1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Leinenkugel's Fireside Nut Brown - Jacob Leinenkugel Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Leinenkugel's Fireside Nut BrownLeinenkugel's Fireside Nut Brown

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
69
poor

768 Ratings
THE BROS
51
awful

(view ratings)
Ratings: 768
Reviews: 367
rAvg: 2.95
pDev: 26.1%
Wants: 2
Gots: 18 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Jacob Leinenkugel Brewing Company visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
Euro Dark Lager |  4.90% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

"Natural Flavor" is added to this beer.

(Beer added by: mothman on 08-12-2008)
View: Beers (35) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Leinenkugel's Fireside Nut Brown Alström Bros
Ratings: 768 | Reviews: 367 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of MarkyMOD
MarkyMOD

Colorado

3.75/5  rDev +27.1%

04-05-2012 16:32:03 | More by MarkyMOD
Photo of akorsak
akorsak

Pennsylvania

3.18/5  rDev +7.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A 12 oz bottle, leftover from Turkey Day.

A: The beer is a brighter orange copper color, brilliant in its radiance. Transparent although without head.

S: Nutty, a firm aroma coming out of this one. Lightly toasted grains and caramel follow. The sweetness is palpable, a little much.

T: Quite sweet, the natural flavors lend a near-cloying syrupy nature to the beer. Nuts and toast are apparent, even over the intense sweetness. The aftertaste brings back a flourish of nuttiness. Mid-sip, hops add just a bit of diversion. The natural flavors are, well, unnatural.

M: The mouthfeel is sweet, too sweet for its own good. One and done.

Serving type: bottle

12-02-2011 01:09:01 | More by akorsak
Photo of mothman
mothman

United Kingdom (Wales)

3.1/5  rDev +5.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a mug. Little head that fizzles down quickly. No lacing. Color is a clear mahogany. Not dark at all.

Aroma is like a lager. Smell is much like grain. I wasn't expecting this at all.

The taste is also like a lager, but it has a unique touch. It tastes a lot like a cinnamon cereal. Very odd, but sort of appealing.

Mouthfeel is somewhat smooth. Heavy carbonation.

Overall, I was expecting more of a brown ale, but was way off. Not something I would ever purchase again.

Serving type: bottle

12-07-2008 02:29:14 | More by mothman
Photo of BillRoth
BillRoth

Maryland

3/5  rDev +1.7%

12-29-2013 04:15:42 | More by BillRoth
Photo of Huhzubendah
Huhzubendah

District of Columbia

3.25/5  rDev +10.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle from drabmuh in an effort to help me review all 104 styles. Thanks Matt!

A: The beer is clear and light copper hued, with 1/4" of head.

S: The aroma is primarily of sweet malt, lager, subtle fruits.

T: The beer has some good flavors happening, but they are all very muted and mild. Subtle fruit and nut flavors are pleasant but could be brought out more.

M: Thin in body and perhaps a bit low in carbonation.

D: An OK offering. I had no problem finishing a pint, but likely would not go back for another.

Serving type: bottle

01-31-2011 02:39:02 | More by Huhzubendah
Photo of beerthulhu
beerthulhu

New Jersey

3.43/5  rDev +16.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A: Poured a cranberry ice tea color with a brilliant clarity and a fizzy flat tan colored head that was quick to dissipate. Visible effervesce was medium, the coloring a few shades lighter redder then expected and the head disappointing with an overall average appeal.

S: The nose was promising, with a bit of fresh smoky nature or rich dried toffee with a finishing fade of dried apple and cherry skins. While not particularly nutty as advertised it was sweet with a dried fruity nature with shades above average regards.

T: The flavor was sweet, highlighted by a fresh fruitiness of apple peels and cherries. A light sense of toasted caramel and warm, moist nutbread also comes through. The finish is bright and fruity of apple skins with a fairly clean fade. Again lacking a good deal of nuttiness but there is a faint underappreciated smokiness that I found soothering and woodsy. Not particularly known for their ample bodies of flavor this one came across fairly decent to me.

M: The mouthful had a nice tightly bubbly sensation with a medium consistency and a syrupy feel. A dry fruity fade ensures on the swallow.

D: Decent drinkability , a bit sweet but certainly manageable at 2-3. Delivers a fair amount of flavor and probably one of their better beers. Worthy of single purchase, but a six pack probably wont go to waste either.

Serving type: bottle

02-15-2010 13:44:48 | More by beerthulhu
Photo of Latarnik
Latarnik

New Jersey

2.75/5  rDev -6.8%

05-26-2014 20:52:15 | More by Latarnik
Photo of Bighuge
Bighuge

Minnesota

2.78/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Clear auburn body. Thin off white head. Lacing is sporadic. Sweet aroma. Confectionery sweet. Artificial kind of sweet. Not really that appealing. The taste follows suit. Something artificial tasting here. The label says "Beer with Natural Flavor." What's "Natural Flavor"? What type of extract did they add?? This is not a genuine tasting brown ale. Maybe it was hazelnut extract or something. It's too sweet and lacks the nice brown malt roast flavors I like in nut brown ales. This is drinkable, just not something I'd return to. Glad I got a single.

Serving type: bottle

03-16-2009 03:31:49 | More by Bighuge
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
Beerandraiderfan

Nevada

2.69/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75

Dark copper color, decent clarity, 1/2" of mild tan head on it, doesn't do much in terms of retention or lacing.

Aroma is nondescript sweet aroma and a mild nuttiness.

More mildness on the way in the palate. Sweet and nuts are minimal. Really thin body doesn't help the flavors settle, just makes it better in terms of 'drinkability' I'm guessing. Plastic flavors going on in the mouthfeel. Its digressing. Coming off as some weak campfire roasted nuts in a watery envelope. There doesn't seem to be much in the way of malt, not much in the way of roasting of that hint of malt.

Its just a thin, sweet beer with some nice color. Not quite oktoberfest, not quite brown ale. Not quite an enjoyable beer.

Serving type: bottle

03-15-2013 18:35:39 | More by Beerandraiderfan
Photo of LXIXME
LXIXME

New Mexico

3.25/5  rDev +10.2%

02-25-2014 22:54:40 | More by LXIXME
Photo of Kelp
Kelp

New Hampshire

2.75/5  rDev -6.8%

05-04-2013 23:47:01 | More by Kelp
Photo of JohnGalt1
JohnGalt1

Idaho

2.75/5  rDev -6.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

12oz picked up today at New Vintage for about $1.35.. poured into my shaped SA glass...

1/2 head went away almost instantaneously.. brew is not really brown at all.. more amber.. no lace.. no cap...

aroma is nutty extract.. I'm assuming hazelnut.. some caramel.. waaaay to much extract... sorta smells artificial..

flavor is the same but with the artificial extract from front to back.. leaving a lingering unappealing sorta chemical finish... caramel and watery bready notes in the middle.. lite body and very big carbonation.. yeck... not good.. doesn't seem natural at all.

3.5/3/2.5/3.5/2.5

Serving type: bottle

11-22-2008 05:13:11 | More by JohnGalt1
Photo of dmorgan310
dmorgan310

Panama

3/5  rDev +1.7%

03-25-2012 20:09:19 | More by dmorgan310
Photo of chinchill
chinchill

South Carolina

3.19/5  rDev +8.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

12 oz served in a pint glass about 1 month before end of (presumably) "best by" date stamped on bottle.

A - a clear, dark, red-orange amber with a short-lived and smallish head. Virtually no visible carbonation.

I thought the "Nut Brown" would refer to the coloration, but perhaps it refers better to the taste which is markedly nutty in both mid-taste and in the finish. I found the pronounced nuttiness to be the best attribute of this otherwise rather pedestrian brew, elevating it to a beer of interest and, likely, making it an exceptional accompaniment to certain foods (yet to be identified). The taste also has a nice roasted malt character and is considerably better than the aroma which has a less pronounced nuttiness and lacks any other particularly interesting or inviting quality. The aroma has some of the negative characteristics of some high ABV ales.

Too little carbonation had a small negative impact on my ratings of both appearance and mouthfeel. Mouthfeel is also a bit too light.

Serving type: bottle

02-01-2011 23:26:05 | More by chinchill
Photo of THECPJ
THECPJ

Delaware

4/5  rDev +35.6%

11-28-2011 01:34:33 | More by THECPJ
Photo of rolltide8425
rolltide8425

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev +1.7%

07-22-2012 03:46:04 | More by rolltide8425
Photo of GarthDanielson
GarthDanielson

North Carolina

2.25/5  rDev -23.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Not good...and I rarely start off a review by stating that outright, but this was a beast to drink. Not in a good, challenging way, either. Poured from a bottle into a pint glass, the beer had a decent appearance. The beer has an almost barn-red/brown color, with a decent (2") head. It got a little shaky from here. The smell has a blending of hazelnut, malt, and hops. When you first drink this brew, you get a mouthful of confusion clumsily barreling around your tastebuds. The hazelnut and hops are present, but the sweetness is thrown off by the increased and overcarbonation and the lightness of the body. The beer doesn't have the substance to balance or compliment the flavors it is trying to pull off. It ends up having a sharp and unpleasant finish, and was not overly enjoyable to choke down. I'm going to give myself a bit of time before trying this brewery's other offers to attempt an unbiased sample.

Serving type: bottle

12-14-2010 00:06:59 | More by GarthDanielson
Photo of BeerFMAndy
BeerFMAndy

Wisconsin

2.4/5  rDev -18.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

10 (ish) tap pour into an American tumbler pint.

A - Pours from the tap clear bronze brown with a stout, off-white head. Low retention and no lace left over.

S - Cold, metallic nose with a nutty amber aroma. It's pretty bland. A huge departure from their first batch that was full of aroma and flavor, sadly.

T - Hints of nuttiness and amber malts. Cold and metallic in flavor with a hard mineral finish.

M - Very light-bodied and bland with a highly carbonated finish.

D - Total weaksauce. I hate to do this, but I'm just being honest; I'm glad I got this pint for free because my pour blew the keg but I didn't even end up drinking more than a few sips of this. The first year this was released, it was awesome. Apparently people complained it was too 'strong' or something, looking to have something with less flavor. Either way, this beer isn't good stand-alone. It's god-awful when compared to the first batch.

Serving type: on-tap

11-08-2010 12:59:40 | More by BeerFMAndy
Photo of jrallen34
jrallen34

Illinois

2.73/5  rDev -7.5%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

On tap into a pint glass...Pours an ugly watery light brown, looks like toilet water. Light watery tan head for a second then gone...The aroma is half ok, roasty and nutty, but then comes generic notes of sterile skunk and grains...Taste and feel is really light and watery. This is pretty bad.

Not worth trying.

Serving type: bottle

12-13-2010 23:50:39 | More by jrallen34
Photo of flagmantho
flagmantho

Washington

3.45/5  rDev +16.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured from 12oz bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance: medium-brown hue with a completely haze-free body and a nice effervescence. Head is a thin layer of pillowy ivory foam. Not bad.

Smell: slightly sweet and very biscuity malt aroma with a nutty component, possibly hazelnut. It's not bad, per se, but biscuit plus hazelnut is not among my favorite combinations.

Taste: sweetish malt with a lot less biscuit and hazelnut than the aroma. I'm also getting some mild tones of coriander in the mix; it's interesting. I would never call this a "Euro dark lager", as it is classified here, but it makes a tasty-enough nut brown ale.

Mouthfeel: medium to medium-light body with a good carbonation and a frankly surprising creaminess. Definitely the best thing about this beer!

Overall: this is a bizarre beer that I find growing on me somewhat. The aroma is a touch off-putting to my personal taste, but the sweet, hazelnutty, brown ale flavor is just weird enough to appeal.

Serving type: bottle

03-27-2012 19:30:15 | More by flagmantho
Photo of Bitterbill
Bitterbill

Wyoming

3.38/5  rDev +14.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

It pours a dark amber brown with a 2 finger head of foam.

The smell is on the sweet side with notes of sweet malt and hazelnuts.

The taste is prety good. I get lots of hazelnuts mixed with some vanilla and caramel malt and a very light bitterness that reminds me of hot cocoa. The flavours are fairly strong on the front end but they really fall near and through the finish to the point of being watery.

Mouthfeel is light and the carbonation is medium.

Head retention and lacing are very good.

Bottom line: This is an interesting brew that doesn't get me all excited or anything but it's easy enough to drink 1 maybe 2 bottles at a sitting.

Serving type: bottle

11-20-2008 23:34:21 | More by Bitterbill
Photo of LiquidAmber
LiquidAmber

Washington

3.13/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a Gulden Draak tulip. Pours a medium to dark red brown amber. Thin off-white head that dissipates quickly to a ring around the glass. Aroma of sweet malt and nuts with a faint vegetable element; faint but pleasant. Flavor very mild, faint roasted malt and lightly nutty, finish abrupt with slight maltiness. Tastes like the flavor elements are all there, but extremely subdued or watered down. No off flavors, but completely underwhelming in flavor. Light bodied. Would be satisfactory with more robustness in the flavors that are present.

Serving type: bottle

03-04-2012 00:52:42 | More by LiquidAmber
Photo of iL0VEbeer
iL0VEbeer

New Jersey

3.5/5  rDev +18.6%

03-09-2012 05:26:50 | More by iL0VEbeer
Photo of DrDemento456
DrDemento456

Pennsylvania

3.3/5  rDev +11.9%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A - Poured a nice "nut" brown color and I even got a half inch of head to boot. Little lacing.

S - Smell pretty much sold me. Full of nuts, roasted malts and a bit of bitter.

T - Taste kind of let me down. Started off pretty great but it was a kind of skunk taste in the roast malt. Gave off a sort of bad peanut taste (old nuts) but after a while it gets pretty smooth. Still I shouldn't have too "get used to it"

M - Comes off pretty light. Drank it pretty slow.

D - In the end I wished it was a bit more sweet. That may have sold me but overall just an average beer.

Serving type: bottle

01-14-2011 07:09:14 | More by DrDemento456
Photo of OWSLEY069
OWSLEY069

Pennsylvania

1.9/5  rDev -35.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Pours a clean orange-ish to brown color with a light tan head. In the aroma, a dry nuttiness and a small caramel sweetness. In the taste, sweet to dry caramel backed by a dry nuttiness. A small spice like bite and a medium to lighter bodied mouthfeel, with a dry caramel like aftertaste. Caramel and nutty, a bit sticky sweet to dry, eh!, pedestrian.

Serving type: bottle

01-14-2012 13:48:09 | More by OWSLEY069
Leinenkugel's Fireside Nut Brown from Jacob Leinenkugel Brewing Company
69 out of 100 based on 768 ratings.