1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Big Sky Kriek - Big Sky Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Big Sky KriekBig Sky Kriek

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
61
poor

56 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 56
Reviews: 27
rAvg: 2.37
pDev: 37.97%
Wants: 4
Gots: 11 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Big Sky Brewing Company visit their website
Montana, United States

Style | ABV
Fruit / Vegetable Beer |  10.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
15 IBU

(Beer added by: JohnGalt1 on 11-16-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 56 | Reviews: 27 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by the Alström Bros:

  None found.

More User Reviews:
Photo of bpfrush
1/5  rDev -57.8%

bpfrush, Feb 20, 2012
Photo of ehammond1
1.75/5  rDev -26.2%

Bottle

Sour Fest 2012
Stone Brew Co.
Escondido, CA

Hazy dark brown and ruby in color with low carbonation. This looks oily and doesn't leave much mess down the glass.

Heavy vegetable aroma, with some earth and mud, along with what I guess is cherry, but I don't think I would have called it that unknowingly. There's some distinct gourd and dirt characters, as well.

The flavor is no better than the aroma, and in truth, it's hardly drinkable. Vegetable forward flavors with some metal and earth, along with a strange acid note. Why in the world is this 10%? There's good amounts of booze notes in here also.

Medium bodied with low carbonation.

San Diego's tap water is exponentially more drinkable than this vile concoction.

ehammond1, Jul 14, 2012
Photo of danp14
3.25/5  rDev +37.1%

danp14, Jul 22, 2012
Photo of Photekut
3/5  rDev +26.6%

Photekut, Nov 17, 2011
Photo of jheezee
3/5  rDev +26.6%

jheezee, Mar 16, 2012
Photo of blearbeer
3.75/5  rDev +58.2%

blearbeer, Jun 12, 2013
Photo of CaptainNomihodai
2.25/5  rDev -5.1%

CaptainNomihodai, Feb 28, 2013
Photo of JohnGalt1
3.48/5  rDev +46.8%

Bottle #26 of 180 provided by Jake65 at the Friday the 13th tasting..

Slightly cloudy reddish amber brew.. lite pink tinge to a descent head.

Aroma is fruity and woody... a little hot alcohol.. but the cherries and the tannic wood elements play first and second fiddle.

I know this is barrel aged, but are they used barrels? I get a little winey aspect that could easily be mistaken for the cherries.. sweet cherries essence is sorta dried out by some oakey tannic elements... the body is a bit on the thicker side.. and the carbonation may be a tad light for a beer this heavy.

Glad I got to try this.. hopefully, I will get to again soon.. but for now, I think it is a good experiment now that Montana is allowed to brew bigger beers, but this is no where near a traditional Kriek and should probably not even have the word on the label, even if it is used tongue in cheek.

Overall.... a pretty good beer and a good base for Big Sky to really run with and continue to improve upon.

3/3.5/3.5/3.5/3.5

JohnGalt1, Nov 16, 2009
Photo of cnbrown313
1.9/5  rDev -19.8%

Picked up a 750ml bottle for $12.99.

A - Pours a reddish brown color with very little carbonation. Looks almost like a warm apple cider in a glass, but nothing out of the ordinary for the style.

S - Yikes... the smell is quite offensive! It smells like either something got infected or went wrong in the bottle. It has a strongly acidic smell.

T - At first the taste isn't too bad, although it never tastes like a Kriek should. At first it tastes a little bit like wood and cherry, but that is followed by a rotten, acidic taste. The aftertaste is like a combination of rotten onions and dirty dishwater. I couldn't make it thorough one glass of this.

M - The mouthfeel was medium, and normal for the style. But it was also lacking most of the carbonation.

O - Avoid, if at all possible...

cnbrown313, Sep 24, 2012
Photo of Kaydogg
3/5  rDev +26.6%

Kaydogg, Dec 16, 2011
Photo of SageO
1.25/5  rDev -47.3%

SageO, Nov 11, 2012
Photo of atone315
2.5/5  rDev +5.5%

atone315, Oct 29, 2012
Photo of Bobbydigi
1.5/5  rDev -36.7%

Bobbydigi, Apr 15, 2012
Photo of KHM
1/5  rDev -57.8%

KHM, Jan 31, 2012
Photo of 4DAloveofSTOUT
2.6/5  rDev +9.7%

thanks to TATURBO for sharinging this beer. Thanks Chris.

Vintage 2010; bottle 874 of 3600.

reviewed from notes taken on 7/17/12.

Appearance: hazy red bodied beer with a white cap drops quickly to no head at all.

Smell: Big vinegar and tart cherries. Hints of earthy oak and sweet vanilla. This beer seriously smell wonderful.

Taste: Wooooh. What happened here? This beer does not tast anything like ut smells. Really sweet cherries with not a hint of sour notes. Little bit of oak barrel is in there. Has a vegital aftertaste.

Mouthfeel: medium bodied beer with a moderate carbonation. Little bit of booze and its a touch cloyingly sweet.

Overall: This was a bit of a wierd beer. The nose tells you that this beer will be delicous then you taste it and its just not what you would expect, caught me off guard.

4DAloveofSTOUT, Jul 19, 2012
Photo of Wisconsinality
1/5  rDev -57.8%

Wisconsinality, Feb 01, 2012
Photo of sweemzander
1.65/5  rDev -30.4%

750mL corked & caged bottle poured into a tulip.

(A)- Pours a murky blood red color. Some white bubbles formed.

(S)- A spicy cherry & dry oak profile. Hints at a sweaty sock coming through.

(T)- Again, a very spicy/zesty cherry oak. Again, a bit funky, but in a bad sewer water thing.

(M)- A decent carbonation level. Quite disjointed and not sure what it wants to be. It even feels a bit hot ABV + booze.

(O)- Not sure of what to give this since it is just a bit too odd and disjointed to be something really cohesive and complete, let alone giving it the name "Kriek." Not even close.

sweemzander, Sep 26, 2012
Photo of drewone
2.75/5  rDev +16%

drewone, Apr 22, 2013
Photo of womencantsail
1.63/5  rDev -31.2%

This beer is terrible. Reddish color with a nice murkiness and a small head. Aroma is just bad. A bit of bile along with onions to start things off. A mild fruit/cherry character followed by a heavy dose of celery. Tastes like pruno/cheap wine with a little bit of cherry. A very strong vegetable character which is far from pleasing. Bah.

womencantsail, Jul 16, 2012
Photo of jamesburkhart
3/5  rDev +26.6%

jamesburkhart, Jan 12, 2012
Photo of EricCioe
2.5/5  rDev +5.5%

EricCioe, Dec 22, 2011
Photo of mychalg9
2.68/5  rDev +13.1%

Bought this on a whim for $14. Take that for what it's worth.

Decided to break it out on Saturday night to share with my brother. He didn't know what the style was supposed to taste like, so I guess it had that going for it.

It looked ok in the glass, and smelled decent even, a bit tart with some cherry and oak. The taste actually starts out decent on the front end: sour/tart cherries with some oak, but it turns south halfway through all the way to the finish. I don't really know what happened, it just drops off a cliff into sub-mediocrity. The mouthfeel was the only redeeming factor I guess, it was decently carbonated and left my mouth "feeling" happy, at least. I warmed up to drinking it (possibly because of the high alcohol) and managed to finish the bottle (my half at least), so it wasn't a total loss seeing that I got a bit of enjoyment out of drinking it. I wouldn't buy it again I don't think unless it cost considerably less (and by that I mean the $1 dollar bin). I usually like Big Sky's beers but this one didn't impress me at all.

mychalg9, Aug 14, 2012
Photo of jnewton
3.58/5  rDev +51.1%

(Chicago IL)
Bottle 18 of 180

In memory of Bruce Abrahms, who gave this bottle to my wife not 48 hours ago. Poured well with a good head which quickly dissipated. Dark amber in color, with a hint of blood orange color, and very cloudy. A little cherry and tannins from the wine barrel aging in the smell. Some effervescence in the mouth. Very nice round mouthcoating. Slight cherry bitterness in the taste with a sweet Belgian note to mellow it out.

jnewton, Jan 30, 2010
Photo of superspak
2.43/5  rDev +2.5%

750 ml bottle into tulip glass; bottle 315 of 3600, 2010 vintage. Pours lightly cloudy red orange color with a 1-2 finger frothy pink head with horrible retention, that reduces to nothing very quickly. No lacing on the glass, and a fair amount of streaming carbonation. Aromas of lightly tart cherry, cherry skin, oak, red wine, light vinegar, hay, funk, earth, pepper, clove, and earthy yeast spiciness. Pretty decent aromas with ok balance and complexity of fruit and barrel notes. Taste of lightly tart cherry, cherry skin, oak, red wine, light vinegar, hay, light funk, earth, pepper, clove, and earthy yeast esters. Light earthy tartness on the finish; with lingering notes of light tart cherry, red wine, oak, cherry skin, light vinegar, clove, earth, hay, and earthy yeast esters on the finish for a while. Fairly decent flavor with ok balance and complexity of fruity and barrel notes; with a fair amount of cloying sweetness present after the finish. Medium-high carbonation and fairly full bodied; with a very syrupy, slick, and lightly prickly mouthfeel that is a bit unpleasant. Alcohol is moderately well hidden with a moderate warming present after the finish. This is very difficult to drink; have to take very tiny sips. Overall this is a pretty unpleasant Kriek. Decent flavor balance and complexity of barrel and fruit character; but very hard to drink with the alcohol and mouthfeel. I think they would have been better off doing a lower gravity fruit beer for this one. Drain poured the rest.

superspak, Mar 14, 2013
Photo of harrymel
1.02/5  rDev -57%

Bottled 2010.

A: turbid. Dark red. No foam. No lace. Only redeeming quality is the color.
S: flintstones vitamins. And some cherries. Smells rough. Really poorly constructed with chemical and wood character.
T: okay, cherry, alcohol, vitamin, repugnant. I will drainpoor.
M: medium on thick. Medium carb. Dry finish
O: this beer should never be produced.

harrymel, Dec 22, 2011
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Big Sky Kriek from Big Sky Brewing Company
61 out of 100 based on 56 ratings.