1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Modelo Especial - Grupo Modelo S.A. de C.V.

Not Rated.
Modelo EspecialModelo Especial

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
66
poor

1,466 Ratings
THE BROS
78
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,466
Reviews: 478
rAvg: 2.79
pDev: 22.22%
Wants: 11
Gots: 78 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Grupo Modelo S.A. de C.V. visit their website
Mexico

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 08-22-2001)
View: Beers (16) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Modelo Especial Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,466 | Reviews: 478 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of khiasmus
khiasmus

South Carolina

3.1/5  rDev +11.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A- Crystal clear golden color with a thin head that disappears almost immediately.

S- Faint hops and a tinge of corn... smells like a balanced(and maybe boring) beer with a hint of sourness. The corn smell gets stronger as it warms.

T- Faint malt is balanced by the hops well, and the overall impression is that of a well-balanced, boring macro lager, with a hint of lime flavor in it. (no, I didn't put a lime in it) leaves a sourish flavor in the back of your mouth, but actually gets better as it warms... the only macro I've had in which this was the case.

M- Crisp, clean, watery. Not much to say here.

D- You could knock them back by the dozen... But why would you want such a boring taste? Go pick up a sam adams if you want a decent macro... But if you're at a mexican joint, this one is definitely better than Corona.

Serving type: can

06-18-2007 23:22:11 | More by khiasmus
Photo of oldirtycaffrey
oldirtycaffrey

Virginia

3.48/5  rDev +24.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Nice crisp, refreshing brew. The appearance is standard gold with very little head and very little lacing. The smell is slightly sweet with hints of malt and corn. The taste is very refreshing with just the right amount of carbonation. The malt taste cuts through nicely. This is smooth and has a dry finish. Drinkability is high and as others have said, it's a perfect beer for a hot day outside or if you're just making tacos or burritos at home.

Serving type: bottle

06-16-2007 11:55:51 | More by oldirtycaffrey
Photo of giblet
giblet

Ohio

3.98/5  rDev +42.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

This is one of my favorite Mexican brews. More body and taste than some of the others that are mass marketed. Very good mouth appeal and good aftertaste. A lighter beer than the Negra making it easier to drink. This is the perfect beer for those who are having a cookout in the summer and want to have more than one or two.

It goes down smooth and is a very tastey thirst quencher.

Yum.

Serving type: bottle

06-11-2007 11:53:39 | More by giblet
Photo of maddogruss
maddogruss

New Jersey

3/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

This beer was included in an all-inclusive trip to Mexico I went on recently, so I immediately went for it. The body poured out quite nicely. Rich, deep gold color with a decent, white frothy head. Pretty solid retention too. The smell was both kind of malty and bready, which had me thinking that I was not in for something that I was going to enjoy. But, to my surprise, the beer had a nice, malty taste to it and it was very smooth going down. The mouthfeel was decent and full-bodied, another chracteristic that caught me offguard. This beer is definitely drinkable. It is smooth and refreshing and tastes pretty good as well. It was a lot better than I thought it was going to be.

Serving type: can

06-04-2007 05:12:36 | More by maddogruss
Photo of BlackHaddock
BlackHaddock

United Kingdom (England)

2.85/5  rDev +2.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I have tried other Brazilian beers before, without being overly impressed, I saw this at a local supermarket and thought I'd give the country another chamce.

Clear 33cl funky little bottle, no best before date (I hate that).

Poured into a Hoegaarden Grand Cru glass (I like to give a beer every chance to impress), it looked fine; a clear, lager golden colour, the white head rushed to the side of the glass and stayed there for the whole drink.

A smell of hops at first, then barley or wheat arrived..

The taste reminded me of holidays in the med and beers from Italy, Spain and Portugal. Meaning light, thirst quenching and bodyless, a beer not to be taken as a serious contender in the flavour stakes of life. The tasting took place in the sun, but in my back garden, although the weed corner and hedgehog sanctum are a joy to behold, it is not the same as looking at sand, sea and bronzed young ladies parading along the prom.

The aftertaste was very dry, a sea breeze might have helped, but there was none to be found.

This beer was better thaan anything else Brazil has given me so far, but it is still not this Englishmans 'Cup of Tea'.

Serving type: bottle

06-02-2007 19:53:30 | More by BlackHaddock
Photo of DoubleJ
DoubleJ

California

3.08/5  rDev +10.4%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

The second of six entries in the Unorganized Invitational, this is one of the few major brand Mexican beers I haven't sampled yet. Cross this off the list, as tonight I am going to try this out:

Don't let the clear bottle from the brewery that brought you Corona fool you, this Mexi-brew actaully holds some flavor and little skunk. Anyways, I poured it into a glass and got a clear golden body with a thin head that faded. Mild skunk hits the nose at first, but it paves way for a surprising spicy hop scent. The taste was rewarding, but at times was tough. The hops and corn flavors battled for supremecy, but in the end, the hops won. Not much in the malt department. It got better when I stopped thinking about the corn and started to focus on it as a refreshment.

I thought this would just be another bland Mexi-brew, but it turned out to be quite a surprise. It's better than my overall score will indicate as long as you ignore the corn flavors. That said, this won't be enough to give it first prize in this invite. We got more brews coming later...

Serving type: bottle

05-18-2007 06:21:58 | More by DoubleJ
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

2.8/5  rDev +0.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12oz. can into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a light gold color with a short white head that fades very quickly and leaves a very little lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is of light malts and adjuncts, maybe a little bit of apple which seemed a bit odd for the style. It seemed to be sweet & sour.

T: The taste is maltier than most macros but doesn’t taste as sweet as it smells, with flavors of corn and other adjuncts along with a little bit of hops. The after-taste is bready and slightly sweet.

M: A little smooth and not very crisp, light-to-medium body, medium carbonation, clean finish.

D: Although it’s better than Corona, it’s not very tasty, goes down ok, not filling at all. It’s a decent macro, but nothing exciting.

Serving type: can

05-10-2007 01:03:31 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of Cyberkedi
Cyberkedi

Georgia

2.05/5  rDev -26.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Appearance is typical lager yellow. Aroma is malty and rather weak. Taste is weak, malty, and rather bitter; its flavor is more like that of a "lite" beer than a regular lager. Smooth but watery, it is barely drinkable and quite forgettable. Maybe the can affected it some - I have found that beers taste best on-tap, while bottles come second and cans are the worst.

Serving type: can

05-08-2007 01:57:16 | More by Cyberkedi
Photo of scottoale
scottoale

California

3.15/5  rDev +12.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

From the big 24oz. white aluminum can, poured into my jumbo chalice (for fun), was a bright golden elixer with a finger of snow-white foam. The head didn't diminish as quickly as I thought, good sized bubbles coming up from all over the bottom helped keep it alive.

Sweet and malty...very dough like malty, is all that came to my nose.

The taste wasn't bad, a little sweetness of pale malt and corn adjunct, without that lingering sweetness that cloys. Hops were not really noticable, yet the brew was fairly well balanced.

A medium-light body with a little fizz to it...this would be an ok hot weather thirst quencher while doing yardwork, type of beer.

Serving type: can

05-01-2007 00:53:46 | More by scottoale
Photo of MrMcGibblets
MrMcGibblets

Illinois

2.68/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

man, i used to love this shit before i knew what good beer was. compared to other macros, it actually is good. a little deeper in color than most macro lagers, and the buttery diacetyl and corn adjunct aromas used to appeal to me. fizzy head. some malt (not much) flavor up front with a tiny bit of malt sweetness. balanced more by the force carbonation than hops. can't notice any hops in this, actually. but somehow drinkable on a hot day, at least in the past.

Serving type: bottle

04-24-2007 04:38:15 | More by MrMcGibblets
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

2.8/5  rDev +0.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Eeh, it's beer... I guess. Not a lot here to brag about, other than it is what is expected from South-of-the-boarder beers. Thirst quenching, carbonated, lightly flavored, and low on the quality. This beer contributes a pungent hop aroma that showm mostly earthiness, but also skunkiness. Tastes are a mix of pilsner malts and corn. The beer fades quickly, just before becomming oily and sweet-heavy late. Sub-par on many fronts.

Serving type: bottle

04-16-2007 17:00:53 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of MrHungryMonkey
MrHungryMonkey

Texas

2.8/5  rDev +0.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Yellow, almost golden, 4-7 SRM. Clear. Mild carbonation. Decent head, poor retention/lace.

Toasty white bread, mildly sweet. Mild floral hoppage.

Thin-medium bodied. Grainy toasted bread with metallic edge. Essence of cooked vegetables. Warm bitterness, but doesn’t feel like its from the hops. In fact I can’t really detect any hop flavors. Decent carbonation. Finishes clean.

Not good, not horrible. Another mass produced Mexican-themed beer. Impressive carbonation and head for a Macro. Taste is just so-so; however it is much better with lime. I suggest key limes. Is it below average for Macro Lagers? I don’t know. It is a below average beer, for sure. Nothing especial about it, Negra is way better.

Serving type: can

03-25-2007 05:30:57 | More by MrHungryMonkey
Photo of tempest
tempest

Pennsylvania

3.3/5  rDev +18.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Not half bad for a macro lager. This hangs with the best of the macros, PBR comes to mind, with mellow sweet flavor and light barley finish. That finish that actually tastes like grains in a good way is what surprised me and kept me from writing this off. Pair with food or a hot day.

Serving type: can

03-21-2007 02:29:42 | More by tempest
Photo of mithrascruor
mithrascruor

California

2.03/5  rDev -27.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

12 oz. can... out of the can... mostly. And the can looks very "retro."

Appearance: Pale gold, clear. Basically no head but a bit of fizz.

Smell: Corn and metallic "aromas."

Taste: Malty nothingness.

Mouthfeel: Fizzy water. Relatively smooth, at least.

Drinkability: Easy to down, hard to believe it has alcohol, hard to really want another.

Lame Mexican lager. Better than some, but not others. Very little to say about it: an incredibly boring beer, but nothing outright bad about it. Probably works fine to wash down some tacos on a beach, but otherwise...

Oh, and why is this so expensive?

Serving type: can

03-03-2007 21:32:03 | More by mithrascruor
Photo of Vancer
Vancer

Illinois

2.48/5  rDev -11.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

This stuff was tolerable, but it sorely needed a beach and bikinis around it to enhance it to drinkable session status.

Look at the pour; crystal clear straw yellow (maybe a tint of amber in there), and it took a hard pour to generate a lil’ white head.

Gentle hints of cooked veggies in the aroma, if you try hard enough. And the taste really shows up with a corn dog in the can.

Well, this is better than Crapona, don’t even need a lime. But defiantly needs some environmental enhancements.

Serving type: can

03-02-2007 15:52:06 | More by Vancer
Photo of SetarconeX
SetarconeX

Florida

2.28/5  rDev -18.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance: Dark golden color. Fizzy. Actually doesn't look half bad. Crystal clear.

Smell: Oh wow. Just...wow. I can't remember the last time I had a beer skunked this bad. I almost wish I'd sprung for the cans. Inexpensive beer in clear bottles is definitely a bad idea.

Taste: Has almost none. This is water with a dash of malt. Still, I've had worse, so it nets a couple points here just for not actually tasting bad.

Mouthfeel and drinkability: Feels and drinks like water. Depending on where you buy it, it might also be cheaper than water.

This being the beer Brosnan drank in The Matador, I really wanted to like it. I don't. It's really some dreadful swill.

Serving type: bottle

02-20-2007 15:57:01 | More by SetarconeX
Photo of goochpunch
goochpunch

Texas

3.35/5  rDev +20.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours out a brassy gold body and a thin head that I had to really force. Smells of some bready pale malts, graininess, little sulphur, and some mild hops. Flavor is very similar with the malt overtaking the grain, however. Finish has a bit of herbal hop flavor and a bit of bitterness. Only complaint is this kind of washes off the palate real quick. Mouthfeel is a bit watery to support the flavors but the carbonation is decent. I used to drink this quite often and I still like it.

Serving type: bottle

02-14-2007 04:10:00 | More by goochpunch
Photo of pmcadamis
pmcadamis

Illinois

2.58/5  rDev -7.5%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

Big ass 24ozer picked up at a gas station for a buck. God bless the big-ass-cheapo-single-serving-gas-staion-can. This particular can is....very cheesy looking. It looks like those pull top cans from the '70's

A - This is a cider-like shade of amber gold. A darker shade of gold than most pale yellow macro lagers. A thin head of white foam reduces to a sudsy haze after a minute or two and some unattractive soapy lacing is left on the glass.

S - Corn and can. I can really smell the aluminium in this one.

M - This is really sweet and malty with a good deal of hop flavors for a macro lager. This is a really nicely balanced macaro lager that actually tastes like beer. There are those naggin hints of corn and aluminium that remind me that this is a cheapo canned beer, but there are some really impressive flavors going on here.

M - Wet and quenching. I drank this extremely cold, and it really hit the spot. This is fuller and more firm in the mouth than other macros, and also has much more of a hoppy dryness at the finish. I'm really quite impressed with this one!

D - Excellent. For a day on the beach in Mexico, this is as good as it gets. Beats Corona or BMC any day. This has more "real beer" qualities than most macros, and for the money this one is a real straight shooter.

Serving type: can

02-05-2007 05:44:16 | More by pmcadamis
Photo of rowew
rowew

Colorado

3.2/5  rDev +14.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Presentation: 12 oz classic Modelo bottle - short bottle with foil on the neck and cap. Date code on the bottle, with code being the key word.

Appearance: Pale yellow and clear, thin head that fades quickly. Nothing visually to distinguish this from any other macro lager.

Smell: Got a whiff of skunked aroma as soon as I poured. Less noticable in the glass. A bit of malt, a hint of skunk - very subdued.

Taste: Slightly sweet malty flavor, just a tiny hint of a hoppy finish.

Overall impression: Highly drinkable - not overly exciting. I would probably take this over a Corona given the choice, and wouldn't be above dropping a lime in it.

Serving type: bottle

02-02-2007 23:20:23 | More by rowew
Photo of lehows
lehows

New York

3.35/5  rDev +20.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a transparent yellow color with a small head, no lacing to speak of. Faint aromas of corn, some skunk, light alcohol. Taste is much the same. This is usually what I order at Mexican restaurants, thirst quenching, simple, and better than most of the Mexi macros. It's good with or without a lime.

Serving type: bottle

01-25-2007 02:26:40 | More by lehows
Photo of kimcgolf
kimcgolf

Georgia

2.25/5  rDev -19.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

A very light beer with little flavor or aroma. I had this with a slice of lime, while eating spicy Mexican food. It was thirst-quenching, and helped put out the fire, but not much beyond that. A typical Mexican beer...best enjoyed very cold with lime or lemon.

Serving type: bottle

01-05-2007 04:13:32 | More by kimcgolf
Photo of Drew966
Drew966

Florida

2.75/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Modelo Especial pours a typical lager yellow with very little head from a clear twelve ounce bottle. The aroma is sweet and corn like. On the plus side, I would have to say that even though this was in a clear bottle I don't think it's skunked. On the other hand its just kind of decent Mexican beer, better than most, but not aiming real high in the first place. Corn is the predominant taste. Drinkable, no lime required. Colder the better.

Serving type: bottle

12-20-2006 01:21:49 | More by Drew966
Photo of jasonpeckins32
jasonpeckins32

Michigan

3.43/5  rDev +22.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a golden, almost bronze color, not much surprise with the clear glass bottle it comes in. The nose is simple and plain, a bit of skunkiness, but not bad or overwhelming at all. The taste is great when compared to other macro lagers. This is much better than a budweiser. Creamy mouthfeel, not heavy but definitly not a light beer either. Not a bad choice when the selection is limited.

Serving type: bottle

11-04-2006 19:14:23 | More by jasonpeckins32
Photo of TechMyst
TechMyst

Illinois

1.85/5  rDev -33.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

CONTAINER VOLUME: 12 oz
CONTAINER TYPE: bottle
FRESH: probably
PURCHASED @: Dos Reales Restaurant
COST: ?
HEAD: none
LACE: none
COLOR: pale yellow
AROMA: lager
MOUTHFEEL: light
PALATE: none
TASTE: lager w/ corn adjunct
COMMENTS: slight tequila aftertaste
CONDITIONS:
MOWING/WORKING ON CAR- n
WITH FRIENDS- n
SIPPING- n
GET MY BUZZ ON-n

Serving type: bottle

11-03-2006 01:44:59 | More by TechMyst
Photo of BeerBelcher
BeerBelcher

Ohio

1.7/5  rDev -39.1%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

I've consumed enough beer at Mexican restaurants to have had this beer before, but I'd never really thought about what it tasted like and actually thought to compare to...other beers.

Appearance is slightly darker than most mainstream American lagers. There is little to no head and no lacing of any kind. Nothing about this particular example of this beer indicates that anything special went into this beer (this is from a can). Smell is practically non-existent. Taste is very much of corn, and is rather sweet, like Coors Light. The next time I have Mexican food, I suspect I'll save myself a few $$'s and drink something domestic instead...it won't be missed.

Serving type: can

10-25-2006 02:04:43 | More by BeerBelcher
Modelo Especial from Grupo Modelo S.A. de C.V.
66 out of 100 based on 1,466 ratings.