Dismiss Notice
Microbrew Invitational
Join us June 3 + 4 in Boston and help us drink 300+ beers, ciders, kombuchas, meads, sakes and more!

TICKETS: beeradvocate.com/micro/

Corona Extra | Grupo Modelo S.A. de C.V.

1,195 Reviews
Read the review
For Trade:
Corona ExtraCorona Extra

Brewed by:
Grupo Modelo S.A. de C.V.
Mexico | website

Style: American Adjunct Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.60%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by BeerAdvocate on 01-10-2001

View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Reviews: 1,195 | Ratings: 4,658
Photo of Halcyondays
2.64/5  rDev +18.4%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12 oz. clear bottle,

A: Pours a pallid yellow into a glass, with really no head to speak of, dissipates quickly leaving only a small, thin ring of clear foam around the glass.

S: Smells mainly of fermented corn, though it is much more evident than in a regular macro, no skunk, didn't expect it, as this came from a 12-pack.

T: This does not taste that bad. Haven't had this one in a while, and had forgotten what it tasted like. It has a simple corn flavour, not much else, but much better than your average macro-type lager beer.

M: Light, carbonic, bubbly, thin and watery.

D: A fair beer, better than most macros, but still, at the end of the day, its just a boring industrial lager. There are a lot better lagers out there, and better beers for the same price, so why waste your time with Corona? I'd drink it if I'm in the Sizzler, and there's no better beer around, but all and all, it's just not very good, and I would not spend my own money on it.

 961 characters

Photo of Gagnonsux
2.68/5  rDev +20.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I was really expecting this to be a horrible beer based on other reviews and the opinions of most on this site. Actually, Extra wasn't too bad for me, just mediocre. The appearance isn't too bad, better than some similiar macros, but still not too impressive. Smell was a little skanky, but not overly bothersome. Taste was fairly smooth, not complex, but not bad. I wouldn't praise the beer for it's taste, but it compared decently to american macros. The most positive thing I have to say about Extra is that it is easy to drink and that I could easily session it. Overall, Corona Extra is mediocre, I think it would work good as a thirst quencher type beer. Also, a lime spruced up the flavor a little bit.

 709 characters

Photo of BlackHaddock
1.86/5  rDev -16.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

When ever I think of Mexico, I think of big hats, big moustaches, Bandits and crap beer.

You can blame Hollywood and the American film industry for the first three and Corona for the last stereotyping.

Yet here I am about to review the beer that gave Mexico a bad name. The first 'designer' foreign beer that was advertised all over the place to hit Great Britain (I believe). This bottle was left at my house by someone who came to my daughters Birthday party, I would never have paid for it.

I poured the beer into one of my Duvel glasses, I wanted to give the beer a chance.

To be fair it looked like a Duvel except the head fell away very swiftly. A little lighter than a Duvel really, very pale and crystal clear too.

I give all lager/pilsners a score of 3 unless there is something bad or good about them. This is as odourless as most, but with a stale bread aroma hanging around.

Insipid and tasteless, nothing to report.

Fizzy water comes to mind when considering the mouthfeel.

Glad I didn't buy this beer.

 1,023 characters

Photo of Zorro
1.79/5  rDev -19.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a clear yellow brew, a bit darker than a Budweiser.

Smell is not skunked, got a good bottle. Smell is a synthetic smell; more like I am sniffing brake fluid than a beer. I finally can detect a mild sweet smell.

Taste is mildly sweet with a bit of corn taste to it. Near tasteless. There isn't anything really nasty about the taste. It just is lacking the slightest malt or hop or grain flavors.

Mouthfeel = Budweiser at best.

Drinkable? It is in a flavorless chugable way. I can find 6-7 better beers in Mexico without really trying.

 551 characters

Photo of biegaman
2.46/5  rDev +10.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

You don't have to buy Corona to know what it looks like - it looks no different in a clear glass than it does in the clear bottle. In fact, you don't even have to see a Corona to know what it looks like; this clear, shimmering golden liquid is exactly how most people envision beer. Rather unbecoming of its name, however, there is no "crown" atop.

The aroma, unlike a lot of macro lagers, is distinctive - that, unfortunately, is meant in the worst possible way. Corona may smell less agreeable than any other beer on the market (and you have the clear bottles to largely thank for that). Lord knows how much light exposure this bottle saw, but it's easy to tell how much damage the UV rays did.

The sad thing is that years of repeat consumption, unwillingness to try new (notably craft) beers and much stubbornness on the behalf of marketers, many people assume this skunky, corn syrupy smell to be inherent to beer, and many have come to actually find it appealing(!). But I assure you it results from clear bottles and bad ingredients.

A hurried brew process and cheap industrial fillers play a role in it too; their effects, however, are most noted in the taste. An artificial, stinging carbonation, a flat, insipid flavour, a cloyingly sweet, syrupy finish - these are the telling signs of a mass, industrially produced lager (and a poor one at that). Luckily, this doesn't have a very strong taste...

Corona is - certainly not a clean, refreshing beer - but a relatively toneless and acceptable one. Its high level of insipidness largely hides the corn syrup (although not entirely) and the pathetically minuscule amount of malt is far too faint to be hardly perceptible. I would take a watery, tasteless beer over a foul and offensive one any day.

As with anything that is consumed, the beer that a person drinks has become a symbol of self-definition. Sadly, most people are easily swayed by marketing and, if nothing else, Corona is the ultimate testament to the power of advertising - there is perhaps no other beer that owes the entirety of its identity and success to it.

Years gone by, billions of dollars spent, Corona has become immersed in idyllic images of pristine beaches, sunny settings and vacation lifestyles. This is the deceit of advertising and nothing more; there is nothing about the beer itself that accounts for these associations. It is as lifeless, insipid and ordinary as any other mass-produced lager.

 2,445 characters

Photo of Evil_Pidde
1.19/5  rDev -46.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

A: It pours strawcoloured from a clear bottle. The head is fluffy white but it dies way to fast.

S: Almost no smell, faint malt and faint lime.

T: Almost no taste, some faint citric notes and som faint malt.

M: No aftertaste what so ever, a lot of carbonation but very thin.

D: I'm having trouble finding any reasons at all for drinking this beer. It's like carbonated water that gives you a buzz...
I'm sorry but this is as far from a beer I would buy again as you possibly can get.

 488 characters

Photo of John_M
1.81/5  rDev -18.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Was at a graduation party the other day, where this swill was available in abundance. I had forgotten just how wretched this crap is.

The beer pours a pale gold color with surprisingly decent head retention, but with pretty much non-existent lacing. The beer doesn't look all that terrible, but alas, this was to be as good as things get.

On the nose I immediately get some corn and seltzer, with perhaps a faint aroma of hops. It's not horrible, but you can tell right off that you are not in for a good time with this one. On the palate, I get sort of a metalic seltzer water flavor, with some slight sourness. The beer is very, very bland and watery on the palate, with sort of a dirty carbonnated water finish.

This "beer" is a flat out embarrassment, especially given the cost and marketing of this swill. I don't care how hot it is outside, or how many lawns I've mowed, I will not be ordering this beer ever again, even for free. As bad a beer as I've had in some time...

 981 characters

Photo of flagmantho
2.16/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Poured from 24oz tall can into a pint glass. I just wish that I reviewed this when I was in Mexico!

Appearance: light straw-yellow hue with a haze free body and a pretty strong effervescence. Head is a thin finger of frothy white foam which dissipated quickly with no lace. Par for the style, I suppose.

Smell: kind of a light, dusty-plastic aroma with perhaps a hint of wet grain. Not the worst thing in the world, but really not too good for even an adjunct lager.

Taste: sweet malt with perhaps a bit of corn to it. Not bad, but the aftertaste is a bit grimmer, with more of that plastic character. I gotta say, I've had worse macro lagers, but this still isn't too good.

Mouthfeel: light body with a strong carbonation and a light but surprising foaminess in the mouth. I don't want to call it creamy, but at least there's *something* going on here.

Overall: I don't love this beer, but I will admit I enjoyed a couple of them on the beach in Mexico. That's really about the only context in which you'll want to drink one of these.

 1,040 characters

Photo of tobelerone
2.05/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Ok I suppose you could drink this one ice cold with a slice of lime on a super hot day and enjoy it...if you're not really into beer. There are plenty of craft choices one could grab that do the same job, but with flavor...any flavor.

This thin yellowish beer lacks head and lace. Almost no aroma except for the lime you jammed into the bottle to make it drinkable. Taste is the same; weak, hint of the adjuncts, no trace of hops, short finish. Fizzy carbonation. Clear glass bottle likely contributes to any level of skunkiness the drinker may encounter.

I don't know why but I hate this one a little less than some other AAL's but I still wouldn't drink one even if there were no other beers on offer. I can dig an ice water on occasion too.

 745 characters

Photo of tone77
3.22/5  rDev +44.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a clear bottle into a weizen glass. Has a pale straw color with a 1/2 inch head. Mild, corn aroma. Taste is light and rather bland. Feels watery in the mouth. Drinkability is o.k. Overall not a terrible beer but not a lot to it. Very ordinary.

 255 characters

Photo of weeare138
2.48/5  rDev +11.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I intentionally waited this long to review this beer because I've been told that it's actually decent on draft. Well...after finally having it on draft in Mexico, I can put that myth to rest.
Appears a transparent light gold with a thin white head that quickly fizzles away into a mild collar. A few spots are left.
Smell is of lemon and flaked maize. Even the lager yeast seems to be dulled down in the draft version. If there are hops in here, they are extremely mild.
Taste...it is what it is. Crispy cereal with bubbles.
Mouthfeel is spritzy, light bodied, easy to drink, lemony & semi-dry in the finish.

 608 characters

Photo of lacqueredmouse
1.91/5  rDev -14.3%
look: 2 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 3

Part of my ongoing effort to review a bunch of readily available beers I've not put pen to paper about yet. Reviewed in a glass without the addition of lemon.

Pour? Well, you can see the colour straight away from the clear glass bottle, and even once it's in the glass, there's very minimal head, so it looks almost identical: a very pale yellow, almost getting towards clear. Large bubbled but surprisingly minimal carbonation. Head, as mentioned, is very weak, just a faint ring of fine white bubbles in a collar around the top of the glass. Uninspiring.

Nose? Well, you can see why you put a lemon in it. Forget the myths about clear glass, keeping flies away, increasing vitamin C intake: you add lemon because otherwise this beer has no aroma whatsoever. Nada. None.

OK, that may be exaggeration, because after filling my lungs with it for many minutes I do start to detect a slightly mealy corn adjunct character. Possibly the most unpleasant character to be had in isolation in a beer.

Taste is light and mealy as well, although it doesn't have any truly offensive characters to it. Much like the rest, it's just bland and unobtrusive. Slight lemony zing mid-palate, with a dry bready character on the finish. Carbonation is solid and bloating.

So bland. So, so bland. And it's depressing to think that that's why it's so popular. Easy to slug in the sun, but if I had to do it more often, it would leave me feeling depressed inside.

"Mas Fina"? Por desgracia no.

 1,476 characters

Photo of jdhilt
1.18/5  rDev -47.1%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Pours a two-finger white head that goes quickly and leaves no lace. Yellow color similar to urine. Light carbonation and very light bodied. Slight skunky nose. Starts and finishes very bland, no flavor, qualifies as a poor lawn mower beer. Why did I buy this stuff? I needed the bottle for my collection - now over 1650. $1.60 for a 12oz bottle from Colonial Spirits Acton, MA

 376 characters

Photo of corby112
1.78/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a clear golden yellow color with a very thin white head that fades quickly. Nothing special about the aroma or flavor other than it is refreshing on a hot day. If it is served freezing cold with a slice of lime on a very humid day it can be drinakble, otherwise avoid at all cost.

 286 characters

Photo of rhoadsrage
2.48/5  rDev +11.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

(Served in a strange)

A- This beer pours a pale straw yellow hue with a sea of big bubbles that supports a snow white head of big bubbles that almost makes it to the first sip.

S- The clean nose has no aroma until it warms quite a bit and then a faint dry sulfur and field corn note comes through in the finish but that is it.

T- The dry carbonic acid combines with a faint field corn taste and a bitter hint that doesn't have any hop qualities to it in the finish. There is a taste of cold water that comes though as the beer opens up.

M- This beer has a light mouthfeel with an almost astringent texture it is so dry. The huge scrubbing bubbles fizz scrapes my tongue clean.

O- This beer really doesn't have anything there it is all just bubbles and takes on a soda pop carbonation.

 794 characters

Photo of akorsak
2.71/5  rDev +21.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A 940 mL caguama purchased at the Mega outside of Bucerias.

A: The lager is pale and yellow, a straw color that seems paler than just about every other beer I've had this week. Small patches of lace are slowly drying.

S: Little nose, if any, wafts out of the glass. A hint of corn, some sweetness, but not much else.

T: The taste seems to parallel the nose, offering up corn and not much else. Grains and adjuncts drive the flavor, offering little else. A sickly sweetness lingers in the mouth.

M: Familiar? More like a haunting nightmare. Much like Corona Extra, this is an uninviting lager.

D: I split the caguama with three people and am luckier for it.


A bottle served with lunch at La Palma in La Cruz de Huanacaxtle. Lime promptly discarded.

A: The lager is fizzy and yellow, exactly as intended. A small ring of white head sits contentedly.

S: The nose is mild, highlighted by a sweet corn aroma. The nose is best when cold, as it tends to mask the adjuncts.

T: Again, the lager is best when cold, delivering a refreshing blast that lacks substance. As it warms, the corn and pale malts become more evident. As a result, the lager heads downhill. So drink it while it's cold! Hops? Someone forgot to add 'em. A good hot weather beer.

M: The fizziness of the beer is a plus, removing the bland flavors on each sip.

D: It's a hot day out, so I won't say no to another.

 1,389 characters

Photo of Axnjxn
2.85/5  rDev +27.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12oz can into a pint glass.

Pours a bright yellow color with an inch thick white head. Smell isn't bad, smells "refreshing" but not much in terms of flavor. taste again isn't bad, it just doesn't have much of a taste at all. Honestly tastes like youre drinking water. Easy to drink. Light bodied with medium carbonation.

Overall this is an okay beer for what it is. Not sure why it gets so low marks on here, its not horrible.

 430 characters

Photo of stevoj
1.98/5  rDev -11.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 2

Catch up rating. Bland, boring cereal lager. The slice of lime makes up for any lack of real flavor. Pale, clear golden wit minimal foamy head. Best seller, but why?

 165 characters

Photo of puboflyons
2.99/5  rDev +34.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

From the one quart growler labeled Corona Familiar. Stamped: AF13AO78-05:00. No lime. I try to rate these Adjuncts based on style not reputation. This is pretty average for the style. The pour is straw yellow with almost no head (Below average). The aroma is of malt, grains, corn, rice, and token hops with enough character to make it a little distinguishable (above average). The body is quite thin (below average). The taste is balanced enough with grains, rice, and a tickle of hops (average). As far as a craft beer goes - forget about it. There's a reason this is one of the best selling Mexican beers in the world but not all beer drinkers are into crafts.

 663 characters

Photo of beertunes
2.53/5  rDev +13.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured into 10oz glass. Poured a very clean, clear yellow with just the thinnest cap of white head that had very low retention and no lacing.

Aroma was a little sweet, basically neutral and benign, with a hint of grain and the faintest whisper of hops. That sums up the flavors as well, neutral, benign and barely existent.

The body was a touch on the thin side of typical for the style, but not as much as some the more highly rated examples. Drinkability was OK, if you're in the mood for the style.

Overall, while I would rarely order one of these, if you want a quick, refreshing, lawnmower beer, you could do worse.

 623 characters

Photo of cjgator3
2.11/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

This beer has a horrible aftertaste if you drink it by itself. Why do you think it is served with a lime? The lime helps mask the taste of this beer. I can only drink Corona when I am already pretty drunk and can't taste much anyways. It seems to be the "in thing" around here with the college kids.

 299 characters

Photo of clayrock81
2.17/5  rDev -2.7%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Everyone knows this beer. I just thought I'd throw in my two pesos here.
This isn't a bad beer if you're at a Cinco de Mayo party, because there's almost no taste and it is extremely smooth (I find that the lime actually makes it a less drinkable) and goes down easy.
As for the beer, it is seethru, almost invisible. There is no discernable smell other than water, because this a watered down beer.
The taste I said that was better w/o the lime is still not impressive.
It isn't worth the money it sells for, and its popularity proves the adage that there is no accounting for taste.

 585 characters

Photo of GreesyFizeek
1/5  rDev -55.2%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

The lowest of the low, honestly.

This one is just downright offensive. I've never poured it out in a glass, just had it out of a bottle. Through the clear (why?!?!) bottle, you can see how grossly yellow and urine-like this one is. Lots of carbonation, pretty fizzy.

Smells like a skunk's ass. Just disgusting. This one was a victim, like so many of other bottles of this brew, of light striking the beer through the clear glass. In case you were wondering, it also tastes like a skunk's ass. Slightly sweet, but mostly just gross.

Light bodied, high carbonation, slimy mouthfeel. UGH




 602 characters

Photo of Bitterbill
1.31/5  rDev -41.3%
look: 2 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

This pours from 12oz bottle...err....strong whiff of skunkiness hit my nose buds before I can continue...ok, very fizzy yellow with a small but persistent head of foam.

The smell...mostly already covered but there's also a strong dose of corn.

The taste is corny and sweet until some hop moves in and then it's gone. Finishes watery. Yuck. "nuff said.

 353 characters

Photo of Haybeerman
1.76/5  rDev -21.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

Appearance: Very light clear, straw yellow. Starts out with a one inch white head, but diminished to a skim in quickly. Not real carbonated like many of its ilk. This was actually the highlight.

Smell: Slightly sweet corn with a hint of green apple. Slightly metallic smell was a turn-off.

Taste: Very little, if any flavor. Repeats the sweet and metallic smell in the taste with like a wet cardboard. No hop bitterniess, no finish, nothing.

Mouthfeel: No body, medium carbonation. Not very much here at all.

Drinkability: Don't let it warm, extreme cold will mask most of the unpleasantness of this beer. Better off to buy something (anything) else.

 656 characters

Corona Extra from Grupo Modelo S.A. de C.V.
54 out of 100 based on 1,195 ratings.