1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Henry Weinhard's Private Reserve - Blitz-Weinhard Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Henry Weinhard's Private ReserveHenry Weinhard's Private Reserve

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

379 Ratings
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 379
Reviews: 166
rAvg: 3.12
pDev: 18.91%
Wants: 6
Gots: 10 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Blitz-Weinhard Brewing Co. visit their website
Oregon, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  4.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Malts: North American Select Pale Malt
Hops: Pacific Northwest Cascade Hops
Calories/12 oz: 150
Carbohydrates (g): 13.0
% Alcohol by Vol: 4.80
Bitterness Units: 15.0

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 07-22-2002)
View: Beers (13) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 379 | Reviews: 166 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Frozensoul327


3.15/5  rDev +1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours from the bottle to a lighter yellow color with a small 1/8th inch head of foam. Hints of lace, medium level of carbonation. Aromas of light floal hops and medium bodied malts are noted. Taste is middle of the road, right down the center; malt, hops, water, light grain. Rather bland, but not offensive. Mouthfeel is pretty good, crisp and bubbly. Very easy to drink. Not bad. Kind of boring. Special thanks to Dubbercody for the sample.

Serving type: bottle

07-02-2006 20:57:39 | More by Frozensoul327
Photo of ElGordo


3.48/5  rDev +11.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a pale straw color topped by a stark white head that shrinks from an inch to a thin layer very quickly. Aroma is very neutral - not bad, just not much there. A hint of malt and adjunct grains, with a little bit of corny sweetness. Palate is pretty well-developed, a good sweet malt character with a touch of corn and just a hint of astringency. Body is light and creamy, lending the beer a highly drinkable quality. Great on a hot summer day, although not nearly as special as it was when it was brewed down on Burnside instead of down in goddamn California.

Serving type: bottle

06-30-2006 07:16:29 | More by ElGordo
Photo of scottoale


2.88/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12oz. brown bottle pour a nice gold with a half inch bubbly snow-white head. Just a few dots of lacing, decent micro bubbles in the carbonation.

Smell is mild malt with a citrus hop balance and some sour notes off the back. Tasting much the same as it smells with lemon peel giving a bite to the finish. Fairly refreshing, very light in body with a fizzy, yet chalky mouthfeel to it.

Pretty average macro lager, not my style of preferance.

Serving type: bottle

03-19-2006 23:08:42 | More by scottoale
Photo of drinkdankbrews


3.25/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance: I poured this brew into a paulaner mug. It poured a yellow color like that of budweiser.

Smell: smells like a japanese lager. It must have been brewed w/ rice.

Taste: It tastes like a generic macro-lager. It sort of resembled the taste of a Canadian beer called Molson. There was no sign of any strong hops.

Mouthfeel: I took a big swig of this and was disappointed. There was a watered-down taste and no signs of any great hops.

Note: I have had this beer before. It is not something i'd buy again for the price of 9.99. I would rather drink miller high life. It resembled a kolsch but was way harder to drink! If your in the market and you see this beer dont bother with it. It does not fade and it gets old after the 3rd brew.

Serving type: bottle

02-23-2006 09:26:55 | More by drinkdankbrews
Photo of palliko


3.03/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A cult favorite in the Northwest! The appearance is a translucent gold with a long lived foam that left nice lacing. Aroma contains a sweet dextrose and grain. Initial taste is sweet, some malt and little carbonation, medium body, and a hint of beechwood. Finish is sweetish, finally settling down to dry. The taste does bring back memories...

Serving type: bottle

02-14-2006 22:19:53 | More by palliko
Photo of Wasatch


2.5/5  rDev -19.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A - Pours a yellow pale color, very little carbonation, not much lacing.

S - Scents of sweet malts, skunky.

T - The taste is kinda malty, and watery, really not much there to talk about.

M - Light body.

D - Drinkable I guess. I had to try it again, since I use to like it way back.

Serving type: bottle

01-25-2006 01:19:21 | More by Wasatch
Photo of RJLarse


2.68/5  rDev -14.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I picked up a six pack of Henry Weinhard’s Private Reserve tonight. I’ve had Henry’s many times over the last 25 years, but I wanted to give it a good going over for a review. I poured this one in to a pint tumbler.

The beer is a pale gold color, and crystal clear with several streams of bubbles rising from the bottom of the glass. Pours with a thin white head, which is gone in a flash, leaving a wispy film on top of the beer, with virtually no lacing.

The beer has a faint smell, a little like grain. It is not a robust smell, and not noteworthy.

The beer has a pleasant, but common lager taste. It has a faint and mellow malt flavor with a nice hop finish. The aftertaste lingers a little and is slightly bitter.

Mouth feel is thin, a little watery, but crisp and refreshing.

This is a drinkable beer, and probably a little above average for an American macro-beer. The flavor is not very robust, and I prefer something with a little more body, but for a “plain Jane nothing special bottled” lager, this one is not a bad choice.

Serving type: bottle

01-21-2006 05:47:43 | More by RJLarse
Photo of sirxtasy


3.35/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance: Looks like a quality lager, not too pale, not too dark.

Smell: Smells more like Euro Pale Lager or All-Malt Lager than a cheap American Macro Lager.

Taste: Once again, tastes more like a EPL or AML than a cheap Macro, no off flavors.

Mouthfeel: Pleasant, full and natural.

Drinkability: For a cheap, tasty AML, reach for Henry's Private Reserve. I know of no lager in America that tastes so good for so little money (Yes, that's including PBR), simply a great session beer. At $9 and change after tax per 12 pack bottles, you can't go wrong.

Serving type: bottle

10-25-2005 04:44:52 | More by sirxtasy
Photo of hoffman


1.5/5  rDev -51.9%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

Pours to a thin yellow color. Zero head zero lace. Very watery pour. Smell is of all grain...no hops. A sharp almost pungent mildew smell overtakes this one. The taste is poor, very typical tastes like a macro. More full mouthfeel than one would expect but not impressive. Do not drink this one. I was not impressed at all. Not a good example of good beer.

Serving type: bottle

10-21-2005 02:56:46 | More by hoffman
Photo of kmpitz2


3.15/5  rDev +1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This one pours a golden yellow color with no head and no ring around the top of the beer. The nose is not really strong for anything, just a hint of soft grains and some corn. The flavor has a touch of honey sweetness, but no hop at all to be found. The feel is moderately thick with a nice carbonation for the feel. This is an easy drinking crisp beer, overall not all that bad, but still nothing really great.

Serving type: bottle

11-20-2004 18:36:59 | More by kmpitz2
Photo of KoG


1.9/5  rDev -39.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

I've never been a fan of lagers, but I have had better.

Light yellow color that pours like soda and leaves no lacing after the fizz goes away.

Smelled slightly skunked, weird for a brown bottle, watered down bleh...

Taste, yep like stale water with some hops in it, not much though.

Left me surprisingly refreshed except for the terrible aftertaste which made me drink more to get rid of it. Still seems like water.

Drinkability is not a word I would associate with this beer.

Serving type: bottle

11-07-2004 05:49:30 | More by KoG
Photo of donnebaby

North Carolina

3.38/5  rDev +8.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Looks are clear gold, darkish, with not too much foam. Smell's strong, sweet malts, a little smelly. Taste is lager, with notes of sweet apples. A beer that totally tastes like beer. Some alcohol comes through, too. Pretty low carbonation, flattish.

Tastes kinda nasty the more I drank it, which brought drinkability scores down, but really it's just an average beer with some flavor.

Seems like a beer that could have a cult following for some reason, like Pabst. Not sure why, just has that feel to it.

Serving type: bottle

09-08-2004 07:32:30 | More by donnebaby
Photo of Thrasher


3.25/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Henry Weinhard's label has been purchased by SAB Miller, and this beer is being brewed in (I believe) Irwindale, CA. (The Hefeweizen and Amber Light brews are being brewed at the Full Sail brewery in Hood River, OR.) It's your standard American premium lager, AKA macro. And it's not half-bad. Pours a crystal clear platinum with a good head that dwindles to a thin ring. Aroma of yeast mustiness. The malts are strong and sweet, with bread crust flavors. A hop crispness balances the beer with a firm but restrained bitterness. Mouthfeel thin, but the hops get some good traction on the tongue and inner cheeks. The beer, as a whole, is clean and fresh-tasting, without any glaring off flavors. If it's not exactly exciting, it at least serves its purpose well, and I can't think of another American "macro"-style lager that is as good, for the price.

Serving type: bottle

06-14-2004 04:10:35 | More by Thrasher
Photo of Tballz420


2.93/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

This drink is a pale, straw gold color, small white head on the top. Light malt scent, same thing for the taste, with a touch of hops, mild acidic twang. The mouth is light/medium. This brew is nothing special nor is it worth seeking out. Just better than most macros.

Serving type: bottle

05-20-2004 20:50:05 | More by Tballz420
Photo of Zorro


2.05/5  rDev -34.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a clear light golden brew, unfortunately this is its best feature.

Smell is a bit of grain and corn, not it's best feature.

Taste is mostly grain with malts and a weird corn twang.

Mouthfeel is Macro swill.

Not real Drinkable, Olde English 800 is better than this.

Serving type: bottle

03-22-2004 03:33:22 | More by Zorro
Photo of beertaster13


3.1/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Private Reserve is a very drinkable american lager, much better than the major american labels. A great thing about Henry's is that a six pack is generally cheaper than Bud or any other of the major american beers. The taste is much better. The beer comes in the now famous 12 oz brown short bottle with a white label with gold. The beer pours a nice golden color with a bubbly/foamy head. The head vanishes after a few minutes but traces of foam will stick to your glass through out. The smell is of hops with a hint of grain. Sometimes I swear I smell a fruit flavor, but only sometimes but don't quote me. The taste is sweet and the hops are dry that calm this beer down to make it a very drinkable beer. Mouthfeel is full and sweet. This is the beer when you want a cheap local beer but don't want to go for the major crap. Can't stress this enough, average beer but much better than Bud, Coors, Miller!

Serving type: bottle

02-22-2004 08:33:08 | More by beertaster13
Photo of woemad


2.88/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Half-rack bought at Safeway. This was on sale and cheaper than my usual "cheap/don't feel like wasting good beer right now" beer, which is Kokanee. Call me an old softie, but I liked this better when it was brewed in Portland rather than Tumwater, WA. Although I was born in Oregon, I've been a Washington resident since the age of 1. Nevertheless, I don't like to see any NW institution get too big for the area that made it successful (hear that, Boeing?). But I digress...
This beer poured a gold color with a medium, fizzy white head that vanished quickly, though a white foam veneer remained at the top for most of the beer's time in my glass. There was a slight amount of lacing. The smell was primarily of sweet malts. Hops are almost totally absent from the scent. The taste was again of mild, sweet malts, with a tiny hop presence. Hey, this is a NW beer! Don't try to tell me you couldn't find any hops! This IS very drinkable, with its very mild demands upon the palate and relatively low abv. This is a sweetish (as opposed to Swedish) easygoing beer that would be good company drunk from the bottle while watching a game (Go 'Hawks, Dawgs, Eags, Mariners, 'Zags, Sups), and wouldn't screw up the flavor of Mac & Cheese from a box, but its really not worthy of anything else. To give it credit, I don't think it really aspires to anything better. .

Serving type: bottle

11-02-2003 21:05:04 | More by woemad
Photo of Redrover


3.5/5  rDev +12.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

For about 18 months in the mid 1990s, you could get this beer and its stable mates in the Chicago area. Than as quickly as it came, it vanished off the shelves. I recently was in the PNW and had a chance to sample it again.

Beer poured a nice golden yellow with a decent sized head. The foam quickly vanished and it did leave some slight lacing.

Beer has a clean smell. You get some grain and a hint of hops and malt. I wish there was a little more to the nose here.

Taste is solid but not earth shattering. Beer tends towards the slightly sweet side of the equation, but the hops keep it in check. Some adjunct grain taste slips in, but it is not to distracting. Taste is much better than the standard macro lager.

This beer inhabits middle ground between macro blandness and the heightened tastes of a good micro. Similar beers/breweries in the Midwest include the Berghoff beers and the offerings from Leinenkugle. This is a good starter or lawnmower type beer.

Serving type: bottle

09-27-2003 17:23:32 | More by Redrover
Photo of RoyalT


3.15/5  rDev +1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance – Light, clear yellow with a big, thick head that went down slowly and laced the glass.

Smell – Typical grain aroma with a tinge of cheap sweetness.

Taste – There’s some more sweetness that comes out in the taste, mostly sucrose, and the grain isn’t as bad as it smelled. There’s also some hoppy dryness that helped this one out.

Mouthfeel – Light body, bordering on medium, with a somewhat refreshing dryness. Almost no carbonation.

Drinkability – It’s better than the Blue Boar.

Serving type: bottle

09-21-2003 01:46:38 | More by RoyalT
Photo of beerguy101


3.43/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I am going to be a little biased in my rating of this beer, as it was my first non-macro beer. Its not great, but it is a beer my Bud loving fishing buddy will drink, so I don't have to drink Bud. Light gold color, medium head. A light bodied lager style beer. Malts are slightly sweet and there is some hop bite. Nice smooth taste. Mouthfeel is full and round. Finish is clean and smooth. Aftertaste is slightly bitter.

Serving type: bottle

08-22-2003 01:29:04 | More by beerguy101
Photo of drewbage


3.13/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Henry Weinhard's the good cheap regional lager of the Northwest.

This beer has a little more character to it than the usual American lager, some of which is good and some not.

The beer is a darker shade of gold and clear without a trace of haze.

Aroma is malt dominated with a vague sense of corniness in it. Hops are present as a background character only.

The flavor is also dominated by the malt with a emphasis on a sweet finish that is just a little shy of cloying.

Overall, the beer is an excellent value and a good find in the realm of American Lager, but it could be easily improved by a few more hops in the brew.

Serving type: bottle

05-30-2003 14:16:09 | More by drewbage
Photo of Reidrover


3.4/5  rDev +9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Ok bought in the typical Weinhards shaped brown bottle..nice label with the crest.
OK this beer actually looked quite good when poured..nice firm gold colour with a nice sized head that stayed a while..very good carbonation strings..
The aroma however is average very faint malts and even fainter hops but its pleasant enough.
For a regional lager this is actually quite enjoyable..it is on the sweet side but for me its not too much..no hops to speak of just malts.
Very nice on the tongue
excellent drinkability..i could drink a 6 of these in a couple of hours easy.
I know a lot of folks in the West turn their noses up at Henry's but for the money we pay Weinhard's make good drinkable beer.

Serving type: bottle

05-15-2003 21:37:07 | More by Reidrover
Photo of Rifrafboy


2.58/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

This pours with a nice white head. Significant carbonation. Taste is kind of smooth, with a decent malt flavor. The hoppiness is very pleasant. This is somewhat light-bodied and refreshing. The first Henry's I've tried, but it won't be the last. Better than expected

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2003 15:11:35 | More by Rifrafboy
Photo of budgood1


3/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

pours out clear and gold. slight head fades quickly. no lace to speak of. sweet sugary aroma backed by faint earthy notes. quite sweet in taste...a sort of honey flavor is dominant...followed by some crisp hop bite. medium mouthfeel. pretty refreshing and not a bad rendition of the lager style. the sugary sweetness is a bit overdone, which would make it hard to drink too many of these. this would make a good summer quaffer or lawn mower beer.

Serving type: bottle

02-14-2003 22:28:54 | More by budgood1
Photo of ADR


2.25/5  rDev -27.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

This and the Red Lager still show up at 1st Grand Avenue Liquors, I don't see the Porter or Blue Boar Ale anymore...

Very clear yellow with a decently persistant white head of small bubbles and it does cling a little to the glass -- hopefully indicating minimal stabilizers or foaming agents. Aroma is pretty fleeting, mostly a bit of yeasty bread malt. Starts rather honey sweet, then, a carbonated water impresion settles in. I try to get a hop impression but really don't. Not a huge corn syrup flavor (thankfully) but really pretty tasteless with a semi unsettling finish that I wouldn't call crisp like a nice Pilsner.

Serving type: bottle

02-05-2003 07:28:10 | More by ADR
Henry Weinhard's Private Reserve from Blitz-Weinhard Brewing Co.
72 out of 100 based on 379 ratings.