1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

333 Premium Export Beer - Saigon Beer Company

Not Rated.
333 Premium Export Beer333 Premium Export Beer

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
64
poor

39 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 39
Reviews: 18
rAvg: 2.44
pDev: 24.59%
Wants: 1
Gots: 3 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Saigon Beer Company visit their website
Viet Nam

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.90% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: soulgrowl on 09-29-2006)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 39 | Reviews: 18 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by Poupae:
Photo of Poupae
2.75/5  rDev +12.7%

Poupae, Mar 28, 2013
More User Reviews:
Photo of intoxabroad
2.25/5  rDev -7.8%

intoxabroad, Oct 08, 2012
Photo of Foulon
2.5/5  rDev +2.5%

Foulon, Jan 04, 2013
Photo of lzepplin01
2/5  rDev -18%

lzepplin01, May 15, 2014
Photo of BodyPolitic
2.5/5  rDev +2.5%

BodyPolitic, Oct 05, 2014
Photo of BlackHaddock
3.6/5  rDev +47.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

330ml can brought home by my parents (from a world cruise) along with a few other goodies.

Poured into a Konig-Pilsner glass on 13th May 2012.

Looked like any other lager/pilsner style beer: golden bright, clean and clear with a white head of tight bubbles.

No smell and semi-sweet in taste; different to what I expected: easy to drink and just what I needed after cutting the grass and doing some ironing.

BlackHaddock, May 13, 2012
Photo of Chegui
1/5  rDev -59%

Chegui, May 14, 2013
Photo of Globetrotter
2.13/5  rDev -12.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Hand-delivered from Vietnam to Austria (thanks, Shannon!), the can features a black and gold oval filled with red behind the white numbers 333. Ingredients include both rice and "houbion," (a substance neither I nor google is familiar with). Best before 10/16/09, I opened it on 3/7/09.

Pours a predictable pale yellow straw under a misty white 1/2 finger head that fades completely quite quickly. The nose has a sickly sweet, raspberry like tone. The mouth is light and very well-carbonated. The taste lacks malt, while the hops a very acidic and rusty bitter. The raspberry is still there, but in the taste it seems as if there is too much stem, not enough berry. The aftertaste is earwax bitter. Not a very good experience (although I've had much worse beers...).

Globetrotter, Mar 07, 2009
Photo of bostonryan
2/5  rDev -18%

bostonryan, Jan 30, 2012
Photo of Tweekers237
3/5  rDev +23%

Tweekers237, Jun 20, 2014
Photo of WHROO
3.28/5  rDev +34.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Poured straw yellow, clear 2 fingerhead, quickly died tho. Big beaded carbonation
S: Straw, grassy, hay notes. Little of that eggy lager aroma too.
T: Ricey, touch malty, only a hint of tropical fruity sweetness. Zero bitterness
M: Crisp & clean. Be quite nice over a meal.
D: Just enough sweet malts to keep interested, any bitterness would have been good, classic Asian Rice beer. Don't expect much flavour.

WHROO, Oct 14, 2008
Photo of fizzy
2.85/5  rDev +16.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Drank a "ton" of this along with Saigon Red and Green a couple of weeks ago on a trip to Ho Chi Minh City. I mean, really, what would somebody expect of a beer made in Vietnam, in a brewery designed by some European, made of imported ingredients, no history dating back centuries? On the other hand, in a town of dust, noise, excitement, color, great food, great people, great adventure, the "333" went down like heaven and I refuse to give this beer the dank review so many of my friendly "craft" quaffers gave it.

fizzy, Feb 09, 2011
Photo of threedaggers
2/5  rDev -18%

threedaggers, Feb 06, 2014
Photo of Hexley
3.5/5  rDev +43.4%

Hexley, Oct 06, 2014
Photo of Joel12
2/5  rDev -18%

Joel12, Jun 02, 2012
Photo of Oakenator
2.75/5  rDev +12.7%

Oakenator, Apr 16, 2014
Photo of WanderingFool
2.88/5  rDev +18%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

A friend of mine received a few bottles of 333 from a guy he knows who traveled to asia. The beer is a typical macro lager. It pours a clear pale yellow color with a fizzy white head on top. The fizz dissolves quickly leaving a couple spots of lace on the glass. A mild aroma of rice and honey greets you before your first sip.

The beer was thin bodied and very easy to drink. Its flavor had some notes of honey, corn and rice. Nothing offensive. For a faint tasting, macro lager it wasn't too bad. It tasted all natural to me and didn't leave behind any strange after tastes.

WanderingFool, Oct 15, 2006
Photo of CuriousMonk
2.03/5  rDev -16.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

From notes at Old Chicago (2001): Poured from can into pint glass. bottle is the best thing about this beer. I was expecting something a little more exoctic, but alas, another one-dimensional pale lager sits in my glass. Pale yellow pour with a wispy white head that vanishes upon first sip. Subtle nose of hay and corn syrup. The body starts with a healthy dose of diacytel, backed by some grassy hops. Umm, not much to say. Drinks watery and offers little in the way of enjoyable attributes.

CuriousMonk, Feb 09, 2011
Photo of sd123
2.5/5  rDev +2.5%

sd123, Jun 01, 2012
Photo of BucBasil
3.64/5  rDev +49.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Poured from the 330mL can into a standard pint glass at a Vietnamese restaurant in Shanghai China.

A: The beer is a pure golden color with lots of carbonation within. 2 fingers of fluffy offwhite head. Classic looking beer.

S: Very faint. Some bready malt deep inside. Clean grassy character with light lemon on top. Good pils-ish character.

T: Beery with lots of sweet lemony zest in there. Grass and some sort of light crackery malt. Very refreshing.

F: Light body to match light character.

Overall, I could see drinking a lot of this in steamy Vietnam, or even in the oven that is Shanghai's summer. A good pale-like beer with lots of refreshing character for this corner of the world.

BucBasil, Jan 22, 2014
Photo of albern
1.35/5  rDev -44.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

Yikes, this beer is bad. One smell and you can tell that this is pretty rancid stuff. For starters, the bottle is listed as "33" so I'm not sure what happened to the final digit. The beer is a clear pale straw color, with no real head, with kind of a flat syrupy look to it. The nose is just adjunct cereal grain and the smell of poor quality processing.

This is pretty awful and undrinkable stuff. It has a zingy little tang to it but there is nothing at all salvagable here. Vietnam is not a country with a beer making tradition, so I'm not sure what happened or the history of this brewery. This import will not last long. This is just poor quality, cereal grained beer, that seems to be made on the cheap. Perhaps the novelty of Vietnamese beer will bring out the curious, but there will be many one and dones with this awful beer.

albern, Jan 10, 2010
Photo of spycow
2/5  rDev -18%

spycow, Nov 01, 2014
Photo of Joefisherman
1.5/5  rDev -38.5%

Joefisherman, Jun 24, 2012
Photo of laituegonflable
2.28/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Pours a pale straw colour with frenetic bubbling and a sinking head. Reasonably good lacing can't save an otherwise poor affair.

Very grassy, soil-esque hop with too much thick, sticky malt. Plain and simple, but fairly aromatic. Shame about the excessive sticky malt aroma.

Taste has fair amounts of malt with twiggy hops. Aftertaste is slightly sticky, with a fairly viscous mouthfeel and no tingling. A slightly carbonated edge to the flavour makes me think it should be tingly, but it isn't. Mostly simple flavour, but unpleasant sticky finish renders this not all that drinkable.

laituegonflable, May 25, 2009
Photo of lacqueredmouse
2.25/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pale gold with a thin film around the edge. Some lacing. Looks very flat and insipid. No carbonation. I don't hold out much hope.

Very unpleasant sticky-rice nose, lots of nothingness as well. Sweet, with a very light sickly note. But don't get me wrong, it's incredibly bland. Blech.

Thin, but fortunately not overly sweet on the palate. Quite clean and dry, with a light lingering bitterness. Mouthfeel is quite crisp, which is a blessing. No, it's not great, but I was expecting a lot, lot worse.

It's really not that bad when you get down to it. It's not amazing, but it's pretty clean and light. I guess I'm just pleased it doesn't have the sweet sickly character promised on the nose.

lacqueredmouse, May 24, 2009
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
333 Premium Export Beer from Saigon Beer Company
64 out of 100 based on 39 ratings.