1. American Craft Beer Fest returns to Boston on May 29 & 30, featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers. Tickets are on sale now.

Smoove Cherry Ale - Big Sky Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Smoove Cherry AleSmoove Cherry Ale

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
70
okay

30 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 30
Reviews: 23
rAvg: 2.82
pDev: 21.28%
Wants: 1
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Big Sky Brewing Company visit their website
Montana, United States

Style | ABV
Fruit / Vegetable Beer |  8.75% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: JohnGalt1 on 02-11-2008

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 30 | Reviews: 23 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of zhanson88
1.47/5  rDev -47.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Bottle 1058 of 2028, only brewed once in 2008. Somehow there are still bottles of this left on the shelf in Helena....had to pick it up, even though I recalled seeing some pretty mediocre reviews for it.

Appearance: It pours out and looks very nice. It's a deep, slightly hazy ruby red color with almost 3 fingers of pillowy off-white head. It reduces fairly quickly but a nice amount of lacing remains, aided by ample carbonation.

Smell: Weird. Lots of sugar and oxidized cherry scents. Perhaps a bit of vanilla, and a funk of some sort that doesn't seem like it would/should have been intended. Here's to hoping the taste is a bit better.

Taste: Extreme oxidized cherries, borderline rotten. Also vanilla and a ton of sugar. Cloying. Again that funk that seems to accentuate the rottenness. Wow, it's bad. Age most certainly did not do good things for this.

Mouthfeel/Overall: Mouthfeel is pretty decent actually. Between light and medium bodied with a reasonable amount of carbonation. Overall? Comes close to undrinkable. I finished just enough to finish the review. I can see how this beer may have been slightly better fresh, but it is to be avoided like the plague at this point. Simply awful. Big Sky strikes again.

Photo of BoredByThis
1.81/5  rDev -35.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

08 batch 1369/2028
I'm all for fruit beers and regularly enjoy them if they have something interesting to offer...sadly this one doesn't

A-Dark Amber with a hint of Red that would imply the cherries inside. Head was large and foamy and dissipated slowly into a rocky and non uniform foam.

S-Light astringency, dark fruits, light chreey scent but not overwhelming, touch of vinegar.

T- Follows the nose. a prune/sour fig taste that hints that the cherries were fermented and not infused.

D-No.

Photo of FreshmanPour77
2/5  rDev -29.1%

Photo of jrallen34
2.02/5  rDev -28.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

750ml bottle poured into my Narke glass. 2008 batch, bottle # 1389 of 2028...Pours a dark blood red, borders on a brown. A big spongey tan/pink head good retention and lacing...The aroma is super weird, it smells like vanilla cake with cherry frosting, and as good as that sounds, just doesn't really work for a beer...The taste is borderline horrendous and its really sneaky. It starts off ok light cherries and sugar on the front, then you are bombarded with rotten cherries and carbonation that attacks your senses. 4 sips to tick this is all I can manager.

This is really bad and should be avoided!!!! Do not even tick it.

Photo of magictrokini
2.25/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

750 ml from BevMo, Scottsdale. Pours a hazy dark pink with a two-finger lighter pink head. the head dissipated very quickly. The aroma was different. Sweeter, marischino cherry nose. A bit of cider as well. The taste, well, it was not good. It was identical to cherry Nyquil, except Nyquil is not at watery. Heavy ethyl alcohol and chemical flavors with the nasty cherry-Slurpee flavor was jsut bad. I only made it about halfway through my first pint before I dumped it and the bottle down the drain. Avoid.

Photo of Sechavar
2.25/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

So, at first I was really excited because I LOVE cherry. LOVE CHERRY. The color looked artificial, but so do the Lindeman's colors so I didn't worry about it. It was SUPER fizzy,with a pale pink head, reminded me of an out of control head I saw on a bottle of Malheur Brut. It just kept going until we'd poured about half of it out. It smelled like cherry, and it was still chilly, but when I tasted it I was like "Nope". It tastes artificial and it makes my tongue kind of numb, like chloreseptic (sp?) spray. When it warms up the nose gets better, with some spices on it, but I felt pretty left down. I didn't even really want to finish it. I wouldn't recommend it unless you get a stiffy for cough syrup flavors.

Photo of Beaver13
2.3/5  rDev -18.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

750ml bottle. Pours a light reddish-amber with a thin fizzy head that quickly diminishes to a tiny collar then disappears completely.

The aroma is off vegetal malts, cherries and sharp rubbing alcohol.

The flavor is sweet cherries and sharp tarry bitter alcohol. The mouthfeel is medium bodied and slightly watery with very low but sharp carbonation.

Overall, it's a bit of a mess. Way too much sharp alcohol.

Photo of aforbes10
2.34/5  rDev -17%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

750mL bottle from a sacramento bevmo. Pours a pink tinged brown with a fizzy white head that falls off fairly quickly. Nose is full of ethanol, fusel alcohol, hint of fake smelling cherry. Flavor has a quick fusel alcohol punch lined with sweet malt and an odd fermented cherry taste that doesn't quite work. Medium to full bodied, somewhat syrupy. Its drinkable, but not delicious. Wouldn't buy this again.

Photo of Duff27
2.5/5  rDev -11.3%

Photo of yemenmocha
2.52/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours great - nice large off-white head that laces well as you drink the ale.

Nose is actually rather unpleasant with a fruit-veggie mixture that doesn't overflow with cherry. Don't think Lindeman's kriek when you buy this cherry ale.

On the palate this beer is mildly cherried, somewhat creamy and medium bodied, and has a faint resemblance to those Ludens cough drops. An unpleasant sour exists as well, and normally I love sour ales.

Photo of brewandbbq
2.64/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

750ml bottle, vintage 2008.

Pours hazy burgundy with a ruby hue in the light. A pinkish-tan head persisted throughout the glass with smeary lacing.

Aromatics are laced with dusty malt, cherry cough syrup, and wet paper. Lacking complexity or a desirable cherry quality.

Medium bodied with a creamy, tacky mouthfeel.

Stale malt akin to extract, wet cardboard, and cherry flavoring lead off the palate. A neutral yeast is apparent and some sweetness follows through.

Finishes with a lingering, stale malt character and cherry cough syrup.

Tasting much like a poorly made, oxidized cherry homebrew. Yikes.

Photo of UtahJonnyMontana
2.7/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Beer poured amber with light head. A friend said he thought it was hot and it was over 10% alcohol but I didn't think it was too hot. It was a little young to my palate. I bought a bottle to cellar. I'll give it a proper rating after it's aged because in all fairness this beer should be aged.

Photo of spycow
2.75/5  rDev -2.5%

Photo of egrace84
2.75/5  rDev -2.5%

Photo of illidurit
2.78/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Bottle from the free table at Woodshop 5.0. Pours amber with a thin white head. Aromas of mealy mushy cherries, cherry pits, medicine. Flavor is bordering on artificial cherry with some caramel and too much booziness. Thick, hot, fizzy, not particularly good.

Photo of brownbeer
2.84/5  rDev +0.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A- Cherry red color, pinkish white head.

S- A rich malt base with cherries and alcohol.

T- Quite rich tasting, not the valentine beer as advertised on the label. Strong alcohol and bitter cherry taste.

M- Had a lot of carbonation, which didn't help at all. Kind of thin body.

D- Not good. Alcohol hangs around too long.

Photo of m1ked
2.85/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Picked this guy up randomly at a Sacramento BevMo. Actually visited this brewery last summer. Cool place.

A- Hard not to notice the soda like huge foamy head right off the bat. Many large bubbled streamers... very active. Streamers maintain a thin white cap. Color is a hazy caramel amber.

S- Sugary, with a light touch of cherry. A little bit of alcohol. Light yeasty and phenols.

T- Caramel sweetness up front, with a noticeable etoh heat early on. Light banana yeastiness. I don,t really appreciate any cherry flavor.

M- Between the etoh heat that comes on early and works its way down to the chest and the sharp carbonation....don't love it.

D- I was hoping this would be better than it is. Not really feeling this one.

Photo of GClarkage
2.91/5  rDev +3.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

02/19/09- Purchased at Sun Devil Liquors in Mesa, AZ.

Presentation- 750ml bottle wrapped in red foil with a festive Valentines-like label on the bottle. Didn't see a freshness date, but I know it's a 2008 release. Poured into my Big Sky Strong Cherry Ale glass.

Appearance- Watered down pinkish-red colored pour. Carbonation produces a 1/2 inch head which hangs around for a few minutes and then disipates. Leaves come light traces of lace behind.

Smell- Funky rotted cherry nose. Certainly not fresh and rather stinky. It cleans up a bit after it has a chance to breathe, but still not a fine example of fresh and vibrant cherries.

Taste- Wine cooler like flavor of cherries. Not really candied or fresh fruit, just a processed flavor. Lots of yeast flavor and some sugary notes as well.

Mouthfeel- Seltzer-like carbonation. Prickly and sharp. Light sugary cherry aftertaste.

Drinkability- Not one of the better outputs from Big Sky. Wouldn't waste my time on this one. Drinkable, but not a go to beer.

Photo of JamnesCameron
2.98/5  rDev +5.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Bottle number 529/2028.

Pours cloudy with a reddish pink hue. Head is large and fluffy pink.

Aromas of sweet cherries and malt. Not sure what the base beer is.

First sip is a little medicinal. Not harsh, but not very pleasing. If you broke this out for Valentines Day, you'd be alone by the end of the night. Not sure what's going on here.

Mouthfeel is a little tart, puckering, but more on the bitter side than tart fruit side.

Drinkability - I appreciate the opportunity to try it, but don't think I'll be coming back for more. More of a one night stand than a long term relationship.

Photo of jaydoc
3/5  rDev +6.4%

Photo of imperialking
3/5  rDev +6.4%

Photo of scruffwhor
3.2/5  rDev +13.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a somewhat rusty ruby and burnt sienna with no head or bubbling :(. Maybe a little sediment visible when this richly colored beer is held to the light. The color is the ONLY good thing about the appearance.

Maybe some wet, toasted bread, and some mostly cherry and a little apple juice. Pretty subtle aromas all around though.

The taste is a little redeeming. Water thi palate upfront with watered down cherry juice and white bread. But the mddle warms and enlivens up just a little bit. But the finish is a smoove, and luscious cherry warmed by the abv.%.

This beerwas an OK sipper that I shared with my girlfriend. It wasn't bad, but I won't buy again.
This beer fell short in a lot of categories for me.

Photo of t0rin0
3.25/5  rDev +15.2%

Photo of youradhere
3.35/5  rDev +18.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Got this upon visiting Missoula, sampled their wares and then bought this with other trinkets. Pours very light in color, with a definate cherry aroma. Sharp alcohol bite that later warms. Not a great session drinker by any means, however it is a good choice to share with that special someone. The cherry flavor is almost too much even for a fruit beer, maybe they could back off a bit on the cherries in the secondary fermentation. After the bottle you will have a headache, mostly from the very phenolic nature of this brew, however given a year or two of aging, this would smoot out exceptionally. I am definately going to cellar a few bottles and see how they fare as vintage.

Photo of BretSikkink
3.43/5  rDev +21.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Reddish tint to the brown-orange ale, white foamy head jumps up quickly but recedes to naught but a collar of lacing. Streaming small bubbles and what I assume are small flakes of cherry floating about.

The nose is strongly redolent of sweet fruit, obviously cherry. Quite boozy, with some sugary sweetness.

The flavor hits hard with the alcohol initially, with plenty of caramel sweetness. Some phenols are noted as well. Cherry is present, but really these are just soaked, for a long time, in booze.

For a beer with less than 9%, the alcohol is way too evident. It's interesting and unusual, but a little over the top.

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Smoove Cherry Ale from Big Sky Brewing Company
70 out of 100 based on 30 ratings.