1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Mt. Tam Pale Ale - Marin Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Mt. Tam Pale AleMt. Tam Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
83
good

101 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 101
Reviews: 63
rAvg: 3.68
pDev: 13.86%
Wants: 1
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Marin Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: xlperro on 03-03-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 101 | Reviews: 63 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of earthling
earthling

California

4.58/5  rDev +24.5%
look: 5 | smell: 5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

The Mt. Tam Pale Ale is a really fantastic beer. Being a West Coast IPA lover, the hoppy aroma is an immediate attraction. Putting back a Mt. Tam is also like drinking a delicous loaf of bread. It's dry, lightly toasted but unroasted, moderate in strength with well-balanced malt.

This one is a drinker, a universal beer, worthy of riding sidecar to great company and a filling meal or simply keeping a lone drinker company across a long, wooden rail.

Serving type: on-tap

07-03-2010 09:38:51 | More by earthling
Photo of andyfrancis
andyfrancis

California

3.38/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Reddish gold with a bit of haze, nice thin, creamy head.

Smelt of orange and other citrus hops at first, now that the head has subsided, pale malt and wheat coming through.

Bitter up front, giving way to the malt. They do mingle nicely. If you're into "balanced" beer, you'll like this one. If you focus, you can clearly detect and separate the hop and malt flavors, but they're present at levels that work nicely together if you want to just sit back and enjoy.

I like it, but for me, it's not a stand out.

Paired with a Spring Hill Farms Dry Jersey Jack. Works pretty well. Fairly even strength of flavors.

Serving type: bottle

05-21-2010 21:20:27 | More by andyfrancis
Photo of jmbranum
jmbranum

Oklahoma

4.65/5  rDev +26.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

An excellent, very drinkable,nicely balanced pale ale. Pretty in the glass, subtle aroma but lots of flavor. Surprisingly malty, with nice breadt notes supported by a backbone of hops. just a little bit of toastiness.

Enjoyed at gott,s sidewalk cafe on the embarcadero in san francisco.

Serving type: on-tap

04-26-2010 20:46:31 | More by jmbranum
Photo of yemenmocha
yemenmocha

Arizona

4/5  rDev +8.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours pale golden with medium sized white head. Nose has some candied citrus, especially grapefruit-orange. More of that candied quality is noted on the palate with juicy-fruit malty goodness and some tangerine fruit from the hop influence. Easy drinking and a long tangerine finish.

Serving type: bottle

03-22-2010 04:21:02 | More by yemenmocha
Photo of Tucquan
Tucquan

Pennsylvania

3.18/5  rDev -13.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Had this at the brewery on 2009-04-27

The ale is a clear, tea color with zero head as served and mild lacing.

I enjoyed the apples and jasmine smells.

The flavors are of toasted chestnut, citrus bitter and pine.

Carbonation and mouthfeel are light.

A decent APA but not remarkable.

Serving type: on-tap

11-22-2009 13:37:29 | More by Tucquan
Photo of mikey711
mikey711

New Jersey

4.18/5  rDev +13.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: Amber/orange with a half inch creamy white head. No lace

S: Big citrus hop aroma, lemon and peach mostly

T: SGood citrus hoppiness that is not too intense. Not much sweetness.

M: Light and slightly watery. Decent body.

D: Very quaffable. Could have multiple bombers if I truly wanted to

Serving type: bottle

10-30-2009 02:49:42 | More by mikey711
Photo of Georgiabeer
Georgiabeer

Georgia

3.03/5  rDev -17.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a very slightly hazy dark golden with a thin fizzy head that fades pretty quickly to a thin ring. Smells thin, grainy, and slightly sour. The taste is quite bitter up front, and then segues into a slightly sour graininess. Thin overall, both in taste and body. I thought I'd enjoy this more, but I'd say its not something I'd buy again.

Serving type: bottle

09-23-2009 16:24:00 | More by Georgiabeer
Photo of mjl21
mjl21

California

4.33/5  rDev +17.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On tap at the brewpub. Poured into a pint glass. Comes in at 5.7%.

A-Pours a clear light amber color. Has a minimal off white head due in part to the bartender overfilling the glass. Visible bubbles can be seen rising from the bottom. Not much lace is left.

S-Lots of fresh hops. Seems hoppier than it used to be, which is not a bad thing. Lots of citrus and evn more pine burst out. It smells like a fresh IPA. Not getting much malt.

T-Lots of sticky fresh pine hops throughout. There is some light pale malt in the back which gives way to more pine flavor. It has a nice level of bitterness in between sips.

M-Mediumn bodied with a smooth mouthfeel. It has a comfortable level of carbonation.

D-Great session beer due to its lower abv. The increased hoppage is a nice bonus.

I have grown up drinking this beer and this was by far the best batch I have ever consumed. It really was much more in line with their IPA. Glad I revisited this one because it has really been tweaked for the better.

Serving type: on-tap

09-22-2009 17:01:33 | More by mjl21
Photo of illidurit
illidurit

California

3.48/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

RBSG09 on tap at the brewpub. Pours a clear deep amber color with a thin wet ecru head. Aroma is hop resins, pale malts, slight marijuana. Flavor is toffee malts up front, then herbal hops towards the end. When the bitterness fades the malty sweetness shines through again shortly. Decent pale ale.

Serving type: on-tap

07-13-2009 06:00:38 | More by illidurit
Photo of Wasatch
Wasatch

Utah

3.48/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a cloudy dark golden yellow color, nice carbonation, nice two-finger foamy off-white head, with tons of sticky lacing. The nose is hoppy, with a nice malt balance, slight citrus. The taste is hoppy, with some malts, slightly sweet/bitter, some citrus notes. Medium body. Drinkable, not a bad brew, but was expecting more from this brewery.

Serving type: bottle

05-11-2009 23:18:29 | More by Wasatch
Photo of MisterClean
MisterClean

California

2.53/5  rDev -31.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Shared with a friend.

A - Pours golden with a 2 fingered white head. Dissipates moderately and leaves nice lacing.

S/T - Grassy bready, and with moderate amounts of hop bitterness.

M - I can't describe the balance because there really was none. Hops and malts fought each other for control and left the mouthfeel watery and thin.

D - Not very satisfying. Too bitter and too thin.

Serving type: bottle

05-11-2009 04:14:09 | More by MisterClean
Photo of Floydster
Floydster

California

3.75/5  rDev +1.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

22 ounce bottle purchased at Cooke's in El Segundo for only $4.19, consumed this past Friday, reviewed from notes, poured into my Stone pint glass, color is a light golden orangish yellow, 3/4 inch foamy white head that sticks around for a little bit, minimal lacing, smell consists of light hops, soft caramel and toasted malts, grassy accents, and mild citrus, flavor starts off with chewy malts, stays that way throught the middle, some mild bitterness in the finish, later on that fades into lemons and yeast, nice balance but could have used some more hoppiness, goes down easy and is refreshing though, light to medium bodied, toaasty, slightly dry, and malty mouthfeel, strong level of carbonation, could drink a few bottles of this no problem, smooth and light overall, welcoming, not bad for the price, would drink again, recommended

Serving type: bottle

03-17-2009 02:11:33 | More by Floydster
Photo of magictrokini
magictrokini

California

3.48/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Solid APA. Pours clear copper with a good off-white head. Nice aroma of malt, hops, and wood. Lots of citrus and hoppy bite up front that mellows into malty sweetness. Nice beer. While the taste is similar to other APAs, this feels cleaner and fresher. One of the better ones in this category.

Serving type: bottle

12-10-2008 18:49:23 | More by magictrokini
Photo of JoeyBeerBelly
JoeyBeerBelly

New York

4.18/5  rDev +13.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

22oz bottle served in a standard pint glass.

L - hazy orange/gold color with a nice sized off-white head that left sheets of sticky lacing on the glass.

S - sweet tea and citrus aroma.

T - sweet and citrusy upfront with a malty balance midway finish is bitter-sweet.

F - medium bodied with a smooth feel.

D - easy drinking and pretty tasty.

Serving type: bottle

11-26-2008 02:35:34 | More by JoeyBeerBelly
Photo of popery
popery

California

4.13/5  rDev +12.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A very pleasant pale ale from just across the Golden Gate. It's a great looking beer with a strong golden color and a big sticky head. It smells of piney hops but could hit a bit harder. The hops are more citric on the tongue and nicely bitter. There's some good, balancing malt, but the whole package is a bit restrained and understated which is good and bad. It's a very drinkable beer with a smooth feel and an understated flavor.

Completely inexpert design review time! The label is kind of busy, showing off a grab bag of awards from various craft brewing competitions. I don't dislike label award listings as a rule, but it's hard to pull off. In my opinion, they should have shown off their awards on the back of the label rather than the front because the front is rather aesthetically pleasing otherwise. The label generally evokes Marin and Mt Tam's ecology. Marin is beautiful and Mt Tam is particularly so. The little scene of the wetland bird in a salt water marsh with small but lush mountains in the background is something that you could easily see just driving around Marin. It's more a scene of Mt Tam the park, than Mt Tam the mountain, but that's fine. The color scheme is greens and yellows and serves the aesthetic well. It's a big wraparound label on a bomber, so they have room for some information. I appreciate brewing notes. It's fun to know hop varieties and other such things, even if I have only faint ideas of what it means.

Serving type: bottle

11-07-2008 03:54:07 | More by popery
Photo of ironlung
ironlung

California

3.88/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: Crystal-clear copper hue. Small head, quick dissapition. No lace.

S: Can barely smell this one. Has just a faint floral scent.

T: A lighter even crisper version of their IPA. I'd call it a "Perrier pale ale" since it's so refreshing.

M: Carbonation it hoppin' with the hops! This beer would be great for people that think sierra nevada is to hoppy(not me!).

D: High&Easy. Lookin' for an all-day beer? You've found it!

Serving type: on-tap

11-04-2008 00:11:59 | More by ironlung
Photo of snaotheus
snaotheus

Washington

4.05/5  rDev +10.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Picked it up on tap at Jack's Cannery Bar in San Francisco.

This is almost as hoppy as an IPA. Strong pine flavor. Surprisingly tasty beer, though. I had never heard of the brewery before, and wasn't sure what to expect.

I'd still take Sierra Nevada Pale Ale over this, because Sierra Nevada is better balanced.

Serving type: on-tap

10-20-2008 22:27:39 | More by snaotheus
Photo of Halcyondays
Halcyondays

California

4.4/5  rDev +19.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

22 oz. bomber,

A: Pours a light amber with a medium white head with good head retention, light spotty lacing.

S: Robust pine resin comes out of the bottle, once poured I get a more malty character, and some citrus.

T: Great taste, similar to Sierra Nevada, but has more vibrancy. Pine Cascade hoppiness is the main force here, but the malt is beautifully done, with light caramel and a great but not overt brown sugar sweetness.

M: Light carbonation, medium body, light oil, very easy to drink, definitely could session this one.

D: This is an outstanding pale ale that took me a bit by surprise, even with all the high hop beers I've had in the past it holds up well. Only $3.19 for the bomber, what a deal.

Serving type: bottle

09-15-2008 01:19:28 | More by Halcyondays
Photo of katan
katan

Colorado

2.98/5  rDev -19%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

22 oz bomber bottle, undated

A - Pours a dark hazy color with a pile of carbonation. Impressively strong in fact as it about blew out of the bottle when I opened it. (Not sure how to demerit that) The head is massive and is strongly retained.

S - Incredible floral hops smell here - must be highly dry hopped. Seems to be warrior or centennial as it has the combination of grassy and floral notes.

T - Not nearly as strong in the taste as the smell would indicate. Starts off with some roasted malts - almost nutty. Mainly a hop bomb like bitterness from what probably are some mega high alpha hops. Finishes with a malt note that balanced out the hop strength. I also wonder if some oxidation made it into the beer.

M - Has a strong enough carbonation profile that the mouthfeel is stingy and strong. The body of the beer itself is generally light. Against the style, I think the carbonation hurts it here.

D - The beer is not particularly drinkable as the hops starts to get to me after a while. The ABV isn't all that strong, so that wouldn't bother me as much.

This one is really like my homebrew which recently got abused by the judges at the state fair. That is probably a confirmation of my opinion that this is not a particularly stellar beer.

The other thought I would have is if perhaps this beer should be considered an IPA. The strong hop profile would make me think its appropriate.

Serving type: bottle

08-31-2008 00:55:24 | More by katan
Photo of WillClark
WillClark

California

3.73/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Poured out of the bottle into your run of the mill pint glass. Nice golden hue to the beer- a creamy, thick head released big floral notes (gotta be cascades). Good strength of hop flavor without being too much. Little bit of tart citrus in the mouthfeel. Finish is classic bitter pale: dry and smooth.

The thing I like most about this beer is its drinkability. The body is along the lines of a medium without compensating texture in any way. Good pale.

Serving type: bottle

07-07-2008 00:16:52 | More by WillClark
Photo of cswhitehorse
cswhitehorse

Oregon

2.95/5  rDev -19.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The Mt. Tam Pale Ale poured a cloudy orange with less than a finger foam head with some foamy lacing.

The aroma was pretty non-existent. Got a tad bit of hops. The flavor was a slight malt taste with a little bitterness in finish. Overall it was a average if best pale.

Serving type: bottle

04-18-2008 20:02:00 | More by cswhitehorse
Photo of JDV
JDV

Texas

2.2/5  rDev -40.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Wow, very surprised at the ratings. Paid 4+shipping for a bottle I ordered online, and was very disappointed by the quality of the beer itself.
Slightly hazy, honeyed amber color with a mild white head. Smells like an amber with more malt than hops playing in, with some metallic scents too. Thin and VERY bland was my initial reaction. Not offensive, but just very poor in general. 1/2 a bottle later, no different and I didn't waste my time drinking the rest. Very watery hop flavor that made this drink just like a watery iced tea. Too muted a flavor in all respects. Not worth the price by a longshot. Hell, I wouldn't pay 1.99 for a bomber. Many better pales out there, and I wouldn't waste my time with this one.

Serving type: bottle

03-01-2008 21:46:25 | More by JDV
Photo of barleywinefiend
barleywinefiend

Washington

4.1/5  rDev +11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pours a nice copper-gold with medium frothy head. The carbonation is, how shall I put it... sudsy! Like root beer. Therefore, you can guzzle the stuff if you're really thirsty. Mouthfeel is somewhat thin, but that is to be expected for the style. Top notch pale ale.

Serving type: bottle

02-06-2008 13:05:00 | More by barleywinefiend
Photo of srandycarter
srandycarter

California

3.65/5  rDev -0.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Into the tulip

A - Pretty cloudy caramel, TONS of head, good retention on lacing.

S - Beyond the mild malt and hops, almost a Belgium undertow of smell.

T - Nice full malt followed by hops. Good, solid beer, but nothing outstanding.

M - Mediocre.

D - Good session, probably.

Serving type: bottle

01-25-2008 04:44:55 | More by srandycarter
Photo of watchnerd
watchnerd

California

4/5  rDev +8.7%
look: 3 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Appearance is about average, with average head, average lacing, and a bit of cloudiness. But the aroma. Whoa! It smells like a bag full of hemp. Seriously, the hops in this have a serious eau du ganja. Nice citrus scent and flavor, too. A good, drinkable, California style pale ale. Very well balanced, goes well with food, and doesn't try to be so extreme you can't have it as a session beer.

Serving type: bottle

01-14-2008 02:15:09 | More by watchnerd
Mt. Tam Pale Ale from Marin Brewing Company
83 out of 100 based on 101 ratings.