1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Tiger Beer - Asia Pacific Breweries Limited

Not Rated.
Tiger BeerTiger Beer

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

806 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 806
Reviews: 355
rAvg: 2.69
pDev: 22.68%
Wants: 11
Gots: 47 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Asia Pacific Breweries Limited visit their website

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 11-25-2001)
View: Beers (10) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Tiger Beer Alström Bros
Ratings: 806 | Reviews: 355 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of hwwty4
3.03/5  rDev +12.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured a 12oz beer into my Maredsous chalice. This beer pours a corn yellow with a pretty supple head for the style. It's pretty creamy and leaves a bit of lacing as the beer recedes down the glass. The aroma is, what I consider, mildly generically sweet. There really isn't that canned corn aroma that comes with most macro lagers. The flavor reminds me of a mix between Heineken and Bud Select. It has a bit of a sulfuric funk and bland canned corn sweetness. Also there is an odd aspartame chemically-ness to it also. The mouthfeel is lightly carbonated and just a touch of dryness. As with all macro lagers, I think its pretty drinkable, especially on a hot day.

Photo of ChainGangGuy
3.05/5  rDev +13.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12 oz. single - $1.79 at Total Wine & More in Kennesaw, Georgia.

Appearance: While it's not exactly a tiger's roar, there is at least a lively hiss of carbonation upon opening. Pours a crystal clear, yellow body with a medium-sized, white head.

Smell: Delicate, light pale malts with a soft touch of maize and some very mild floral touches.

Taste: Light pale malts dashed with a hearty handful of dried yellow corn and a medium sweetness. Faintly floral hops and mild bitterness leave you with, well, a slightly sweetish finish.

Mouthfeel: Light-bodied, but not quite as thin as some of its lagered compatriots. Medium carbonation.

Drinkability: Oh, come on, it's not so bad. Really! Though it leaves me wishing I had some tasty Asian grub to wash it down with.

Photo of KickInTheChalice
3.03/5  rDev +12.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from a bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance: A pretty standard pour for an Asian lager - a golden yellow color, with a medium sized head that began to vaporize as soon as it had formed. Above average carbonation is present.

Smell: A fairly light, mostly adjunct smell. More specifically, I would say it has a slightly sweet corn smell. No real hop or malt to speak of.

Taste: A consistent flavor from start to finish. I actually thought the sweetness from the corn in the taste was an improvement over the normally awful tasting beers in this category.

Mouthfeel: Only a small amount of texture and not entirely smooth. A fair amount of carbonation reminds me that I am drinking a fizzy Asian lager. It is light enough to be ok, though.

Drinkability: Some of the beers I have had in India and Asia are so bad that I can not even finish one. So with a decent level of smoothness and a light, sweet character, I would put this ahead of those in terms of tolerability. That said, it certainly is not a beer I would go out of my way to purchase, and I would probably laugh at anyone drinking it in the U.S. as an "import."

Photo of Georgiabeer
2.68/5  rDev -0.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours like a typical macro-lager. Yellow with a thin, pure white head. The head sticks around as a thin cap. Smells of adjuncts, but relatively clean and not too sweet. The taste is a bit sweeter, and there is a slight graininess that comes through as well. Some very slight hops on the finish that are mostly overwhelmed by the adjunct sweetness. Not terrible, but a bit too sweet and uninspired. The carbonation is right, but it would be crisper without the adjuncts. Just okay. One of those beers you end up drinking at an Asian restaurant because the other options are worse. Meh.

Photo of ToddT
2.53/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A- Pours a pale golden color with a white head that dissipates quickly and leaves no lacing on the glass.

S- Light notes of yeast and little else, some rice adjuncts in the background.

T- Thin but crisp bite of the malt, the adjuncts come through but less than most of the American macros. Little touch of hops at the end for a little more than what was expected.

M- Thin, watery and heavily carbonated. Crisp and clean finish.

D- You could drink quite a few of these with the right food or on the hottest summer day and be quite happy with it. At 5.0% ABV it is easy to put them down.

A decent beer for what it is (a macro lager). Got turned on to this one in Asia and like to have a few with spicy Asian foods. I would have a hard time pairing that with a Russian Imperial Stout or many of my other favorite beers.

Photo of GRPunk
2.88/5  rDev +7.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Bottle poured into a pilsner glass.

A- It poured a clean, straw yellow with heavy carbonation. There was a 2-finger, fluffy, white head that left loads of sticky rings on the side of the glass.

S- The aroma initially struck me as vegetal with some hints of grainy malts. I had a difficult time picking up any significant hop aroma.

T- More of the vegetal tones struck me in the flavor mixed with some bready features and hints of fruit.

M- Pretty strong carbontaion. Not quite as clean a feel as I'd expect. It had a slight grainy feel, but nothing I'd categorize as a "rich" or "full-bodied" feel.

D- It's a very average beer. I wouldn't pay the premium price for this import when many of the more common domestic or Canadian lagers are of the same quality at a better price.

Photo of jpiper
1.8/5  rDev -33.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured at cooler temp into a pilsener glass

Clear golden with a decent white head. Nothing about this is reminiscent of any good beer I've had.

A lighter smell than the Kingfisher, with nothing really inviting about it. Maybe a little malt on the nose - much like an American macro.

This was pretty terrible - light, a little malty. Nothing very redeeming about this.

Not as pleasantly dry as the Kingfisher, but still clean on the palate.

I mean, these are meant to be drinkable. I just don't find them so. It's like drinking bad water.

Speaking of water - pass me the water. I'd take a Kingfisher over this anyday. Now there's a good beer!


Photo of coalcracker
2.58/5  rDev -4.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: Light golden in color with only minimal head and lacing.
Smell: Grainy, corny aroma noted
Taste: Light on the grain, adjuncts are noticeable; just a little hop balance. Beer taste is a bit transparent overall. Aftertaste is clean, though some metallic notes pull through here.
Mouthfeel: A bit thin on the palate, yet on the smooth side.
Drinkability: Quite, if you're looking for an easy drinker. Not so if you're seeking a more complex beer.

Overall: Not great. Nonetheless a clean adjunct lager comparable to Miller, etc.

Photo of smedley
3.15/5  rDev +17.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A - Clear yellow, thin white head which disapeared quickly with no lacing. Very bubbly - forming on the side of the glass and rising quickly to the top

S - Pretty typical, light, light malts, bready smell.

T - Just about what I expected after the smell. Not much taste, very slight hops at the end, which makes is just a tad better than most american macros.

M - Thin, smooth, high carbonation. Crisp and refreshing.

D - Not really my cup of tea. Lacked anything worth remembering, but not terrible. Drinkable if you're looking for something light without too much flavor.

Photo of Beerislife652854
3.5/5  rDev +30.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Had one on tap at a Thai restaurant somewhere in London, England.

A - Similar to most American beers of this style. Crystal clear yellow beer with a fizzy white head that settles to a thin patch. Lots of lively carbonation bubbles.

S - Very mild, a bit more hops than what I am used to in this style.

T - A mild lager with a slight bitter aftertaste.

M - Good amount of carbonation, but not overdone.

D - Very drinkable, especially with Thai food.

Photo of aubuc1
2.7/5  rDev +0.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12 oz bottle poured in to a tulip glass.

Mich ultra clear with constant carbonation stream and a thin white head.

First the smell is a metallic synthetic beer, then there is a faint wiff of some fruit.

Taste is better. No bad flavors, but nothing stimulating. Some initial sharpness, but then a mellow and lightly fruity finish.

Average mouthfeel at best.

Pretty drinkable misc. lager. I don't have many light lager favorites.

Photo of atigerlife
2.38/5  rDev -11.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Pours a very clear golden with a big 2+ giner creamy white head. Good retention. Lots of small carbonation rising. Good start.

Aroma is light malts and adjuncts. Nothing special here.

Taste is sweet, light hops, somewhat dry at the end. Really not much going on.

Mouthfeel is flat and dry at the end. Disappointing.

Overall, it is drinkable but nothing special. Much better lagers out there.

Photo of jwinship83
2.98/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

bottle bought by my father in IL after a business trip to Malaysia where this is what they drink

A- rather dark golden color with a finger of white head with moderate lacing and a steady stream of carbonation racing to the top of the glass.

S- bready grains and a slight metallic scent.

T- exactly how it smells, with the metallic part being more pronounced

M- medium bodied with plenty of carbonation

D- meh, for the style it isnt that bad. sure, there are macros id rather have, but if this was all that was available i wouldnt really suffer. im glad i tried something from asia.

Photo of radshoesbro
3.45/5  rDev +28.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

first and foremost, if you haven't actually had this in asia you can't truly review this. to understand the allure of tiger beer you've absolutely got to have it in context (preferably with chicken rice and fish-head curry).

this is the typical asian attempt at american style macro beer. it's got that nasty smell that's associated with the style too. however, it's the best beer in asia and it tastes more like a malt liquor than beer.

Photo of atliens81
4.45/5  rDev +65.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Looks like I'm in the minority here... but I thought this beer was well above average. Got mine in a 6 pack of bottles from our local Hyvee supermarket and poured in to a glass. The most noticeable attribute of this one for me was that it was extremely smooth and crisp. I found it to be one of the smoothest lagers I've had in a long time. It was sort of heavy though, so not the best choice for a long session beer. It had a very non obtrusive aroma... almost nothing there. I think that contributes to the overall appeal to me. If your looking for a smooth, crisp, somewhat filling beer without the hoppyness or odor of other beer styles that might be this thick... this is a good bet.

Photo of Shadman
2.65/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

left over from a party & I'm watching a game on braodband..let's do a review.

Pretty average looking beer. Quite pale amber in appearance, fizzy carbonation, smallish bone-white head that did nothing in terms of retention or lacing.

Some grainy malt and a sweet floral aroma, nothing that is bad or great.

Definitely an asian lager. Quite dry. Light maltiness with a fairly sharp hop bite. Semi astringent taste. Super dry and crisp on the palate.

Would go well with spicy Thai food, but I certainly wouldn't go looking for it outside a restaurant type venue.

Photo of OtherShoe2
2.8/5  rDev +4.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured a medium gold with a fizzy pale white head. No lacing

Macro scents, but not too bad. Malt, corn, raw grain, and some hops.

Same same in the flavors. Raw grain malt, somee hop bite at the end, a little corn/grainy sweetness. Finishes with some bitterness but clean.

Mouthfeel is light, clean, and carbonated.

Had this with some Cambodian food -- certainly addressed the fire, curry, and multi-spiced dish by cleaning the palate without taking away from the food. Not something I'd knock a 6-er down on, but if you find yourself in a particular restaurant, give it a try. It works with the cuisine.

Photo of TheTrevor
3.1/5  rDev +15.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

This beer poured a deep yellow with a two-finger head that didn't last long and some aggressive carbonation. The smell is sweet with a a lot of the corn adjunct that's prominent in American Macro-style beers. The taste is sweet bread with a little bit of corn that doesn't linger and leaves next to no aftertaste. The mouthfeel is nice and crisp, if a bit watery. I'd say where this beer shines is its drinkability. Nothing to write home about, but would probably make a good companion beer to some spicy food or on a hot summer day.

Photo of DrJay
3.05/5  rDev +13.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

This was the last beer I had on my way home from Bali when we stopped overnight in Kuala Lumpur. What a way to end a trip! The tiger poured very clear with a pale gold colour. The white cap disappeared fast, leaving a few fizzy, soapy bubbles behind. The aroma was mild and inoffensive, just a little sweet with a clean yeast profile and a hint of spicy hops. Very mild bitterness, sweet with some grain and faint hop character. It also seemed to be a bit sour with some acidity that seemed to come from the carbonation. Light bodied and dry, CO2 was crisp. Not a bad beer in the heat, but there's not much here as far as character. A decent industrial lager, just not something I'd go looking for.

Photo of woemad
1.98/5  rDev -26.4%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

11.2oz bottle purchased at Huckleberry's in Spokane for $1.29. Purchased because I'm running out of new beers to try at that place and because I'd never had a beer from Singapore before.

Poured a clear, straw color with the faintest wisp of white foam for a head. Said head dropped faster than Tom Brady's (and almost certainly the Patriots) chances of a repeat of last season. No lace at all.

Vegetable oil and metal in the nose, but the skunk factor was lower than I'd thought it would be.

Tastes like vegetable oil as well, with a slight metallic twang and a mildly bitter (and not in a good way) hop flavor at the swallow.

Light bodied, with a watery mouthfeel.

Not at all impressed with this, but I honestly didn't think I would be, except as a bland shit beer. Still, I can find shit beers that were at least brewed in this country for less money that are still better tasting than this. Tiger? More like that pissy prima donna housecat one might have encountered as a child at their dotty aunt's house.

Photo of Avryle
2.68/5  rDev -0.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

I'm going to be honest, I bought this bottle of swill primarily for the cap. However, I will be honest re. my thoughts about it for the purpose of the review, no matter how much I don't even want to drink this.

A- mmmm. Piss. clear, watery, pale golden color. 1/2 finger white head.

S- Sweet corn-adjuncty. oppression and sweat shops.

T- Watered down corn syrup. 'tis corn season, but I like the flavor on the cob, not in the glass. For the style though... ho-hum.

M- thin-bodied. Low carb. Reminds me of when I was 18 and willing to drink whatever because I was underaged.

D- I can't do it. It'll make me vomit, especially after a night of GOOD drinking at Mahar's.

Photo of nrbw23
2.65/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A- Pours a straw yellow color with a thin white head and little to almost no lacng.

S- Not a whole lot going on here mainly some grains and a mild hoppy aroma.

T- Taste bready and slightly pepper.

M- Light in body and watery.

D- Glad I got to try it but I'll pass on this one.

Photo of Phyl21ca
2.28/5  rDev -15.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Bottle: Poured a clear golden color lager with a large pure white foamy head with some good retention but no lacing. Aroma consists of sweet malt with some minimal adjunct showing. Taste is also dominated by a bland medium sweet malt taste with no easily discernable adjunct. Not the most complex beer out there but definitely not the worst pale lager out there.

Photo of MTNboy
3.08/5  rDev +14.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Appearance- It pours a brassy yellow color with a thin head and lace.

Smell- As weird as this may sound I thought the aroma was somewhat pleasing. It had a floral scent to it.

Taste- It was mildly bitter and a little adjunct flavored but not bad.

Mouthfeel- Thin with a crisp bite.

Drinkability- Average and a little bit refreshing.

Photo of BeerCon5
3.23/5  rDev +20.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a straw yellow color with very little white head.

Not much of a scent, mostly some light grain.

The taste is mostly of grains, some yeast.

Light-bodied, a little watery, pretty crisp and refreshing with adequate carbonation.

Pretty easy drinker. Although, it's not really anything creative, it still tastes pretty good, I could drink quite a few of these.

Tiger Beer from Asia Pacific Breweries Limited
64 out of 100 based on 806 ratings.