Horton's. Really the taste is harsh. Unpleasant. Not good.

Moving on....

Very thin bodied and watery.

I drank a third of the can and dumped it.

Avoid.

MeisterBurger, Jan 13, 2010
Photo of jhall00
2.45/5  rDev -7.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

A- Medium brown beer with lots of carbonation and full head

S- Nothing too noticeable

T- Nothing memorable. Very thin malt and bitterness. Not consistent with a dark ale

M- Thin and watery

D- Better than most macro beers, but not work searching out

jhall00, Jan 10, 2010
Photo of thehyperduck
2.6/5  rDev -2.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Regular tall-boy can received as a gift along with a bunch of other brews. I guess I'm the first to review a can of this stuff.

Pours an opaque black cola colour with a rather impressive tan head, but that may just be because I screwed up and poured too quickly. Retention is decent. It seems pretty good, at least visually - unfortunately this is basically the high point.

The smell is non-descript; to be honest I can't really make out any specific odours. 'Malty' is the only adjective I can confidently use here. This is a very fitting prelude to the taste, because that's about the only flavour I could make out; roasted malts. Maybe a bit of a coffee after-taste, with a faintly bitter finish. Not repelling, but not very creative for a dark ale. The carbonation is surprisingly low - at least they did not try to use it to mask the lack of interesting flavours. It definitely has a watery mouthfeel for a stout.

It's quite drinkable, and I can see how this would seem interesting to someone who has never had anything more exotic than Keith's IPA. But in the end it's just a bland offering for the style. Dark ale for the masses? Yep - I hear you, JohnnyBarman. I won't go out of my way to buy this again.

thehyperduck, Dec 31, 2009
Photo of JohnnyBarman
2.5/5  rDev -6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Had this on tap at the Whale and Ale in Kitchener. It was cheap Keith's night, thought I'd give it a go.

Started off well. Poured into a typical Keiths glass, nice and dark, almost like a porter. Tan head, good lacing.

The smell was okay, but not very noticable. A bit of chocolate and coffee, a slight cola effect in the back. Not bad though.

The taste is where it completely fell off the rails. Bland, bland, bland! One of the poorest dark ales I've had in a long time. Only a bit of chocolate and coffee at the very beginning, bitterness at the finish; the middle was watery and boring. It literally tastes like a dark regular Keiths, like they added some dark malts to a Keiths vat and hoped for the best. I could finish it, however, and it wasn't repugnant. High praise...

Mouthfeel was thin and watery. No real redeeming factors here.

Very poor effort; not worth bringing to Ontario. Dark ale for the masses, really. It's a shame too, because there are so many better dark ales brewed in Ontario, but this one will get all the attention in pubs.

Avoid.

JohnnyBarman, Dec 04, 2009
Photo of Long813
2.05/5  rDev -22.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

G: Keiths Pint

A: Dark brown, half an inch of off white head with poor retention and little lacing.

S: Faint scents of malts, chocolate and hops.

T: Chocolate is a little stronger in taste than it smells, some roasted coffee beans and hops follow. Still quite faint in flavour.

M: Medium-light bodied with medium-high carbonation. Leaves a slight dry-bitter feel.

D: I did not enjoy this much at all. It was lacking in all aspects and to boot I had this when they tried to call it a stout. I would never pay a premium price for a beer like this when there are others out there which are far better.

Long813, Dec 02, 2009
Photo of manutd5
3.98/5  rDev +49.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Tried this on-tap at the Lower Deck Pub. I may be bias in my opinion because I'm a HUGE Keith's fan... I liked it. Not my favorite Keith's mind you, but I did enjoy it. Had a Guinness look to it, but a hint of Keith's taste and it was not overly strong or thick. Nice beer.

manutd5, Nov 14, 2009
Photo of mrmanning
3/5  rDev +12.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Draught sample- A dark brown that lets some light in, pours a medium sized frothy mocha cap that recedes to a thin cap. Nose of toasty malts, some milk chocolate, mild pit fruits, some hops. Flavour profile is much of the same, with the chocolate, roasty malts, a bit nutty too. Somewhat fruity, leading to a slightly bitter finish to balance out the sweetness. Pretty good actually, but seems more like a Dunkel to me.

mrmanning, Aug 03, 2009
Photo of Bobbyok
2.4/5  rDev -9.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Tap at O'Carroll's. Cola-like appearance. Dark ruby colour, nowhere near opaque, probably a shade lighter than Guinness with a fully diminishing fizzy off-white head. Lightly grainy, very faint chocolate and roast aroma with some acidic and vinous notes. Grainy, lightly acidic start with a fruity, acidic, vinous, and lightly roasty bitter finish. Light (if I stretch it I could get as far as light to medium) bodied fizzy, almost crisp mouthfeel - very lager-like feel. Cleaner than I expected, but this borrows all the worst aspects of Labatt's Velvet Cream Porter, Guinness, and Sleeman's Original Dark. It's a dunkel that isn't a dunkel, a porter that isn't a porter, Guinness that isn't Guinness, and most importantly, a stout that bears no resemblance to a stout of any kind. I'd add American Dark Lager that isn't, but that's probably the most accurate classification for this. It's not terrible, granted, and it's better than Keith's IPA, but I didn't find it enjoyable. For InBev/Labatt/Keith's to call this a stout is a greater heresy than calling their IPA an IPA, if that is even possible. Poor old AK rolls in his grave yet again.

Bobbyok, Nov 19, 2008
Photo of matt7215
2.15/5  rDev -19.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

on tap at the Black Badger in Cambridge ON

taps deep red, not even close to black

aromas are of roasted malts mixed with the same sweet aromas of a regular Keith's (fake) IPA.

the flavour is not very good. overly sweet with some roasted malt coming through the otherwise bland and watery body. the runaway sweetness is not held in check by anything, not hops, not carbonation, nothing.

at least regular keiths can be somewhat redeeming on a hot summer day but this mess probably shouldnt be consumed by anyone on a regular basis.

maybe try this is there is nothing else availible and you really feel the need to have a beer. otherwise avoid.

matt7215, Nov 17, 2008
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Alexander Keith's Dark Ale from Alexander Keith's
66 out of 100 based on 66 ratings.