1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Henry Weinhard's Blue Boar Ale - Blitz-Weinhard Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Henry Weinhard's Blue Boar AleHenry Weinhard's Blue Boar Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
68
poor

109 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 109
Reviews: 69
rAvg: 2.84
pDev: 23.24%
Wants: 1
Gots: 6 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Blitz-Weinhard Brewing Co. visit their website
Oregon, United States

Style | ABV
Cream Ale |  4.60% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Malts: North American Select Pale and Caramel Malts
Hops: Pacific Northwest Cascade, Willamette and Cluster Hops
Calories/12 oz: 144
Carbohydrates (g): 12.4
% Alcohol by Vol: 4.60
Bitterness Units: 14.0

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 02-12-2002)
View: Beers (13) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 109 | Reviews: 69 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

2.7/5  rDev -4.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pale goldenrod topped by a pretty snazzy looking bleached white cap. Although I don't have any preconceived notions about this beer (okay, not many), I'm surprised at the quality of the head and the better than adequate amount of lace. As far as one word descriptions, 'generic' fits, but so does 'classic'.

Thanks to the green glass bottle, the pervasive odor of skunk was noted on cap cracking (and is now nearly gone). The nose is a dead ringer for an American macro lager. It's grainy and musty-musky hoppy with a trailing whiff of Pepe Le Pew.

Macro lager all the way, no question about it. Or pale lager... or standard lager... or... you get the idea. The brewery's website calls it 'a light Irish-style ale' and the label calls it a pale ale. Hmmm. The ingredients list is either a mistake or such miniscule quantities of some ingredients were used that they aren't detectable.

The malt is supposed to be pale and caramel. The first is obvious, the second is doubtful. The hops are supposed to be Cascade, Willamette and Cluster. That's fine, but 'double hopped?'. No way in hell. How does double hopped jibe with 14 IBUs?

The flavor profile should be familiar to anyone who has slogged his/her way through the thousand and one American macro lagers that are sold all over this country and beyond: very slightly sweet grain, with a brief flash of herbal-earthy German hops. In the interest of locating a silver lining, the beer isn't becoming too nasty with warming.

Given the style and ABV, the mouthfeel is actually pretty decent. It's light without being watery and has the proper amount of bubbles to keep things jumping, while falling well short of fizzy.

In my opinion, Henry Weinhard's Blue Boar Lager (sorry... Ale) is a slightly higher quality alternative to BMC. The suits at Blitz-Weinhard should change the bottles to brown glass and should make sure the price stays low.

Serving type: bottle

05-15-2008 12:04:49 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of biboergosum
biboergosum

Alberta (Canada)

2.45/5  rDev -13.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

This beer pours a clear medium golden yellow colour, with two fingers of sudsy white head, which leaves an unstable sheet of lace around the glass as it slips away. It smells strongly of skunky, musty grain. The taste is sweet grain, mostly corn-like, and skunky, weedy hops. The carbonation is middling, the body on the light side, moderately smooth at best, and it finishes off-dry, the acrid hops taking (or adding) an edge off the sweet grain.

Pale ale, cream ale, adjunct lager? Too much nomenclature confusion over essentially a thinly disguised macro.

Serving type: bottle

08-12-2010 23:47:03 | More by biboergosum
Photo of feloniousmonk
feloniousmonk

Minnesota

2.45/5  rDev -13.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

"There's a box over here labeled Blue Boar," said my sister. "Is that a beer?"
"I don't know, possibly," says I. "Aren't you the guy who should know," asks sis. I saw the Weinhardt name and realized it was my brother's purchase. "Sorry," says me,"it's a little too cheap for my attention."
Actually, I learned long ago that I the Weinhardt line isn't for me and I'd be hard-pressed to purchase it, but I forgot my own beer at Thanksgiving, so this is what I was stuck with...

"Pale" is the operative word, though "ale" is in objection.
Very clear, pale yellow color, faint, swiftly disappearing head...not looking like a pale ale in the least, nothing even remotely attractive.
Nose is very minor, no hops, a whiff of citrus, very spritzy.
On the tongue, and in the mouth, it's a far too fizzy affair, a bodiless offering that offering very little in texture, and throws up none of the hops you'd expect in even the weakest example of a "pale ale" as this bills itself. Faint mouthfeel, dull, dreadful finish. Actually, tastes more like a Rolling Rock...
This drinks down okay, but only if your standards are low. If you really want taste, this is not the way to go. As I said, not even near a decent ale...steer clear, unless you haven't got the dough for better beer, or just don't give a darn.

Serving type: bottle

11-26-2004 01:45:35 | More by feloniousmonk
Photo of jdhilt
jdhilt

New Hampshire

1.98/5  rDev -30.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 3

Pours a five finger frothy white head that fades slowly leaving some lace. Pale clear amber color. Light carbonation and light-medium bodied. Slight hoppy nose. Starts boring only hints of malt and hops, doesn't taste like any of the Irish ales I've had. Finish is clean due to lack malts and hops. Might be a good lawn mower beer. $1.50 for a 12oz bottle from Utah DABC Salt Lake City, Ut. Their site has the ABV at 4.6%.

Serving type: bottle

09-13-2006 22:28:52 | More by jdhilt
Photo of Zorro
Zorro

California

2.89/5  rDev +1.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Clear yellow colored beer with a small white colored head.

Smells sweet with a mild floral noble hop aroma. Mild caramel and some grassy scents.

Starts out mildly sweet. Cracker malt and mild hop bitterness, it is a little bland.

Mouthfeel is OK.

Overall just an average beer, not something I would seek out but I wouldn't refuse a free one.

Serving type: bottle

03-09-2014 22:33:06 | More by Zorro
Photo of Wasatch
Wasatch

Utah

2.03/5  rDev -28.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a nice clean/clear golden yellow color, nice carbonation, tiny fizzy white head, some nice sticky lacing follows. The nose is skunky with maybe some hops. The taste is slightly sweet, slight hops. Light body. Not drinkable, would not buy this again. Also the bottle sez Pale Ale, but it is more of a cream ale, if that's what you want to call it.

Serving type: bottle

02-21-2008 02:37:45 | More by Wasatch
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
Beerandraiderfan

Nevada

2.73/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Man, what have I drank, 500 of these? Pours a clear straw pale, almost no head or lacing. Aroma is a big put off of alcohol and sweat.

Taste, I dunno, its probably sympathy or something, but this stuff just became an acquired taste during the adolescent years. Had it again recently, just have to admit its not that good. But you know, thanks for the memories. No hops or malt, just cheap beer w/o a slick ad campaign. A desireable alternative to BMC, this does have its own unique taste going for it, and yes, there is taste. Something a little fruity, never would I describe this as a cream ale.

Serving type: bottle

08-12-2010 23:54:13 | More by Beerandraiderfan
Photo of beertunes
beertunes

Washington

3.05/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured into straight pint glass. Poured a clear, clean, bright yellow (almost like a cider) with just a thin cap of white head that had no retention and average lacing.

Oh no! Green bottle alert! I purposely grabbed a sixer from the back of the line to reduce the chances of light skunk. Well, it sort of worked. There was just a bit of skunk, enough to have to gig the brew a half point. Otherwise the beer had a nice grainy background and just enough of a hop presence to be interesting. On the tongue the story was much the same, nice grains, balanced hops and, best of all, no skunk.

The body was light and crisp. Drinkability was very good, the bottle I used to do this review disappeared very quickly. Good thing they sell these in sixers, I was able to crack another. Overall, not a special beer, but at $6 a sixer it's certainly a good budget choice. I'm not sure why this is listed as a cream ale here on BA, it seems to be more of a straight-up Pale ale to me. Not worth seeking out, but worth trying next time your heading over to your macro friends place, maybe you can make a new craft beer lover.

Serving type: bottle

08-15-2011 03:37:05 | More by beertunes
Photo of Gusler
Gusler

Arizona

3/5  rDev +5.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The beer pours a clear light to medium amber color on the pour, the head appropriate, the texture frothy and a bright white color with the lace a satisfactory sheet upon the glass. Clean and crisp the sweet malt nose with a malt sweet start and the top a bit thin Finish is briskly acidic, the hops are spicy and pleasant, dry and long lasting aftertaste, drinkable but no where near Sierra Nevada as Pale’s go.

Serving type: bottle

10-05-2003 23:04:51 | More by Gusler
Photo of harpus
harpus

Alabama

2.75/5  rDev -3.2%

01-02-2013 18:46:12 | More by harpus
Photo of Bitterbill
Bitterbill

Wyoming

3.38/5  rDev +19%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

Poured from 12oz bottle a yellow-gold with a large head of foam that dissipated slowly leaving a solid layer that lasted through the entire session.

The smell is a mix of sweetness from the malt and some grass from the hops.

The taste is slightly on the hoppy side up front and then it kind of flattens out midway through. Good thing the finish has some good malt character to it or this one would really not be worth trying.

*This* was one of my staple beers before the great Micro movement and I still like it; a good summer beer and quite quaffable.

Serving type: bottle

05-18-2006 22:23:19 | More by Bitterbill
Photo of flagmantho
flagmantho

Washington

2.83/5  rDev -0.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from 12oz bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance: light golden color with a thin layer of white foam. Average.

Smell: sweet malt, a little grain, a little skunk. It's a green bottle pale ... what else do you expect?

Taste: quite grainy with only the slightest hint of floral hops. It's OK at best, a boring macro-esque beer at worst. Full Sail can do *so* much better.

Mouthfeel: medium-light body with a good level of carbonation. Not too bad.

Drinkability: despite its relative blandness in flavor, it is pretty refreshing.

Serving type: bottle

01-07-2010 03:54:54 | More by flagmantho
Photo of ZAP
ZAP

Minnesota

1.83/5  rDev -35.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

Not a recommended beer here...big skunky smell immediately after opening the green bottle....They call it a pale ale...this site lists it as a cream ale which is more suitable...as a pale ale this would be 1's across the board as it has none of those characteristic...

Clear, golden color...looks like a lager....body is thin...bordering on watery....slick..taste is non-descript....some skunk...some graininess...

Bought it because it was on sale..I should have known better...

Serving type: bottle

01-31-2004 20:24:16 | More by ZAP
Photo of RoyalT
RoyalT

Ohio

2.58/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Appearance – Light yellow with a thin James Brown head.

Smell – This skunked up my kitchen pretty good. There’s some light grain and cheap sweetness to go along with it, but the funky animal aroma is a real turnoff. The label has a picture of a boar’s head on it. They ought to turn that thing around and show us his backside.

Taste – Very empty and light. It doesn’t taste as bad as it smells, but the fizzy grain flavor just doesn’t cut it. There’s a touch of hops that kind of evens things out a bit, but the corn syrup sweetness kills the finish.

Mouthfeel – The cheap carbonation was helped along by a rather pleasing dryness.

Drinkability – I bought this because it was on sale, but the dollar I saved wasn’t worth it.

Serving type: bottle

09-21-2003 00:13:25 | More by RoyalT
Photo of Haybeerman
Haybeerman

Colorado

2.75/5  rDev -3.2%

02-07-2013 21:50:20 | More by Haybeerman
Photo of wrightst
wrightst

Maryland

2.5/5  rDev -12%

06-14-2014 02:52:00 | More by wrightst
Photo of Reidrover
Reidrover

Oregon

3/5  rDev +5.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

bought in a green glass 12 oz bottle..with boar on label ( beer was not skunky despite colour of glass).
What can i say this beer is average..bland even but is drinkable.
Not Weinhards best beer but ok if all you have to choose is Bud or Coors i would go for this.
Its called a pale ale but looks abd tases like a pilsner/lager, also says "ireland style" on the label strange indeed :).
But all in all not an offensive brew..just average LOL.

Serving type: bottle

02-17-2003 19:52:53 | More by Reidrover
Photo of strongaf
strongaf

Washington

2.5/5  rDev -12%

01-17-2012 20:59:31 | More by strongaf
Photo of cdwil
cdwil

Texas

2.5/5  rDev -12%

12-28-2011 15:19:21 | More by cdwil
Photo of harrymel
harrymel

Washington

1.94/5  rDev -31.7%
look: 3 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Bottled 14MAR13

Golden, light, light, yellow. Sheet of white atop and brillantly clarified. Smells like skunk, corn, grain and some bits of soil. Tastes like cheap beer, stronger than a Coors light, but less than say a Rolling Rock. Simple and grainy with little satisfying merits. Thin and moderately carbed with a wet finish that lingers longer than I'd prefer. Seems like a decent pairing with the shitty jack in the box I have beside me.

Serving type: bottle

04-29-2013 05:13:20 | More by harrymel
Photo of flexabull
flexabull

California

2.8/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

College beer, before I learned about Sierra Nevada Pale Ale.

Pours a brought yellow color, with a nice white head.

Smells skunky. Not much else to say..

Taste is creamy and sweet. Corny and vegetal, with some malty creaminess. Not a whole lot else going on, except for the skunky finish.

Mouthfeel is ok, about right for the style, but too carbonated for my liking.

Drinkability is decent. If this wasn't skunked it would rank higher,but not much higher, Ugh... For nostalgia purposes only for me.

Serving type: bottle

12-19-2010 05:40:47 | More by flexabull
Photo of kmpitz2
kmpitz2

Tennessee

1.73/5  rDev -39.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

What a crappy beer. Not only was it bad, but it came in a green bottle which made it skunky on top of it all.

This beer poured a yellow color with little head that falls to nothing after pouring it. The nose was skunked. Awful nasty ass skunked beer. I let it sit for a while as well and it still was not good. The taste was pretty much not there. It was kind of like white noise for my tongue. The beer was moderate to thin. Eh. Another dumber from good old Henry. I don't know what this brewery is doing, but its not good. I have one more to try from there and I'm scared.

Serving type: bottle

11-22-2004 04:10:21 | More by kmpitz2
Photo of oldp0rt
oldp0rt

Quebec (Canada)

3/5  rDev +5.6%

11-24-2011 03:15:29 | More by oldp0rt
Photo of beerguy101
beerguy101

California

2.83/5  rDev -0.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Medium gold color, small head. A medium bodied ale. Advertised as a "traditional Irish" ale. Malty and slightly hoppy. Smooth taste, perhaps a bit too carbonated? Mouthfeel is full. Finish is clean and smooth. Aftertaste is slightly bitter.

Serving type: bottle

08-22-2003 01:24:38 | More by beerguy101
Photo of Overlord
Overlord

California

2.83/5  rDev -0.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I picked up a mixed pack of H. Weinhard recently to relive old glory days. For the price, this was gourmet stuff back in college.

Light, thin body. Lots of white foamy head. Taste is bready and mellow with a hint of malt.

Palatable, but not my favorite of their brews. Still, at 5.99 a sixer, pretty good.

Serving type: bottle

02-17-2008 22:09:29 | More by Overlord
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Henry Weinhard's Blue Boar Ale from Blitz-Weinhard Brewing Co.
68 out of 100 based on 109 ratings.