1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Lilja's Hop Nest Monster - Sand Creek Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Lilja's Hop Nest MonsterLilja's Hop Nest Monster

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

184 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 184
Reviews: 104
rAvg: 3.35
pDev: 16.42%
Wants: 3
Gots: 5 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Sand Creek Brewing Company visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American IPA |  7.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
Nest is NOT a typo.

(Beer added by: feloniousmonk on 01-14-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 184 | Reviews: 104 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of ncketchum
ncketchum

Wisconsin

2.38/5  rDev -29%

Served in a Sierra Nevada imperial pint glass

A - pours a straw yellow with much carbonation, 2 fingers of white head with good retention.

S - a bit of floral hops followed by malt. nothing off-putting but nothing to write home about

T - straight bitter - not really in a good way. kind of harsh with a medicinal aftertaste

M - fair, not too thin

O - nothing that I'm going to seek out again, I might actually end up drainpouring this one... Others I know have liked it, did I get a bad bottle?

01-20-2012 03:51:30 | More by ncketchum
Photo of weatherdog
weatherdog

Illinois

3.1/5  rDev -7.5%

12oz. bottle poured into a tulip glass

It pours a crystal clear gold with a nice decent white head and medium lacing.

Medium light crystal malt aroma up from then going into some floral and light citrus hops. It's all around just pretty muted and very balanced. Not too impressed.

The surprising thing about the bitterness in this beer is that it comes on strong and harsh but then really dies in the aftertaste, it's something I kind of enjoy as the lasting, resiny bitterness is not my thing. Hop flavor is swayed more towards the floral with just a little bit of grapefruit coming through. Nearly non existent malt flavors but it lends a balancing sweetness at the end.

Overall it's a very average American IPA, nothing great but nothing really wrong with it, like so many of the of the hundreds or thousands of IPA's out there.

01-17-2012 21:01:43 | More by weatherdog
Photo of bonbini26
bonbini26

New Jersey

3/5  rDev -10.4%

01-13-2012 18:30:26 | More by bonbini26
Photo of zonker17
zonker17

Texas

3.5/5  rDev +4.5%

01-12-2012 22:27:01 | More by zonker17
Photo of Skye1024
Skye1024

Indiana

3.5/5  rDev +4.5%

12-27-2011 19:09:47 | More by Skye1024
Photo of bigbluebeerguy
bigbluebeerguy

Kentucky

3.08/5  rDev -8.1%

12oz bottle into a pint glass. Golden yellow with a slight haze, very rocky, two-finger off-white head. Thick, sticky lacing.

Nose is a little grassy, almost a soapiness to it. I'm not getting a lot in the way of hops here.

Taste is a little more hop forward than the nose would suggest. Some bitter citrus peel, oily hops, and a very grassy finish.

Mouthfeel is not bad. Medium body and good carbonation make it very crisp, fairly astringent. Very dry finish.

Overall, not a bad beer, but not outstanding. Just didn't seem to get the complexity of flavors that I would have liked.

12-07-2011 01:53:57 | More by bigbluebeerguy
Photo of KC9LDB
KC9LDB

Illinois

5/5  rDev +49.3%

12-04-2011 16:23:38 | More by KC9LDB
Photo of barnzy78
barnzy78

Illinois

2.5/5  rDev -25.4%

11-29-2011 04:34:32 | More by barnzy78
Photo of xipho
xipho

Illinois

3/5  rDev -10.4%

11-25-2011 02:59:49 | More by xipho
Photo of ScottageCheese
ScottageCheese

Wisconsin

3/5  rDev -10.4%

11-24-2011 02:15:32 | More by ScottageCheese
Photo of captainbearcat
captainbearcat

Illinois

4/5  rDev +19.4%

11-22-2011 21:34:26 | More by captainbearcat
Photo of bpfrush
bpfrush

Wisconsin

3.5/5  rDev +4.5%

11-15-2011 18:20:29 | More by bpfrush
Photo of mattcrill
mattcrill

Ohio

2.45/5  rDev -26.9%

Aroma: Low levels of floral hop resins appear first. Slight smell of skunkiness and buttery-like aromas but they are faint. Still, not a good sign.

Appearance: Light straw color with a bone-white head. Appears very efferevescent in the glass.

Flavor: Nice floral hop flavors but again I get some background skunkiness and butter-like flavors. They fade in and out and I'm not sure I get them with every sip but it definitely fits in the "things that make you go hmmm" category. Finish is nice and dry. Aftertaste is bitter. Balance is to the bitterness.

Mouthfeel: Light body with high carbonation. A little slippery so if it "smells like a duck, tastes like a duck, and has the mouthfeel of a duck" it must be diacetyl.

Overall impression: A light bodied, suspicious IPA. Base beer seems ok but fermentation and packaging issues suggest otherwise. Pass next time.

10-23-2011 19:58:32 | More by mattcrill
Photo of Rhynes2
Rhynes2

Ohio

3.35/5  rDev 0%

Picked this one up at my local beer shop in a mix a six. Pours a nice light color with a tall head. Little head retention but lots of lacing from this brew. Taste is very hop centered (obviously since it's called Hop Nest Monster). Hops are not over powering though. i was expecting more bite on this one and the hops are more of a non-agressive flavor in this beer. I won't buy this beer again but it's a decent IPA to try

10-13-2011 23:47:50 | More by Rhynes2
Photo of outdoorbrewer
outdoorbrewer

New Jersey

3.75/5  rDev +11.9%

Poured lively into an 18 oz. Hourglass leaving the lees in the bottle (yes I downed it) which created well formed beer settling a rocky, creamy off-white head that lasts awhile with good lacing. Orange amber hue that's a little cloudy. Figure I'll get some more and leave a few in the back of the fridge so they clear up some weeks then check. Aroma blended the light to moderate malty cookie grain profile with the Amarillo in a big time presence. Esters some apple/pear lemon/lime generally there though pleasing. Light tart/sweet flavor. Nice malt background seems like the character you get from British malts. Light to moderate bitterness would be at fault with an IPA. I like this beer for what it is. A nice drinking ale.

10-12-2011 03:58:08 | More by outdoorbrewer
Photo of Jesse13713
Jesse13713

Ohio

3.88/5  rDev +15.8%

Awesome bottle art. Picked up at 101 Bottles in Kent.

Appearance - A volcano of frumpy and frothy head. Whipped and scoopable on your fingers. Does not lace to the glass hardly at all. The beer itself is a sickly pale green. It looks poisonous, even venomous, in a way.

Smell - A slightly sour apple smell. A light citrus zest that is also full of hops. Quite fruity overall.

Taste - A nice burn all-throughout. Light hops with a bit of lemon juice in the background. I get some sort of odd unsweetened cotton candy taste also. Heavy in apple.

Mouthfeel and Overall - Very dry in its entirety. Low carbonation. A bit of sweetness in the end adds a different tone. This IPA has something a bit special about it, although it is hard to put my finger on. I liked this quite a bit.

09-28-2011 01:15:09 | More by Jesse13713
Photo of beerthulhu
beerthulhu

New Jersey

2.58/5  rDev -23%

A: A crystal clarity pumpkin orange coloring shows a light and lazy rise of effervesce. The head is frumpy and rocky of light cream coloring, standing an initial finger high. Retention was fair, as was the lacing.

S: Lemon weed best describes this, really light in strength despite its name. Lightly dried vegetation, dried citrus peel. Really disappointing in light of its name, what a farce.

T: Watery toasted grains, dried flowery citrus is quick to hit and go before returning to a weak finish. A bit more distinguishable then their argosy, but really isn’t saying to much. Dried grapefruit shows a quick flash at punch out. The strength is coarse but again as with their argosy, a wreck and like chewing raw citrus weeds. A ton of hops alone doesn’t make for a good beer, neither a snappy name.

M: The mouthful is medium, dry toasted malt with a touch of heat coming from the alcohol and warming citrus. Dried grass comes as well on the swallow.

O: Overall another bitter disorganized beer by sandcreek that is trying to be the big bully on the block in the ipa department, but needs to step back and learn some class and refinement. Its evident that they know neither so just opted for the most blunt and offensive amount of hops which im sure is someones thing. No complexity, uninteresting flavor, boring, and a hold off by purchase unless you just like to be insulted.

09-05-2011 16:19:47 | More by beerthulhu
Photo of PilsPony17
PilsPony17

Michigan

2.85/5  rDev -14.9%

Poured into a Belgian tulip.

A: A dark gold, wheat colored brew with fairly decent head. Head retention is quite good and kept up until the finish. Carbonation on the medium side of things. Unfiltered (didn't notice at first until the end) which makes this feel very promising.

S: Not too aromatic. Has a very subtle grassy aroma with a little bit of hop presence behind it.

T: Hops are right up front on the palate with a slight biscuity flavor to it. Very lemony and sharp. Hops dominate most of the taste even after the finish.

M: Smooth mouth feel and nice level of carbonation makes it a very quaffable brew.

Overall: It's a fairly average IPA. The presentation and mouthfeel of this brew is on par with what I'm looking for, but the hops dominate way too much and seems to be lacking a more malt background in that area. Aroma of the brew was less than impressive. Drinkable, but I've had better.

08-25-2011 21:13:54 | More by PilsPony17
Photo of OlRasputin989
OlRasputin989

Arkansas

2.75/5  rDev -17.9%

Poured into a pint glass...

A: pours a slightly hazy shade lighter than amber with a large off white rocky head that leaves lots of webbed lacing

S: aroma of lemon, orange peel, grass, and pale biscuity malt. hops aromas are much lighter than i had expected. very subdued and lacking complexity

T: a tad better than the aroma. has a sweet honey toast malt flavor with a much stronger hop presence than the nose implies. hop flavors are grass, orange peel, lemon peel, and pine sap. has a long finish of very bitter hops and biscuit-flavored malt

M: light-medium body with a medium carbonation and a resinous, very dry finish.

Overall, this beer seems to be headed in the right direction, but i'm not digging the choice of hops. They lack the grapefruity, piney, and danky weed hop characteristics I look for in world class AIPAs. That being said, I found the long hoppy finish to be displeasing. Most likely would not purchase again, unless out of options. And by options I mean Bud, Miller or Coors. Ya, thats not gonna happen. Cheers!

08-18-2011 02:12:54 | More by OlRasputin989
Photo of farrago
farrago

New Jersey

3.73/5  rDev +11.3%

Two plus finger of bone white head, thick coating of delicate microfoam with excellent retention, more cratering than dimpling, sticky lacing stains the glass walls almost completely. Somewhat dark golden color that flirts with amber, no visible bubbles but there are some floaties in there. Broadly arrayed nose, curious lactic notes alongside an otherwise conservative orange, lemon citrus, pine cone, dried flowers base and a smattering of apricot, peach, yellow apple scents, small amount of brown sugar and caramel makes for a soft landing. Medium-bodied, the gentle and mostly fluffy carbonation acts as a counterbalance to grass, hay, herb elements. Touch of pepperiness enlivens the middle while the apricot, peach, pear, apple fruit swell to fill in most blanks. Dries through the finish. No one element leaps out at you but it coheres as a basic “fastball down the middle” IPA that is drinkable, if not memorable. [Note that the bottle says brewed by Pangaea Brewing Company, not Sand Creek Brewing Company although it may be contract produced at the latter, dunno.]

07-21-2011 13:58:34 | More by farrago
Photo of xnicknj
xnicknj

Pennsylvania

3.18/5  rDev -5.1%

12oz bottle poured into tulip - thanks to phan869

Pours a somewhat pale golden color with some haze, thin white head retains with film and leaves layers of lacing on the glass.

Decent helping of hops in the nose, some bready malt backbone as well with some caramel lacing. Slight sweetness, but more on the hoppy side of things.

Bitter and floral up front followed by some citrusy notes. Hints of grapefruit and orange. Thick bread crusty malts with some sweetness and caramel. Finishes a bit hoppy and dry.

Medium body, nice carbonation, sticky and lingering on the tongue. Eh, this wasn't bad but it took me forever to finish as I pretty much kept forgetting that I was even drinking it during dinner (and it was my first beer of the evening as well).

06-13-2011 22:54:14 | More by xnicknj
Photo of TastyTaste
TastyTaste

Minnesota

3.8/5  rDev +13.4%

Pale body, small head. Taste and smell have a grainy malt component not really wanted/ expected in the style. Certainly delivers hop bitterness if that's what you are looking for, but not a very well rounded experience. The grassy-grainy malt of euro lager is certainly unexpected for the style. The hop are large, but not overpowering. A decent IPA, flirting with the DIPA range of bitterness and strength.

05-14-2011 01:08:52 | More by TastyTaste
Photo of BasementBer
BasementBer

Manitoba (Canada)

2.68/5  rDev -20%

A: Light straw translucent color. Good lacing, good bone-white head retention. Little to no carbonation.

S: Grainy, some bitterness from the hops in aroma, but mostly grain and husk.

T: Has a decent pale malt body, but its swept away by the somewhat overpowering hops. A good bitter, but not the citrus i prefer in the style.

M: Bitter resin on the tongue and pockets of the mouth are enjoyable.

D: Its an ok IPA, id prefer a bit more variation than one or two different hops and the same pale malt to be sparking my interest.

04-28-2011 01:37:44 | More by BasementBer
Photo of Lauthaha
Lauthaha

Michigan

4.35/5  rDev +29.9%

Poured from a 12 ounce bottle into a beer mug.

Appearance: Beer pours a beautiful medium golden color. Moderate carbonation visible through the glass. Excellent head retention; after several minutes, there's still at least a finger of off-white head left. Wispy lacing, like cumulus clouds dotting the sky on a summer's day.

Smell: Very floral. Some mild bitterness. Grapefruit leaning towards clementine citrus tones. Maybe a little spice somewhere in there for good measure.

Taste/Mouthfeel: Beer is tangy at first, the citrus-type flavor shining through on impact. As the carbonation begins to bubble, a very hefty and beautiful malt character is unveiled. Moderate bitterness balanced with just the right amount of sweetness...a win win! Aftertaste is hops, but not overpowering. Darn-near perfect.

Overall: Really good for the style, very drinkable, and relatively inexpensive.

04-15-2011 00:50:42 | More by Lauthaha
Photo of Mitchster
Mitchster

Michigan

3.2/5  rDev -4.5%

$1.80 for a 12oz single at Jack's.
http://pangaeabeers.com/Hop_Nest_Monster_IPA.html

7.0% ABV, Hopped with Merkur, Amarillo, and Cascade; Degrees Plato: 17; 77 IBU, Fermented with Wyeast 1272 (American Ale 2), Post-boil Hopped with Amarillo, not dry hopped. Filtered. 222 kcal/12oz bottle.

Pours out to a lightly hazy pale golden, forming a peaking whipped bone white head with superior retention and solid sheets of lace. Moderately strong carbonation. Not terribly hoppy for an IPA, no doubt due to the lack of dry hopping. Quite pale for an IPA as well. The head is literally like meringue. Very thick, beautiful looking. The nose reminds me of Sierra Nevada Pale Ale. I doubt I could tell a difference. It's uncanny. The mouthfeel is sharp, bone-dry with a medium body. The taste is almost exactly like SN Pale Ale, but more bitter. Medium-strong bitterness. No perceptible off flavors.

Not really digging this beer. Too light bodied, not enough malt, too bitter, not enough hop flavor or aroma for an IPA. Look elsewhere for a good IPA.

04-03-2011 20:38:47 | More by Mitchster
Lilja's Hop Nest Monster from Sand Creek Brewing Company
77 out of 100 based on 184 ratings.