Tiger Beer - Asia Pacific Breweries Ltd.
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 725 | Reviews: 343 | Display Reviews Only:
1.9/5 rDev -29.6%
A mediocre lager brought in by LCBO. Watery, no taste and some floral smell. Sweet malt and corn sweetness. Dry very bitter and metallic aftertaste. Pale yellow. Carbonation. A lot of soapy foam that gives some creamyness to water. Herbal and clean and plain.
11-29-2004 00:08:46 | More by Sammy
2.98/5 rDev +10.4%
Pours a clear darker yellow with a foamy off-white head that settles to a film on top of the beer. Foamy streaks of lace form around the glass on the drink down. Smell is very mild and is of malt, grain, and some grassy and hay aromas. Taste is much the same with a fruity and slightly metallic flavor on the finish. There is a mild herbal bitterness on the palate with each sip. This beer has a lower level of carbonation with a slightly crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty average beer but it's drinkable and even has a slightly hoppy edge in the flavor unlike other Asian beers of the same style.
10-21-2012 04:54:10 | More by UCLABrewN84
2.93/5 rDev +8.5%
A: The beer is clear golden yellow in color and has a slight amount of visible carbonation. It poured with a half-finger high white head that died down but consistently left a thin head covering the surface.
S: There are light to moderate sweet aromas of corn in the nose.
T: Like the smell, the initial taste has sweet flavors of corn; hints of rice and other grains are noticeable towards the finish. No hops are present in the taste.
M: It feels light-bodied and a bit smooth on the palate with a moderate amount of carbonation.
O: The light flavors in this beer would probably make it a nice accompaniment to spicy Asian food.
03-24-2012 00:06:19 | More by metter98
3.15/5 rDev +16.7%
Pale maize with quite a few flecks and flakes that almost certainly aren't yeast or hops. Given the style, the head isn't bad. It's off-white, soft and decently creamy, with enough substance and enough tackiness to last for more than a few minutes and to leave an acceptable amount of lace.
The nose is, again, not bad for the style. Keep in mind that my expectations are on the low end and are easily exceeded. The dominant aspect of the aroma is an artificial (though not unpleasant) sweet perfuminess. Perhaps it should be classified as an off-aroma, but I usually reserve that for aromas that are unappealing.
S'okay. The flavor is nothing to write home about, but I still can't manage to work up any beer geek distain over what I'm tasting. It's a little sweeter than many of its style mates and has at least as much hop content as the style average. It's pretty generic and uninteresting, but that seems to be the goal of most brewers who foist this stuff off on us.
Any attempts to find hidden depth or complexity are wasted. TB is simple, straightforward beer that is, nevertheless, better than Budweiser, as one example among many that could be given. I can't help but compare the macro lagers of other countries to the macro lagers of the Big 3. Embarrassingly (though I shouldn't be), amazingly (though it shouldn't be), the actually American American macro lagers are usually left sucking fumes.
On the positive side, the beer doesn't deteriorate with warming. I'm down to the final few ounces and have noticed no drop-off in... ahem... quality. The mouthfeel is much closer to medium than to light, a characteristic that it maintains throughout the entire bottle.
I love the bottlecap that I managed to remove without so much as a scratch or dent. It's the same tiger under a palm tree that is seen on the main label and the neck label. That's pretty much it for the high points. Having said that, one could do much worse. The fact that I could down 3-4 cold bottles of Tiger Beer with a minimal amount of complaining should count for something.
10-11-2005 13:55:57 | More by BuckeyeNation
2.28/5 rDev -15.6%
Bottle: Poured a clear golden color lager with a large pure white foamy head with some good retention but no lacing. Aroma consists of sweet malt with some minimal adjunct showing. Taste is also dominated by a bland medium sweet malt taste with no easily discernable adjunct. Not the most complex beer out there but definitely not the worst pale lager out there.
08-19-2008 20:01:07 | More by Phyl21ca
3.13/5 rDev +15.9%
It seems that the distributor(s) in the Central Kentucky area are pushing this beer quite hard. I finally ordered one under the pressure. Gladly, it didn't seem to be a mistake. I thought the beer was as clean tasting as it looked. The brightly colored straw brew with a bleached head retention prevailed with a solid pilsner malt sweetness and low levels of vegial / grain flavors. Spiced with hip bittering a light grassy flavors. Mostly clean in the feel with a mild grain lingering. Overall, decent but my money will be better served on other good Germal Lagers.
03-08-2007 18:49:40 | More by BEERchitect
2.68/5 rDev -0.7%
saw it at whole foods the other day and grabbed it on a flyer. served cold and poured into a pint glass, this one was consumed on 08/22/2010.
decent pour with an above average amber color that had a small head of white and a crystal clear body. very nicely done i have to admit. aroma is light rice and corn, touches of grain and a wet cardboard that throws the whole things off. clean, easy flavor, but again lacking in the depth dept for sure.light grains, touches of bready mixes and that was about it. went down smooth and easy without too much of a fight.
overall for the style it was not terrible, but compared to my normal fair, i will pass.
08-24-2010 10:47:50 | More by mikesgroove
2.8/5 rDev +3.7%
Thin head on a Clear deep golden body. Aroma is light with breads, light floral, grains and sweet corn. Flavor is also fairly bready, sweet corn, Pale malts and almost no hop character. Medium body and moderate carbonation. As far as American adjunct lagers go this one has decent flavor without off putting flavors. Not bad for what it is.
10-06-2012 01:25:59 | More by kylehay2004
3.05/5 rDev +13%
12 oz. single - $1.79 at Total Wine & More in Kennesaw, Georgia.
Appearance: While it's not exactly a tiger's roar, there is at least a lively hiss of carbonation upon opening. Pours a crystal clear, yellow body with a medium-sized, white head.
Smell: Delicate, light pale malts with a soft touch of maize and some very mild floral touches.
Taste: Light pale malts dashed with a hearty handful of dried yellow corn and a medium sweetness. Faintly floral hops and mild bitterness leave you with, well, a slightly sweetish finish.
Mouthfeel: Light-bodied, but not quite as thin as some of its lagered compatriots. Medium carbonation.
Drinkability: Oh, come on, it's not so bad. Really! Though it leaves me wishing I had some tasty Asian grub to wash it down with.
02-21-2009 00:16:10 | More by ChainGangGuy
1.9/5 rDev -29.6%
Picked this one up pretty much to just finish filling a 6 pack up. Mostly this beer is like many other lagers. I'm sure it's got hops, barley and malts in it but to what extreme are they putting in? Anyway the beer is pee yellow with very little head. The aroma is mostly malt no hop aroma unfortunately. This beer is rather bland, with something as wild as a tiger on the label should this brew be a little more aggressive?
03-23-2011 01:40:39 | More by Knapp85
2.7/5 rDev 0%
Served in a Budweiser pokal.
Nothin' better than drinking an Asian AAL while watching some low-grade chop socky. "Shaolin Ex-Monk" to be exact. The clear, very pale straw is just as bland and unexciting as the dubbed dialogue I'm being forced to listen to. If only this brew had such an awesome fake moustache as this guy here... Ah, without visuals that didn't work as well as I'd hoped, but trust me, it's a cool fake moustache. And those sound effects: every movement of an arm or leg produces a beast of a whoosh, just as unsatisfying as the weak, ricy, corny, almost metallically sour nose on this thing. Along side the usual corn syrup, toasted rice, and baked wheat tastes is a hint of vague, blunt bitterness with a tiny bit of tinny edge. Wow, do these attempts at physical comedy suck, and in the best way! Now, as lame as the taste is (as is this movie), at least it's nice and light, both in body and in carbonation, and goes down easily, allowing it to be done with quickly. If only this movie would move along so easily...
03-27-2010 04:42:21 | More by TMoney2591
2.05/5 rDev -24.1%
A - Poured out a straw yellow color with a bubbly, white, two-finger head. It was highly carbonated and left no lace.
S - It smelled of corn and grains.
T - It tasted a little bittersweet. The predominant flavor was just corn.
M - It was pretty crisp and sharp. A light-bodied beer.
D - This is a below average beer. It is fairly bland and doesn't bring much in terms of flavor.
09-24-2007 03:27:05 | More by zeff80
2.55/5 rDev -5.6%
330ml bottle. I do always seem to get this when at Thai or Malay restaurants, so now it's time to give this a proper shake at the Metro in DT Edmonton, after another splendid Iron Maiden concert. My hearing may be a bit fuzzy, but my tastebuds should still be in working order.
This beer pours a clear, pale golden yellow colour, with two fingers of puffy, rather finely foamy off-white head, which disappears fairly quickly, leaving a bit of webbed rainforest lace around the glass.
It smells of a gritty, somewhat crackery, semi-sweet corn and rice graininess, and a slightly perfumed skunky, grassy hoppiness. The taste is a sort of bready, grainy pale malt, blended with more rice and corn pithiness, and some hard to mistake acrid, perfume-heavy floral hops.
The carbonation is moderate, with a certain frothy fluffiness, the body medium-light in weight, just above average for the style, and not really all that smooth. It finishes still unpleasantly floral, and just a bit skunky.
While this seems to fulfill the trope of working well with various spicy Southeast Asian cuisines, on its own, it's pretty below average, even for this generally less than impressive style.
06-28-2009 23:28:33 | More by biboergosum
3.45/5 rDev +27.8%
Tiger pours a crystal-clear straw-gold body beneath a bright white head that holds very well but leaves no lace. The nose is basic, but there are some floral, grassy, and spicy hops present. It's crisp in the mouth with a standard carbonation and light-medium body. The flavor delivers a well-balanced combination of sweetish adjunct-laden malt, a solid bitterness, and spicy hops that linger shortly in the dry aftertaste. A basic, but nicely hopped golden lager.
05-23-2005 23:26:10 | More by NeroFiddled
3.35/5 rDev +24.1%
Pours as is expected. Clear gold with a white head that sticks around and a lot of carbonation. Smells as expected. Slightly bitter and sweet. Flavor is as expected. Slightly bitter tone to a beer that has a mild sweetness to it. Tastes watered down on the end as no significant traits hang around. Feel is standard. Drinkable. Sure. Why bother though. A standard macro. But hey. At least I add another country to my growing list.
12-30-2007 13:01:09 | More by RblWthACoz
1.83/5 rDev -32.2%
Poured from a 12oz bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.
A: The beer is a light yellow color, with a thin white head that fades very quickly and leaves a thin lace on the glass.
S: The aroma contains adjuncts, light malts and a very faint touch of hops.
T: The taste starts out bready with flavors of adjuncts and grain. Then some light malt sweetness comes in. The hops presence is very mild as you would expect from this kind of beer, but there's not a lot of balance. The after-taste is slightly sweet.
M: Crisp but not very smooth, light body, medium-to-high carbonation, finish is clean.
D: Not very flavorful, goes down ok, not too filling, mild kick, good representation of style for whatever that's worth, there are a lot of other beers in the style I would rather drink if my choices were that limited.
11-27-2010 21:15:05 | More by TheManiacalOne
1.4/5 rDev -48.1%
Appearance: Golden and fizzy that's about it, thin short lived head just poor looking brew. Aroma: Wretchedness as my lovely girlfriend, Carrie put it so eloquently. Smells worse than Old E' grainy malt liquor like approach no hopes bland, blah. Taste: Tolerable only because of it's lack of flavor, there is also a distinct offness ridden with rice as it's evil adjunct of choice. Mouthfeel: Thin bodied watery who cares about carbonation. Drinkability: Wow, I can't believe they export this shit who else in the world would send this shitty beer, I'll tell you the same one that beats their citizens with rods.
02-20-2004 00:49:21 | More by WVbeergeek
2.8/5 rDev +3.7%
11.2 oz brown bottle with a best before date on the back label.
A- Good frothing white head dissipates into a thin lace that sticks a bit. Bright bubbly gold clarity shines in the light.
S- The usual aroma of an adjunct lager, no definitive malt in the nose just husk and cooked cereal.
T- Thin maltiness holds together for a modest generic lackluster hop bite. Clean and mostly dry.
M- Super crisp and pretty damn smooth.
A half decent lager, an easy pick when you want a weak flavored beer to wash down extra spicy Pan-Asian cuisine.
06-26-2005 22:17:23 | More by Jason
Tiger Beer from Asia Pacific Breweries Ltd.
64 out of 100 based on 725 ratings.