1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Ciuc Premium - Miercurea Ciuc (Brau Union Romania)

Not Rated.
Ciuc PremiumCiuc Premium

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
68
poor

52 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 52
Reviews: 28
rAvg: 2.79
pDev: 19.71%
Wants: 2
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Miercurea Ciuc (Brau Union Romania) visit their website
Romania

Style | ABV
Czech Pilsener |  4.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 10-23-2003)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 52 | Reviews: 28 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Phyl21ca
1.58/5  rDev -43.4%
look: 3 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

Bottle: Poured a low yellow color lager with a medium size pure white foamy head with medium retention and some light lacing. Aroma of grainy cereal with some overcooked vegetable notes. Taste is dominated by some unrefined cereal notes with some overcooked vegetables. Body is light with good carbonation. Weird notes of overcooked vegetables don’t really help me enjoy this beer.

Phyl21ca, Feb 06, 2014
Photo of Fatehunter
1.6/5  rDev -42.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

A half finger of head on a clear, yellow colored body. Poor head retention.
The aroma is grain and a stale clover honey. Weird.
The taste is quite bitter with a high level of dryness and pucker factor. Not good.
The texture is crisp with a ton of carbonation and light body.
There's too much going against this beer.

Fatehunter, Jan 20, 2013
Photo of Marius
2/5  rDev -28.3%

Marius, Aug 04, 2014
Photo of crosbyms
2/5  rDev -28.3%

crosbyms, Aug 26, 2014
Photo of oldp0rt
2/5  rDev -28.3%

oldp0rt, Nov 24, 2011
Photo of Ciocanelu
2.25/5  rDev -19.4%

Ciocanelu, May 13, 2013
Photo of Eir
2.25/5  rDev -19.4%

Eir, Dec 06, 2013
Photo of Chadhowie
2.25/5  rDev -19.4%

Chadhowie, Jan 18, 2013
Photo of arkanu
2.25/5  rDev -19.4%

arkanu, Jul 05, 2012
Photo of liamt07
2.28/5  rDev -18.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Can from the LCBO, 500ml into a stange. Best before July 27, 2012.

Pours a crystal clear golden yellow, so clear the I was actually able to read the text from the ingredients list on the can through the beer. Loose and transient white head, leaving a collar and no head. Nose has some weak hop notes, a bit of corn and come assorted cereals. A general sweetness about it. Taste has some run of the mill malt sweetness with some adjunct notes, some odd metallic notes and a weird hop flavour and bitterness in the finish. Feel is pretty light, with a medium low carbonation. Little to no flavour all around, and that which exists is downright boring - yet, this beer avods being truly offensive. On the plus side, this is fairly easy to consume. Fill a funnel or something with this one...

liamt07, Nov 03, 2011
Photo of JohnW
2.3/5  rDev -17.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Had both from bottle and on tap in various bars during a tour of Romania in July 2011. Pours pale gold,lively head, little if no aroma - grassy, dry. Taste is thin, highly carbonated, acid, dry, all the things expected from Euro lager from a big brewery of the area. I guess it seems refreshing if served well chilled on a hot summer day, but would not have it again. Incidently, the name is pronounced CHuish if you really need to know!

JohnW
B'ham UK 2011

JohnW, Aug 01, 2011
Photo of rhoadsrage
2.3/5  rDev -17.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

(Served in a strange)

A- This beer pours a crystal clear yellow body with a sea of carbonation. This beer has a thick white head that last and last.

S- This beer has a slight sweet pale malt note with a sulfur and noble bitterness.

T- This beer has a light dry carbonic acid flavor that finishes in a bitterness from Noble hops.

M- This beer has a light mouthfeel and a carbonic bite.

D- Another pale dry malt beer with noble bitterness that is not very interesting or tasty.

rhoadsrage, Jun 25, 2006
Photo of TheBeeraholic
2.5/5  rDev -10.4%

TheBeeraholic, Jun 16, 2013
Photo of leitmotif
2.5/5  rDev -10.4%

leitmotif, Nov 06, 2013
Photo of smekermann
2.5/5  rDev -10.4%

smekermann, Jun 03, 2014
Photo of nandika
2.5/5  rDev -10.4%

nandika, Feb 08, 2012
Photo of Molson2000
2.5/5  rDev -10.4%

Molson2000, Sep 10, 2012
Photo of GeeZaa
2.5/5  rDev -10.4%

GeeZaa, Apr 04, 2014
Photo of thehyperduck
2.55/5  rDev -8.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Half-litre can from the LCBO; best before January 2013. Another day, another European country to scratch off the list - with yet another pale lager, of course. But I am a little picky with Czech pilseners, so we'll see how this goes.

Pours a pale golden yellow, completely translucent, topped with two fingers of frothy, soapy, sparkling white head. It sticks around for a few minutes, leaving in its wake some smears of lacing on the side of the glass. It certainly looks the part, although the aroma doesn't. It's mildly grainy with some grassy hay-like qualities, but much too faint to make out anything much more specific than that. At least it smells fairly clean.

Acceptable flavour, but pretty bland for a pilsener. The flavour is mostly grainy malt sweetness and white bread, with some grassy, vaguely floral hop notes toward the end of the sip. A little metallicity (especially in the aftertaste) is not really appreciated, but not a serious detraction either. It has no real noble hop presence - no lemony zest, no crisp/spicy goodness like in real Czech pilseners. Relatively creamy mouthfeel for a pale lager, with noticeably mild carbonation. Light-bodied and highly watery.

Final Grade: 2.55, a forgettable C-. Call it whatever you want - a rather lame pilsener, or a decent-to-mediocre Euro pale lager - Ciuc Premium isn't anything special, and there aren't many reasons to bother drinking it beyond the low price (or in my case, the fact that it is from Romania, and thus a rarity here). BAs with no interest in pale lagers might as well skip this, because it's mediocre at best.

thehyperduck, Jun 20, 2012
Photo of pootz
2.55/5  rDev -8.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Can: Clear gold, disappearing head, poor lacing, over carbonated.

Aroma is faint but there is some graininess indicating pasrtial malt beer.

Watery mouth feel, extract sweetness, gristed malt biscuit tone is obliterated by over boiled hops and massive carbonation.

Better than the Turkish abortion in a bottle I just sampled but not by much. Partial extract beer with an annoying hop signature achieved with either over boiling or hop essence over amping.

pootz, Aug 14, 2010
Photo of mintjellie
2.6/5  rDev -6.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Deep golden coloured. Head is eggshell white, thin, and poorly retained. Doesn't lace. Bready aroma with mild green apple and even milder hopping. Mild residual sweetness comes through in the flavour. Unsalted cracker. Green apples are there again. Mild hop bitterness but no real hop character. No aroma or flavour, just a flat bitterness. Feels light and crisp, though perhaps a bit thin. Still inoffensive enough to finish quickly, or maybe I'm just afraid of it warming up.

mintjellie, Sep 02, 2010
Photo of spinrsx
2.68/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

500ml Can

Appearance – Clear yellow colour with an average size fizzy white coloured head. There is an above average amount of carbonation showing and there is almost no lacing. The head lasted for around 4 minutes before it was gone.

Smell - Grains, bread, corn, malts, floral notes

Taste & Mouth - The beer has an average amount of carbonation. I can taste malts and very light hops mixed with corn. There are also some floral notes and a bit of a metallic flavour. It ends with a corny yet floral aftertaste.

Overall – I actually found this beer to be kind of harsh tasting. It's got a lot of corn/adjunct taste and it really doesn't taste refreshing.. which is one of the main qualities I look for in a beer like this one. I wouldn't buy it again.

spinrsx, Oct 25, 2011
Photo of JohnnyBarman
2.7/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Can picked up at the local LCBO at the recommendation of my Romanian friend. He pronounced it "Tchook" - file that under 'useful'!

Poured into a tall lager glass. Very pale golden, but with a decent frothy head that retained itself fairly well. A few flecks of lacing. Actually, doesn't look too bad.

Nose is quite potent: corn, bitter hops, lemon, bread, maybe a touch of tart white wine or apple juice. Certainly more complex than most Euro lagers at the LCBO.

Taste is extremely corny, with a strong chemical flavor that gets progressively worse as I work my way through it. An incredibly sour, almost acetic taste in the background. Fortunately the bitter hop character is more respectable in the finish, helping things out a little and preventing things from getting too sweet. Still, not very pleasant to drink.

Decent body, slightly under-carbonated.

Ciuc has flavour, I'll give it that. With a bit of tweaking, this might actually be a good beer. However the strong chemical-sour flavor and strong presence of corn are huge turnoffs here. Only pick this one up of you want to cross another country off your all-time list.

JohnnyBarman, Sep 27, 2010
Photo of biegaman
2.7/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

It always astonishes me how these mass-producers lagers can be so foul smelling, insipid tasting, loaded up with preservatives and fillers and yet look so damn appealing. Its straw yellow colour has the faintest of fogginess, an almost imperceptible green tinge and is topped with a milky white froth - Ciuc is far from perfect but it still looks it.

The aroma, of course, is another matter altogether. While it is nowhere near the worst canned, exported offender it is nevertheless tarnished with the distinguishably odd smell of soured cooked vegetables (especially corn) and a heavy green apple twang. It's by no means a natural, familiar odour and consequently mustered quite a bit of my attention.

If, for whatever reason, you didn't believe me when I told you that most industrial brewers dilute their beers with chemicals and cheap adjuncts, try a few sips of this and see for yourself that the proof is in the pudding. This tastes of canned sweetcorn mulled in vinegar. I almost wish I hadn't paid enough attention to notice that, now it's all I taste.

That unusual sourish element, combined with a perceived high carbonation, makes each sip feel as though you're licking an envelope. In a sense, however, it actually improves the beer's scores because it hides a lot of the cloying sweetness and unpalatable corny taste and, somehow, oddly enough, the beer comes out of it drinking pretty average.

I end this review as I began it, wondering how a beer that looks so seemingly refreshing and clean can taste so befouled and off-putting. To paraphrase E.B. White, analyzing a beer is sometimes like dissecting a frog - few people are interested and the frog dies of it. I probably would have enjoyed Ciuc more if I just thought a little less hard about it. If you buy some, be sure to turn your brain (and sense of smell and taste buds) off.

biegaman, Sep 05, 2010
Photo of drpimento
2.7/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Poured from a can bought last night at a non-stop kiosk with a nice foamy, frothy head and some lace. Very pale yellow color. Ligtht super light aroma of baer. Watery. Mild. Not much other than the head and lace. Almost no character. What finish? Go elsewhere if possible.

drpimento, Jul 26, 2008
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ciuc Premium from Miercurea Ciuc (Brau Union Romania)
68 out of 100 based on 52 ratings.