1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Deadlift Imperial IPA - Widmer Brothers Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Deadlift Imperial IPADeadlift Imperial IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
85
very good

226 Ratings
THE BROS
65
poor

(view ratings)
Ratings: 226
Reviews: 153
rAvg: 3.79
pDev: 13.46%
Wants: 7
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Widmer Brothers Brewing Company visit their website
Oregon, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  8.60% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: msubulldog25 on 01-08-2010)
View: Beers (78) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Deadlift Imperial IPA Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 226 | Reviews: 153 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of afterforever
afterforever

Maryland

1.45/5  rDev -61.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

I had this beer on tap at the Green Leaf Cafe in New Towne Williamsburg, VA. The Green Leaf has 64 beers on tap and I was looking forward to trying some fine ales. It looked nice in the glass highball glass? however it had what seemed to be a soapy flavor. It was different but in a bad way. Maybe it is the hops. I am a big IPA fan but I left this one on the table.

Serving type: on-tap

06-13-2011 15:51:50 | More by afterforever
Photo of BGsWo22
BGsWo22

New York

2/5  rDev -47.2%

03-20-2013 23:55:36 | More by BGsWo22
Photo of TrojanWheels
TrojanWheels

California

2/5  rDev -47.2%

01-19-2012 17:30:47 | More by TrojanWheels
Photo of SolomonGrundy
SolomonGrundy

California

2.17/5  rDev -42.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

SO nice to tip back a brew today...Pours a nice amber color - with a tiny bit of haze, hmmm, ok I guess. Not much of a head to speak of. This is kind of like your first girlfriend or boyfriend - you're not really sure what to make of it but you're certain that there's better out there. Aroma is kind of blank - not much going on. Flavor has something off in it...not sure what it is, but I don't like it. Problem is exacerbated by the fact this aforementioned off flavor (which is a weird bitterness that is part hops and part crap yeast, I think) carries through the long and dry finish. Not good, but well-priced at $6.99/4-pack so it's worth it, even though it's not great.

Serving type: bottle

07-15-2010 01:04:40 | More by SolomonGrundy
Photo of mpensworth
mpensworth

Oregon

2.2/5  rDev -42%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Looks good in the glass, nice orange color with a good head and nice lacing. Smells like it's not an IPA, almost no hop aroma, straight malts. The taste is what I would expect from Widmer making an "Imperial" beer, very bland. There is 0 hop flavor from this IPA.

For all the other Imperial IPAs on the market in the same price range this is a snooze. If you like hops, avoid it. Spend your money on some 90 Minute instead.

Serving type: on-tap

04-09-2010 19:28:13 | More by mpensworth
Photo of 100floods
100floods

California

2.38/5  rDev -37.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Gotta give a shout out to Tom for providing me with again more beer, especially beers I would never thing to drink, but hey, he's got em. Definitely excited to try this seeing as how Widmer, for me, has never really gone past thinking about their Heff.

Poured into my 12oz stein. Golden pale (almost lager-esque) hue with a single finger head. I'm about a foot away from the glass and I'm already getting subtle wiffs of that hop aroma.

Creamy/medium mouth feel, not too malty, but you know it's there. Very subtle hop notes, really shy. I want to say something with grapefruit, a little pine, it's too hard to tell. The sweetness of the malt is far more apparent than the hops. The carbonation breaks up the maltiness The hops are almost there as a secondary ingredient (!). I can understand why it's 8.6%, but as far as labeling this an Imperial IPA, it misses the mark. This is more like a malty pale ale. I think the malt notes would be more enjoyable if there were more hop flavors present.

Serving type: bottle

06-01-2010 04:00:16 | More by 100floods
Photo of pperez38
pperez38

California

2.5/5  rDev -34%

01-31-2012 10:33:05 | More by pperez38
Photo of mercatonero
mercatonero

Oregon

2.5/5  rDev -34%

02-27-2012 23:56:38 | More by mercatonero
Photo of SkunkWorks
SkunkWorks

New York

2.6/5  rDev -31.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Had on tap at the Lark in East Northport, NY. Served in a tulip glass.

Look: lightly cloudy, pale golden color, with a decent, two finger head that has good retention and leaves a little bit of lace. Good looking DIPA.

Smell: hoppy with citrus and pine, emphasis on the pine, with a bit of honey sweetness and a bit of malt. Not as pungent in terms of hops as I would like.

Taste: starts citrusy, yields to a heavy hand of pine, but finishes with a big malt flavor of pale malt, biscuit and honey. Not enough hops for me, I'm afraid.

Feel: crisp, fairly smooth, moderate carbonation, medium bodied.

Drink: easy drinking but given the alcohol content and that this isn't an exceptional DIPA, I couldn't see ordering a second glass.

Overall, nothing really too impressive about this DIPA. Not enough hops. I hate to be overly critical of this one but in a world where you have hundreds of different DIPAs to choose from, I can't see why anyone would ever choose this. Sorry, Widmer. Not impressed by this one. Cheers!

Serving type: on-tap

03-12-2011 13:43:04 | More by SkunkWorks
Photo of BeerAdvocate
BeerAdvocate

Massachusetts

2.75/5  rDev -27.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Review from BeerAdvocate Magazine Issue #38 (Mar 2010):

The beer talk about this beer is that it uses the hops of New Zealand, the elusive Nelson Sauvin hop. And there's lots of talk --even AB-InBev uses it. Brassy amber color, clarity is fine, with a healthy head on top. Fruitiness from the hops and alcohol vary from ripe straw- berries to mangos and pineapple ... and a very fruity nose it is. Sure, it's hoppy, nearly soapy with a fruity wrap. Bitterness is there with a slow but light raking of the palate. Malt back- bone is not nearly enough to handle this fruit, hop and alcohol combo. Too clean. Fruitiness is all up front, and the malt drops dry in the end.

Very polished and clean, and wanting to be drinkable. While the body and crispness tell you to take another sip, the somewhat hollow malt base, fruit-focused hops and alcohol take everything over, and it soon becomes a chore to drink. Widmer is a day late and a dollar short for this style; too many brewers have already defined where it should be, and Deadlift misses its mark.

Serving type: bottle

01-11-2011 02:11:24 | More by BeerAdvocate
Photo of kevosbob
kevosbob

Colorado

2.78/5  rDev -26.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Widmer Brothers Brewing Company capitalizes on brewing well balanced ales, using unfamiliar hops, and producing a lineup of “feel good beers” that everyone can appreciate. Deadlift Imperial IPA is no exception to the Widmer style but, this imperial beer may be a few pounds light of a good workout. With a unique citrus quality, well balanced body, and an 8.6% alcohol by volume, this “deadlift” won’t mess up your back but you may wish you had more than a four pack to show for it.

This beer pours a beautiful butterscotch/orange color into a average pint glass. The head appears a seafoam white that dissipates relatively quickly. The Nelson Sauvin hops from New Zealand brings a beautiful aroma of citrus fruit and berries to this beer. The slight astringent note gives me the impression that this beer will be big and bold while the citrus notes gets the hops lover in me excited.

Tasting this beer makes me think that it’s not imperial ale, it tastes too smooth and mild. The Nelson Sauvin hops are interesting and I appreciate the new style but I feel they leave a slight chalky taste underneath my tongue. However the the malts leave a wonderful caramel taste blending well with the lemon-grass/citrus notes also found in the hops. “Not too fruity, no too much citrus, a very hoppy balance of flavors and qualities.” The light body lends to a great lingering flavor but sadly dies off quicker than I would like an Imperial IPA to do.

This is a great beer if you are just starting to workout your taste buds for big hoppy beers. Unfortunately, you’ll have to do a lot of ‘deadlifts’ before you’re ready to lift a big imperial ale. This is a drinkable beer because it doesn’t pound your taste buds into submission with alcohol and hops, but that’s also what makes big beers fun. This beer just isn’t exciting enough for me to give a high recommendation, however it is good enough for me to enjoy time after time.

My Beer Rating: 2.8

Serving type: bottle

05-30-2011 00:48:40 | More by kevosbob
Photo of JTomczak
JTomczak

Connecticut

3/5  rDev -20.8%

08-14-2013 16:13:06 | More by JTomczak
Photo of sgregory
sgregory

Connecticut

3/5  rDev -20.8%

07-12-2013 16:37:46 | More by sgregory
Photo of jenray
jenray

Texas

3/5  rDev -20.8%

12-12-2011 04:07:12 | More by jenray
Photo of jsboates
jsboates


3/5  rDev -20.8%

03-11-2012 13:24:25 | More by jsboates
Photo of CBlack85
CBlack85

South Carolina

3.13/5  rDev -17.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

On tap at Duckworths, served in a pint glass.

Pours a light amber color with copper highlights. The smallish white head recedes quickly, leaving behind a moderate amount of lacing, a little less lacing than I would expect. Appearance is fairly typical for the style.

Lots of fruity notes in the nose; Pineapple, grapefruit, mango, and maybe a little orange zest. Some piney and floral hop notes as well, a slightly soapy aroma is present as well. I get just the faintest hint of caramel malts, but not nearly enough to even attempt to balance this beer out.

The flavor is very similar to the nose; lots of sweet fruity and hoppy notes up front and a bit of bitterness and grainy malts in the end. Fortunately the soapy aroma does not translate to the taste. Unfortunately the small malt presence is not enough to stand up to the hoppy and fruity notes that dominate this beer. Medium bodied and appropriately carbonated. Drinkability suffers from the lack of malt presence to help balance this beer out, this is not a beer that I could drink several of in a sitting.

Overall, this is not a bad beer but it seems to fall short of what it could be.

Serving type: on-tap

03-15-2011 14:37:00 | More by CBlack85
Photo of hopstradamus
hopstradamus

Kansas

3.13/5  rDev -17.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A. Pours a hazy, bright copper color. Very little pure white head that dissipates almost immediately. This looks like a good beer at first glance. It would look like a great beer if it had more head and less haze.

S. Wow! The resiny, pine-like hop smell makes my nose pucker. Sweet caramel malt lurks in the background, but hops are the star of the show.

T. The taste is an utter letdown after the smell. The intense, resiny, pine-like smell is in reality very bitter with a muted hop flavor. The sweet caramel malt is weak at best, and the beer has an overall dishwater- like quality. It is not undrinkable, just disappointing.

M. Thin and under carbonated, the mouthfeel is average in every way. The 8.6% alcohol is not overwhelming.

D. What started out great turned out to be just average. Not a favorite, but not the worst beer ever.

Serving type: on-tap

12-02-2010 21:31:16 | More by hopstradamus
Photo of mithrascruor
mithrascruor

California

3.18/5  rDev -16.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On tap at Callahan's, San Diego.

Pours a slightly hazy copper color. White head with decent retention. Very minimal aroma... a hint of hop spices and some malt. The taste is rather indistinct at start, but turns to some malts and is eventually a bit bitter with some hop spicyness. Slightly lingering aftertaste of malts and bitterness. Medium-bodied with moderate carbonation. A decent DIPA, but not the most interesting where the flavor is concerned.

Serving type: bottle

05-10-2010 02:23:52 | More by mithrascruor
Photo of obrike
obrike

Texas

3.2/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

4 pack of this DIPA at Specs in Round Rock going for 5.99 today.

Decent look...orange-caramel hue, spider web lacing. Above average.

Fruity...very fruity smell...mango, strawberry, other assorted berries....did not catch much malt...just an assault of fresh fruity hops. I like it, but did i mention this was a fruity smelling beer?

Hmmm...well, the stawberries certainly come out front and center in this one, a bit of mango as well..followed by bitter pine hops...would be a lot happier if there was some malt backbone.Not bad, but it could be so much better.

Pretty easy to drink...hides the nearly 9% abv quite well, but too unbalanced to have more than one per sitting.

Many better DIPAs in this wonderful world to choose from my friends. In a nutshell...it's a Maharaja wannabe.

Serving type: bottle

05-08-2011 00:24:43 | More by obrike
Photo of allengarvin
allengarvin

Texas

3.2/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

This beer is a darkish gold color, almost copper, with a dense, very white head. Heavy malt aroma backed with very piney hops. Initial dominated with thick, sweet malt, it slowly gives way to citrusy hop flavor, but bitterness is distinctly lacking. It remains sweetish throughout, finishing with an overripe fruitiness. Body is heavy, almost syrupy texture.

Very disappointing double IPA.

Serving type: bottle

04-11-2010 20:21:57 | More by allengarvin
Photo of keith712
keith712

Texas

3.2/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle into a nonic tumbler....

Appearance: Medium amber and fairly clear. Head goes thick but fades a bit, leaves a nice spider web on the glass.

Nose: Some pine, floral hops, kind of sweet. Malty for sure on the back end. Not real exciting and a bit lackluster, I want/expected more of a hops presence.

Taste: Hops start out, but a malty presence comes on and kills the bitter really fast. Not sweet, but certainly less hops character than I expected. For an imperial IPA, this seems a bit...plain? Not enough hops to balance out the back end maltiness. As it warms, the malts become more pronounced and over ride the hops completely.

Mouthfeel: Medium thickness, not a lot of carbonation and a bit flat. Not much hops bitterness sticks to the inner cheeks. OK, nothing special.

Overall: Well, for an imperial, I expected more. In this class of craft beer, this is not a standout. I give it a 3.5 and given a choice of several other IPA's (Stone, Sierra Nevada, Avery), I would not drink this one again. Far better than cheap pissy beer but weak in the category it claims to exist in.

Serving type: bottle

04-24-2011 01:34:17 | More by keith712
Photo of BucBasil
BucBasil

South Carolina

3.23/5  rDev -14.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from the 12oz bottle into a large snifter.

A: The beer is a dark hazy amber/orange color with strangely little to no head. What was there was offwhite.

S: Fruity hops and citrus rind unsurprisingly dominant with a sturdy malt backbone.

T: Malty/bready first sip with a bitter, drying midpalate of mostly citric hops. There is a somewhat syrupy caramel note in there somewhere. Finishes somewhat balanced with hints of citrus and a creamy sweetness in the back.

O: Not bad but there are so many better ones out there. Unspectacular.

Serving type: bottle

04-22-2011 04:12:26 | More by BucBasil
Photo of budgood1
budgood1

Minnesota

3.23/5  rDev -14.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

pours out a slightly hazed copper colour with a fair amount of foam retaining some lace. hefty juicy hop aroma...bubblegum and some spice. hard to pick out the malt...this one smells like a hop bomb. hoppy flavour...a bit soapiness up front with a touch of boozy spice. pale malt flavours seem weak and timid compared to the hop characteristics. aside from the soapy aspect to the taste, there is some tropical fruit notes that weave in and out with hints of resin and pine. very little back end bitterness. seems unbalanced, even for a IIPA. medium bodied for such a big beer...although the mouthfeel is pretty seemingly smooth for such a highly hopped beer. no grating bitterness on the tongue. it does have a fair degree of drinkability for the style, quite approachable if you might be new to the style.

overall i was disappointed...seems like a poor mans version of hop stoopid. tropical fruit flavour hop bill was a plus, malt bill and lack of bitterness was a detraction.

Serving type: bottle

04-17-2011 23:44:56 | More by budgood1
Photo of popery
popery

California

3.23/5  rDev -14.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

From notes, 7/11/11. Nelson IIPA version. Appearance is fine. Mildly cloudy, bright orange. A dissipating head that stuck around for awhile as a thin film of bubbles. The aroma is grassy with tropical fruits - more kiwi/papaya than pineapple, like some hops. A bit grapey, too. Not quite strong enough for my taste but pretty good. On the palate, it starts out with some hop resin flavor with an alright crystal malt backbone, but the finish mars things with a big booze note that goes particularly poorly with the grassy bitterness. Mouthfeel is, well, hot. Plus, the beer is a bit sticky. Didn’t much like this one, despite the hop choice.

Serving type: bottle

02-26-2013 23:35:42 | More by popery
Photo of LXIXME
LXIXME

New Mexico

3.25/5  rDev -14.2%

04-28-2014 17:16:02 | More by LXIXME
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Deadlift Imperial IPA from Widmer Brothers Brewing Company
85 out of 100 based on 226 ratings.