Dismiss Notice
Hello, is it beer you're looking for?

Learn more about beer. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for as low as 68% off the single issue price.

Subscribe now →

Lilja's Argosy IPA - Sand Creek Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Lilja's Argosy IPALilja's Argosy IPA

Educational use only; do not reuse.

59 Reviews
no score

(Send Samples)
Reviews: 59
Hads: 78
Avg: 3.12
pDev: 18.91%
Wants: 0
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Sand Creek Brewing Company visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
English India Pale Ale (IPA) |  6.30% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: dirtylou on 09-12-2006

No notes at this time.
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
firstprev| 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 59 | Hads: 78
Photo of Kegatron
3.3/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle into a tulip glass.

Pours hazed golden copper, with lots of suspended oils very visible, and topped with a finger of tight eggshell-white head. This retains with a ¼ finger of froth, which maintains a good richness to it and leaves a solid latticework of thick lacing behind. The aroma is grassyl, green, and earthy overall, with grapefruit accents giving the nose some bitterness while sweet grains pulling up the rear.

The taste is bitter with grapefruit and citrus rind, with that toasted malt sweetness balancing out the back. This finishes with some leafy feeling earthiness and lingering dry spiciness. The mouthfeel is medium bodied, with a crisper feeling carbonation on top that then gives way to a good bit of oily slickness underneath. This is maybe a tad too thin on the swallow. Some gentle warmth hangs on the breath after each sip but that's about it as far as the ABV goes.

This was OK I guess. The hop profile came off as a little too one dimensional to me at times, with a bit more assertiveness to the bitterness probably would have been more welcome here. This did hide its ABV pretty darn well though, which at least helped keep things smooth on the palate for the most part. Decent but I probably wouldn't have another.

 1,261 characters

Photo of Sammy
3.6/5  rDev +15.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

An extra in a trade. A serviceable IPA. Mild pleasant hop aromas. A medium yellow colour, with lots of foamy creamy head. Medium mouthfeel. Good drinkability,decent caramel malts, and being an English style not in-you-face bitterness, rather understated. WOrth a try.

 267 characters

Photo of tubacharlie
3.48/5  rDev +11.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz. bottle with an uber-graphics label of a ship's prow - not sure what that has to do with the beer, other than the "Argosy" name.

Good flowery hop nose, as you would expect with an IPA.

Pours a crystal clear golden yellow color with a nice, lasting rocky white head.

Not an overpowering hop flavor, well balanced with soft malts and receding grain taste. Easily drinkable IPA, would be a good introduction to hopness for those new to the style.

 452 characters

Photo of tapman
4.05/5  rDev +29.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Very light body with a rocky cream head, this one looks lighter and perhaps more carbonated than others. There is a bunch of gunk floating around in my beer, which means I was a bit hard on the pour, but on the other hand it is nice to have a real ale once in a while (or all the time).

Definitely some crystal, though light, and/or some victory. Some vienna malt perhaps. Nice and sweet, but the color is so light Im not sure... Bread hops. EKG? I hope so.

Now that is an English IPA. Nothing at all like an American IPA. Sweeter base grain, a little toastiness complimenting the toasted bread of the British hops. Bitterness is clean, if not slightly vegetal, but fresh hops opposed to DMS or something like that.

Light and crisp, I don't know if I would want more or ot. I'm going to say probably not, but maybe.

I ould session the hell out of this brew. I mean session, as in I don't have to think too hard about it. I still like the Lagunitas IPA better, my favorite thus far since you can sip or session, but this one is a good example of an English IPA, instead of something like the Eel River AIPA which is kinda similar, but calls itself an AIPA.

 1,160 characters

Photo of drizzam
3.21/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from the brown bottle into a clear pint glass. Label boasts it's a "Fully laden IPA"...let's see if it lives up to the hype.

A - Poured a yellow/orange body that had fine particulate floating around that gave it a bit of a cloudy appearance. An aggressive pour yielded a foamy one finger head that settled to a foamy cap after several minutes. The head left very generous sticky lacing down the inside of the glass.

S - This is not the scent I normally associate with an IPA. I'm getting the aroma of caramel malt with a slight hop afterthought. I guess this may lend itself to the "English" IPA beer style though.

T & M - The taste definitely outperforms the nose. Very bitter hop taste up front that seems to finish sweet toward the back end. Something doesn't seem right with the hop taste though...seems really earthy, or almost like it isn't fresh. There certainly is a big hop bitterness here anyways. Mouthfeel is on the thinner side. Low carbonation. Finishes dry.

D - This is a "one and done" kind of beer in my opinion. I wasn't really impressed and likely will not recommend this to friends.

 1,114 characters

Photo of neenerzig
3.91/5  rDev +25.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured out a 12 oz. bottle into my pint glass as i have had this sitting in my fridge for about 2 months now. This beer pours a hazy medium golden color that burns into a lemon like yellow when held to the light. Has a nice big, fluffy white hear well over an inch thick when poured, settling to a good 2/3 inch with very nice lacing and then eventually settles to a good solid 1/4 inch with good retention. Aromas of earthy citrus hops along with a nice caramel and biscuit malt undertone. Very nice citrus hop bitterness flavor upfront, followed by a nice, slightly toasted, biscuit and caramel malt flavor along with a sort of grainy taste. Very well balanced, but the hops certainly dominate. This is very tasty. Has a nice full bodied and crisp, frothy mouthfeel with moderate carbonation. This really is a good beer, one the best English IPA's I have had in a long time. Spot on for the style I'd say. I would certainly drink this again.


 949 characters

Photo of Ryan011235
2.06/5  rDev -34%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured into a pint glass on 11/12/09

A - Ever-so-slightly cloudy yellow with ¼ inch head of white foam. Decent retention throughout. Solid & impressive lacing.

S - It smells of an American Adjunct Lager - thin & grainy. Hints of muddled & unfocused hops. Faint citrus presence as it warms.

T - There are no surprises here after what was put forward by the nose. The only real difference is that the hops come across as more murky, resembling rotten orange & lemon rind. Hints of pine & a dry toastiness.

M - Moderately light body with ample carbonation. There is a skeevy bitterness that lingers a few moments too long.

D - This may as well be a "hoppy" American Adjunct Lager; in the confines of such a style it might be considered almost decent. As an English IPA however, this is pretty much awful. I simply cannot recommend this one.

 844 characters

Photo of OldSchoolGamer
2.81/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Another unremarkable beer from an unremarkable brewery.

A: This has got to be one of the cheapest and generic looking beer labels I have ever seen. The beer pours a Bud Light yellow. A little cloudy. Head is actually nice and creamy. Lacing is present.

S/T: The aroma is very grainy and cheap. Slight fruityness in there. Taste is also pretty cheap. Pretty grainy with a hint of hops. Maybe some chlorine in there as well. Its not offensive at all, just very cheap. Not a lot there. Their Pale Ale was hoppier and more impressive than this.

M/D: Mouthfeel is pretty watery. Not bitter like an IPA should be. Not dry either. Drinks rather well, actually. Probably could slam a few of these down if I wanted, but with such better beer out there, why bother?.

If a macro-brewery made an IPA, this is exactly what it would taste like. Cheap on the hops and flavor, this is quite a forgettable beer. You probably won't even take notice of this beer to begin with due to the cheap label. Pass it up.

 1,000 characters

Photo of hosehead83
3.35/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a twelve ounce bottle into a Sam Adams "bubble" glass
Pale golden, slightly cloudy,big head of foam
Aroma-Grassy, some biscuit, not much hop aroma
Taste-Biscuit, clean, faint lemon grass, then hops come on and stay for a earthy, bitter finish
Seems to be in the English tradition of IPA's, subtle, earthy hops, rather clean and uneventful

 350 characters

Photo of Otesanek
2.59/5  rDev -17%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pale golden with a light haze, pours a nice 1" bright white head that recedes down to a good 1/2", nice lace. I'll start off by wondering if I got an old bottle? Aroma is very mellow, a little sweet malt, tiny suggestion of citrus, maybe it's too cold--(time passing montage)--warmed up a little, still nothin! Flavor is about as bland as the aroma, kinda grainy sweet, no real hop flavor. The bitterness starts midway through, pretty clean, but not interesting. This beer has a pretty flat, one-dimensional flavor. The mouthfeel is pretty fizzy, medium-light body. Drinkability is pretty low, because this isn't fun to drink, kinda bitter, nothin else really.

 660 characters

Photo of bigreduw64
2.96/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured with a hard pour into my glass and produced only minor head. Appearance is a hazy yellowish orange. Upon smelling, I get a minor hop presence with a slight aroma of wild grass. The taste is ok, decent bitterness that comes across as an earthy flavor with a touch of bleu cheese. This would probably go well with a nice Maytag or Gorgonzola. Overall this is a lackluster IPA. Not upset with it, but won't pick it up unless it is a very limited selection.

 460 characters

Photo of Natural510
2.76/5  rDev -11.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a light, hazy yellow with a decent set of soapy head & lacing.
Not much to the scent; a bit of breadedness, a touch of hops.
Taste is fairly thin, with a metallic bitterness. An overall breaded quality is there to balance the (unremarkable) hops.
It does provide the desired dry, astringent quality one seeks in a "bitter", if nothing else.
Weak pale/IPA entry. It has a good breaded malt but fails in providing the necessary citric and/or pine hop balance.

 463 characters

Photo of Risser09
2.6/5  rDev -16.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

12oz bottle poured into a pilsner - fridge - 2009

Appearance: A somewhat cloudy golden orange beer with a 2.5" off-white head. Good carbonation and a relentless cake of a head. Speckled, spongy lace shrads itself all over the glass.

Smell: Milky grain is cereal-like in aroma. Pale malt, without a trace of bitterness, okay, maybe a touch of hops.

Taste: Bitterness is actually apparent, but doesn't have much of a flavor aside from lemon pine sol. A cereal grain and pale malt flavor are dominant throughout.

Mouthfeel: Somewhat bitter, but a pedestrian malt smoothness lies underneath. Some booze in the finish. Sweet.

Drinkability: An average IPA that needs more hop bitterness and flavor. There are so many readily available, cheap, awesome IPAs, that you have to make something unique or spectacular to move your product. Needs work.

 843 characters

Photo of jackorain
3.67/5  rDev +17.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A- pours a cloudy, dingy straw color. Very little head forms, maybe a quarter inch. This falls quickly to a clumpy, thin coat.

S-Earthy hops, biscuit malts and caramel malts. Clearly, this has not bee heavily dry hopped.

T-Initially, earthy hops hit hard. Some floral and herbal notes are here as well. This is followed by a big malty backbone, which is followed by a onslaught of bitterness. The finish is earthy hop bitterness coupled with a slight acidity. The bitterness does not linger too long.

M-Firm, medium body with nice mouth coating fell to it. The carbonation is medium to low, befitting the style.

D-Drinkability is pretty good, I could easily have a few of these.

Overall, this is much better than I thought given that it is an English IPA combined with its average rating. The bitterness is quite high even though the hop and malt profiles are distinctly English. I say nice job Sand Creek.

 912 characters

Photo of BigMike
2.51/5  rDev -19.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12oz. bottle into a nonic pint glass.

No best by or bottled on date present.

Pours a hazy copperish orange color. A really nice amount of creamy rich white head tops it off. The appearance was the best part of this beer experience.

Aroma is funky. Grainy and breadlike. Also lemon zest and astringent malts. Smells a bit "off"

As with the smell. The flavor itself is a bit "off". Grainy and a bit musky. Not much bitterness from the hops. Some earthy type flavor too. Doesn't really remind me of an ipa. Alot of sourness.

Mouthfeel is nothing special. I would not drink this one ever again.

 609 characters

Photo of alcstradamus
2.67/5  rDev -14.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Beautiful creamy, sticky head that sits upon a pale golden base.

Very watery, musty, and waxy...three characteristics which are bad enough individually but together make for a really weak beer.

The taste isn't much better...nothing off-putting but really nothing of note. Watery and plain, with a bit of stale bread. Normal mouthfeel, but this just isn't drinkable due to its overall lack of anything noteworthy.

 414 characters

Photo of WakeandBake
3.82/5  rDev +22.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A hazy golden orange color with a thin soapy off white head, slight lacing ,medium carbonation. Aroma of musty malt grain,citrus,caramel and yeasty fruit notes. Flavor was better than expected , caramel malt,mild citrus and a bitter floral hop profile. Nice full muthfeel , medium body, nice bitterness,slightly dry,long bitter finish.

This was pretty good and drinkable

 373 characters

Photo of BierFan
3.58/5  rDev +14.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12 ounce bottle into a pint glass. No freshness date to be found.

Appearance: One inch of foam on top of the hazy cider colored body. Good lacing and head retention.

Smell: Doesn't have the same kind of citrus hop aromas that most would normally expect an IPA to have. Rather flowery, like most heavily hopped European style beers.

Taste: Creamy mouthfeel, flowery hops, little yeast bite. This reminds me a lot of Bell's pale ale.

 448 characters

Photo of supercolter
3.52/5  rDev +12.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Appearance is relatively bland for an EIPA. Coppery hue with no real head or lacing to note.
Smell and taste are decent but nothing special. Firm evergreen hop taste that hangs on the whole way though. That was really all that I picked up on this one. Sort of like an overhopped pilsner.
Mouthfeel is pretty decen actually. Some notalbe carbonation and oily feel.
Drinkability is ok.

 383 characters

Photo of scruffwhor
2.95/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Thick looking deep amber and copper. Maybe a one finger head after a hearty pour. Interesting suspended haze to this IPA. Piney and maybe a little creamy aroma with somewhat maple and tobacco notes make this a questionable and interestng aroma. Hints of citrus peels and pine cmbne with a syrupy sweet toastd bready malt. Resiny andcream textured plate. A little odd for an IPA. A bit off-putting.

 397 characters

Photo of mynie
3.06/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Nice IPA pour. Or, well maybe it's way too cloudy. That's kind of weird. But still it's got a real nice head and good color to it.

Smells of west coast hops and astringent malt. A little unbalanced, a little off, but not really bad by any means. There's something going on in there, and that has to be worth at least a little something.

Hop profile is decent. More spicy than bitter and well balanced. The malt profile does a good job of backing up the hops, too, it's somewhere between bread and caramel. But there's a very unsettling node of astringent alcohol that just about ruins everything. What the hell is that? It's not age. It's just that offness that so often ruins otherwise tasty American IPA's.


 715 characters

Photo of CaptainIPA
2.62/5  rDev -16%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 12 oz. brown bottle without freshness dating.

Appears reddish amber with virtually no visible head. Spotty lacing at best. Lethargic carbonation.

Hoppy citrus aroma with notes of pear, lime and vegetable rinds.

Toasted biscuit malt upfront, followed by a lingering bitterness and dry finish. Detected a kiss of honey. Watery mouthfeel. Limited drinkability. Lacking in the character and complexity departments.

According to the label, Lilja's Argosy is a fully-laden India Pale Ale. Fully-laden with what? Disappointment?

If you're setting sail to discover a memorable IPA, don't climb aboard this underperforming argosy.

 641 characters

Photo of BuckeyeNation
2.74/5  rDev -12.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Coppery dark orange with bright pumpkin trim. Sunlight brings out a suggestion of coral without quite getting there. The whipped creamy crown tops out at about three fingers after a high-altitude pour and does everything it's supposed to do; namely, persist and look good while doing so. Sudsy squiggles of lace decorate the drinking vessel.

This is an India Pale Ale? Sure, it's mildly citrus fruity, but that's the extent of things. Most APAs have more power and presence than Lilja's Argosy IPA. Given the style, there's no choice but to go with a less than average score.

What an odd beer. Unfortunately, Sand Creek does not publish specific ingredients. East Kent Goldings hops? If blinded, I would have identified this as an organic IPA. It has that earthy, clay-like, almost vegetal off-flavor that is all too common in organically brewed beer.

The malt tastes pale-dominant (with a moderate toasted breadiness) and isn't quite sturdy enough for the style. The hops deliver more bitterness than flavor... and what hop flavor is present is nothing to shout about. Or even whisper about. Rotting grapefruit rinds and earthy caramel (once the stuff at the bottom of the bottle is added) stored in wooden barrels?

The mouthfeel barely hangs on to the bottom rung of the IPA ladder. It just does reach the next rung up as it gains a few degrees. Carbonation stays behind the scenes, while doing its job well enough.

Sand Creek Wide Ride IPA is wonderful beer. In fact, it vies with Tyranena Bitter Woman for Wisconsin's best IPA. That's why Lilja's Argosy is such a disappointment. The brewers need to take this one back to the drawing board.

 1,650 characters

Photo of BeerCheese
2.73/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 2 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Nice copper color with average head, but it was a little cloudy with some chunky sediment even with a gentle pour. No indication on the bottle that it's unfiltered. Aroma was appropriate for the style - hoppy, not much malt. Taste was hoppy like an IPA should be, but a little watery for my taste. Pretty typical of an English IPA. A little weak on the carbonation. Not a beer I'd run out and buy again, so I have to give it a lower score on drinkability.

 455 characters

Photo of Redrover
3.65/5  rDev +17%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I had this one at Tannins in Elmhurst, IL. Do yourself a favor and check this place out. It is a wine bars with an outstanding beer list.

Poured into a pint glass, the beer is a darkish copper with a slight chill haze. Nice sturdy head and lacing.

I like the pine/citrus aroma. The malt adds a nice grainy smell.

The taste is just a notch below the smell. The beer has some nice hop bite, but seems to fall a little short. The beer has a nice pinesap taste that is backed with caramelized malts. It just needs a bit more of each. The beer is in balance.

The mouth is sturdy enough. This beer was refreshing and was easy enough to drink. It just leaves wanting a bit more. Perhaps a good intro beer for this style?

 721 characters

firstprev| 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Lilja's Argosy IPA from Sand Creek Brewing Company
74 out of 100 based on 59 ratings.