1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Heineken Dark Lager - Heineken Nederland B.V.

Not Rated.
Heineken Dark LagerHeineken Dark Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
74
okay

545 Ratings
THE BROS
83
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 545
Reviews: 248
rAvg: 3.21
pDev: 19.94%
Wants: 22
Gots: 31 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Heineken Nederland B.V. visit their website
Netherlands

Style | ABV
Euro Dark Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 08-08-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Heineken Dark Lager Alström Bros
Ratings: 545 | Reviews: 248 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of mrcarterxxl
4.7/5  rDev +46.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

a beer that i thought that was every where but i was wrong.

A= pours a brown color in the amber family with a cream color head.

S= hoppy smell.

T= a toffe/butterscotch taste with hops

MF=smooth wiht medium cardonation.

this beer leaves light lacing behind, this is one of my favorites
everyone should try it.

cheers!

mrcarterxxl, Oct 20, 2009
Photo of Tee76
4.88/5  rDev +52%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 5

I've always been a huge fan of Heineken and when i found that they made a dark lager i went to all ends of the earth to find it....and i'm glad i did

Dark reddish brown, with a rich tan head to it.

Nice smokey smell, with hints of maple.

Tastes like your typical dark lager but with a thicker, sweet maltier taste that has a hint of maple.

Not much of an after taste but the beer gives a full mouth feel.Has a creamy feel to it.

One of my favorite beers be far.Highly drinkable if you can find it...it's that damn good!

Tee76, Sep 28, 2009
Photo of twiggamortis420
2.42/5  rDev -24.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Pours a clear, dark copper color with a rapidly diminishing tan head. Leaves no lacing and barely even a collar.

Smell is sweet and caramely with a bit of sulfur and stale coffee. Does not smell all that inviting.

Taste is exponentially better than Heineken Lager, but still is not all that tasty. A bit too sweet with a fake chocolate flavor and an astringent, plasticy aftertaste. Body is light and only slightly watery, carbonation is adequate. I would probably take a Baltika #4 over this one, but I've yet to come across a Euro Dark that I really enjoy.

twiggamortis420, Sep 17, 2009
Photo of SargeC
3.73/5  rDev +16.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Appearance: Crimson-brown colored brew with a tight, tan head.

Smell: Cherry, some malt presence.

Taste: Slightly smoky malt, dry hop finish. Touch of fruit throughout.

Mouthfeel: Light-medium body. Dry.

Drinkablity: Well done brew. Good alternative to regular Heineken. Very drinkable, yet presents hearty qualities.

SargeC, Aug 29, 2009
Photo of nasty15108
3.9/5  rDev +21.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from a bottle into a pilsener glass.

A - Poured a deep mahogany color. The pour produced a head of tan foam that subsided into a bubbly film.

S - Yeasty (dark bread) and hints of raisin and nut.

T - Bready with hints of chocolate, raisin and nut. A slight macro-style graininess presists throughout and the beer finishes off with a slight hop bitterness to even things out. Not overpowering, but still tasty.

MF&D - I wish this beer were just a bit thicker. I good offering from a macro beer company.

nasty15108, Aug 27, 2009
Photo of tatoodkelt
3/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Consumed 8/12/2009- from notes.

Brown 12oz bottle poured into a shaker glass.

A- Clear, dark amber with a quarter inch almond colored head that disappeared very quickly. Carbination looks pretty active.

S- Very muted. Light, sweet fruit aroma.

T- Pretty much the same as the smell but a little bolder. Caramel is more evident.

M- Light, a little watery. The carbination wasnt as string as it looked.

D- Meh. Pretty average brew to me. Easy to drink, I suppose it would be sessionable if you had no other alternative.

tatoodkelt, Aug 13, 2009
Photo of ExtraStout
3.6/5  rDev +12.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a clear dark brownish copper color with a very thin tan colored head. Nose is dominated by sweet malts and grains with a hint of fruitiness. Taste is roasted malts with notes of caramel and dark bread. A strong maltiness is present both upfront and in the finish. This is a decent beer, but it doesn't really have any distinguishing characteristics aside from the strong maltiness. I wanted to like it more but couldn't.

ExtraStout, Jul 07, 2009
Photo of WakeandBake
3.68/5  rDev +14.6%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A dark amber color pour with a small offwhite head, no lacing. Aroma is of lightly sweet caramel,slightly nutty,faint hops. Flavor is semi-sweet,toasty malt flavor (better than expected) lightly bitter,some caramel,with just a hint of grass. Light body,crisp clean mouthfeel, very sessionable and a pretty good drinker

WakeandBake, Jun 16, 2009
Photo of prototypic
3.03/5  rDev -5.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This one's crystal clear and a scarlet infused brown color. It has a nice deep red tint to it. An off white head tops it off (for a minute), but recedes quickly. It only reached a finger or so deep. Little to no lacing lined the glass. The color's pretty good, but the rest is a little disappointing.

The nose is weak and underwhelming. It features some caramel and toffee malt sweetness throughout. Yeast and grainy notes take up the secondary level. Smells like there's some light dark fruit present (mostly plum). There's a faint spicy scent on the tail. It's tough to get much out of it. It's all very weak and the individual parts don't work well in tandem. Aside from the lack of strength, there's nothing overtly bad about it. It's just not very good either.

The flavor is a little better, but not enough to trigger a bump in score. Primarily, it features a sweet caramel and toffee malt flavor. There's a light cocoa flavor that wasn't apparent on the nose. It's grainy and yeasty throughout. Whatever dark fruit I was getting in the nose is extremely faint. So faint that I'm questioning whether my palate's playing tricks on me. A light spicy and herbal flavor emerges it late. It's somewhat light and subtle. I can't tell exactly what individual spice or herb it may be. It doesn't really hurt or help. It's just there. The flavor's much like the nose. There's some individual flavors floating about, but they never really mesh or collectively work to produce a meaningful flavor. There's just a little here, a little there. Meh. Average.

It features a light body that feels a tad watery. It's not smooth at all. Carbonation is fairly light, but doesn't seem to help it attain any desired level of smoothness. Drinkability is average at best. Everything about this beer is average and pretty forgettable. It goes down quick and easy, but doesn't present anything to really enjoy.

Heineken Dark Lager is very average in the grand scheme of beer. The nose is weak, the flavor's convoluted and uninspiring, and it's not enjoyable. That being said, I don't really hate it. There's just not much to like. If it had something to add some pizzazz, it'd be dramatically improved. Maybe some hops? Pretty average all around. Maybe worth a try, but I wouldn't suggest seeking it out.

prototypic, May 26, 2009
Photo of pokesbeerdude
3.48/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Picked up a single at the state liquor store in Vernal, UT. Around $.95.

A: Light brown with a tan head about half an inch thick that recedes to a thin film of bubbles. Fairly nice lacing. Excellent clarity. Not a lot of carbonation moving around in this one.

S: Roasted malts, some caramel, a little bit of nuttiness, definite lager yeast strain, and that's about it. Nothing offsetting, nothing exciting though.

T: Caramel, honey sweetness, nice malt characteristic, almost reminds me of a dunkel lager, fairly sweet, nice nuttiness too. A few brown ale flavors are really strong here. Overall, not a bad tasting beer. Just as good as I remember it.

M: A little creamier than what you would expect from a lager, quite smooth really, light carbonation, somewhat dry, pretty crisp really.

D: Easy session beer. I've drank this beer a lot, just not recently. One of my "gateway beers". Its good to see that this is one that I still enjoy. I'd recommend it to anyone looking for a bit of a change.

pokesbeerdude, Apr 16, 2009
Photo of mjw06
3.13/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

first and foremost let me comment on the presentation. this beer caught my eye by being a heineken with a RED label. wow was that weird. a red heineken actually looks kinda cool, almost like a special edition/halloween version or something. also, the bottle is brown as opposed to being green, which adds to the weirdness.

a dark, deep, raspberry red color, almost purple. with a two finger size tan head that dissaptes quickly.

lacking in smell, but the smell i do get is rich cereal malts.

the cereal malt smell is replicated in the taste, except just a little sweeter. not much hop and theres really not much taste here at all. its funny that the dark lager would have this much less taste than the flagship brew. it also had a metallic finish that i didnt appreciate too much.

lacking in body with a carbonation that is there, but is hard to find. the carbonation doesnt hit until the back of the tongue.

drinkable despite its flaws. the prospect of a darker heineken excited me, however ill stick to the regular stuff.

mjw06, Apr 05, 2009
Photo of cottonkoozie
2.42/5  rDev -24.6%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A - Head doesn't last even 15 seconds, and leaves no chance for lacing at all. Dark brown color with some red hues. Really nothing impressive at all.

S - Smells like a dark lager, some malts, nothing else really. Not a whole lot of smell here.

T - No a lot going on, a little bit of roasted taste and some hints of caramel malts. Also some kind of weird taste there too though that leaves a strange aftertaste.

M - Pretty watery.

D - wouldn't be to bad if it wasn't for that aftertaste, but that really makes me not want much of this. Won't reach for another one.

Not a very good beer. Just has a very odd taste and its just not good.

cottonkoozie, Mar 29, 2009
Photo of OtherShoe2
2.83/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a reddish brown with a decent fizzy head and some lacing.

Light scents here -- some caramel and brown bread notes.

Light light flavors, with caramel malt sweetness, some bready notes, and a green vegetable/leafy hop element. The carbonation in this one also gives it an acidic feel on the tongue, which worked well as a palate cleaner and with food. My big fault is that the flavors are too muted, a bit too thin.

Overall, not too bad, but nothing you'd put near the top of your list either. I always find this on the beer menu in Thai/Chinese/Vietnamese restaurants but never try it. Glad I did, as it is an interesting spin by this huge brewer.

OtherShoe2, Mar 06, 2009
Photo of Clydesdale
3.35/5  rDev +4.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: A deep, clear, reddish-brown. A moderately-large, foamy tan head with decent retention and some sticky, patchy lacing.

S: Some lightly toasted, vaguely caramel malt. A breadcrust-like character as well. Some mineral and slightly leafy hop scents.

T: Malts provide some bland sweetness and a bit of roasted, breadlike flavor. Again, mineral and leafy hops, along with a dry, seltzery characteristic.

M: On the light side. Dry and again, somewhat seltzery into the finish.

D: Well, it's better than Heineken's lighter offerings. Why don't they use this wonderful brown bottle for their other beers? Maybe then they wouldn't have such a bad reputation for being light-struck all the time.

Clydesdale, Mar 06, 2009
Photo of LyonsHead
3/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: dark brown, minimal head and lacing

S: malty smell with hints of coffee

T: tastes to me about how it smells. nothing to blow you away

M: light body, which was weird cause you don't usually expect that from a dark beer

D: this beer was just okay for me, I would have trouble buying it if it was next to something else in the store.

LyonsHead, Mar 01, 2009
Photo of dpsychoholic69
3.45/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A Poured into a glass. This beer has a nice look, reddish brown clear color with a thick frothy tan head that left a little lacing on the glass, not a lot of carbonation

S Grainy, sweet hops and a hint of malt

T Crisp and hoppy, a little sweetness, kind of oaky hops really hit on the finish

M Thin and crisp, a little watery

D Goes down easily, hops are a little too strong for my taste but not overpowering crisp finish. For a dark lager would be good on a hot day. Would pare well with red meat

dpsychoholic69, Feb 14, 2009
Photo of CityBoy1986
3.2/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a pint glass.

The pour is a dark, ruddy colour with a small tan head. The head goes quickly and leaves some lacing.

Smells detected are fruity with sweet tones, like molasses. The taste includes fruit, molasses, coffee and chocolate. There is very little bitterness, and a bit of a burnt taste takes over at the finish.

Mouthfeel is medium with quite a bit of carbonation. Although it goes down well enough, I would drink more than one in a sitting if not for the annoying burnt taste in the finish that lingers seemingly forever. Drinkability suffers because of the aftertaste.

It's not bad; I've had worse that cost more than this. It won't be one of my regulars or even semi-regulars, though.

CityBoy1986, Jan 12, 2009
Photo of Rhynes2
3.9/5  rDev +21.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

very surprised by this beer. It is an awesome combo with a good salmon meal. Pours a nice rich red color though not much to say for a nice frothy head. The flavor is right on for a dark lager, not too powerful but still great. I got a cedar/coffee dark taste from it. This may be one of my new favorite brews.

Rhynes2, Dec 26, 2008
Photo of lionking
2.3/5  rDev -28.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Poured from the bottle into a glass.

Appearance. One finger head which quickly disapeared. Brownish red color.

Smell. Faint smell of grains, somewhat soapy smell.

Taste. Weak grainy taste, like the grains had been used before.

Moutfhfeel. Somewhat dry and crisp.

Drinkability. Nothing jumped out at me. I was expecting more flavor and body. Very bland and weak. Either I got an old bottle or this is a really poor beer.

lionking, Dec 15, 2008
Photo of colts9016
3.45/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance: Mahogany reddish amber hues a half finger head that quickly dissipates. There are carbonation at first.
Smell: Roasted malt hints of coffee, caramel, molasses, hints of ester lemon, and fruity
Taste: Roasted malt molasses coffee hint of chocolate and hops and burnt sugar.
Mouthfeel: Astringent, powdery alkaline
Overall it is an okay beer not to bad.

colts9016, Dec 07, 2008
Photo of Doomcifer
2.9/5  rDev -9.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Pours brown into the glass with decent head that sticks it out a little. Smells of a touch of yeast, maybe a bit of caramel...nothing smacking you in the face, but nothing unpleasant. Taste is decently malty sweet with a touch of caramel flavor up front and fades off to a thin flavor and mouthfeel. Highly carbonated. Better than this beer's more popular brother. Fairly drinkable.

Doomcifer, Nov 23, 2008
Photo of currysage1
3.28/5  rDev +2.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from 12 oz into Imperial Pint, it looks so sadly small.

Pours a nice looking clear chestnut topped by a one finger short lived off white head, pops itself down to just a ring. No lacing.

Smell is of light malt mixed with dry apple, slightly perfumed.

Taste is honestly kind of what I expected, its a maltier Heineken. Kind of biscuity, definate lager yeast, with that traditional Heine funk. Certainly better than Heineken.

Feel is better again than the original, but nothing too much. The body is slight but there, and the carbonation is good, keeps it refreshing.

currysage1, Nov 09, 2008
Photo of avalon07
3.13/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Poured from a bottle to a pint glass. Had a nice brown color and a somewhat thick texture. There was about a quarter inch of foamy head and some OK lacing.

S: Smelled mainly of malt, but also yeast and a little hops.

T: An odd taste. Very malty up front, then it thins out and becomes watery and uninteresting. Neither good nor bad.

M: An average amount of carbonation and a dry finish. Medium-bodied.

D: While this is certainly better than most other Heineken beers, it's still wildly uneven on the whole.

avalon07, Nov 06, 2008
Photo of oriolesfan4
3.05/5  rDev -5%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Didn't even know that Heineken made this beer up until a few months ago.. purchased a single of it for $1.69.

Well, it's better than the usual Heineken in the green bottle. Actually a beautiful brown color in the glass with a nice small head that stays with it. Taste wise it feels like there is some potential at first, but once swallowed you just get bland-ness. Def above average, but not by much.

oriolesfan4, Oct 14, 2008
Photo of ThreeWiseMen
2.93/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: Pours a dark brownish-red with tiny tan cap. Light lacing.

Smell: Black malts and a touch of citrus. Maybe some caramel as well.

Taste: Black malts and some sour-ish yeast. Not much else of note.

Mouthfeel: Light-medium body with high carbonation. Carbonation stings at times and leaves mouth feeling fuzzy.

Drinkability: Sits heavier than the mouthfeel would indicate. Flavor is mild. Not a great black lager, but I could drink it I suppse.

ThreeWiseMen, Sep 14, 2008
Heineken Dark Lager from Heineken Nederland B.V.
74 out of 100 based on 545 ratings.