Lilja's Hop Nest Monster - Sand Creek Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Lilja's Hop Nest MonsterLilja's Hop Nest Monster

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

187 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 187
Reviews: 104
rAvg: 3.35
pDev: 16.42%
Wants: 3
Gots: 7 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Sand Creek Brewing Company visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American IPA |  7.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
Nest is NOT a typo.

(Beer added by: feloniousmonk on 01-14-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 187 | Reviews: 104 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of scruffwhor
3.63/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a clear, light copper with pretty good bubbling. Theres a nice film o' foam and some Brussel's lacing stuck to my glass, a good sign.

The aroma is a crisp orange and grapefruit peel citrus. Not much malt noticed in the smell though.

Lots of crisp grassy malts topple the tongue first. Then the bitter oarnge peel and a few other citric hop flavors dominate the flavor profile. The finish has a more pronounced malt compared to the front and middle of the palate. This is a bitter beer overall, but not a hop bomb by any means. This is a bitter session beer. Hop flavors from start to finish with just a little balancing malt.

Pretty good beer overall.

Photo of tempest
3.15/5  rDev -6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Thanks to Keith for sharing this. There was a doughy malt background behind standard citrus and pine hops. While this beer is technically fine (no flaws), it's also fairly unremarkable. The hops aren't very big for an IPA, this comes off more like a thick pale ale.

Photo of meatyard
3.1/5  rDev -7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a cloudy, pale, golden/yellow with a dense, 2 to 3-finger, white head that has good retention and lacing. Seems too light in color for an IPA but not too big a deal.
The smell is grassy and orange hops with a light, sweet malt following.
This beer starts to fall apart with the taste for me. It starts off bitter, stays bitter while providing some minor malt flavor.
Mouthfeel is thin but improves some as it warms, finishes dry.
Not particularly drinkable as an IPA. As it warms, over normal IPA temps, the malts come forward more in aroma & taste but not the hops. Who knows when this was bottled, Another case of a hop style beer possibly losing score value due to being past it's prime without any indication of bottle date. To me, this beer has some good qualities but taste & aroma need some tweaking. I'm glad to see another Wisconsin beer show up in Philly, though I hope their other beers are better.

Photo of pacothrash
1.83/5  rDev -45.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5

This is one of the worst beers I have ever had. It poured a piss yellow color and has a frothy very light head. I should have not paid the $8.99 price for 6 of these beers. I cannot compare this beer to any other IPA's I have every had. I enjoy a good American IPA and this does not cut it. I think I will have a Clipper City Heavy Sea's IPA after cleaning my palate with some water.

Photo of saccro
3.43/5  rDev +2.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - nice lasting foam. white. dense. Melted butter color. Tons of suspended sediment.

S - grassy. sweet malt in the background. Slight balance towards hops. a little orange citrus.

T - sweet at first with some bitterness. followed by strong harsh aftertaste of bitterness. Flavor is pretty balance with sweet malt and hops.

M - very carbonated. medium bodied.

D - not bad. a little harsh with the bitterness. The sediment is a bit of a turn off.

Photo of ClockworkOrange
3.63/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A single 12 ounce bottle picked up at the Beer Stop for $1.75. Poured into my nonic pint glass. Hop Nest appears a hazy muted peach color with about a finger of off white foam. The head leaves a size-able lace on the inside of my glass. Nose and flavors consist of pine, bready malt, some caramel, grass, lemon. Decent medium+ body with adequate carbonation. Pretty tasty, but - "hop nest monster"? Really? That is certainly a myth in this case...

Photo of BuckeyeNation
4/5  rDev +19.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

"Men heap together the mistakes of their lives, and create a monster they call Destiny."

--John Oliver Hobbes

Polished 24-karat gold with sunshine colored highlights. A vigorous pour produced four full fingers of eggshell colored foam that has a mousse-like texture. The lid melts in attractive fashion and is leaving the glass festooned with a generous amount of delicate lace.

The nose is more Imperial pils than American IPA, thanks to a musky-earthy grassiness reminiscent of Saaz and its ilk. One source says that Amarillo hops are in use. It's odd that their typical orange zestiness isn't apparent. Warming makes things more pungent and more pleasing.

Lilja's Hop Nest Monster tastes like an IPA... to which one or more of the German/Czech nobles were added. Classic Saaz flavor. It's also pretty hoppy-bitter, so this must be a fairly fresh bottle. Some sort of dating would still be nice (for all craft beer).

It looks and smells and tastes like nothing darker than pale malt is present. That allows the focus to be where the focus should be in an IPA. Hop flavor is clean and pithy and biting. It's mostly white grapefruit pith, with bitter grasses and lemon zest close behind. I'd love to know the hop bill.

The mouthful is more APA than IPA. On second thought, a more full creaminess would require more malt, and that would not be a good thing. Actually, it's fine the way it is. Sparkly carbonation adds just the right amount of mouth energy.

Lilja's Hop Nest Monster isn't as good as Sand Creek's best beer (Wild Ride IPA), but it's a wonderful effort in its own right. It you like the European hops as much as the American ones, give this one a go... and satiate your inner hop monster.

Photo of Ricochet
3.35/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Poured a faint yellow and mirky with good sticky lace and small head. First impression is it looks like a Hefe? Scent was a light orange, maybe a little grapefruit also a little metallic.

Mouth was full and creamy with a quick wash and slight raisin aftertaste.

Creamy made the impression, a little on the creme ale side, so I may be wrong, but a cooked corn and butterscotch note were primary tastes. Hops bitter took the center stage but not much else.

It's different. It's worth a try. Hops sting is the real bonus. Not much else.

Photo of BMoney575
4/5  rDev +19.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Sampled on 2-13-10

Pours a hazy orange/yellow color, with a thin white head and even thinner lacing.

Smell is all hops, slightly earthy and citrusy. Very fresh smelling, and quite enjoyable.

Taste is exactly like the smell, a decent malt character backed up by big hop flavors. Fruity and grassy with a bitter kick in the finish.

Mouthfeel is what you'd expect for the style, creamy but still light, with a carbonation to keep the hops tart.

Drinkability is very good, if you're in the mood for hoppy and bitter.

Overall, a great IPA that I'll definitely be trying again.

Photo of jampics2
3.4/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A bottle that was either an extra or a left-behind. Nice pour into a pint glass reveals a yellow-orange cloudy beer with a small white head that does stick across the middle as well as the edges.

Smells OK. Sweet malt, mild hops, just not anything more than average and nothing too pronounced.

Taste is much better that the smell lead me to think. This bottle tastes like it may be a little old (Freshness date your bottles, please!) but there is a nice brightness to the malt/yeast/hops combo that makes me like it. Bitterness is moderate, but this has a nice fruit hint and does an upbeat dance across my tastebuds.

Mouthfeel is ok. Tastes a little watery in the finish, and that makes the carb feel prickly. But this is almost there.

Drinkability is slightly better than your average American IPA. This is a decent beer, but could use a bit more aroma and showcasing of the hops.

Photo of Ryan011235
2.68/5  rDev -20%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured into a pint glass on 11/12/09

A - Pale yellow/gold in color. Pours a one finger head that holds at first but eventually dissipates to a thin layer which lasts throughout. Sporadic, yet solid rings of lace.

S - Over-ripe citrus: orange & lemon. Reminds me of pine-sol, having a soapy aroma to it. Hints of pine & floral hops. Slightly dry malt undertones.

T - Very similar to the nose. Hops are definitely present here, mostly orange, grapefruit & lemon. Some hints of a piney bitterness, too. Toasted bread & biscuit in there. Like the nose, it's kind of soapy.

M - Medium bodied with carbonation that seems appropriate. Finishes dry with some residual flavors lingering.

D - While this beer is far from enticing & isn't particularly good in my opinion, it is drinkable. To that end, I won't be drinking it again unless someone gave me one, or maybe if it were on draft. Maybe.

Photo of weeare138
2.5/5  rDev -25.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Thanks to TomDecapolis...
Appears a hazy light gold with a small white head that fades into a mild cap. Spotty bits of lacing are left around the glass.
Smell is of cracked grain and a bit of a bland clay like aroma.
Taste...ok, talk about bland. Just not a whole lot going on in this other than the yeast.
Mouthfeel is medium bodied, yeasty overkill, and grassy bitterness. I don't like it. Sorry.

Photo of BigMike
2.88/5  rDev -14%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I reviewed this a few weeks ago but it disappeared.

Pours a light golden yellow with a thin white two finger head.

Smell was floral with a light amount of citrus.

This one tasted a bit "off" to me. Light floral and citrus and a bit skunky for lack of a better word.

This is not one i would want to drink again or one that i would recommend.

Photo of Brenden
3.68/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

The color is a clear, deep yellow that just gives the slightest hint of an orange tint in a certain light. The head pours about a finger and fades to a thick foam that leaves some firm patchy lacing behind.
This smells very much like a pils initially. There's a bit of a hops presence in there and it's clean and pretty raw with a natural earthiness. There's a faint malt as well.
The taste is like an APA with a citrus and flowery hops flavor, fairly strong but not typical of an IPA. Plenty of grapefruit and citrus rind with a little pine resin is in there with a light malt presence. Raw bitterness lingers in the finish.
There's a moderate crispness with a smooth finish in a medium body. Carbonation is light to moderate.

Photo of Otesanek
2.75/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Very hazy golden glowing orange, tiny 1/2" head settles to a light fog with a solid ring, lacing is ok. The smell is nice enough, mellow sweet malt and faintly citrusy hops, kinda like a lighter version of 90 minute. Deeper inhales bring out some bitter resinous pine notes. Flavor isn't very great, unbalanced in the direction of bitterness, rather harshly so. Holding it in my mouth I really only pick up some nondescript malt sweetness and intense pine hop bitterness. The finish is grapefruit pith. Mouthfeel is average, a little high on the carbonation side given the bitterness. The drinkablity is ok, not coating or cloying, finishes clean, but the out of whack bitterness hurts the repeat performance. I've wanted to use the phrase "hopness hot-mess" for a while now, it fits this beer. "Hop Nest, hop-ness, hot mess." It seems like the bulk of the hops went in for the long boil and the finishing hops were overlooked or under represented.

Photo of buschbeer
2.9/5  rDev -13.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I reviewed this beer last week but it is not on here. So here we go again . . .

I poured into a pint glass to an inch of white head. It is yellow in color. This is a lot lighter than expected. The smell is of weak pine. It has a bitter taste but not in a good way. Overall, it is not a good IPA.

Cheers!

Photo of movingtrain
3.55/5  rDev +6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Couldn't find the brewery name on the bottle...but was interested in the beer title. At the bottom of the label it reads: "Bold, Brazen Beer Brewed Behind the Cheddar Curtain. A reference to Wisconsin, I'm assuming.

12 ounce bottle poured into a standard pint glass.

Pours a slightly cloudy straw color. Carbonation looks pretty active. Pours with a half finger head on top.

Smell is citrusy, oily, caramel, dried fruit, hops for sure.

Taste is pretty piney up front...very bitter. A bit of that homebrewed tinge to it...metallic. Pretty empty in the middle here. It' bitter all around...and the carbonation gives the beer a push over the tongue which detracts from the nice fruity flavors that usually come with a good IPA. It's bready...but that maltiness isn't really adding much sweetness to the brew.

Overall, a decent beer. Not too much to write home about, but worth trying, for sure.

Photo of kegger22
3.78/5  rDev +12.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured a hazy, medium yellow with a moderate head that quickly faded to barely a skin. The aroma was that slightly skunked, lagerish smell. The taste was not skunky at all, though. It was not particularly malty, more citrus with a pine after taste. The feel was medium bodied with good carbonation. Drinkability was also good. Hop Nest Monster was a pleasant surprise as I was not familiar with the brewery and just taking a flier on this one. This was a better beer than the rating indicated, but it suffered from appearance and aroma scores

Photo of bigreduw64
3.4/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 1 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from a bottle dated October 15, 2009. Looking forward to a fresh IPA. They had some stats listed on a flyer with the beer and I was intrigued by a listing of 88 IBU's and no dry hopping.

Pours a nice hazy orange with steady carbonation. A small head that hangs around with a little lacing on the glass.

The smell is not good. It smells like spent grain, no hop presence is detectable. If you handed this to me and asked me to drink it based on smell, I may turn you down.

Taste is surprisingly good after the aroma. Very nice earthy hop notes with a drying bitterness on the tongue. The finish is enjoyable and lasts a good amount of time.

Overall I enjoyed this beer and would buy it again. May not be my first choice for an IPA, but I liked it anyways.

Photo of kirok1999
3.68/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a mildly hazy light gold. Sticky head and a good bit of lace.
Smell is quite mild, some caramel hops mix, mild citrus as in bitter grapefruit. Also a mild medicinal smell. Hard to place.
Taste is dry and slightly bitter. Just a hint of sweetness in the finish. There's a lingering bitterness as well, it kind of hangs in the back of the throat and makes you want to take another sip.
Feels rich and creamy and is pretty easy to drink.

Photo of hosehead83
3.75/5  rDev +11.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a standard pint glass
Surprisingly light colored for an IPA, with a big rocky head of foam
Aroma-Again a bit surprising, grassy,lemony wheat with subtle hop notes
Taste-Big earthy hops, mineral, and grapefruit rind-long, bitter finish.
Overall this seems to be an unconventional American IPA-from the color, aroma, and even the taste-Reminds me of a hopped-up pilsener.Certainly an interesting brew and worth a try.

Photo of alkemy
3.5/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Completely agree with the reviewer a couple posts down about this looking like a hefeweizen, it's uncanny. Hazy gold color with almost a finger of whipped egg white looking head. Some grapefruit and maybe lemon grass in the scent along with a touch of pine. Grapefruit is both the first and last taste for me. Sweet at first and quite bitter at the end. It's definitely different for this style. I don't know if the look got me headed in that direction, but I felt there were also both taste and scent similiarities to a Hefe. Interesting.

**The 3rd and 4th beer out of this sixer were about 10 degrees warmer and poured with no haze whatsoever. I've had a bit of this effect before with other beers, but this was a very pronounced change.

Photo of GRPunk
3.6/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Bottle poured into a pint glass.

A- A conservative pour left a solid 1 finger, off-white head. The body was a hazy gold, loaded with carbonation. The head eventually dropped to about 1/2 finger and left awesome sticky rings all down the glass.

S- My initial impression was of grapefruit-like hops. Further inspection yielded more of a grassy/piny aroma. Malts definitely played a backup role in the scent. I'd like a little more malt in the profile.

T- Very hop forward. My first sip gave a lot of grapefruit flavor from start to finish, as noted in the smell. The malts do show up a little more than the aroma would suggest, with a grainy/cereal sort of flavor. Still, a little much on the hoppy side for me to score higher.

M- Very full feel. It came off as a little grainy and oily, but I really enjoyed the "raw" nature of this beer. There's a definite bite from the hops. The carbonation doesn't come off as aggressively as the appearance would indicate.

D- It's a pretty easy drinker. The hops are aggressive, but not overwhelming. They definitely take the lead, but don't make you feel like you're enamel is being eaten off your teeth. That said, I'd look for a bit more parity between the hops and malts. It's something I'd drink again, but not seek out.

Photo of Sammy
3.7/5  rDev +10.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

On tap at Hopcat. Very hoppy, like a double IPA Light yellow body with creamy white head and lacing. Hoppy aroma, creamy mouthfeel at the beginning and then lighter as you work your way through the head. Carbonation right there, as in all the taps at Hopcat.

Photo of sholland119
3.88/5  rDev +15.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A-Golden but extremely hazy. If you poured it next to a hefeweizen, I am not sure you could tell the difference. Nice head and lots of sticky lacing.

S-Grassy hops, a light sourness and a pleasant maltiness. A little light on the hop character.

T-Unusual but tasty. Lots of earthy hops from the start to finish. Citrus hops peek in at the very end. Little malt presence, no surprise given the color.

M-Creamy and medium bodied. The suspended yeast really gives this a nice, though unexpected mouthfeel.

D-Yeah, this is a nice change of pace IPA. Unconventional, not just another IPA. I liked it.

HV

Lilja's Hop Nest Monster from Sand Creek Brewing Company
77 out of 100 based on 187 ratings.