1. Extreme Beer Fest tickets go on sale Sat, Sep 27 @ Noon EDT.
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Cattail Ale - Lakefront Brewery, Inc.

Not Rated.
Cattail AleCattail Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
74
okay

112 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 112
Reviews: 103
rAvg: 3.19
pDev: 19.12%
Wants: 3
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Lakefront Brewery, Inc. visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
English Pale Mild Ale |  5.16% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Described as a Wisconsin Mild Ale, brewed with water, malt, hops and yeast; hopped with Kent Golding and finished with a California Ale yeast strain.

(Beer added by: Winter on 04-08-2003)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 112 | Reviews: 103 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of wrightst
3.5/5  rDev +9.7%

wrightst, Aug 18, 2014
Photo of jaydoc
3/5  rDev -6%

jaydoc, Dec 14, 2013
Photo of harpus
3.25/5  rDev +1.9%

harpus, Oct 07, 2013
Photo of dgherm
3.25/5  rDev +1.9%

dgherm, Jul 30, 2013
Photo of wakajawaka76
3.25/5  rDev +1.9%

wakajawaka76, May 03, 2013
Photo of boehmer7
3.25/5  rDev +1.9%

boehmer7, Oct 16, 2012
Photo of NilocRellim
3/5  rDev -6%

NilocRellim, Sep 17, 2012
Photo of DIPADude01
5/5  rDev +56.7%

DIPADude01, Jul 28, 2012
Photo of AlphaKing414
2.5/5  rDev -21.6%

AlphaKing414, Apr 02, 2012
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
3/5  rDev -6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a mixture of yellow and amber. Decent enough pour, nothing special or underwhelming (a theme). Aroma was just bready.

Taste, definitely mild, a session beer if you will. Had that earthy and bready thing going again, no hop quotient was noticeable, didn't seem to have any kind of adjunct or anything about it to stand out. Reminiscient of those old generic 'beer' cans they had back in the day.

Not my favorite offering from Lakefront, but hey, they can't all be zingers.

Beerandraiderfan, Jan 24, 2011
Photo of DrDemento456
2.7/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Ow god I had no idea this was retired before I drank it. Could explain why it tasted awful.

A - Clear straw yellow color with decent head for a retired beer.
S - Mostly grass and slight undetectable smell (butter?)
T - Buttery Cornish taste with mild citrus in the background. Hated it to the point of spitting it out.
M - Rough on the palate. Really expected more citrus hops then a grassy buttery flavor. Aggravating.
D - No thanks so thankfully its retired. Was really the only beer in the pack that was a drain pour and will probably dispose of the other two bottles.

DrDemento456, May 16, 2010
Photo of tjd112
3.58/5  rDev +12.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Presentation - Poured into Flying Fish Pint glass

Appearance - Golden coloured with foamy finger white head, well- retained with some lacing

Smell - Very weak maltiness

Taste - Fruit and butter

Mouthfeel - Medium bodied and creamy

Drinkability - Sessionable

Overall - An OK beer, nothing I'd go out of my way for

tjd112, Jan 25, 2010
Photo of tpd975
3.88/5  rDev +21.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

HUGE thanks goes out to kbutler1 for sending this one my way. I had been looking for it for awhile to finish the 103 styles list.

A cool day in Florida means this one was ready for consumption right off the Fed Ex truck.

A: Pours a nice light clear yellow hue with a tall foamy white head. Okay retention with just a spot or two of lace.

S: Very sweet malty aromas. Lots of fresh bread with hints of cream of corn.

T: Malty sweet up front. Mildly doughy with the corn coming through. There is a wonderful hop addition though to balance all the sweetness. Mild citrus notes with a nice bit of bitter floral and grassy hops in the finish.

M: Light in body, smooth, sparkling carbonation.

D: Good, for a lighter beer this one really packs a punch. Too bad they retired it cause it is the best Lakefront beer I have ever had. Beats all the light Macro swill by a mile.

For what it is, a real solid beer.

tpd975, Jan 08, 2010
Photo of stakem
3.23/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Cattail Ale...ok what is it? No identification as to what I am about to dive into, but lets give it a whirl.

Bottled during: 3rd week of May (no year)

Pours a clear yellow color with a bit of an orange shade to it. Less than a finger of white head that quickly dissolves to just a lace upon the top of the beverage. Nose is faint in hops, mostly citrus and a bit of spice. Also picking up on a bit of yeast and clove. Taste is a little bitter upfront with malt sweetness filling out the thin body and a bit of clove character in there as well.

stakem, Nov 11, 2009
Photo of drizzam
3.38/5  rDev +6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Poured into a clear pint glass. The beer is a clear pale straw color with sediment floating in it...I'm assuming this is a bottle conditioned ale due to the sediment. Poured with an egg shell white one finger head that dissipated rather quickly, leaving a small amount of lacing.

S - Not high on the aroma scale...smells like sweet caramelized malt. It even seems to have a buttery quality in the nose...reminds me of a malt liquor I've tried recently.

T - Malty and yeasty with some pale hops trying to come through. This is not at all high on the IBU scale but there is a very, very minor hoppiness to it.

M & D - Thin, light bodied mouthfeel...a bit on the watery side. Finishes crisp, with very little aftertaste. The low ABV makes this pretty drinkable...this is one of those brews that you would drink on a hot summer day while BBQ'ing. Not one of those beers that is memorable or even recommendable, but I wouldn't turn it down if it was offered to me. Better than drinking macro, for sure.

drizzam, Oct 27, 2009
Photo of tone77
3.3/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a brown 12 oz. bottle. Has a rich golden color with a 1/2 inch head. Mild aroma, some notes of fruit. Taste is sweet with a bit of hops. Feels medium bodied in the mouth and has average drinkability. Overall this is not a bad beer at all.

tone77, Oct 21, 2009
Photo of brewmudgeon
3.13/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

lakefront cattail ale

3.5 clear golden amber, modest head leaves a sparse cap and ring. that too soon backs out of the deal, leaving no trace of lace.
3.5 smells like english malts and there's an odd sweet/sulphery odor. the aroma is not pronounced at all; it's like a very reserved englishman.
2.5-3 not much at all to report in the way of flavor. it's inoffensive enough, and is pretty damned similar to very weak iced tea with a twist of lemon.
3 mouthfeel is extraordinarily watery. the carbonation is modest, but at least it doesn't get in the way.
3 given the dearth of flavor and body, this beer ought to be more like 3% abv, not 5.something. third beer i've tried from this brewery, and am very unimpressed so far. feeling bloody ripped off, actually.
3 it can be drunk easily, and probably in large quantity, but with so little going on per % alc, why bother? you'd be smashed by the time you felt you had tasted enough to know what you were drinking. on the other hand, if this were very low strength i'd regard it rather fondly.

brewmudgeon, Jul 02, 2009
Photo of BierFan
3.55/5  rDev +11.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12 ounce bottle into a pint glass.

Slim white head and a slightly hazy bright yellow/orange body. Carbonation is much more active than I was expecting. The smell is fruity, flowery, and a tiny bit buttery. Taste is much like the smell. Has a bit of tartness to the finish.

BierFan, Jun 13, 2009
Photo of williamherbert
2.75/5  rDev -13.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

The appearance is a sunny, clear yellow. Hint of orange. Tons of carbonation. Icy, white lace. Decent specks of lace.

The smell is of a light ale, almost to the point of being lager-like. Strictly average.

The taste is that of a very skimpy lager. Corny and close to a macro for sure. Not really unpleasant but bargain basement flavor.

The feel is light but with a touch of a creamy body; not bad. It's a very basic, unchallenging brew. Not much to distinguish it. A challenge to finish, quite honestly.

williamherbert, Jun 10, 2009
Photo of Cyberkedi
3.15/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Aroma is fairly strong, malty and yeasty, with just a hint of lemon and maybe even a touch of vegetable. It pours a clear amber golden with a typical white head. Flavor is mouth-filling, not complex but satisfying and refreshing; it is mainly malty with some yeasty tones and more than a hint of hops but very little bitterness. Texture is tingly and fizzy, like any good beer.

Cyberkedi, Jun 06, 2009
Photo of Tone
3.58/5  rDev +12.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a hazy, golden/orange color. 1/4 inch head of a white color. Decent retention and poor lacing. Smells of earthy malt, pale hops, some yeast cleanliness, and strong butter aroma. Fits the style of an English Pale Mild Ale. Mouth feel is smooth, crisp and average carbonation level. Tastes of grass up front, pale hops come through next, some fruit flavors from yeast, and noticeable butter flavors. Wow, this is definitely a unique flavor. From what I've read it fits the category; I don't think I could drink more than a couiple of these at the most because of the butter flavor mostly.

Tone, May 28, 2009
Photo of NeroFiddled
3.98/5  rDev +24.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Well I wasn't sure to expect from this one based on the brightly colored label, but it's turned out to be just a regular beer and nothing fancy. It's a very basic, well-rounded ale. It pours a hazy golden-amber body beneath a short head of white that holds fairly well and leaves small patchhes of thin sticky lace here and there. The aroma is bright with lots of grainy, gently toasty malt and leafy hops. In the mouth it's medium-light in body, and delicately zesty on the tongue with what seems like a natural carbonation - whether or not it's actually bottle conditioned I don't know. It's got some very tiny bubbles though. The flavor is malty and hoppy upfront, and then some yeastiness steps in. It's softly fruity, kind of like dried apricots. Some floral hop flavors appear as well. There's more to the yeast though, but I can't pin-point what it is. It's very English in nature. Mineralish, I guess. A solid bitterness braces it, and it finishes mainly dry with some lingering notes of biscuity malt and leafy hop. Nicely done. Very drinkable. I could quite easily imagine hanging with the lads at the pub and having three or four of these. If you enjoy English ales, you'll love this one.

NeroFiddled, May 15, 2009
Photo of Seanibus
2.65/5  rDev -16.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I really wish the taste lived up to the aroma. But it doesn't.

Pours a slightly hazy golden with a thin head that collapses to nothing instantly. The aroma, however, is really good, noticeable from several feet away as I opened and pours - grainy, sharp, slightly acidic and refreshing, like a good lager, with a bit of overripe floral hop. I actually held off taking a sip just to breath in the aroma for a moment longer. But the flavor? Not so great. Ok, but nothing like the aroma. It is a bit sour, grainy, with a flavor a bit like rice - it has a strange saki-like tone to it. Not unpleasant, but not a beer that will bring me back. The mouthfeel is insubstantial and the hop bitterness is slight on the finish.

Seanibus, May 05, 2009
Photo of BeerFMAndy
3.5/5  rDev +9.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

12 oz bottle poured into a Lakefront pint with bottled during notched - Mar. Week 1.

A - Crisp and nicely carbonated golden clear color with a small white head that maintains itself with a good dense lumpyness.

S - Crisp, dry wheats and a husky-grainy aroma with a slight hop aroma in the background.

T - Dry, grainy and wheaty with a "wet" hop flavor thats very subtle (wet hop, like, young, soaking wet, not the practice of throwing freshly picked hops in brewing). Finishes with a little bitter, dry hoppyness that's more of a genuine hop flavor. Tastes more like a lager.

M - Smooth and very light with a slickness on the palate.

D - The best part of this beer is it's drinkability. It has a very lager-like taste and goes down well which makes it a good session beer.

BeerFMAndy, May 05, 2009
Photo of thekevlarkid
3.05/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Out of a bottle this beer was a cloudy gold color with lots of sediment and a two-finger white head. The retention was only so-so and the lacing the same. The aroma was light and dry, yeast, pale malt, and hints of sweetness from the citrus hops. The flavors were unusual. Starting with tangy citrus and yeast it had a semi-sweet, doughy malt middle and a dry finish. Interesting, but the flavors did not compliment each other. The mouthfeel was average, the body medium and the carbonation good.

thekevlarkid, Apr 16, 2009
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Cattail Ale from Lakefront Brewery, Inc.
74 out of 100 based on 112 ratings.