Dismiss Notice
Microbrew Invitational
Join us June 3 + 4 in Boston and help us drink 300+ beers, ciders, kombuchas, meads, sakes and more!

TICKETS: beeradvocate.com/micro/

Mt. Tam Pale Ale | Marin Brewing Company

YOUR RATING = None |
BA SCORE
84
good
71 Reviews
THE BROS
-
no score
Send samples
BEER STATS
Reviews:
71
Ratings:
141
Avg:
3.72
pDev:
18.28%
 
 
Wants:
2
Gots:
11
For Trade:
0
Mt. Tam Pale AleMt. Tam Pale Ale
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Marin Brewing Company
California, United States | website

Style: American Pale Ale (APA)

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.40%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
Mt. Tam Pale Ale is our best-selling flagship brew! It has a bright golden color, a medium body and a smooth taste.

Added by xlperro on 03-03-2002

User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
firstprev| 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 71 | Ratings: 141
Photo of mikey711
4.19/5  rDev +12.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: Amber/orange with a half inch creamy white head. No lace

S: Big citrus hop aroma, lemon and peach mostly

T: SGood citrus hoppiness that is not too intense. Not much sweetness.

M: Light and slightly watery. Decent body.

D: Very quaffable. Could have multiple bombers if I truly wanted to

 293 characters

Photo of Georgiabeer
3.03/5  rDev -18.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a very slightly hazy dark golden with a thin fizzy head that fades pretty quickly to a thin ring. Smells thin, grainy, and slightly sour. The taste is quite bitter up front, and then segues into a slightly sour graininess. Thin overall, both in taste and body. I thought I'd enjoy this more, but I'd say its not something I'd buy again.

 342 characters

Photo of mjl21
4.32/5  rDev +16.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On tap at the brewpub. Poured into a pint glass. Comes in at 5.7%.

A-Pours a clear light amber color. Has a minimal off white head due in part to the bartender overfilling the glass. Visible bubbles can be seen rising from the bottom. Not much lace is left.

S-Lots of fresh hops. Seems hoppier than it used to be, which is not a bad thing. Lots of citrus and evn more pine burst out. It smells like a fresh IPA. Not getting much malt.

T-Lots of sticky fresh pine hops throughout. There is some light pale malt in the back which gives way to more pine flavor. It has a nice level of bitterness in between sips.

M-Mediumn bodied with a smooth mouthfeel. It has a comfortable level of carbonation.

D-Great session beer due to its lower abv. The increased hoppage is a nice bonus.

I have grown up drinking this beer and this was by far the best batch I have ever consumed. It really was much more in line with their IPA. Glad I revisited this one because it has really been tweaked for the better.

 999 characters

Photo of illidurit
3.47/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

RBSG09 on tap at the brewpub. Pours a clear deep amber color with a thin wet ecru head. Aroma is hop resins, pale malts, slight marijuana. Flavor is toffee malts up front, then herbal hops towards the end. When the bitterness fades the malty sweetness shines through again shortly. Decent pale ale.

 298 characters

Photo of Wasatch
3.48/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a cloudy dark golden yellow color, nice carbonation, nice two-finger foamy off-white head, with tons of sticky lacing. The nose is hoppy, with a nice malt balance, slight citrus. The taste is hoppy, with some malts, slightly sweet/bitter, some citrus notes. Medium body. Drinkable, not a bad brew, but was expecting more from this brewery.

 345 characters

Photo of MisterClean
2.54/5  rDev -31.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Shared with a friend.

A - Pours golden with a 2 fingered white head. Dissipates moderately and leaves nice lacing.

S/T - Grassy bready, and with moderate amounts of hop bitterness.

M - I can't describe the balance because there really was none. Hops and malts fought each other for control and left the mouthfeel watery and thin.

D - Not very satisfying. Too bitter and too thin.

 383 characters

Photo of Floydster
3.71/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

22 ounce bottle purchased at Cooke's in El Segundo for only $4.19, consumed this past Friday, reviewed from notes, poured into my Stone pint glass, color is a light golden orangish yellow, 3/4 inch foamy white head that sticks around for a little bit, minimal lacing, smell consists of light hops, soft caramel and toasted malts, grassy accents, and mild citrus, flavor starts off with chewy malts, stays that way throught the middle, some mild bitterness in the finish, later on that fades into lemons and yeast, nice balance but could have used some more hoppiness, goes down easy and is refreshing though, light to medium bodied, toaasty, slightly dry, and malty mouthfeel, strong level of carbonation, could drink a few bottles of this no problem, smooth and light overall, welcoming, not bad for the price, would drink again, recommended

 842 characters

Photo of magictrokini
3.47/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Solid APA. Pours clear copper with a good off-white head. Nice aroma of malt, hops, and wood. Lots of citrus and hoppy bite up front that mellows into malty sweetness. Nice beer. While the taste is similar to other APAs, this feels cleaner and fresher. One of the better ones in this category.

 293 characters

Photo of JoeyBeerBelly
4.18/5  rDev +12.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

22oz bottle served in a standard pint glass.

L - hazy orange/gold color with a nice sized off-white head that left sheets of sticky lacing on the glass.

S - sweet tea and citrus aroma.

T - sweet and citrusy upfront with a malty balance midway finish is bitter-sweet.

F - medium bodied with a smooth feel.

D - easy drinking and pretty tasty.

 345 characters

Photo of popery
4.13/5  rDev +11%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A very pleasant pale ale from just across the Golden Gate. It's a great looking beer with a strong golden color and a big sticky head. It smells of piney hops but could hit a bit harder. The hops are more citric on the tongue and nicely bitter. There's some good, balancing malt, but the whole package is a bit restrained and understated which is good and bad. It's a very drinkable beer with a smooth feel and an understated flavor.

Completely inexpert design review time! The label is kind of busy, showing off a grab bag of awards from various craft brewing competitions. I don't dislike label award listings as a rule, but it's hard to pull off. In my opinion, they should have shown off their awards on the back of the label rather than the front because the front is rather aesthetically pleasing otherwise. The label generally evokes Marin and Mt Tam's ecology. Marin is beautiful and Mt Tam is particularly so. The little scene of the wetland bird in a salt water marsh with small but lush mountains in the background is something that you could easily see just driving around Marin. It's more a scene of Mt Tam the park, than Mt Tam the mountain, but that's fine. The color scheme is greens and yellows and serves the aesthetic well. It's a big wraparound label on a bomber, so they have room for some information. I appreciate brewing notes. It's fun to know hop varieties and other such things, even if I have only faint ideas of what it means.

 1,456 characters

Photo of ironlung
3.83/5  rDev +3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: Crystal-clear copper hue. Small head, quick dissapition. No lace.

S: Can barely smell this one. Has just a faint floral scent.

T: A lighter even crisper version of their IPA. I'd call it a "Perrier pale ale" since it's so refreshing.

M: Carbonation it hoppin' with the hops! This beer would be great for people that think sierra nevada is to hoppy(not me!).

D: High&Easy. Lookin' for an all-day beer? You've found it!

 424 characters

Photo of snaotheus
4.05/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Picked it up on tap at Jack's Cannery Bar in San Francisco.

This is almost as hoppy as an IPA. Strong pine flavor. Surprisingly tasty beer, though. I had never heard of the brewery before, and wasn't sure what to expect.

I'd still take Sierra Nevada Pale Ale over this, because Sierra Nevada is better balanced.

 313 characters

Photo of Halcyondays
4.37/5  rDev +17.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

22 oz. bomber,

A: Pours a light amber with a medium white head with good head retention, light spotty lacing.

S: Robust pine resin comes out of the bottle, once poured I get a more malty character, and some citrus.

T: Great taste, similar to Sierra Nevada, but has more vibrancy. Pine Cascade hoppiness is the main force here, but the malt is beautifully done, with light caramel and a great but not overt brown sugar sweetness.

M: Light carbonation, medium body, light oil, very easy to drink, definitely could session this one.

D: This is an outstanding pale ale that took me a bit by surprise, even with all the high hop beers I've had in the past it holds up well. Only $3.19 for the bomber, what a deal.

 713 characters

Photo of katan
3/5  rDev -19.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

22 oz bomber bottle, undated

A - Pours a dark hazy color with a pile of carbonation. Impressively strong in fact as it about blew out of the bottle when I opened it. (Not sure how to demerit that) The head is massive and is strongly retained.

S - Incredible floral hops smell here - must be highly dry hopped. Seems to be warrior or centennial as it has the combination of grassy and floral notes.

T - Not nearly as strong in the taste as the smell would indicate. Starts off with some roasted malts - almost nutty. Mainly a hop bomb like bitterness from what probably are some mega high alpha hops. Finishes with a malt note that balanced out the hop strength. I also wonder if some oxidation made it into the beer.

M - Has a strong enough carbonation profile that the mouthfeel is stingy and strong. The body of the beer itself is generally light. Against the style, I think the carbonation hurts it here.

D - The beer is not particularly drinkable as the hops starts to get to me after a while. The ABV isn't all that strong, so that wouldn't bother me as much.

This one is really like my homebrew which recently got abused by the judges at the state fair. That is probably a confirmation of my opinion that this is not a particularly stellar beer.

The other thought I would have is if perhaps this beer should be considered an IPA. The strong hop profile would make me think its appropriate.

 1,403 characters

Photo of WillClark
3.72/5  rDev 0%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Poured out of the bottle into your run of the mill pint glass. Nice golden hue to the beer- a creamy, thick head released big floral notes (gotta be cascades). Good strength of hop flavor without being too much. Little bit of tart citrus in the mouthfeel. Finish is classic bitter pale: dry and smooth.

The thing I like most about this beer is its drinkability. The body is along the lines of a medium without compensating texture in any way. Good pale.

 454 characters

Photo of cswhitehorse
2.94/5  rDev -21%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The Mt. Tam Pale Ale poured a cloudy orange with less than a finger foam head with some foamy lacing.

The aroma was pretty non-existent. Got a tad bit of hops. The flavor was a slight malt taste with a little bitterness in finish. Overall it was a average if best pale.

 271 characters

Photo of JDV
2.24/5  rDev -39.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Wow, very surprised at the ratings. Paid 4+shipping for a bottle I ordered online, and was very disappointed by the quality of the beer itself.
Slightly hazy, honeyed amber color with a mild white head. Smells like an amber with more malt than hops playing in, with some metallic scents too. Thin and VERY bland was my initial reaction. Not offensive, but just very poor in general. 1/2 a bottle later, no different and I didn't waste my time drinking the rest. Very watery hop flavor that made this drink just like a watery iced tea. Too muted a flavor in all respects. Not worth the price by a longshot. Hell, I wouldn't pay 1.99 for a bomber. Many better pales out there, and I wouldn't waste my time with this one.

 719 characters

Photo of barleywinefiend
4.1/5  rDev +10.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pours a nice copper-gold with medium frothy head. The carbonation is, how shall I put it... sudsy! Like root beer. Therefore, you can guzzle the stuff if you're really thirsty. Mouthfeel is somewhat thin, but that is to be expected for the style. Top notch pale ale.

 266 characters

Photo of srandycarter
3.66/5  rDev -1.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Into the tulip

A - Pretty cloudy caramel, TONS of head, good retention on lacing.

S - Beyond the mild malt and hops, almost a Belgium undertow of smell.

T - Nice full malt followed by hops. Good, solid beer, but nothing outstanding.

M - Mediocre.

D - Good session, probably.

 279 characters

Photo of watchnerd
4.01/5  rDev +7.8%
look: 3 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Appearance is about average, with average head, average lacing, and a bit of cloudiness. But the aroma. Whoa! It smells like a bag full of hemp. Seriously, the hops in this have a serious eau du ganja. Nice citrus scent and flavor, too. A good, drinkable, California style pale ale. Very well balanced, goes well with food, and doesn't try to be so extreme you can't have it as a session beer.

 393 characters

Photo of Stoneman78
3.15/5  rDev -15.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

750ml poured into Duvel tulip glass
A- Pours an opaque dull orange hue, head is 1-finger tall, white, bubbly with little retention, some thin lacing on the glass
S- Nose is dominated by floral and citrus hops, hints of grapefruit, lemon, and other sweet fruits, some pale malts in the background
T- Initial taste is tangy grapefruit, followed by some floral and herbal spice, sligth chalkiness, biscuit/bread malts come in half-way and soon dissipate leaving a short finish of dry hops exacerbated by overcarbonation
M- Light/medium-bodied beer, watery texture, slight over-carbonation
D- Easy-to-drink in terms of 5.4%abv, this feels too hops-forward for a pale ale, and the carbonation is a bit overwhelming, this is caught between Pale Ale and IPA categories and unfortunately is not a great fit for either
Buy again? Probably not
Personal score- 68/100

 856 characters

Photo of domtronzero
3.36/5  rDev -9.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a clear orange copper with a nice 2 finger short lived frothy head. Little lacing on the glass. Aroma is a nice blend of citrus fruits (oranges and grapefruits) with a nice bready note. TAstes of citrussy hops with a little piney flavors, and the malt is well balanced. The sweetness is evened with a nice hop note. Mouthfeel is somewhat lacking. Does not fill the mouth with flavors, and they aren't quite noted until almost through the finish. Quite watery up front. Carbonation is well balanced, but doesn't make up for the lack of mouthfeel. Overall it is an average brew; I think I will stick to Stone's Pale Ale for now.

 632 characters

Photo of largadeer
3.95/5  rDev +6.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Appearance: Very clear orange-amber. The head starts out strong but eventually settles into a small cap.

Smell: Lemony hops, something slightly herbal/vegetable. A solid malty sweetness is present as well.

Taste and mouthfeel: Very citric at first. A sweet, bready malt flavor comes out in the middle, followed by a balanced finish of oily hops and malty sweetness. This is a heavily hopped pale ale, nearly an IPA but not quite there. Fairly light in body, the aftertaste is long and slightly oily, making it less quaffable than most pale ales. That's not necessarily a bad thing though, and I could still easily session this.

 633 characters

Photo of Gueuzedude
3.8/5  rDev +2.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Sampled March 2007
Pours with a brilliantly clear, copper color and is topped by a frothy, initially three-finger thick, nicely tan colored head. The head creates a rocky surface as it slowly subsides, all the while leaving a nice lacing pattern on the sides of the glass. The aroma is nicely hop focused with notes of spicy herbs, and a full, rich grapefruit citrus character. The citrus is the single most noticeable aspect of the aroma, with maybe just a hint of malt character coming through as well. Hop fruit aromatics of apricot, peaches and some sort of sweet tropical fruit are also noticeable in the nose.

A sharp, spicy taste of hops greets my tongue as I first take a sip. Immediately though the citrus character becomes the dominant note; it leans towards sweet citrus fruit like oranges, tangelos, grapefruit and even some smooth tropical fruit notes. The carbonation is fairly low, which makes this very smooth to drink; almost creamy in texture. Caramelized malt notes, a touch of brown sugar, and some light toasted grain character play a supporting role for the dominant hop character. A nice bitterness is here as well, though it is not overly powering; it plays as a nice juxtaposition to the softer, more approachable fruity hop character.

This is just a nice easy drinking Pale Ale, I could easily drink a couple pints of this brew. It is so well balanced to be quaffed pint by pint. Perhaps I could wish for a bit more chewy malt body here, but that would keep it from being so drinkable. I am a sucker for the fruity, smooth hop varieties right now (in this case Amarillo) so this Pale Ale is right up my alley.

 1,642 characters

Photo of DogFood11
3.7/5  rDev -0.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

22oz bottle. Poured contents into a small tulip. It forms a solid whispy white head that leaves spider web lacing. Copper body with an orange tint towards the outside of the glass.

Hops are the short story. This has alot of character and depth. Hop oils and resin would make this hard to session but its great for a one stop offering. Light fruity element slims down the citrusy hops a bit. I struggled to find out what was going on with the malt bill for a while and then it hit me...toasted saltines. Mouthfeel is surprisingly light even with the heavy hop load and slightly watered.

Notes: This is a pretty aggressive pale ale that has alot of similarities to a full blown IPA. Citrus is a major player. I couldn't see this being a regular brew for me but it was enjoyable.

 783 characters

firstprev| 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Mt. Tam Pale Ale from Marin Brewing Company
84 out of 100 based on 71 ratings.