1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Ryan Sullivan's Imperial Stout - Moylan's Brewery

Not Rated.
Ryan Sullivan's Imperial StoutRyan Sullivan's Imperial Stout

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

426 Ratings
THE BROS
67
poor

(view ratings)
Ratings: 426
Reviews: 329
rAvg: 3.86
pDev: 12.95%
Wants: 18
Gots: 12 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Moylan's Brewery visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
Russian Imperial Stout |  10.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 05-16-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Ryan Sullivan's Imperial Stout Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 426 | Reviews: 329 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Jeffo
Jeffo

Netherlands

1.48/5  rDev -61.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 1.5

Got this one at De Bierkoning in Amsterdam. What a huge mistake that was.

From a bomber into a snifter
2013 batch

APPEARANCE: Pours out clear black and yields a two finger, medium looking, creamy, tan head with great retention. Clear black body with higher levels of carbonation evident. Head fades to a full cap and clings to the sides of the glass. A splotchy wisp remains until the end and leaves dots of lacing down the glass. Decent looking.

SMELL: Anise, lightly roasted notes and a touch of dark chocolate all trying desperately to compete with the dominating aroma of rotten vegetables and cabbage. Just nasty.

TASTE: Much the same here, though the competition has basically given up. Straight up rotten vegetables and cabbage. A hint of roasted flavors and anise try initially while a faint touch of stale coffee comes out after the swallow, but none of this can save this rotten cabbage bomb. Medium strength but lingering aftertaste is very off-putting. Chocked down about 3 oz of this before Drain was called into action.

PALATE: Medium body and medium levels of carbonation. Creamy smooth on the palate, goes down smooth and finishes a touch dry. Decent feel.

OVERALL: Awful. There's no other word to describe it. They seem to have engineered the look and feel just fine, but really, how the hell did this beer win all these awards that are proudly displayed on the label? A real winner doesn't need to brag, so I guess the label is their own way of convincing themselves that it doesn't suck. Shameful. Either this was simply a bad batch or the people involved in these competitions need to give their heads a shake. I am inclined to think it's perhaps the former, so if someone gives me a different batch for free, I'll gladly take a second stab at this.

Serving type: bottle

02-24-2014 13:39:10 | More by Jeffo
Photo of brdc
brdc

Wisconsin

1.6/5  rDev -58.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Large capped bottle poured into a snifter.

Nearly pitch black, cocoa colored head disappears very fast, no lacing.
Aroma is a bit unpleasant, chocolate, but the grains seem charred, generating an acrid aroma.
Medium bodied, it tastes like burnt grains, acid and acrid, with some chocolate sweetness.
IMHO, really bad. Drainpour.

Serving type: bottle

03-22-2010 18:36:40 | More by brdc
Photo of sendbeer
sendbeer

Georgia

1.75/5  rDev -54.7%

12-03-2012 20:26:19 | More by sendbeer
Photo of smartassboiler
smartassboiler

Illinois

2/5  rDev -48.2%

12-27-2012 05:18:18 | More by smartassboiler
Photo of champ103
champ103

Texas

2.2/5  rDev -43%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A: Pours a nearly opaque black color with a little bit of ruby/brown around the edges. A tightly packed tan head rises to over two fingers with good retention. Light lace is left behind.
S: Roasted malt, acidic coffee, sour, and bitter chocolate. Lots of fusel alcohol. Harsh and over the top.
T: Burnt and charred malt. Tastes like charcoal. Acidic coffee and a bitter chocolate finish. The bitterness and a fusel ethanol drenched alcohol flavor lingers on forever.
M/D: A medium body that is way to thin for an Imperial Stout. Very harsh alcohol makes this really hard to drink.

This is not enjoyable. I was looking forward to this, but a big let down. Poorly made in my opinion. Avoid.

Serving type: bottle

05-30-2010 22:01:08 | More by champ103
Photo of rapidsequence
rapidsequence

Virginia

2.25/5  rDev -41.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

22 oz bottle.

Appearance: Black, opaque, light brown head and lots of lacing.

Smell: Roast, char, and the unpleasant, sour, vegetal graininess I get from all Moylans beers.

Taste: As with the smell, lots of char and bitter coffee grounds. More of that vegetal grain taste. Its bad.

Mouthfeel: Thinish, not impressive.

Overall: Gross, I'm dumping it out. I hate Moylans and will not buy their beer again. All their beer tastes like this.

Serving type: bottle

08-05-2011 01:40:09 | More by rapidsequence
Photo of bigbeers84
bigbeers84

Minnesota

2.5/5  rDev -35.2%

01-23-2012 05:45:41 | More by bigbeers84
Photo of Mitchster
Mitchster

Michigan

2.6/5  rDev -32.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

$6.99 for a 22oz bottle @ Merchants. Brewed with American 2-row malt, Crystal 15L and 45L, Munich, Special B, Roasted malt, Brown Malt, Chocolate malt, Black malt, and acidulated malt. Hopped with Yakima Glacier and Yakima Chinook. Fermented with White Labs #001 (Chico). 10.0% ABV, 65 IBU's, OG=1.098.

Pours out to a very deep oily black, like used motor oil, forming a nice whipped dark tan head with good retention and solid lacing. The aroma is very nice, with big raisins, prunes and figs up front, chalk, bittersweet chocolate, vanilla, and even an interesting buttery oakey note. The mouthfeel is tart, with a low carbonation, oily slickness and dense body. What promised to be a good beer is ruined by acidic kiwi fruit...there is something growing in this beer that isn't supposed to be there. Taste of nickels soaked in kiwi fruit and grapefruit juice on top of what could have been a really nice Impy stout. Bitterness is moderate and herbal, with a lingering sweetness in the back of the tongue, like brewers licorice.

Unfortunately, it appears this bottle is funky. I would love to have the brewers right here to taste this and see what they think. Not recommended.

Serving type: bottle

12-08-2010 01:33:13 | More by Mitchster
Photo of warnerry
warnerry

Michigan

2.65/5  rDev -31.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Bottle purchased about two years ago

A - Pours black with one finger of brown head. Head has pretty good retention and leaves some spotty lacing.

S - Lots of chocolate and roasted malt in the aroma, with a bit of char. Smell has a bit of sweet chocolate and mostly bittersweet chocolate.

T - The taste is a pretty big letdown after the aroma. Huge amount of char and some sourness, though it doesn't taste like infection sourness. Some dark fruits, milk chocolate and bittersweet chocolate, but covered up by the intense char and sour character. Ashy finish.

M - Even on a warm summer night, this seemed quite thin. Dry, bitter, ashy feel.

O - Started strong enough, but the taste was pretty unpleasant and the mouthfeel quite disappointing. Won't be having this again.

Serving type: bottle

07-25-2012 23:39:41 | More by warnerry
Photo of ibbjamin
ibbjamin

California

2.68/5  rDev -30.6%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Paid $4.89 for a bomber from BevMo in Willow Glen, CA. Poured into a couple snifters to share with my girlfriend.

3/4 inch dark tan semi-frothy head after an aggressive pour. Head dissipates quickly with almost no retention. Black in color. Almost no lacing.

Smells of very roasted malts. Very strong aroma. Toasted malts and alcohol present.

Roasted/toasted malts. A bit over roasted flavor. Not the best balance. Some very dark chocolate present in the aftertaste.

Full body, little carbonation. A rather watery mouthfeel for a RIS.

The price is rather high for a RIS from CA when I live here considering the quality.

Serving type: bottle

08-07-2008 03:43:57 | More by ibbjamin
Photo of BMoney575
BMoney575

Texas

2.7/5  rDev -30.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Sampled on 10-2-10

Pours very dark and 100% opaque, with a very nice brown head that leaves big chunks of lacing.

Smell is huge sweet malt, tons of booze, strong aromas of anise and molasses. Very strong, quite complex, and very intriguing.

Taste is hugely bitter and a little sour, very unexpected. The sourness is very odd, and it's all I can do the choke t down.

Mouthfeel is decent, but thinner and with more carbonation than I would expect.

Drinkability is poor, the flavor and mouthfeel are not a good combo.

Overall, maybe a bad bottle, but not good.

Serving type: bottle

10-02-2010 22:54:10 | More by BMoney575
Photo of terence
terence

California

2.75/5  rDev -28.8%

06-12-2014 01:48:04 | More by terence
Photo of antoines15
antoines15

California

2.75/5  rDev -28.8%

04-15-2012 23:58:08 | More by antoines15
Photo of AApparel
AApparel

California

2.75/5  rDev -28.8%

04-13-2012 03:55:36 | More by AApparel
Photo of drewba
drewba

Illinois

2.78/5  rDev -28%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 1.5

A - pours opaque black with dark brown on the edges. One finger head quickly dissipates to clumps of huge khaki bubbles with moderate lacing.

S - chocolate, ash tray, dark fruits, musky old wood, a mocha afterthought. It's unique, I'll give it that.

T - Simply put, this is unusual. Up front, the expresso is intensely bitter and is not mixing well with the currant and dark fruits which are the next flavors in the progression. I feel like the two are a flavor clash and not doing anything for me. The middle and finish are quite bitter; the only reminder that hops were incorporated into this beer.

M - Creamy, silky but thin - medium body, low - medium carbonation. I'm left wanting a little bit more out of the mouthfeel, but overall I'm impressed.

D - The bittering hops maintain through the whole taste experience and long into the aftertaste. I want to eat or drink something else to break the taste up. To sum up in a word: unrefined.

Serving type: bottle

11-30-2010 07:20:34 | More by drewba
Photo of mortarit
mortarit

North Carolina

2.85/5  rDev -26.2%
look: 5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

First thing first, I like this style of beer. I thought I was going to get a real treat with all the awards it showcases on the label, but I guess the taste has moved on. The claim to fame has ran away with the taste. I am not saying that the beer is bad but I have had better. It does provide a different blend but not real appealing. Yes, it would go well with a cigar.

Taste is burnt, burnt, and burnt.

Smell may have been burnt out too.

Serving type: bottle

11-03-2009 00:10:03 | More by mortarit
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

2.88/5  rDev -25.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

I’ll be blunt; this beer did nothing for me. I’ve had other Imperial Stouts and this one did not meet what I expected it to be. The head retention was decent at best; the aroma was a bit acrid with soured roasted grain. It had a good sweetness but it was lost in a downward spiral of estery alcohol and acidic roasted grain. No balance and even the dark fruitiness got lost in the mix.

Don’t get me wrong I love Imperial Stouts but this one just did not make the cut.

Serving type: bottle

07-22-2003 01:12:43 | More by Jason
Photo of mdcrouser
mdcrouser

Missouri

2.88/5  rDev -25.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Stout-brown/black, with very little head.

Sweet, slightly hopppy, chalky coffee on the nose - by chalky, I mean that it smells earthy, but with a hint of stone. Sweet vanilla too, with some solvents.

Grainy with big alcohol right up front - the alcohol resembles the burn of an overly-aggressive bourbon barrel aged beer - just too much for the rest of the beer to be appealling. Sweetness in the malts are drying and sticky in the mouth, with a bit of hoppiness at the end. Seems askew and unable to decide between whether it wants to be a sweet malty beer, or one with a nice hoppiness.

Pretty lame in the mouth - it's a stout, but comes thorugh as a simple slap on the tongue, and little else.

There's nothing terrible, but I certainly didn't enjoy it like I thought I would, and don't understand the hype about this one.

Serving type: bottle

01-26-2010 03:37:14 | More by mdcrouser
Photo of ThreeWiseMen
ThreeWiseMen

California

2.88/5  rDev -25.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured into a Guinness 20oz. pub glass.

Appearance: Pours out thick and black. A short, creamy, brown head forms on top but recedes to just a crown after a minute or so. Appears to drag good lacing from the get-go (drags thick lacing all the way down). Shows shades of red around the edges when held to light.

Smell: Dark chocolate covered cherries and espresso. Reminds me of those See's chocolates that always grossed me out as a kid. Lots of roasted malt, too. Caramel, vanilla, and even coconut also make an appearance, but cherries those dark, bitter aromas steal the show.

Taste: Dark chocolate, cherries, vanilla, and caramel appear upfront, but are quickly wiped out by loads of smoke, ash, charred wood, and hop bitterness. As some would put it: forest fire. Forest fire indeed - an impenetrable one. Aftertaste is long-lasting and unforgiving. Eventually the taste buds are numbed and the sweeter flavors become more prevalent, but in my mind it's too little too late.

Mouthfeel: Milky, cool, and tad syrupy in the finish. Carbonation and over-the-top bitterness perform acupuncture on the palate. Very full and warm. Imagine milk mixed with soot - it's something like that.

Drinkability: I feel like this beer should come with a coupon for a free hug. (Lord knows I need one right now.) This was rough, and I mean that in the full sense of the word. Bottle says, "This is the classic 'Cigar Stout.'" I wonder how many cigars were used in this batch... Brow sweat of a West Virginia coal-miner keeps coming to mind. I'd recommend this only to those stout lovers that are running out of new beers to try. This one is more of a novelty than anything. Tastes like the Grinch's soul. (Does smooth out eventually, but only after the palate has been totally wrecked. Proceed with caution.)

Serving type: bottle

06-03-2009 02:52:48 | More by ThreeWiseMen
Photo of womencantsail
womencantsail

California

2.9/5  rDev -24.9%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A: Unfortunately, this is the best thing about this beer. The pour into a snifter is black with a thin mocha colored foam.

S: There is a strange sour aroma. The traditional aromas of an RIS peek out at times, but they're just very overshadowed by that sourness.

T: Unfortunately, the flavor is not much better than the nose. The sourness is not all that present, but the chocolate, coffee, and roasted flavors are rather muted.

M: The beer is a bit thin for an RIS, but not terribly so. The carbonation is also a bit more than I typically like for the style.

D: There just isn't much to get excited about with this beer. Poor aromas and sub-par flavors make this one that I'll be passing on in the future.

Serving type: bottle

12-29-2009 09:44:08 | More by womencantsail
Photo of biglite351
biglite351

Pennsylvania

2.9/5  rDev -24.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A - very dark. Tall tight slow dropping medium dark head.

S - chocolate and malts with a bit of a bock-like scent in the mix.

T - again with chocolate and malts. Bitter though, like a chocolate covered coffee bean. Some hop kicks in at the end.

M - thick, but not coating. Tingle on back of tongue and a little on the front sides.

D - a bit too bitter for more than one bottle, and if I wanted hops I would not have picked an Imperial Stout.

Serving type: bottle

08-25-2010 21:10:59 | More by biglite351
Photo of TCgoalie
TCgoalie

Michigan

2.93/5  rDev -24.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a quarter finger mocha head atop a black brew. As the head recedes, mild lacing is observed around the glass.

The smell is bland lacking depth. It is very malt heavy with some roasted flavors and an essence of plastic. I guess there are some tones of chocolate and maybe coffee, but they are muted.

Ok, after the smell, this beer had me worried. The taste is much more rewarding showing the depth which the smell was missing. The first tastes are heavy in chocolate malts which transition to milk chocolate with hints of coffee. It is hard to tell if coffee or hops are giving the bite in the end, but the effect is reminding me of dark chocolate.

The mouthfeel is nothing to brag about and reminds me of a single stout. Thin in the mouth for 10% with a forgettable aftertaste.

If this was a single stout, there would be some redeeming qualities. Compared to other 10% stouts, this is well below average.

Serving type: bottle

11-19-2010 02:49:28 | More by TCgoalie
Photo of DogFood11
DogFood11

California

2.98/5  rDev -22.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

the appearance was decent ....I'm maybe a bit picky since I have stone imperial stout at my fingertips but without being a big hack fest I'd have to say this beer is average looking. Decent lacing and a rather dark head.

I just found the burnt taste to be dictated rather than crafted...almost like extracts were used (just tasted that way i'm don't in any way think its true)...there is even a citrus/cleansing taste in the middle of this BIG beer. Melted root beer popscicle in the backdrop. This leans on the burnt malts and leaves the hops behind, not much in the way of bitterness but somehow it avoids being too sweet.

Imperial stouts are really hard to mess up completely. Ranking it within the style its just OK. Its BIG its BOLD but comparitively its middle of the road. For the price? it gets better when compared price wise thats for sure as this is in the $4 dollar range. Nice.

Serving type: bottle

08-13-2005 05:40:24 | More by DogFood11
Photo of Mbpike
Mbpike

Arkansas

3/5  rDev -22.3%

12-18-2013 03:49:19 | More by Mbpike
Photo of richbrew
richbrew

New Jersey

3/5  rDev -22.3%

11-15-2011 17:26:48 | More by richbrew
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ryan Sullivan's Imperial Stout from Moylan's Brewery
87 out of 100 based on 426 ratings.