1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Butte Creek Organic India Pale Ale - Butte Creek Brewing Company

Butte Creek Organic India Pale AleButte Creek Organic India Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
78
okay

212 Ratings
THE BROS
83
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 212
Reviews: 179
rAvg: 3.43
pDev: 13.7%


Brewed by:
Butte Creek Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American IPA |  6.70% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 03-02-2002)
View: Beers (7) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Butte Creek Organic India Pale Ale Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 212 | Reviews: 179 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of raindog814
raindog814

Iowa

3.69/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

A decent take on an American IPA, well-balanced, if not particularly hoppy. Pours a nice hazy brownish-gold, with solid lacing on the glass. It won't blow your mind, but it's a highly drinkable, perfectly pleasant beer. Highly recommended for anyone unused to IPAs or adverse to bitter brews.

Serving type: bottle

09-27-2013 21:03:19 | More by raindog814
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
Beerandraiderfan

Nevada

3.23/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

A rather brown pour, dark copper and red kind of color. Far darker than your average IPA. Off white head, about 1/4" deep, a little thin.

Aroma was hoppy, heavy malt aspect to it. Grains. Comes off as lots of Cascade hops.

Taste, substantially bitter. Tons of bittering hops. Again, Cascades give off the grapefruit character and pithiness. Big hit of caramel throughout it.

Man used to drink these quite often, I don't know what the deal is now, but their distribution seems to be almost nil. Seems like they continually lower the heft and abv of this beer every year or so.

While it used to be pretty enjoyable, every subsequent time I have it, it comes off less impressive.

Serving type: bottle

03-27-2013 19:29:01 | More by Beerandraiderfan
Photo of Tadloco
Tadloco


3.2/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12 oz bottle poured into pint glass. Picked this beer up at The Cellar in Norman, Oklahoma.

Appearance-Light amber color with steady streams of bubbles rising. A foamy off white head that started at about 2 fingers but quickly subsided to half a finger where it held steady. Light lacing.

Smell-Light hops. Sweet malt smell. Light caramel. Very balanced. Smells delicious but not a typical IPA smell.

Taste-This beer didnt attack my palate like i expected. Almost no flavor up front, just a light sweetness. Finishes with a light hoppiness with some light caramel as well. Definately not robust or overpowering. Good, but not what i was expecting from an IPA.

Mouthfeel-Beer feels crisp and refreshing. Watery? Seems to have above average carbonation.

Overall-I found this to be a pleasant, drinkable beer. Very mild tasting for an IPA. Great color and nice lacy rings after each drink. Just not enough hop flavor for me.

Serving type: bottle

12-16-2012 22:40:55 | More by Tadloco
Photo of turnerk3
turnerk3

South Carolina

3.1/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: Pours an interestingly light amber color with a nice, but miniscule, 1/4 inch head. There is quite an excellent retention of the head for only being 6.7%.

S: Not quite what I was expecting. The caramel malt backbone comes through considerably more than the floral hop aroma. The over all result is a mixture of caramel, earthy, floral essence.

T: The tongue once again agrees with the nose. Caramel malts flood through the palate followed by a floral hop coating. Even though the malts are favored overall, It's actually balance especially well.

M: Nicely carbonated and relatively easy to drink. Even though the malts are the dominant factor in flavor, the hops come through by making this smoother than expected.

O: I picked up a single 12 oz. bottle just to try it out. The hops don't define this IPA as well as I would like, but it's still an easy to drink brew. This would be a good beer for those just transitioning into IPAs.

Serving type: bottle

07-10-2012 22:07:33 | More by turnerk3
Photo of TheWhiskerReview
TheWhiskerReview

Tennessee

3.58/5  rDev +4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Tasting sample pours a hazy golden-orange with some soapy lace leading to a nose that seems a tad more English in style with a big bready malt and some caramel against a backdrop of earthy hops, greens and orange blossoms. Palate speaks to a more American-styled IPA with the moderately big bitterness, but the flavors still lean towards the major breadiness. There's some vague hits of juicy orange and hoppy leafiness, while everything dries out on the finish- lingering bread crust and bitterness. Overall, not bad, but certainly what I'd consider of the more boringly flavored IPAs.

Serving type: bottle

03-01-2012 20:53:08 | More by TheWhiskerReview
Photo of BilbosNuts
BilbosNuts

California

3.13/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a pint glass.

A: Pours a hazy sunburst orange with basically no head, just a thin ring along the sides of the glass. It looks very still, lacking any sort of carbonation.

S: The toasted malts are definitely the backbone in this one. There are some hops present of the floral variety, but they take a back seat to the overpowering malts.

T: Similar to the aroma with the toasted malts overpowering the floral hops that try to make an appearance. I pick up on a touch of sweetness, probably again from the malt backbone.

M: It is medium bodied with a slight oily feel. There is no carbonation and it probably could have used some. It has an oily finish that coats the palate.

O: This was definitely one of the maltier IPAs I've had. The hops had a very small impact and that isn't really what I'm looking for in an IPA. There was no date printed on the bottle so maybe I just got an old batch. I'll have to pick up some that are more fresh and compare.

Serving type: bottle

01-28-2012 18:47:49 | More by BilbosNuts
Photo of chinchill
chinchill

South Carolina

3.8/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

12 oz undated bottle. Different label than on BA. Small amount of sediment in bottom of the bottle (added).

Appearance: Pours a slightly hazy amber with a small ivory-hued head. Speckled lacing left on the glass.

Smell: A bit faint for style. Aroma of pale malts with hops providing notes of herbs and citrus fruit. Earthy, and slightly musty, but not so much as to render the overall effect unpleasant.

Mouthfeel: Medium-bodied. Medium carbonation. Crisp with a lightly dry finish.

Taste: Rather sweet and malty for style, making this well-balanced and highly drinkable for an IPA, but not a go-to beer for a good hop hit. The caramel sweetness is eventually followed by herbal and citrus hop flavors. Moderately bitter, although still bittersweet, by the finish. The aroma is more complex than the taste.

Serving type: bottle

12-06-2011 23:41:02 | More by chinchill
Photo of farrago
farrago

New Jersey

3.73/5  rDev +8.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Big foamy head, easily over two fingers, airy and delicate yet with excellent retention, almost so whipped up as to not look like distinct bubbles, the lacing has more moderate stickiness but what’s there clings. Filmy dark orange colored liquid, mostly consistent with a slight yellowing at the rims, lazy fat bubbles spread widely rather than in beads. The nose has a clear cocoa, chocolate touch which pairs with the pink grapefruit, tangerine citrus and flowers for an easy to access experience, goes light on the grass or any biting hoppy elements, splash of pine, very pungent during the pour, in the glass it could use more length. Full-bodied, the carbonation keeps it aggressively swirling around the mouth, probably relieves some of what remains formidable sweetness, especially candied grapefruit, tangerine, orange citrus. The cocoa powder still present if quieter here, instead you get a lot more herbal bitterness and unprocessed grains and a touch of earthiness. Solid core of peach, apricot, pear, red apple fruit. While the flavors are sweet, the tacky residue it leaves on your tongue makes for a drier finish. Friendly in style, refrains from seriously challenging you.

Serving type: bottle

10-28-2011 03:38:40 | More by farrago
Photo of LXIXME
LXIXME

New Mexico

3.88/5  rDev +13.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A clear honey golden colored beer sits below a big off white head the slowly falls into a pretty nice lacing.

Citrus fruit to almost floral hop aroma, a really pretty nice aroma on this IPA.

Taste is citrus hops with a light maltiness backing it up, not as hoppy as the aroma would suggest, but not bad either.

A light dry aftertaste with a slight citrus tone remains after all the beer is gone.

This is a decent tasting beer but not quite the west coast hops taste I thought I was going to get after my initial whiff of this IPA

Serving type: bottle

07-30-2011 21:48:50 | More by LXIXME
Photo of ocelot2500
ocelot2500

Arizona

3.18/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a clear golden amber color with a small fizzy white head that leaves small chunks of lacing.

Smells of earthy hops with some citrus.

Tastes of a decent wave of hops on top of a decent malt backbone. Hops have an earthy, grassy, and a bit citrusy character. Malts add with a bit of grainy sweetness and caramel. Leans slightly towards bitter.

Mouthfeel is medium with a slightly smooth amount of carbonation.

Overall, not very enticing unless for some reason the organic certification intrigues you (it shouldn't).

Serving type: bottle

07-20-2011 03:22:39 | More by ocelot2500
Photo of crusian
crusian

Oregon

2.8/5  rDev -18.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

normally wouldnt review this, but promised i would.

pours a decent looking golden color with about a finger of head. carbonation seems a bit on the artificial side, as the bubbles are rather large. Head fades quickly, almost before i can get my nose down to smell it.
Not too much on the nose, First thing I get is pale malt... a tiny bit of hop, but i have to really dig for it... and thats about it.
Taste is actually a bit of the same. I was told this was fresh as well, but there is no date anywhere on the bottle. clean malt character, with a bit of bitterness, but just seems like a generic bitterness. no citrus, pine, grass... just a hint of bitterness on the finish. Seems like there is a hole in the middle, a bit of sweetness from the malt, then a hole, then the bitter finish. One thing that is quite amazing is that this is very dry... my mouth has become rather parched. Even my teeth feel dry. So strange.
overall this is just an average IPA.

Serving type: bottle

07-15-2011 19:23:45 | More by crusian
Photo of depechemode1983
depechemode1983

Texas

3.3/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Pours out a medium clear golden copper color. The head on this beer is awesome, its thick, rocky and pretty sticky. There is lots of lacing on the glass as well.

S - Great nose too. There is a good amount of citric and piny hops up front along with subtle floral notes. Through the middle you get grapefruit and orange peel coupled with grains and lightly toasted malts. The finish is pretty clean.

T - Nice and hoppy and actually sweeter than anticipated. Its maybe a bit too sweet. The malts could stand to be toned down a bit. Still you get some good bitterness and a good tropical fruit flavors. The balance isn't too off just not exactly spot on.

M - Good mouth feel. It's medium bodied, soft, well carbonated. There is nothing to complain about.

O - I'm glad I purchased this. There wasn't too many new selections at my local shop at the time. This was one out of 5 new ones. I would buy it again if they start selling them in singles.

Serving type: bottle

07-03-2011 16:44:22 | More by depechemode1983
Photo of TexIndy
TexIndy

Texas

3.38/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a pint glass. Julian date of Apr 1 but not clear if that's bottled date or best by date but guessing bottled. It was a slightly hazy amber color with lots of carb streams. It had an average sized white head that settled into a good foam cap fed by the streams. Great lacing with lots sticking.

The aroma was bready and grainy malt mixed with grapefruit and pine hops. Was average for the style. Taste starts out with moderate bitter hop bite then some malt to offset it but once that fades there is bitter and slightly aspirin aftertaste. Medium to full mouthfeel with lots of carb but hurt by the aftertaste.

Overall, I didn't like this one as it had some off flavors and aftertaste issues. Not a drain pour but there is just better ones out there. Avail here in TX. One is enough for me [N;N]

Serving type: bottle

06-21-2011 02:01:32 | More by TexIndy
Photo of avalon07
avalon07

South Carolina

3.48/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Poured from a bottle to a pint glass. Had an amber color and a clear consistency. There was a small amount of foamy head that quickly dissipated. Average lacing.

S: A decent, if somewhat muted aroma of hops, citrus, and a little malt.

T: Tasted of citrus (lemon), hops, malt and a grainy quality. This latter graininess is not endearing. Not the most dynamic of flavors, but not altogether awful either.

M: An above average amount of carbonation with a slick finish. Light- to medium-bodied.

D: Definitely an uneven beer, but moderately drinkable nonetheless.

Serving type: bottle

04-02-2011 12:36:22 | More by avalon07
Photo of knm
knm

New Mexico

3.78/5  rDev +10.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

When poured this beer had a medium, but super frothy head! It disapated quickly and decent carbonation was left. The word organic scares me in beer because it can somtimes taste earthy. This beer didn't really give off that presence. Te hops are strong but a good balance with the rich undertones. THe smell is great, but I think my nose is stopped up. I can't pick out any flavors! I will try to update next time I drink this.

Serving type: bottle

02-05-2011 02:15:47 | More by knm
Photo of BeerAdvocate
BeerAdvocate

Massachusetts

3.73/5  rDev +8.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Review from BeerAdvocate magazine Vol. II Issue IX:

Something for the organic driven hopheads? Excellent lacing on the glass after a hard pour; bright and clear copper color. Orangey, spicy citric zest with a mix of biscuit and caramel graininess in the aroma. Fullish body with a pleasantly smooth carbonation. A slightly pungent hop bitterness makes sure the taste buds know that this is an IPA. Citric zest and spearmint flavors come through strong middle to end. Faint apricot/estery fruitiness within, though all in all quite clean. Nice caramel malt backing, a good amount of toasted grain as well, which comes off a little rough toward the drying finish. There is some malt sweetness here, yet the taste buds are more caught up in the hop profile.

This is a good IPA--while it is not totally balanced, it does come forth with a ton of flavor and some complexity. A worthy pick for the hophead or IPA fanatic.

Serving type: bottle

09-14-2010 15:07:07 | More by BeerAdvocate
Photo of WOTO97
WOTO97

California

3.4/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

This beer could easily be mistaken for a hopped up amber. Color is gold with slight amber tones. Decent head retention and moderate lacing. The nose on this is predominantly malt: sweet bread and toast aromas. Slight off-putting resin qualities, while some bright citrus plays through from the hops. The nose along with the taste made me almost mistake this for a hoppy amber if not for the label on the bottle. A big mouthful of of slightly burned toast and biscuit comes through, lingering pretty nicely on the palate. Definitely a lemon and pine element working in the mid-palate from the hop component. All-in-all the flavor profile is unexpectedly balanced for a west coast IPA. Mouthfeel on this is fuller than most IPAs. While flavors still linger on the palate, the beer finishes pretty clean, almost watery. Approaching this as an IPA places your expectations a bit off-kilter. Nonetheless, the flavors are nice and balanced. A decent effort.

Serving type: bottle

07-14-2010 21:46:45 | More by WOTO97
Photo of hophead247
hophead247

California

3.63/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured clear, healthy medium orange with a thick, creamy cap of off-white head. The aroma picked up drier grapefruit, pine, and perfumey hoppage over orange and pale malt sweetness. The flavor had sweet bready pale malts at the core with a dry, somewhat stale feel rolling off the edges.. bitterness was moderate with pine and perfume leading the way.. finished bitter and somewhat refreshing. Medium-bodied with higher carbonation on the palate.. finished warm and drier. Decent brew.

Serving type: bottle

02-15-2010 01:28:11 | More by hophead247
Photo of Cyberkedi
Cyberkedi

Georgia

2.5/5  rDev -27.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Aroma is quite strong and hoppy with a slight citrus undertone. It pours a nice clear orange-gold amber with a fairly thick off-white head. Flavor is strongly hoppy and quite bitter, but nastily rather than pleasantly so. There is also a tinny tone. I hope this bottle came from a bum batch! Texture is a bit thin and watery, and the finish is nastily bitter and metallic.

Serving type: bottle

12-18-2009 04:01:58 | More by Cyberkedi
Photo of velosuds
velosuds

Oregon

3.33/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a clear pint glass. No freshness date. Single purchased at for $1.65.

A-Clear copper amber with about a two finger, off-white head with poor retention and lacing.

S-Piney hops and caramel malts. Pleasant aroma that is too faint.

T-Some mild hop bitterness up front and caramel malt sweetness in the finish. Not bad, just not nearly hoppy enough for an IPA.

M-Medium bodied, but a little more carbonation would help.

D-Another nondescript IPA. I liked it being organic, but probably won't buy again.

Serving type: bottle

10-31-2009 20:32:53 | More by velosuds
Photo of nickd717
nickd717

California

2.65/5  rDev -22.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Bottle shared by largadeer.

A - Pours a clear copper color with a medium white head.

S - Aroma is nail polish, caramel, and some resiny, overboiled hops. Besides the nail polish, it's not too bad.

T - Below average for an IPA, with burnt wood, caramel, resiny hops. A little weird but not too bad. Others were more disgusted by it than I was.

M - Palate a bit watery with medium carbonation.

D - Not so good.

Serving type: bottle

10-06-2009 17:34:57 | More by nickd717
Photo of schmitter
schmitter

Pennsylvania

2.9/5  rDev -15.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Poured a beautiful deep amber with a foaming, floating head.

Smelled excellent, almot identical to (the amazing) hop rod rye.

This is where it all goes down hill. Taste is bitter, astringent, and otherwise fairly bland. I wouldn't call this beer hoppy in anyway as none of the typical spice taste is present. Its just disappointingly bitter.

Maybe this is what organic beers taste like (this is my first) and if so, I won't be trying another.

Serving type: bottle

09-25-2009 22:38:19 | More by schmitter
Photo of largadeer
largadeer

California

2.17/5  rDev -36.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Appearance: Butte Creek's IPA sits in the glass a beautiful, brilliantly clear pale amber. The finger of dense white foam retains very nicely. Butte Creek has mastered the art of making a nice looking beer. Now they just need to work on aroma, taste and mouthfeel.

Smell: Some uh... malt I guess. Maybe some hops. Cut grass. A bit of caramel sweetness. This is an IPA?

Taste & mouthfeel: Sweet unholy Jesus, I see why this beer has no hop aroma. They decided to dump all of the hops in at the start of the boil. Caramel and a massive bittering hop attack make up the entirety of this beer's flavor profile. If there's anything else to note here, I can't find it. Maybe because the bittering hops have decimated my palate. Yeah, this pretty much sucks.

Serving type: bottle

09-17-2009 03:19:56 | More by largadeer
Photo of ThreeWiseMen
ThreeWiseMen

California

3.78/5  rDev +10.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a New Belgium globe.

Appearance: Tried to force some head by rushing the end of the pour. I can only say that I was somewhat successful. What did form was loose, white, and maaaybe 1/4 inche in height. It's hard to say - it disappeared immediately. (I feel like I'm describing a UFO siting.) At this point, a small white halo sits on top of a hazy amber body. The hue of the amber is bright and inviting. Nice cobweb-like lacing. Looks good.

Smell: Caramel malt and pine. I don't think I get anything else. Simple and pleasant.

Taste: Big, resinous, piney hops. Yup, a big ol' bucket of 'em. Light citrus (orange) and toasted malt, too; but this is certainly a hop bomb. Damn. Bottle reads, "A delight for all hop-heads." Well, I certainly am delighted. Not the most complex IPA you'll come across, but this is definitely ___-quenching (it quenches a lot of things). Organic too? Sweet, I dig that!

Mouthfeel: Oily, poorly balanced (in a good way), bitter, and dry. Carbonation is low and suits the style well. Tons of bitter mouth-coating/numbing going on. I was hoping to have another beer after this, but I may have to wait. Claims to be "full-bodied" but really doesn't feel too full in the stomach. Finishes very dry and bitter.

Drinkability: This is certainly an IPA for hop-heads. (I wish they listed the IBUs.) Complexity is thrown to the wayside in favor of palate-wrecking bitterness. And you know what? Maybe that's the way to go with an organic IPA. The other organic beers I've had have been a little bland. Maybe over-powering hops are the key! I dunno... I'm a little tipsy at this point. If you're a hop-head, this is a must! Otherwise, you're probably not gonna care for it too much.

Serving type: bottle

08-24-2009 16:12:19 | More by ThreeWiseMen
Photo of StJamesGate
StJamesGate

New York

3.6/5  rDev +5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a pale rust with no real head but lacy rings. Roast chestnuts on the nose. Bright berry and cotton candy malts with tangerine hops at the end. Tightens up a little with no burn. Musty barrel nose and sharp skunky finish comes out as it warms. Greasy feel. Not subtle.

Served cold, malty sweet for the style, especially being from the West Coast. Only at cellar temp does it show it's teeth. Jekyll and Hyde of IPAs.

Serving type: bottle

08-17-2009 22:44:08 | More by StJamesGate
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Butte Creek Organic India Pale Ale from Butte Creek Brewing Company
78 out of 100 based on 212 ratings.