Ciuc Premium - Miercurea Ciuc (Brau Union Romania)
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 51 | Reviews: 28 | Display Reviews Only:
3.28/5 rDev +18%
Poured a two finger fluffy white head upon a uric hued body, little retention but nice sticky patchy lacing.
Smell and taste is Grassy hops, hay, mineral water,cardboard. Faint lemon note.
Light bodied, some carbonation, very smooth creamy mouthfeel for the style. Slightly bitter without too much sweetness.
Much better than I expected. Always the risk of that pale euro trash lager taste when it comes from a can at the lcbo, however this brew was a pleasant surprise although it is not spectacular by any means.
03-02-2012 20:33:44 | More by Stocean1
3.35/5 rDev +20.5%
Green 12 oz. from a wraparound cardboard six pack. Best by 04/05/12, so it's still in code.
Served in a narrow fluted stange glass.
High clarity pale gold, languidly rising champagne streams of carbonation, dense layer of creamy whipped foam that lasts for a good five minutes, and leaves webs of lacing in the glass.
Lightly sweet biscuit and dry hay aroma, spring water minerals.
Crisp and light, a vague noble hop grassiness lending a flash of bitterness in the aftertaste. Fairly smooth and supple in the middle, barely there flavors of cracker, honey, and dried field grasses. It's crisp cleanliness is the best thing going for it, the flavor is just average with no flaws for the style.
First Romanian beer I think... nope, Timisoreana was.
02-18-2012 21:36:31 | More by emerge077
2.28/5 rDev -18%
Can from the LCBO, 500ml into a stange. Best before July 27, 2012.
Pours a crystal clear golden yellow, so clear the I was actually able to read the text from the ingredients list on the can through the beer. Loose and transient white head, leaving a collar and no head. Nose has some weak hop notes, a bit of corn and come assorted cereals. A general sweetness about it. Taste has some run of the mill malt sweetness with some adjunct notes, some odd metallic notes and a weird hop flavour and bitterness in the finish. Feel is pretty light, with a medium low carbonation. Little to no flavour all around, and that which exists is downright boring - yet, this beer avods being truly offensive. On the plus side, this is fairly easy to consume. Fill a funnel or something with this one...
11-03-2011 14:16:20 | More by liamt07
2.68/5 rDev -3.6%
Appearance – Clear yellow colour with an average size fizzy white coloured head. There is an above average amount of carbonation showing and there is almost no lacing. The head lasted for around 4 minutes before it was gone.
Smell - Grains, bread, corn, malts, floral notes
Taste & Mouth - The beer has an average amount of carbonation. I can taste malts and very light hops mixed with corn. There are also some floral notes and a bit of a metallic flavour. It ends with a corny yet floral aftertaste.
Overall – I actually found this beer to be kind of harsh tasting. It's got a lot of corn/adjunct taste and it really doesn't taste refreshing.. which is one of the main qualities I look for in a beer like this one. I wouldn't buy it again.
10-25-2011 16:16:52 | More by spinrsx
United Kingdom (England)
3.45/5 rDev +24.1%
A man at the shop said this is a good beer, so I bought it. Ingredients: water, barley malt, hops. Off to a good start.
The beer pours a very nice, crystal-clear golden color. The head is there, but a bit sad, and it soon dissipates into a rather ugly, frothy white scum. Mineral and slightly sulfuric aroma, but not in a skunky way... more in, like, a rusty pipe way. It smells not good. In the flavor, it is still way too metallic, but it also has a surprisingly rich, sweet, fresh malt flavor and a good smack of floral, resinous hops that lingers on for a moreish finish. Not bad at all, really. A pleasant surprise.
10-07-2011 17:07:30 | More by soulgrowl
United Kingdom (England)
2.3/5 rDev -17.3%
Had both from bottle and on tap in various bars during a tour of Romania in July 2011. Pours pale gold,lively head, little if no aroma - grassy, dry. Taste is thin, highly carbonated, acid, dry, all the things expected from Euro lager from a big brewery of the area. I guess it seems refreshing if served well chilled on a hot summer day, but would not have it again. Incidently, the name is pronounced CHuish if you really need to know!
B'ham UK 2011
08-01-2011 18:03:49 | More by JohnW
2.83/5 rDev +1.8%
Pours a clear golden colour with a soapy white head that leaves a bit of lace and settles as a collared film.
Extremely sweet aroma, but more like a caramel that standard corn syrup. Also very fresh and grainy, quite appealing.
After that nose, the taste falls quite flat. Slight sweet maltiness and a hint of toasted grain, but very little else. No noticeable weird, gross or adjunct tastes though, so that's a plus.
It has a sort of creamy mouthfeel at first, but it literally tastes like water with a can hint on the finish. Fairly crisp and dry though at least.
Well it smells decent and sure is easy drinkin', but rather unsatisfying all around. Would be good ice cold on a hot day, but I won't be going back for more.
05-02-2011 19:25:32 | More by bryehn
3.2/5 rDev +15.1%
500ml can poured into a pint glass.
A - Poured a clear golden yellow with minimal head. Some lacing.
S - Sweet malts with bready notes and some grass.
T - Sweet malts, hint of citrus, bitter finish with isn't strong but lingers.
M - Average carbonation, smooth, some stickiness, crisp finish.
D - Drinkable but a bit weak for a Pilsner.
04-22-2011 01:14:31 | More by decimator
3/5 rDev +7.9%
Picked up a bottle at EuroMarket in Queens. After noticing on the label that this was a Heineken beer, I had trouble distinguishing the taste of Ciuc from Holland's finest. As this warmed, however, a sharp peppery hop note became apparent. The basic creamy malt was unchanged that kick of Euro hops certainly qualifies this as a legit pilsner. The aroma is uninspired with metallic hints of skunk. It's not a bad beer, but not a great pilsner.
04-07-2011 03:34:14 | More by tempest
4.13/5 rDev +48.6%
11.2 oz green twist off bottle. It came covered for the most part in paper and it is pretty fresh (best before 16/08/11) and the store was nice and dark.
It pours a pale gold with a foamy right white head, typical of the style. It has above average lacing though.
The smell is thankfully not skunked, it has a nice bready malt presence and some super grassy hops.
The first thing I noticed was it actually started out pretty full bodied for a pilsener, then it mellowed out with a super dry finish. It has enough flavor, it straddles the line between a generic Euro pale lager and a pilsener. But it is well balanced, the malt is bready and almost papery and the hops have a nice tang, pretty much lime zest, and a surprising bitterness right in the finish. This a noble hop bomb and I like that a ton.
I really like the drinkability and mouthfeel, and that will certainly bump this one up.
01-17-2011 03:42:31 | More by crossovert
3.23/5 rDev +16.2%
The beer pours a pale golden colour, very clear and luminous. A massive pure white head crowns this lasting quite well with respectable lacing.
High effervescence pushes grassy hop scents to the for. Wet leaves and sulphurous notes add to the character. Aromas of a grain store come to mind in the malt.
Bitter up front very green hop flavours that are fairly mild. Bready gram cracker malt give good body and rounds out the flavour well. A stale baguette taste mixes with the other malt flavours. A crisp hoppy finish round out the profile.
The body is very light and highly carbonated.
This one is slightly a cut about a lot of the bland euro lagers we are inundated with here. I certainly wouldn't categorize it as a pilsner though.
12-07-2010 17:57:55 | More by Reinheitsgebot71
2.88/5 rDev +3.6%
A - Clear straw with a fairly solid head of foam.
S - Not much here at all. Light grass... maybe.
T - Green, raw bitterness and a bit of a husky grain. Moderate sweetness. Bitterness in aftertaste is long-lasting.
M - Significant astringency and overall light body. Carbonation is on the low side.
D - Fairly drinkable, but a bit rough.
11-04-2010 01:08:07 | More by allergictomacros
2.7/5 rDev -2.9%
Can picked up at the local LCBO at the recommendation of my Romanian friend. He pronounced it "Tchook" - file that under 'useful'!
Poured into a tall lager glass. Very pale golden, but with a decent frothy head that retained itself fairly well. A few flecks of lacing. Actually, doesn't look too bad.
Nose is quite potent: corn, bitter hops, lemon, bread, maybe a touch of tart white wine or apple juice. Certainly more complex than most Euro lagers at the LCBO.
Taste is extremely corny, with a strong chemical flavor that gets progressively worse as I work my way through it. An incredibly sour, almost acetic taste in the background. Fortunately the bitter hop character is more respectable in the finish, helping things out a little and preventing things from getting too sweet. Still, not very pleasant to drink.
Decent body, slightly under-carbonated.
Ciuc has flavour, I'll give it that. With a bit of tweaking, this might actually be a good beer. However the strong chemical-sour flavor and strong presence of corn are huge turnoffs here. Only pick this one up of you want to cross another country off your all-time list.
09-27-2010 19:50:32 | More by JohnnyBarman
2.78/5 rDev 0%
Pours a very pale yellow colour with nice white head and some small lacing around the glass. Aroma smells of faint grain and some very mild grassy hops. Flavour is quite clean with a tinge of bitterness. Almost no aftertaste, possibly because there isn't much of a taste in the first place. Carbonation is nice though.
09-24-2010 16:45:11 | More by kwjd
2.7/5 rDev -2.9%
It always astonishes me how these mass-producers lagers can be so foul smelling, insipid tasting, loaded up with preservatives and fillers and yet look so damn appealing. Its straw yellow colour has the faintest of fogginess, an almost imperceptible green tinge and is topped with a milky white froth - Ciuc is far from perfect but it still looks it.
The aroma, of course, is another matter altogether. While it is nowhere near the worst canned, exported offender it is nevertheless tarnished with the distinguishably odd smell of soured cooked vegetables (especially corn) and a heavy green apple twang. It's by no means a natural, familiar odour and consequently mustered quite a bit of my attention.
If, for whatever reason, you didn't believe me when I told you that most industrial brewers dilute their beers with chemicals and cheap adjuncts, try a few sips of this and see for yourself that the proof is in the pudding. This tastes of canned sweetcorn mulled in vinegar. I almost wish I hadn't paid enough attention to notice that, now it's all I taste.
That unusual sourish element, combined with a perceived high carbonation, makes each sip feel as though you're licking an envelope. In a sense, however, it actually improves the beer's scores because it hides a lot of the cloying sweetness and unpalatable corny taste and, somehow, oddly enough, the beer comes out of it drinking pretty average.
I end this review as I began it, wondering how a beer that looks so seemingly refreshing and clean can taste so befouled and off-putting. To paraphrase E.B. White, analyzing a beer is sometimes like dissecting a frog - few people are interested and the frog dies of it. I probably would have enjoyed Ciuc more if I just thought a little less hard about it. If you buy some, be sure to turn your brain (and sense of smell and taste buds) off.
09-05-2010 22:42:24 | More by biegaman
2.6/5 rDev -6.5%
Deep golden coloured. Head is eggshell white, thin, and poorly retained. Doesn't lace. Bready aroma with mild green apple and even milder hopping. Mild residual sweetness comes through in the flavour. Unsalted cracker. Green apples are there again. Mild hop bitterness but no real hop character. No aroma or flavour, just a flat bitterness. Feels light and crisp, though perhaps a bit thin. Still inoffensive enough to finish quickly, or maybe I'm just afraid of it warming up.
09-02-2010 14:22:50 | More by mintjellie
2.55/5 rDev -8.3%
Can: Clear gold, disappearing head, poor lacing, over carbonated.
Aroma is faint but there is some graininess indicating pasrtial malt beer.
Watery mouth feel, extract sweetness, gristed malt biscuit tone is obliterated by over boiled hops and massive carbonation.
Better than the Turkish abortion in a bottle I just sampled but not by much. Partial extract beer with an annoying hop signature achieved with either over boiling or hop essence over amping.
08-14-2010 19:29:27 | More by pootz
3.48/5 rDev +25.2%
A: Dull golden yellow. Small head.
S: Barely maltier than hoppy. Hints of flowers.
T: Sour lemon, dirty in a nice way, neutral.
M; Sandy, grainy, with a medium body.
D: Inoffensive, I found nothing wrong with this beer, yet it's not outstanding at all.
05-10-2010 02:47:46 | More by sfprint
3.08/5 rDev +10.8%
First off, let me say that I'm very surprised to see Ciuc listed as a Czech Pilsener. I had it many times during my stay in Romania (which lasted from July 24th to August 1st), and never noted any spiciness, oiliness, or even pronounced bitterness for that matter. I would guess that this is either a Euro Pale Lager (or something similar), or the brewers are really missing the mark.
Review written from notes.
Served in a .4L Ciuc mug.
Appearance: Clear and light gold with active-looking carbonation. The white, foamy head on top retains pretty well and drags nice wispy lacing.
Smell: Leafy hops and Munich malt. Light, but well-balanced.
Taste: Sweet malt, grains, and grass. As with the smell, nicely balanced. Light bitterness in the back.
Mouthfeel: Light and malty with enough carbonation to stimulate the palate without stinging it. A tad creamy and a tad oily; not too clean.
Drinkability: This became my go-to light beer in Romania. Not quite as easy to find as Ursus, Timisoreana, and others, but defnitely a cut above. Order this if you're ever in the area.
08-02-2009 00:17:54 | More by ThreeWiseMen
2.7/5 rDev -2.9%
Poured from a can bought last night at a non-stop kiosk with a nice foamy, frothy head and some lace. Very pale yellow color. Ligtht super light aroma of baer. Watery. Mild. Not much other than the head and lace. Almost no character. What finish? Go elsewhere if possible.
07-26-2008 18:13:23 | More by drpimento
3.13/5 rDev +12.6%
Can sampled from Fidelio Supermarket, Iaşi, Romania.
Pours a very pale, clear blonde colour. Excellent meringuey head, however, which has great retention and leaves excellent lacing. Carbonation is fine and plentiful.
Bit of sweaty socks on the nose, hint of cut grass, but with a tempered hoppy character to anchor it within the realms of decency. It's not amazing on the nose, but it's not bad.
Taste is slightly sweet, with a surprising sesame seed character first up, followed by a slight drying hoppiness, and a very weak diminished back palate. To be honest, it's pretty drinkable, and pretty decent, even though it doesn't have all the right characters there.
Not bad by any means - it's probably unlikely to win any awards, but as a choice for a six-pack when you're stuck in Romania, it probably makes a decent option.
05-23-2008 01:37:06 | More by lacqueredmouse
2.3/5 rDev -17.3%
(Served in a strange)
A- This beer pours a crystal clear yellow body with a sea of carbonation. This beer has a thick white head that last and last.
S- This beer has a slight sweet pale malt note with a sulfur and noble bitterness.
T- This beer has a light dry carbonic acid flavor that finishes in a bitterness from Noble hops.
M- This beer has a light mouthfeel and a carbonic bite.
D- Another pale dry malt beer with noble bitterness that is not very interesting or tasty.
06-25-2006 02:50:12 | More by rhoadsrage
Ciuc Premium from Miercurea Ciuc (Brau Union Romania)
68 out of 100 based on 51 ratings.