1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

White Knuckle Double IPA - Marin Brewing Company

Not Rated.
White Knuckle Double IPAWhite Knuckle Double IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
92
outstanding

326 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 326
Reviews: 248
rAvg: 4.15
pDev: 10.12%
Wants: 138
Gots: 17 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Marin Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  8.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Bierman9 on 03-08-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 326 | Reviews: 248 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of oakbluff
oakbluff

Manitoba (Canada)

2.48/5  rDev -40.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

22 ounce bottle - hazy orange, bit of a gusher. uh oh. Nose- smells infected. Not a good sign. Taste- has a storng twinge of infection which is a shame as there is a good beer underneath- still can tell mango hops and cookie dough malt. Carbonation high. Disapointing.

Serving type: bottle

10-03-2009 02:55:18 | More by oakbluff
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

Texas

2.64/5  rDev -36.4%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

8.0% ABV confirmed. 1 pint 6 fl oz brown glass bottle with branded pressure cap served into a conical Samuel Smith's pint glass in me gaff in low altitude Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California. Reviewed live. Expectations are above average. Acquired earlier tonight at an L.A. bottle shop. No best before date. "Double India Pale Ale."

"Serve at 45 F." Served straight from the fridge. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

Not paired with food.

A: Pours a three finger beige colour head of nice cream and thickness, and quite good (~6 minute) retention for the high ABV. Body colour is a clear translucent copper-amber of good vibrance. No yeast particles are visible. No bubble show. Thin sticky lacing as the head slowly recedes. It's par for the style - not unique or special - but the retention is impressive and it has no obvious flaws. I'm excited to try it.

Sm: Floral hops, nectary hops, grapefruit zest (from hops), hop bitterness, and light vague pine. Pale malts. Soapy (too long in primary, methinks). Light resins. The soapiness bothers me, but hopefully it'll turn out alright. A moderate to fairly strong aroma. No yeast character or alcohol is detectable.

T: Clean and soapy. Some detergent notes. Grapefruit. Floral hops. Hop bitterness (a sign of lack of balance). The pale malts lack backbone or body, and can't subdue the hops adequately. I don't get any yeast. A bit of alcohol comes through, but I wouldn't dare call it boozy. Soap is dominant; this definitely spent too long in primary. Bright citrus in the third act. Resiny, with a terrible nectary finish that doesn't do it for me at all. Boy, this lacks balance; suffers from the biggest IPA flaw of all. IPA brewing is not about dumping more hops in than the next guy; balance and subtlety are key features. This has neither. Bold and assertive but lackluster.

Mf: Smooth, soft, wet, chewy. Good carbonation. Not bitey or sharp. Poor palate presence, though. Unrefreshing. The mouthfeel is decent for the style, but is far from ideal considering the flavour profile. A bit thin, actually. Somewhat oily.

Dr: Drinkable but underwhelming. ABV is hidden okay. I wouldn't get this again; it's poorly concocted. I wish American breweries would figure out what real IPA brewing is all about - balance, balance, balance. None of that here. This soapy IPA will satisfy many, but I need more from my IPAs. I wouldn't bother with this again.

C-

Serving type: bottle

02-23-2013 05:50:16 | More by kojevergas
Photo of alexhahn82
alexhahn82

California

2.85/5  rDev -31.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A. Semi hazy brownish orange, light .5 finger head.

S. Sweet barley, hints of caramel.

T/M. slightly sweet, slightly bitey, some toasted barley, really surprising that this is a IIPA/DIPA, I do understand where they are coming from, this is on the malty end of an IIPA/DIPA, which is kind of the opposite side of the spectrum I am normally on. Some could consider it well balanced.

Overall. Not knocking my socks off, like I said some would consider it well balanced, but there is a huge lack of hops for my palette. Decent ABV of 8%, but just too safely played for my palette.

Serving type: bottle

05-17-2011 02:07:32 | More by alexhahn82
Photo of ibbjamin
ibbjamin

California

2.9/5  rDev -30.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 5 | overall: 3.5

Purchased a bomber from Healthy Spirits in San Francisco, CA and poured into a snifter to review.

Not this thickest DIPA on the pour. Leaves a nice head of about an inch. Head is rather light and pillowey. Little retention. Nice glowing orange color characteristic of a good DIPA. Good lacing.

A balanced DIPA with a strong malt character. Floral hops are only mildly inviting.

This one is almost more malty than hoppy. Rather unimpressive.

Mouth is thicker than I had expected from the pour. Smooth and mildly creamy going down. Almost a full body. Good carbonation. Medium finish.

This beer becomes more enjoyable as it warms. An enjoyable brew and the best I've tasted from Marin, but this is rather average in the sea of DIPAs these days.

Serving type: bottle

07-28-2009 03:21:18 | More by ibbjamin
Photo of cpetrone84
cpetrone84

Pennsylvania

2.9/5  rDev -30.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Pour is copper, mostly clear, with a small tan head. Nose is caramel malts, light bread crust, stale hops, pine and hop resin with a faint citrus. Taste is a lot of the same, not horrible but not on the good side. Lots of malt, caramel, bread crust. Fair bit of hop resin and some piney hops. Carb is light, body is a bit syrupy, sticky and thick. Finish has a hint of citrus bitterness with the bitterness lingering. Lots of sugars still sitting around.

Serving type: bottle

02-13-2014 02:50:27 | More by cpetrone84
Photo of LSUPT
LSUPT

California

2.95/5  rDev -28.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

22oz bomber, no bottle date, poured to a NB Globe, split into two servings.

Color is pretty good, medium amber/orange, but it is extremely cloudy and hazy (second pour was sightly hazy but not cloudy at all?) ¾ inch beige head that leaves some lacing.

Nose is pleasant. Very sweet, floral and fruity notes mostly apricot with some mango. Big soy sauce taste is the finish is very off-putting. Other than that it is a very malty beer but has a ton of hop bitterness to the taste. Caramel, apricot and mango are all there but are hard to notice beneath the bitterness and the off flavors. Mouthfeel is weird and the drinkability suffers because of it. Very full bodied, which give extra emphasis to the bitterness, and medium to high level of carbonation with small bubbles that gives a creamy feel that leaves a film on the tongue.

Overall, a very disappointing beer that I was looking forward to. Still I owe a big thanks to DearthVader for hooking me up with yet another want, thanks man.

Serving type: bottle

07-21-2011 21:11:53 | More by LSUPT
Photo of jimilayne
jimilayne

New York

3/5  rDev -27.7%

12-07-2012 00:40:27 | More by jimilayne
Photo of warmstorage
warmstorage

California

3/5  rDev -27.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Serving: 22 ounce bomber from high-end grocer with very good beer selection, $4.19. Poured into "beer clean" bell pint glass.

Pours slightly hazy orange/deep amber, with a thick, dense, fairly vigorous white head with a slight amber tint. Leaves lacy remains on sides of pint glass. Very attractive appearance, a little deceptive of what's to come.

Sweet, slightly matly alcoholic aroma, hops not especially pronounced in the initial smell (or the secondary smelling, after it warmed from fridge temp to more cellar temp.) For a self-described Double IPA, the hop aroma is really pretty limited. The aroma is nice, but more like an old ale or a thinnish barleywine style: sweet and alcohol, but not hoppy. So, a nice aroma, but not a Double IPA aroma.

Initial taste is resin, pine, deep hop flavor, without the overpowering florality or citrus-ness of many west coast style duoble IPAs. A nice follow through with warm alcohol, aftertaste lingers for a LONG time with warm alcohol, piney-ness, notable but not inappropriate sweet malt presence, and a overall pleasant alcohol warmth. An excellent taste overall, with excellent warm alcohol notes, and good resin notes, but only hints at the overpowering hop presence one expects in a W.C. double IPA. So, much like the aroma, it's very nice, even great tasting, but not really to style, so sadly, I have to dink them in taste. (For the overall taste, I'd give it a 4, but for style, I have to lower it to a 2.5.) See "drinkability" below.

Mouthfeel: lovely. Full mouthed, full bodied, thick and creamy and warm alcohol, resin, pine, chewy, yummy. Along with appearance, it's where this beer stands out.

Drinkability: what I think of as my "overall" rating, this is a great beer, very tasty, very drinkable. Right this minute, the sun is setting, so it's only about 85 degrees outside, and this is actually quite quenching. The alcohol warmth resounds throughout, and I really like this beer, and the medium to medium-high hop presence is very tasty, and surprisingly balanced. Just not the high hop presence I have come to love and expect from west coast double IPA styles.

Serving type: bottle

05-23-2005 01:30:15 | More by warmstorage
Photo of PHBoiler
PHBoiler

Illinois

3/5  rDev -27.7%

10-07-2013 15:04:05 | More by PHBoiler
Photo of AKBelgianBeast
AKBelgianBeast

Alaska

3.18/5  rDev -23.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Got this one from Floydster.

Pours a a deep golden orange hue with slight haze and a good fluffy off white head that retains very well and leaves nice lacing.

Nose is suprisingly weak in the hops department, alot of sticky old IPA-like malt presence though.

Yep. This has got to be old. Either that or incredibly overrated. Taste is up front with old ass IPA bready malt stickiness. There's still some bitterness trying to hang on, but as far as the hop profile is concerned, this one is totally underbilled, as it sits now (pretty sure this is an old bottle)

Mouthfeel is a little bit viscous, but not bad for the style. Carbonation is good.

Drinkability would probably be quite solid if this didn't taste like a malty mess and was somewhat balanced out by a hop profile.

Overall, as it sits, not very good. It has potential, would have loved to have tried this fresh. And if it is fresh, then im incredibly dissappointed with it. Get this one fresh, or don't get it at all.

Serving type: bottle

10-21-2009 23:12:45 | More by AKBelgianBeast
Photo of Sideswipe
Sideswipe

California

3.2/5  rDev -22.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

On tap. Poured into a 20oz mug at my local tavern.

White Knuckle arrives with a finger of white head which dissipates leaving some nice lacing. The beer is a clear, dark coppery color. Smell is citrus hops and sweet malt. Taste starts out bitter, citrusy and sweet. Orange, hemp, and dank hops dominate. The beer has a pretty hefty malt backbone and there is a good dose of caramel present. I'm picking up a slight booziness towards the finish which is overpowered by a lingering bitterness at the end. mouthfeel is thick and syrupy with a low level of carbonation. Overall this is an decent DIPA. Nothing to write home about, but not the worst I've had either.

Serving type: on-tap

04-05-2011 23:10:38 | More by Sideswipe
Photo of SpdKilz
SpdKilz

Illinois

3.25/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Appearance - Pours a dark amber color into my SA Perfect Pint. About a finger of tan head is achieved that dissipates at a moderate pace and leaves decent lacing on the sides of the glass. An overall dark colored DIPA.

Smell - Pine, hops, slight onion...honestly it smells a little like Gubna so I am a bit worried at this point. Slight citrus tones can be discovered under the heavy layer of onion, however, the aroma is still relatively slight. This beer better be worth the ten dollars I spent on it, heh.

Taste - Yikes. I have no idea what I'm drinking right now. An incredible sweet malty flavor hits my palate like a ton of bricks. Overly sweet...sickeningly sweet. I really can't taste much hops or pine, though sweet citrus flavors such as pineapple and orange do show through. BUT, throughout all of this there is that distinct onion flavor. Honestly, not very enjoyable - the sweetness is just so damn cloying.

Mouthfeel - The Mouthfeel is the highlight of this beer, if there is one. Medium bodied, nice oily, creamy Mouthfeel, moderate carbonation.

Drinkability - This is a chore to finish but I'll be damned if I drain pour a freaking ten dollar DIPA bomber. After reading other peoples reviews I have no idea what the hell I'm drinking. I know this is fresh because my local beer store guy JUST got it in and it has been in the refrigerator at the store and my place since. This hasn't been sitting around warm on a shelf for the past year (unless this was somehow last years that got misplaced? I'll have to see if there is a way to figure out the bottling date). I get no hop bitterness, just a hint of pine, overwhelming onion and cloying malt backbone. This is a beer I will run away from in the future. Hell, I'd take a DFH 90min over this (and if you've ever read my other D/IPA reviews you know I do not enjoy that beer whatsoever). Baffled.

Serving type: bottle

11-04-2010 02:25:32 | More by SpdKilz
Photo of BlackTuesday
BlackTuesday

California

3.25/5  rDev -21.7%

02-18-2013 04:43:33 | More by BlackTuesday
Photo of Gueuzedude
Gueuzedude

Arizona

3.33/5  rDev -19.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

No Bottle date Sampled April 2010
Definitely excessively carbonated, as I pop the cap a slow foam-over starts. A soft pour into my New Belgium globe glass produces four-fingers of amber -tinged, light tan colored froth on top of a murky amber colored beer. When held up to the light the beer shows a gold-hued, amber color. The head forms a dense, meringue-like head that slowly subsides with a raised mesa of foam in the center. The aroma is pungently hoppy, a mix of caramelized tangelo, lychee, bergamot, a touch of mango as well as a more essential-oil type citrus note. The finish has a touch of biscuit-like malt aromatics to it if you really dig around. While the nose is predominantly fruit-focused, there is a softer, supporting pine character, along with some herbal aromatics as well as a touch of floral hop character.

Rich and malty feeling as it first hits my tongue, as it rolls across the palate a dirty malt-hop flavor comes out and the beer finishes with an ample bitterness as well as an astringent, green hop tannic quality (this last sticks to my teeth like a strong cup of tea). Lots of candied, heavily caramelized orange zest flavors as well as flavors of tangelo, some lighter lychee and a kumquat note are now more balanced by a herbal and bracing pine-like hop character. This definitely comes off as dirty somehow as the hops, malt and alcohol clash a bit; actually the hop character alone seems to clash. The body comes off as a little heavy, but is well within the "style" bounds.

Not nearly as bad as my previous description makes it sound, and this certainly isn't anywhere near as harsh as I remember this being at GABF when I had it last. Less muddled, caramelized malt character would likely go a long way towards cleaning this up.

Serving type: bottle

06-28-2010 02:44:23 | More by Gueuzedude
Photo of david131
david131

California

3.38/5  rDev -18.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A- Pours a hazy dark orange liquid with a thin but creamy off white news that leaves some nice lacing.

S- Grass, pine, and caramel dominate with some fruit and oddly noticeable alcohol on the tail end. Not all that complex and a bit old school.

T- Sweet caramel, grass, and pine. There is a bit of smoky flavor as well, which is a bit odd. The maltiness is a bit excessive.

M- Sweet and kind of bitter. The carbonation is a bit lacking.

O- For the style, this is pretty old school and not all that interesting. Pretty rich and malfunction, especially when considering the alcohol content.

Serving type: bottle

07-01-2012 06:12:17 | More by david131
Photo of egajdzis
egajdzis

Pennsylvania

3.43/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured an amber color with a small, off white head that left no lacing on the glass. Aroma of toffee malt, floral hops, caramel, nuts, and citrus. Taste of more caramel and peat malts, nuts, a light roastiness, and moderate carbonation on the mouthfeel.

Serving type: bottle

11-25-2008 02:35:26 | More by egajdzis
Photo of pjwilson
pjwilson

California

3.43/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

gonna give marin another chance. I usually don't like thier beers.

appearance: nice amber color, with a nice head that holds as a thin layer

smell: hoppy, actually less than some regular ipa's like stone's. you can smell a little malt, but it's like sniffing a bag hops

taste: very hoppy. no malt taste despite the color. more oily hoppy than bitter. ok there are hops here, but overal i just don't like the flavor that much at all.

mouthfeel: felt a bit thin

drinkablility: i drank the bomber, but it wasn't that good. another miss from Marin. Won't buy anymore unless i forget like i always do

Serving type: bottle

02-26-2006 23:39:03 | More by pjwilson
Photo of Phelps
Phelps

Arizona

3.48/5  rDev -16.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Bottle into a tulip.

Pours a burnt sugar color with nice clarity and a 1.5-finger khaki head that’s nice and creamy. Walls of lace grip the sides as the bubbles descend to a thick and silky top layer.

The nose is packed with orange peel. Behind all that bright citrus are honey and light toasty character.

Much more caramel in the flavor. Malty sweetness balances with nose of orange blossom, honey and toasty bread. Sweet throughout with moderate bitterness.

Lightly prickly carbonation amidst a soft and expansive body. The smooth feel exhibits a light fizziness as it moves.

I dig the occasional malty IPA, but these one lacks a bit of the balance. Aggressive hop bitterness and unrefined malt sweetness seem to be at odds with each other. It’s not undrinkable, but it’s definitely not worth the price tag. Like, at all.

Serving type: bottle

05-23-2011 23:10:05 | More by Phelps
Photo of leprakhan
leprakhan

California

3.5/5  rDev -15.7%

12-28-2011 05:27:11 | More by leprakhan
Photo of oline73
oline73

Maryland

3.5/5  rDev -15.7%

05-30-2013 19:53:36 | More by oline73
Photo of Steimie
Steimie

Michigan

3.5/5  rDev -15.7%

06-17-2012 17:03:06 | More by Steimie
Photo of sevenshubby
sevenshubby

California

3.5/5  rDev -15.7%

10-22-2013 00:57:58 | More by sevenshubby
Photo of baybassboy
baybassboy

California

3.5/5  rDev -15.7%

02-02-2013 18:28:57 | More by baybassboy
Photo of DrWalterWhite
DrWalterWhite

Illinois

3.5/5  rDev -15.7%

02-13-2012 06:51:13 | More by DrWalterWhite
Photo of RBorsato
RBorsato

Virginia

3.53/5  rDev -14.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Copper colored with a full pillowy beige head, good carbonation, and leaves rings of lace. Flowery, pine-spruce hop aroma that seems slightly less bitter than Lagunitas IPA Maximus. Almost all hop (pine, spruce) flavor with a slightly inadequate malt balance in my book -- bitter ! Medium bodied (prob a bit light due to carbonation).

Again, I guess I just don't get this style ...

Purchased: 05/10/03 ('02' Emb on bottom)
Tasted: 07/27/04

($6.29 / 22 oz. bottle)

Serving type: bottle

07-28-2004 14:48:41 | More by RBorsato
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
White Knuckle Double IPA from Marin Brewing Company
92 out of 100 based on 326 ratings.