1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Fantôme / Jester King Del Rey - Brasserie Fantôme

Not Rated.
Fantôme / Jester King Del ReyFantôme / Jester King Del Rey

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
79
okay

45 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 45
Reviews: 8
rAvg: 3.39
pDev: 18.29%
Wants: 10
Gots: 11 | FT: 4
Brewed by:
Brasserie Fantôme visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Saison / Farmhouse Ale |  8.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: yourefragile on 06-11-2014)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 45 | Reviews: 8 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by the Alström Bros:

  None found.

More User Reviews:
Photo of StonedTrippin
3.56/5  rDev +5%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

weird beer, actually, one of the weirdest I've ever had. its bronze colored, thick and sludgy burnt orange, cloudy and full of sediment and a tall off white head. the nose is like no other, weird as anything, and not all the way appetizing. distinct white truffle mushroom oil coming from this, its like the smell outside of the burger joint by my house. unmistakable. there is also a dried either apricot or peach aroma, in among the weird fantome yeast and belgian style base beer, grainy and maybe a little stale already. a very curious beer, i could keep smelling it forever, not because its yummy, but because its so strange, doesnt even really smell all that much like beer. the taste sort of starts a little slow for how insane the nose is, its almost under flavored until about mid palate, and then it too gets real bizarre. flavors of that dried orchard fruit, more apricot this time, and a lot of sweet mid caramel malt. belgian yeast does what it can to penetrate the density, but it can't cut through, influencing this beer less than we had all probably hoped it would, given the two parties responsible for birthing this weirdo. the truffle thing is barely there in the taste, its all aromatic. finish is long and funky stale, a little sweet, and just filling to me, thank goodness we were sharing the bottle. not a beer i would ever buy again, but its certainly one interesting brew, something worth trying for the adventurous.

Photo of DrinkSlurm
4.25/5  rDev +25.4%

Purchased at Bier Cellar in Portland, ME - around $20 - kinda steep.
Pours an orange color with a little white lacing/foam. Signature Fantome funky aroma - although mild.
Hints of rye and fruity saison-like yeast. Taste is a little sweet malty rye, slight noble hop, and that Fantome funky flavor. I really like it a lot. Not sure why its rated so poor, but perhaps I am biased as Fantome is my favorite.
Either way...its not just an "ok" beer IMO. Worth it for sure. Glad I got a second to cellar to bring out the funk a little more!

Photo of champ103
1.45/5  rDev -57.2%
look: 3.25 | smell: 1.25 | taste: 1.25 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 1.5

A: Pours a hazed golden orange color. A one finger white head forms, and recedes after a minute. Light lace.
S: Moldy, earthy...yes truffles. Plastic, phenolic, even metallic. Ridiculously revolting. I just...good god, no.
T: Well, yeah. Again, good god, I just don't get why anybody would make this? Musky, earthy, moldy. There is a phenolic and plastic yeast character. This is abysmal. Please, somebody, tell both of these breweries that this is one of the worst things ever.
M/D: A moderate body and carbonation. After that, just dirty, moldy. The definition of not clean. Yep, I don't ever want to drink this again.

Shame on both Jester King and Fantome. Maybe one of the worst beers I have ever had. While I am not the biggest fan boy of Jester King, I do see that they at least care with most of their releases. This is like Tom Hanks playing in one of those god awful and brain dead Dan Brown novels turned movies. If beer is to be taken as seriously as wine, these types of releases need to never happen. Worse then that, if craft beer wants to be taken more seriously than macros, this needs to be abolished.

Photo of stakem
1.95/5  rDev -42.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

750ml corked and capped bottle poured into a matching Fantome tulip. The brew appears a muddy light brown color with ample carbonation that produces a heavy volume head when poured down the middle of the glass. Some spotty lace sticks to the glass.

The aroma is funky with an earthen note of stinky cheese, mushrooms, more dirtiness, a hint of cardboard and a little bit of diaper/dumpster. As it breaths, it picks up a pretty bad aspect like cooked cabbage. The taste is strangely sweet and earthy like soot mixed with cream corn. A bitterness of pulp and light fruity quality gets slightly rindy. The sweetness is just too much to enjoy this.

This is medium to full bodied. It has a strangely creamy texture that is smooth and warming with a tingly spice and alcohol. This beer is in a really awkward place right now. Despite being in the fridge for days undesturbed, it pours like soup and has an overall feel like it just isnt finished. It is so sweet that it seems like it is unfermented. Maybe some age will help this out but right now its pretty bad. It pains me to say it since I love Fantome but wow, why was it sold in this current state?

Photo of tectactoe
3/5  rDev -11.5%

Photo of tbryan5
4.1/5  rDev +20.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25

Photo of olradetbalder
3/5  rDev -11.5%

Photo of jtladner
3.75/5  rDev +10.6%

Photo of JamesStreet
3.76/5  rDev +10.9%

Photo of jonblake
3.32/5  rDev -2.1%

Photo of mattfancett
3/5  rDev -11.5%

Photo of benbazi
3/5  rDev -11.5%

Photo of Alieniloquium
3.08/5  rDev -9.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.75

750 mL bottle poured into a snifter.

Appearance - Cloudy orange. Medium white head. Big collar.

Smell - Citrusy and a little toasty. Kinda bready and fruity. Very yeasty.

Taste - Fruity and doughy yeastiness up front. Citrus behind it. Very odd sickly sweet flavor followed by an aggressive toasty bitterness.

Mouthfeel - Medium heavy and medium carbonation.

Overall - It's a little weird. Kind of an artificial flavor I can't pin down.

Photo of GRG1313
3.75/5  rDev +10.6%

Photo of LotsofLupulin
3.6/5  rDev +6.2%

Photo of mendvicdog
3/5  rDev -11.5%

Photo of Rhettroactive
2.75/5  rDev -18.9%

Photo of ygtbsm94
2.5/5  rDev -26.3%

Photo of greenspointexas
3/5  rDev -11.5%

Photo of WCW
3.37/5  rDev -0.6%

Photo of drewone
3.6/5  rDev +6.2%

Photo of jrenihan
3.8/5  rDev +12.1%

It's hard for me to understand why this beer is so lowly rated. Hard because it doesn't have a particularly strong or unusual flavour: i.e., it doesn't seem like a "love it or hate it" beer (let alone a plain "hate it"). I think it is quite good. A bit funky, some spices and fruit, and a strong dose of sweet malt. The sweetness is a bit much and the aftertaste is a bit tiresome, but otherwise it is quite good. I wouldn't hunt it out nor would I buy it again, but unless there is huge variation between the bottles (which is possible), I don't understand the hatred for this beer.

Photo of chippo33
4.25/5  rDev +25.4%

Photo of stevec32
3.5/5  rDev +3.2%

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Fantôme / Jester King Del Rey from Brasserie Fantôme
79 out of 100 based on 45 ratings.