1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

1888 Bock - Jacob Leinenkugel Brewing Company

Not Rated.
1888 Bock1888 Bock

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

470 Ratings
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 470
Reviews: 297
rAvg: 3.26
pDev: 16.56%
Wants: 1
Gots: 11 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Jacob Leinenkugel Brewing Company visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
Bock |  5.10% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: brewdlyhooked13 on 12-12-2008)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 470 | Reviews: 297 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of BEERchitect
2.53/5  rDev -22.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

As with most other Leinhenkugel beers, 1888 Bock takes some shortcuts that cheapens the style.

A standard Bock-brown with mohogany highlights, good clarity, and a lot of carbonation. Off white head shows fizziness at first but soon settles into a froathy blanket that covers the beer and laces well. Aside from the carbonation, the beer has a handsome appearance.

The character of the beer is a one-dimentional malt flavor and aroma. Wet grain flavors play a major role in the complexity where a malty melanoidin-rich flavor should take precedence. Grain astringency gives an awkward bite and hurts the smoothness of the beer. Light caramel and toast try to make the beer Bock worthy but is more of a tangent than a benefit.

Thin, harsh, and astringent- the mouthfeel is where the beer suffers the most. Michelob Amber Bock passes for a better Bock than this. Not a good showing at all.

BEERchitect, Feb 11, 2010
Photo of likethetaste
4/5  rDev +22.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pick this up at food lion just to give it a try. A nice surprise. This is pretty good. Pours a nice medium brown with a nice head. Really not much in smell. Taste has hints of nut in it. Feel nice in the mouth and this is very drinkable. This is not a bad beer to pick up at food lion.

likethetaste, Feb 05, 2010
Photo of Fnord
3.6/5  rDev +10.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Appearance - Clear, bubbly red with a cream-colored head.

Smell - Caramel malt, alcohol, and hay.

Taste - Sweet and malty. There's a little bit of bitterness and walnut in the middle, and a lot of caramel throughout. The finish is long and sweet.

Mouthfeel - Medium thickness and high carbonation. Pretty crisp.

Notes - This is actually a pretty decent beer. A little low in alcohol for the style, and more carbonated than I prefer, but otherwise not bad. Kind of reminds me of Shiner Bock, though a bit more complex. It seems like the kind of beer that might be much improved on tap. Another good intro-to-craft beer.

Fnord, Feb 03, 2010
Photo of armock
3.5/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Poured a mahogany color with a tan head that leaves lacing behind

S - Has a sweet malty nose

T - Follows the nose sweet malt with a touch or caramel

M - This beer has a medium body with medium carbonation to it

D - For what it is its really not a bad beer it has a pretty good taste thats easy to drink for an easy to get beer its worth a shot

armock, Jan 31, 2010
Photo of giblet
2.93/5  rDev -10.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

a lighter than expected bock. brown opaque color. light carbonation. light lacing. decent taste but a bit weak for me there too. this would go well with food for it would not overpower the food nor fill you up too much. worth a try but there are better bocks out there.

suckem up and movem out


giblet, Jan 30, 2010
Photo of ncm45
3.58/5  rDev +9.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A - Dark brown color with poor head.
S - OK but nothing exciting.
T - Not bad but I'm not sure it is their best effort.
M - Light - what I expect from their beer.
D - Definitely something I won't mind having but I might go back to getting their Creamy Dark when I'm in the mood for a Leinenkugel.

ncm45, Jan 29, 2010
Photo of bbeane
3.85/5  rDev +18.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A- Poured into a snifter... a weak fizzy head erupts and disappears quickly leaving no lacing. Beer is ruby/brown with little activity

S- Smells of malt, bread, coffee

T- Ill be honest, much better than I expected. Has a nice caramel malt taste with a crisp finish

M- Medium/full bodied with light/medium carbonation

D- I think I could put a few of these down. Definitely better stuff out there, but the best Leines I've had so far


bbeane, Jan 27, 2010
Photo of BeerDrinkerDave
2.68/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

What a weird name for a beer company. The beer pours a weak head (pinky width) which dissapates quickly into a thin lingering foam like a cheap Bud.
The smell isn't bad, not inviting either. The taste is ok but not impressive by far. The color is a deep brown, oak cask color.
I probably won't be purchasing this one again.

BeerDrinkerDave, Jan 22, 2010
Photo of DrDemento456
3.75/5  rDev +15%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

I wanted to try this for a while but had so many other beers to try it never ended up in my six pack until now.

A - Not as dark as I expected for a bock. Head was pretty decent though.
S - Very slight malt smell. Nothing to get excited about.
T - Slight malt with a porterish bitter taste. OK I guess.
M - Light and crisp. Always good for a Lennie.
D - One of my favorites from the brew but Berry weiss will always be my first.

Overall if this was stocked in PA at a decent price per six pack it may sit in my fridge but eventually get downed in one sitting.

DrDemento456, Jan 19, 2010
Photo of DerekP
3.73/5  rDev +14.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottle poured into pint glass.

I was in my local 6-pack shop looking for randoms to pick up when I saw this: Leinenkugel's 1888 Bock. I'm a fan of Leinenkugel Brewery (Jacob Leinenkugel Brewery to be exact). Based out of Chippewa Falls, WI, the only beers of theirs that I'm either opposed to drinking or haven't thought were that great were Berry Weiss & Classic Amber. Berry Weiss is close to wine in sweetness/intensity, and Classic Amber is earthy and unflattering. But try them both and decide for yourself.

Today was the first day I've ever seen 1888 Bock. The beer is dark brown, maybe mahogany. Lacing does not exist in this beer's world. As you can see in the picture, a healthy head establishes itself at first, but it turns out only to be a card carrying bluff. There is a rim of foam after a few minutes, but it's quality is similar to that of a settling soda.

The smell emits sweet malts, a little alcohol, and an oak barrel. The taste is about the same, with sweet malts coming out the most, but balanced with an alcohol bite. I would assume the bite is also derived from hops, but I can't really distinguish hops from alcohol in this beer. Bitterness is present, but nothing overwhelming. If you like bocks you shouldn't be disappointed or taken aback. It goes down nicely without a fuss, and the body is a standard medium.

I'm happy to say that this is another Leinenkugel brew that I approve of.

Side Note: I bought this beer for 98 cents. It had acquired the cardboard box dust around the shoulders of the bottle, a condition that always makes me question whether my purchase will be satisfying or just plain disappointing. I'd have to say that although this one example doesn't prove anything 100%, dust on the bottle doesn't necessarily mean the beer has been sitting around too long for it to be consumed.

DerekP, Jan 19, 2010
Photo of AmberMan22
2.88/5  rDev -11.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a nice solid brown, darker than most brown ales. Finger+ of creme colored head. when backlit it turns to a radiant strawberry red.

Smells roasty and malty, here goes.

Taste is underwhelming. Everything is there, but there isn't enough of it. Malt is weak, which is disappointing for a bock -- especially one so dark. Can barely taste the hops, everything seems a little watery.

Way too fizzy. Carbonation is even worse out of the bottle.

Overall, it's not terrible, but it certainly is a little disappointing. Especially when I just had Sam Adams Winter Lager.

AmberMan22, Jan 18, 2010
Photo of emsroth
3.48/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle

App: Small off white head that very quickly dies. A beautiful medium brown that is just too dark to be transparent.

Smell: Lots of great roasted malt. Solid aromas of coffee and some caramel. Herbal hops make themselves known, but are subtle.

Taste: A rather uniform taste of dark caramel/coffee. Ends with a wonderful marriage between husky malt, coffee roast, and herbal bitterness.

Crisp bock carbonation that I love, but the body is a bit thin and detracts.

emsroth, Jan 17, 2010
Photo of whtguitarguy
3.8/5  rDev +16.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Pours to a brown color with a little bit of red when held up to the light. It has a rather sweet aroma. It doesn't really taste like beer to me. No alcohol flavor, a medium mouthfeel. Flavors are a bit sweet. The best thing is that there is no aftertaste. Enjoyable.

whtguitarguy, Dec 26, 2009
Photo of BretSikkink
3.05/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Medium brown color with no haze, lots of red-orange highlights. Tops has some good stick and leaves a decent lace even on a shaker pint. The nose is noticeably chocolatey for the style, along with other brown ale notes. A hint of Munich malt keeps it in line with a bock. Not much going on in the nose in terms of power.

The beer is more than a little watery. The malts are barely present, weighing in with hints toward caramel, chocolate, hazelnut, etc. That, combined with a fizzy, light body makes me feel sad that I drank it. 1888 looks the look but doesn't walk the walk.

BretSikkink, Dec 17, 2009
Photo of luchris80
2.65/5  rDev -18.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Tasting Notes: Stored in the fridge and served in a pilsner glass.

Aroma: Moderate lightly toasted malt aroma.

Appearance: Brown with ruby highlights in the background. Tall (four finger or so), tan head that dissipates slowly with some trail. Clear with many tiny bubbles.

Flavor: Some toasted malty flavor (not overwhelming). Light hop bitterness with slight astringency at the finish. Flat flavor overall.

Mouthfeel: Medium to light body (if that) with pretty low carbonation. The opposite of creamy (whatever that is).

Overall Impressions: Low alcohol for style (6.3-7.2%). Really blah overall and I wouldn't bother with it again (even though this one was a freebie). Not their best beer.

luchris80, Dec 11, 2009
Photo of twiggamortis420
3.9/5  rDev +19.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Has a freshness code of 06019 E20728, guessing that means it was best by June of this year. Pours a deep reddish-brown color with pretty good clarity and a nice, dense tan head. Some lacing, but not an abundance.

Smell has the requisite sweet caramel maltiness, if a bit light. There are some fruit notes in there in the form of raisins and even watermelon. Hints of cinnamon and cocoa round out the nose here.

While it's not exactly bursting with flavor, 1888 bock has some good things going for it. Caramel sweet and toasty malts strike a nice balance with just a touch of hop bitterness on the finish. Fine bubbled carbonation lends a nice creamy texture to the beer. I rather like this Leinenkugel's offering and is probably the best one I have had yet.

twiggamortis420, Oct 16, 2009
Photo of jsprain1
3.2/5  rDev -1.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A- Pours a coffee brown color with a thin tan head that disappates quickly. nothing specatcular going on.
S- smells of malt, a little bit of nut, and a large amount of sweetness. a tiny bit of metallicness and some hop.
T- Starts off a little nutty and the malty. pretty run of the mill. a little bit of bitter hops in there but generally the sweetness is carrying the flavor.
M- A little bit slick and kinda fizzy but too watery for the style.
D- Not terrible, I wouldn't mind another. But all in all i'm pretty neutral. not a terrible bock, but nothing outstanding. I do not regret the 6 pack purchase but it wont be a re-buy.

jsprain1, Oct 14, 2009
Photo of russpowell
2.85/5  rDev -12.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Review based on notes

Pour copper with 3 fingers of tan head. Average head retention & below average lacing

S: Grainyness, cooked cereal & metallic hops

T: Caramel, cornyness, & smokeyness up front along with a bit of dryness. Some leafy hops & grainyness as this warms, along with astringency & toasty malt. Finishes with a caramel candy corn sweetness

MF: Thin bodied with moderate carbonation

Drinks okay, lacks malt depth needed for the style, I found it a bit boring, but would take this over Shinerbock any day

russpowell, Oct 11, 2009
Photo of ClockworkOrange
3.2/5  rDev -1.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A 12 ounce bottle poured into my shaker glass. Appears a clear chestnut color with about a finger of of quickly fading fizzy light tan foam. Nose and flavors are of fruits such as apples and cherry skins, light toasted cereal grain, some caramel, sweet. Light body with decent enough carbonation. If you dig bocks and must try every one out there, then I suppose you could add this one to your list.

ClockworkOrange, Oct 04, 2009
Photo of generallee
3.88/5  rDev +19%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Presentation: It was poured from a brown 12oz bottle into a pint glass. There was no freshness date on the bottle.

Appearance: The body has good clarity and a dark brownish color with a nice big fluffy head on top. The head is white in color and doesn't hang out for long. Before it settles down to just a wispy thin layer it does make a few lace rings on the glass.

Smell: Its aroma is full of sweet malt and dark bready notes.

Taste/Mouth: The flavor has a sweet and bready character with caramel notes, soft pretzel, and light nutty notes. The finish adds some mild hop notes for balance and a little dryness. Still overall it finishes on the sweet side. On the palate it has a good medium to full body with nice active carbonation and a smooth slick texture.

Notes: This bock was very tasty and easy drinking.

generallee, Aug 26, 2009
Photo of auxiliary
2.8/5  rDev -14.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

appearance - Reddish brown color, small head.

smell - Some roasted malts, and nutes here.

taste - Toasted malts, nuts,slight bitterness, watery. Not much going on.

mouthfeel - Medium light body, watery.

drinkability -Least favorite bock, I would say.

auxiliary, Aug 15, 2009
Photo of squirrelpirate
3.08/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

The Leinenkugel 1888 Bock pours a coppery brown with a thick tan had that quickly recedes to a light film on top of the beer, and leaves no lace on the way down. Very active carbonation bubbles floating up to the surface.

A light caramel maltiness and roasted barley character come through in the aroma, which really lacks any sort of hop contribution.

The taste has the same attributes as the aroma, but stronger. A nice specialty malt flavor with a tad of fruit sweetness. Light mouthfeel that maintains the high carbonation for the length of the beer. I was intrigued by the Leinenkugel take on a bock, but I was not impressed. The beer is very drinkable, but I would much rather drink something else.

squirrelpirate, Aug 08, 2009
Photo of donmonkey1
3.48/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Appearance: Dark, dark brown with a really foamy light tan head. Not particularly good lacing, but some.

Smell: Really mild but kind of nutty.

Taste: Weak maltiness, nothing really stands out. Maybe a hint of nuttiness.

Mouthfeel: Slightly thicker than water with a touch of astringency.

Drinkability: Easy because it's so weak, but still much better than standard macros.

This is an OK beer. It's really weak but decent.

donmonkey1, Jul 21, 2009
Photo of beerthulhu
3.33/5  rDev +2.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: Poured a dark burgundy with a 1 finger fizzy and micro-bubbly tan colored head that quickly fizzled out leaving no lacing. Visible carbonation was light-medium. Rather ordinary here but a deep coloring gives this a slight bump.

S: Cherries add a light fruity sweetness which was backed by a semi-dry toasted munich malting. Fresh apple skins with a faint fresh flowery hopping adds some aromatic quality but found it to be less enticing then many other staples (Salvator, SA). Overall found the aroma to be light in strength, coming off decent considering the brewery, but only average in a broader scope.

T: The flavor was better then expected and what the nose led you to believe. A semi-dry toasted caramel malting along with apples, and a cherry fruitiness at the beginning redeems this somewhat. Progressing to a touch of bitterness of lemon flowers, light canned pears and a munich dry malting there was a light citrusy and floral hopping found on the finish. Much like the nose, the flavor was not as malty or fruity as other staples per style but was a better then expected effort by this brewery.

M: fizzy, way overcarbonated with a fizzy texture. Light to medium consistency. It is the overcarbonated state that distracts both the mouthful and distracts from the flavor.

D: For the casual or light craft drinker it serves it purpose. Better then average consumption but doesn't mean this is a good beer overall, im sure if I had more then one the carbonation would slow me down and turn me off even more. Once again their beers seem to be macro-style interpretations of craft beer. Overall probably one of their better beers which doesn't say much, overall would rate this as decent, nothing more, nothing less.

beerthulhu, Jul 02, 2009
Photo of strengthdoc
2.25/5  rDev -31%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I used to like Leinenkugel when I was in college at the University of Illinois, but I have been dissapointed in the offerings I have had since moving to CT. There is a mild roasted malt aroma and the beer is dark brown in color. The mouthfeel is very light and watery as well as the taste. There is a mildly sweet taste with a hint of lime.

strengthdoc, Jun 27, 2009
1888 Bock from Jacob Leinenkugel Brewing Company
75 out of 100 based on 470 ratings.