Dismiss Notice
Sneak peek! BeerAdvocate magazine #104 (September 2015) featuring Leah & Oscar from Highland Brewing in Asheville, North Carolina. Learn more ...
Dismiss Notice
Subscribe to our newsletter and get the latest BeerAdvocate updates delivered to your inbox.

Beatification - Russian River Brewing Company

Not Rated.
BeatificationBeatification

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
98
world-class

516 Reviews
THE BROS
-
no score

(Send Samples)
Reviews: 516
Hads: 2,317
rAvg: 4.44
pDev: 8.11%
Wants: 3,085
Gots: 487 | FT: 29
Brewed by:
Russian River Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Wild Ale |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: hopsaplenty on 01-25-2006

No notes at this time.
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
firstprev| 451-475 | 476-500 | 501-525  | next → last
Reviews: 516 | Hads: 2,317
Photo of bennetj17
4.35/5  rDev -2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 5 | overall: 4.5

Batch 001. Light sunny orange color, with minor haziness. Frothy light head is about half-inch and is well sustained. Nice streaming carbonation visible. Spotty lace remained. Sour apple and pear in the nose, just a really funky tart aroma all around, acidic, vinegar-like. The taste is intensely sour and it immediately begins to dry out through the finish leaving only a touch of bitterness. Light hints of apple, lemon and orange fruit present, with a mild woody taste. Part way through the glass the flavor softens a bit and is very easily drinkable. Sharp carbonation and a light body, there is a superb fluffy/creamy mouthfeel. This and the PH1 are both great offerings. Highly recommended... (698 characters)

Photo of meathookjones
4.65/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 5 | overall: 5

Batch 001.

Pours out a murky orange with a fizzy tall white head of foam. The head stayed together awhile leaving rings of lace around the glass. Funky brett yeast notes come on pretty strong with a nice mix of fruit sweetness and a balancing light tartness. Some woody notes are in the mix as well. The flavor kicks off with some tart fruit and a light sweetness. Funky yeast and notes of wood add a nice depth of complexity. Lingering tart fruitness lingers at the finish. Well carbonated body and quite refreshing. Really drinkable stuff as well, almost too much so. I wish it was a 750ml bottle or bigger. A very unique and delicious beer that I would love to have available all the time. (695 characters)

Photo of Bighuge
4.42/5  rDev -0.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Batch 001-PH1.

Slightly hazed light copper. The big bubbly off white head fizzes away quickly and the remnant collar leaves sparse amounts of lace behind. Carbonation doesn't LOOK to be as jacked up in this one compared to the 001. Aroma is a little more pronounced than the 001. Some barnyard funk and more discernible brett characteristics on the nose. Even a little horse blanket smell. Bone dry feel again in the mouth. Medium bodied. Acidic and tart. Carbonation is not quite as spritzy as the 001, but still nice. Maybe a little bit more of an "airy" feel to it. The acidity and tartness are a little more agressive here compared to 001. Nice bite to it. The funk is more pronounced on the palate and it's pretty damn nice. Fruitiness isn't quite as noticeable compared to 001. I'm not one of those guys that lives and dies for Wild Ales and lambics and sour beers, etc... But this shit is addictive. I'm liking them more and more, but maybe that's 'cuz I'm getting the best of the best here.

Thanks again to Darren for the sample. MUCH appreciated. (1,062 characters)

Photo of GClarkage
4.83/5  rDev +8.8%
look: 5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

08/11/06- Purchased by mail order direct from Russian River Brewery in Santa Rosa, CA.

Presentation- Batch 001-PH1. 375ml (12.7oz) bottle which was caged and corked. Poured into an oversized wine glass.

Appearance- Opens with a loud pop and pours with furious carbonation. The loudest talking beer I have ever heard. The carbonation was just screaming. Poured into a huge ass wine goblet, maybe 22oz capacity. Filled close to the top at pour and settled down at about a 1/4 inch of a spitzy yet slight creamy looking top. Quite lovely cobwebs and small chunks of lace leftover in the aftermath.

Smell- Bits of stinky horse blanket and musty barn and moth balls. You know this one will be a sour one upon the taste. Sour overripe fruits appear after the cork pops.

Taste- Pretty much pure decadence. Combines the flavor of several of my favorite styles of beer. Has a NB Love flavor (which makes sense as it was aged in those barrels). Has a nice Flanders Ale quality....liked to Goudenband and even has that nice barnyard Fantome-esque flavor. Sour, but about the perfect acidic level fruits rush around. Lemon rind, maybe some cherries and raspberries. All combine to make you crave that next sip.

Mouthfeel- A tad bit highly carbonated and gaseous, but not too much as to hinder drinking. Sweet and sour aftertaste that lasts just long enough to tempt you for that next sip.

Drinkability- Well, I timed this one about perfect. Sat here on an early evening night in Broadview, Montana...nothing but vast farmland as far as the eyes can see. A few antelope over here, a few partridges over there and a cow or two mooing in the background...not to mention the bats starting to fly into the barn and the two hoot-owls going at it. Ahhh, all this in the middle of a thunderstorm. Review #999 and taking a 8 month or so beer respite as of bedtime this Sunday....only have a Dreadnaught in waiting for my last beer in my self imposed beer break due to my wife's pregnancy. This was about the perfect beer today. Great taste, incredibly refreshing due to the higher humidity today. Russian River scores again. Vinnie...thanks for making one of my last brews for a while a memorable one. Extreme highest of recommendation!! (2,235 characters)

Photo of Skidz
4.55/5  rDev +2.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 5 | overall: 4.5

Pours out pale yellow and sits bright gold in the glass with a waivering white head. Fades to a thin skimming over the surface with some decent lacings.

Smells sour and perky, very dominant Brett and Ped characteristics. Tart and shiny apples, light, puckering grapes. A very clean aroma, void of much mustiness, a delicate appearance.

Tastes powerfully sour at first contact. Under-ripened grapes and crab apples form the fruit body. Mild acidity and a pungent, near citric, soury sweetness pulled over any form of malt flavor, making this most akin to a sparkling sauvignon blanc. But to hell with wine, this blows it all away. A tight, crisp finish with mild bitterness caps it all off.

Crisp, with ever-so-tiny bits of carbonation, moderate overall, and a medium-light body.

This is fantastic. It's nice to find such a high quality sour beer being produced in the States. Too bad it doesn't find it's way out of CA, unless if I have agents working for me while on vacation. Just spectacular. (1,007 characters)

Photo of ggaughan
4.85/5  rDev +9.2%
look: 5 | smell: 5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

I had previously sampled Beatification at the RR Brewpub in October of 2005, straight from the barrel and again in January of this year at a RR dinner at Monk's Cafe but this is my first review of this fine beer from the bottle.

Batch 001 (PH1) is waiting patiently in my cellar.

The beer poured a nice brilliant hazy straw color with a bit of a white head that didn't last very long and gave way to a good ring around the glass and strong lacing. The aroma of the beer definitely had the characterstics of where it was aged, in an oak barrel, but it was not overpowering. Notes of cherry and other fruit. The taste was very impressive, tart and acidic and a bit of funkiness but not overbearing, just perfectly complimenting each other. The taste lingered in the mouth for awhile and did have a bit of a dry champagne burn to it which I like in a beer. There is a lingering sweetness to this beer that is very pleasant and I just can't get enough of.

It would be interesting to taste this along side Redemption which is where this started and also with the PH1 to test the subtle differences in each. Vinnie and Natalie hit this one out of the park as they do with so many of their beers. A real winner, too bad there is not much of this out there. (1,259 characters)

Photo of hopsaplenty
4.38/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

375ml smoked green bottle, batch 001.

The cork releases with a loud pop and the neck starts to fill with slowly building foam.

Hazy peach core with sunlight highlights at the margins. Short, loose packed head of small soft eggshell bubbles that crackles as it slowly settles leaving a tall collar and a thick cap. Intertwined lines of meandering carbonation mix with fine lines of racing bubbles. The aroma is filled with tartness and just a hint of funkiness. There is some blossomy sweetness paired with barrel notes. A wonderful tartness with an acidic edge opens things, filled with plenty of brett essence. There is a delectable sweet element that intermingles with a gently wood note. Bright and sharp with a delicate, sweetly tart underpinning. The finish is pleasingly edgy and with a prolonged dryness which makes this compelling. There is a sense of balance here, but it is still a bit brash. Medium body with ample peppery carbonation, there is a vibrant mouthfeel that is almost light, the dryness leaves the palate clean. In a word: fantastic. I could not put my glass down. This was simply a spectacular beer and I am looking forward to the PH-1 waiting down in the cellar.

A homerun by Vinnie and Natalie and the rest of the RR crew. (1,257 characters)

Photo of alyankus
4.85/5  rDev +9.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 5

While I'd normally take obsessive notes to "properly" review this beer few tasting notes would do this brew any justice. This is quite simply the greatest beer I've ever tasted. The lenghth and breadth of flavor are intense ranging from cheesy to yeasty to oaky notes with hints of citrus fruits and spice throughout. Forgive the wine analogy but it's like Salon, Krug Clos de Mesnil, and a Flemish sour ale got freaky together and this is their love child. It displays all of the strengths of their parents without any of the detractions. It has the cleansing sourness of the Flemish ale, the cheesiness of Salon and the nuttyness of Krug all harmoiniusly balanced within its beery goodness. The only problem is that the bottle at 375ml is too small for a second serving. For a first batch (was there a test?) this is a resounding success. Bravo Russian River for an extremely amazing brew.
edit:This was batch 001 (can't wait for more!!) (939 characters)

Photo of weeare138
4.3/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Batch PH1...
Appears a hazy, light gold with a fizzy white head that fades out.
Smell is of sour tartness, citrus, apples, oak, light cherries.
Taste is of the same aforementioned aromas.
Mouthfeel is fizzy, a bit overly carbonated, with a dry, tart, champagne like medium body. (282 characters)

Photo of Westsidethreat
4.8/5  rDev +8.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

Batch 001

A: Fizzy carbonation that I'll let chill a bit before taking a sip. The blue tinted white head has reduced to a healthy ring and wispy top. The color of the body is truly breathtaking...A vibrant dark golden hue. No visible sediment but damned if you are going to see thru this beer. Walking the line between raw and hand crafted.

S: Lemon, oak, yeast, wet hay, sourdough bread and a quite a few other aromas that most brewers try to avoid.

T: Oh my...oh my goodness. The pungent sourness is immediate and apparent. This much I expected. The exotic yeasts then lend their buttery goodness and transform the beer from a standard sour to so much more. I expected this as well but not too the level at which its achieved. An ameretto flavor pops up and displays a nutty personality that took me by surprise. From there the beer moves towards a dryer tone with the sourness and sweetness balancing then waining and the buttery brett holding strong across the palate.

M: Full bodied but a smooth but somewhat prickly carbonation.

D: These friggin guys, I swear. Where do they get off making beer like this? Who the hell do they think they are?

I think they are the best brewers in the world, but thats just me. Simply staggering. (1,254 characters)

Photo of Gueuzedude
4.62/5  rDev +4.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 4

Batch 001, Sampled July 2006
Pours with an orangish, hazy (got a bit more sediment than I thought on that pour), gold color. It is topped by a frothy, pale tan colored head that disappears fairly quickly. It is pretty well carbonated, but seems to be a bit more subdued than the PH1. As soon as I pour this beer it is apparent to my nose that this is a sour beer; tart acidic notes reach my nostrils. A lactic sourness seems to dominate, almost has that fresh grapefruit aroma that some straight Lambics pick up. Does not have much in the way of Brettanomyces character; there does seem to be a touch of musty Brett funk and perhaps a hint of urea, but that is fairly subdued. When digging around in the nose there is a dry, malty, toasted grain note almost like crackers. This does not have the funk in the aroma, or the woody notes that the batch-001 PH1 had, it is still quite nice though and reminds me of the aromatics on a batch of Girardin straight Lambic I once had in Beersel Belgium.

Dry, tart and lactic from the get go, this is actually a bit harder in its perceived acidity than the PH1. I say perceived because this beer does not have as many of the balancing notes (wood and funk come to mind), that the other batch did, so it may just seem more tart. It does remind me some of a very tart grapefruit, sour yet with a bit of fruity complexity that a lemon does not have. Hints of green apples (in fact even something that reminds of a green apple jolly rancher) and a touch of unripe pear. The finish is at first dominated by the sourness (like the rest of the beer), but picks up a touch of astringency, perhaps some tannins, a dry sort of lingering, biscuit like maltiness and even a note that reminds me of Curacao orange peel. Wonderfully easy drinking, and light on the palate, while at the same time having a sort of creamy mouthfeel to it.

While it is not as challenging or complex, I really like it for its aggressive straight forward tartness. The dominant tartness is joined by a touch of malt character, some austere fruit notes and perhaps a wisp of funk. Another characterful brew from what is fast becoming one of my absolute favorite breweries. (2,181 characters)

Photo of kmcnair
4.45/5  rDev +0.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Batch 001 - PH1, 375ml bottle, caged & corked.

Pours a hazy copper color and makes a fizzy sizzling white head. Head is rather short and fades quickly into a thin ring of medium sized bubbles.

Aroma is tart with some big sour citrus, earthy barnyard funk and vinegar.

Flavor is moderately sour with a lemony citric bite, barnyard qualities carry well into the flavor, very earthy. All hop characteristics are hidden by sour/funk. Very nicely balanced, strong acidic intensity but not overbearing.

Crisp, light bodied, very carbonated, some astringency and a very dry finish.

Quite good! (601 characters)

Photo of TheLongBeachBum
4.57/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

Batch 001-PH1.
(Brewed on 4-May-04 and Bottled on 6-Feb-06)
Primary: R.R. Belgian 2
Conditioning: White Labs White Wine

5.5%ABV

The Batch 001-PH1 is the “sister brew” to the Batch 001, which I also tried. The principal difference is that the used La Folie barrel known as PH1 was, according to Lauren Salazar the La Folie QA & Sensory Analyst, the best of the two barrels used to age the Beatification.

The Batch 001-PH1 was sampled alongside the Batch 001 in a simple straight forward good old fashioned ‘side-by-side’ comparison.

Presentation: Exactly the same bottle as the Batch 001, like for like, the only difference, easily missed, is the fact that it is labeled as Batch 001-PH1, a reference to the above.

Appearance: Like last time, I used my Cantillon Gueuze tumbler again. For a start, the Batch 001-PH1 has a darker body, a coppery golden torso with a little more turbidity than the Batch 001. A starker contrast between the two was immediately evident before the first sip though, the head retention is dramatically reduced in the Batch 001-PH1. The head dies down quickly and leaves only a broken covering which very quickly rescinds to nothing, the surface only punctuated with an explosion of rising bubbles like farts in the bath. Whilst the Batch 001 looks Gueuze like, the Batch 001-PH1 is more like a 1 year old straight lambic.

Nose: Harder to quantify but it has a distinctly sharper aroma, cutting acidic character with a drier tartness in the finish.

Taste: The nose provides plenty of insight into the differences. The Batch 001-PH1 has a more aggressive feel, the softness in the Batch 001 is gone and replaced with a scorched middle, acerbic finish scrapes a little. Ending is shorter lived too I found.

Mouthfeel: Lower carbonation and a harsher feel on the palate, the woody nature adds more texture but it feels a rougher than the Batch 001. Big feel though and a solid presence.

Drinkability: Not much difference the two, they are not exactly alike in the drinkabilty stakes but they are both *very* appealing brews. I found the Bacth 001-PH1 incredibly drinkable despite the small differences with the Batch 001.

Overall: Differences between Batch 001 and Batch 001-PH1 are easily noted in appearance, but the changes in the nose and taste comparison are a little bit more subtle, but they are there. Batch 001-PH1 is the harsher of the two variants, higher in acidity and sharpness, it will be interesting to follow the aging of both versions, and I suspect the PH1 will flag first.

A great beer nonetheless, but Batch 001 takes it over the slightly more expensive ($1 more per 375cl bottle) Batch 001-PH1 for my money. (2,695 characters)

Photo of SethB2
4.67/5  rDev +5.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Batch 01. I have the PH too, to sample later.

Poured from a bottle into a pint glass.

A - Orangish, apricot color with a pilowy head that disipates fairly quickly. Well carbonated. Just a swirl of the glass with put more foam on top.

S - First, let me start by saying that I could smell this thing as soon as the cork popped from over two feet away. Smells of funky apples, almost ciderish, with subtle fruits in the background. The Bret is there too, bringing a vinegar quality to it as well. Great stuff.

T - Sour apples start, but very soon the earthy flavors push them out of the way. At the finish, this baby will make you pucker, while at the same time reminding you of a sweet Belgian. It is very difficult to describe and I'm not sure I've ever tasted anything like this. I like it a lot, however. Very unique.

M - Maybe a tad overcarbonated and a little thin, but I suppose that is OK for this wide-open style. As one would guess, this is a very dry beer, but in a good way.

D - Not a problem. I love it. (1,031 characters)

Photo of Callenak
4.76/5  rDev +7.2%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 5

I tasted both the 001 and the PH1 side by side to see how they matched up together. The differences are subtle but they are there. If you were to taste them a couple weeks apart, you probably wouldn't be able to decipher any differences though.

001
Pours a nice golden color. A distinct murkiness to it. Beautiful white head on it that never goes away.

Not to much on the nose. Definitely get the tartness and the carbonation. Smells of oak and fruitiness.

Incredible tasting beer. Of course the tartness hits you first. But not overpowering. I've had a hand few sour beers, and the tartness on this one was by far the most balanced. Not like the Cuvee Rene that your puckering for 10 minutes after you drink it. Oak flavoring, but not to powerful either. A slight taste of cherries too.

PH1
Of course many similarities between the two. The major differences though, are it pours slightly darker than the 001. Side by side, you can tell. The PH1 seems to have more initial carbonation, but does not keep the head retention of the 001. Not much difference in the nose between the two. The PH1 has a more profound tartness to it. Stays on the tongue much longer than the 001. A longer, more sourer, aftertaste.

I may be in the minority on this, but I preferred the 001 over the PH1. They are both absolutely amazing beers, and I do enjoy sour beers. I just preferred the fact that sourness dissipated on the tongue quicker on the 001 than the PH1, allowing you to pull the other amazing flavors from the beer. I've had a pretty wide selection of Russian River beers, and besides the Pliny's, this has been by far my favorite to come from them. You'd do well to try and get some of these. (1,702 characters)

Photo of objectivemonkey
4.48/5  rDev +0.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

My notes were a little messy here, but I'm sure htis is the right beer.

Pours a lovely gold with a lingering white head. Having a hard time picking out this aroma ... cherries? Nice aroma though. Taste is delicious and lingering and a highly drinkable beer.

Not many notes on this, but it was freakin good. (313 characters)

firstprev| 451-475 | 476-500 | 501-525  | next → last
Beatification from Russian River Brewing Company
98 out of 100 based on 516 ratings.