1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Steenbrugge Tripel - Brouwerij Palm NV

Steenbrugge TripelSteenbrugge Tripel

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

207 Ratings
THE BROS
90
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 207
Reviews: 86
rAvg: 3.9
pDev: 11.54%


Brewed by:
Brouwerij Palm NV visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Tripel |  8.70% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Absumaster on 07-17-2008)
View: Beers (18) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 207 | Reviews: 86 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of threeviews
threeviews

New Jersey

4.45/5  rDev +14.1%
look: 4.75 | smell: 4.75 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Poured from a corked and caged 750ml bottle with no freshness date (yet has been cellared in proper conditions for over a year) into a 16oz St. Bernardus branded chalice.

A- Initial (and conservative) pour reveals a beautiful orange/apricot hued beer with minimal haze and a 1/2 finger white, head with sea foam-like consistency. Nearly perfect for the Tripel style. 4.75

S- An absolutely inviting aroma for a Tripel! A wonderful fruity bouquet comprising of pear, apricot green grape, apple skins, honeydew along with a orange/lemon zest...some pineapple comes though as the beer warms. 4.75

T- Equal parts sweet and tart. The tartness is that of a 'green grape' quality, reminiscent of a white wine. The sweetness is only perceived for a moment before the spicy and dry finish takes over, much like an oak barrel aged Chardonnay wine. Despite the (as far as Tripels go) a relatively modest 8.7% ABV, you do feel a warming sensation as it goes down. 4.25

M- Highly carbonated with a medium body. The spicy and "tannic" finish makes this beer quite refreshing and devastatingly drinkable. 4.5

O- Although Tripels rank in my top three beer styles, I did not have much expectation being that this is brewed with gruut/gruit as opposed to hops. However, this beer was an absolute joy to consume (the bottle was a relatively quick study as a result of the time it took to consume)...so color me absolutely impressed by the Steenbrugge Tripel. There is no question that I will purchase this again, but next time I will be certain to find a bottle reflecting a 'Best Before' date...but being that my review is of an older bottle, I can say with confidence that this beer ages very well. 4.5

Serving type: bottle

01-24-2014 19:25:56 | More by threeviews
Photo of dacrza1
dacrza1

New Jersey

3.91/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

DATE TASTED: November 23, 2013... GLASSWARE: Affligem chalice... OCCASION: a Game of Thrones reading evening... APPEARANCE: pours a slightly copper, malty golden body; lively effervescence; thick,, foamy two-finger white head that keeps its resilience; lacing is formidable... AROMA: bouquet is light, hoppy, floral with light citrus--mostly peach--and apple as well--quite an air to it!... PALATE: full-bodied; immediately warming at the throat; active and anxious in the teeth--clearly not disguising its intentions...TASTE: grape accents early grant a surprising start; smooth, mellow hops make for a surprisingly casual finish; coriander and some nameless funk round out the flavor...OVERALL: a bright, uplifting strength to this beer lends spirit to the religious overtones of the label; situated among the other beers of this mix pack, the "Best of Belgium" proclamation holds some substance--not the best tripel I've tasted, but more than holds its own...

Serving type: bottle

11-28-2013 05:02:07 | More by dacrza1
Photo of JCBears
JCBears

Germany

4.49/5  rDev +15.1%
look: 5 | smell: 5 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.5

appearance: Wow just beautiful it is like a perfect combo of everything yes I said perfect. Beautiful hints of amber.

smell: It just hits you perfectly. I would have to say something obscene to fully describe it but wonderful you fall into it. A little bit fruity and aromatic. It is worth it just for the smell

taste: Bold, it hits you with the aroma and bam there you are. A bit fruity like bananas. Has a bit of a bight surprisingly but not to shabby.

mouthfeel: Stays with you in fact the bitters take over for a potent bitter taste long after the sip is gone.

overall: Not bad, I am certainly not disappointed and if this is your type of beer you will be jumping over angry wives to get one. It make me want to try more Belgians if nothing else

Serving type: bottle

11-05-2013 18:30:50 | More by JCBears
Photo of UCLABrewN84
UCLABrewN84

California

3.65/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottle pour at The Belgians Are Coming held in Old Town Newhall in Newhall, CA.

Pours a hazy golden orange with a foamy off-white head that settles to a partial film on top of the beer. Small dots of lace form around the glass on the drink down. Smell is of malt, grain, fruit, yeast, and floral aromas. Taste is much the same with fruit and caramel flavors on the finish. There is a mild amount of yeast bitterness on the palate with each sip. This beer has a lower level of carbonation with a slightly crisp and medium bodied mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty good beer with an aroma that is much better than the flavor in my opinion.

Serving type: bottle

09-03-2013 00:43:26 | More by UCLABrewN84
Photo of Alextricity
Alextricity

Michigan

3.78/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Sampled at the World Expo of Beer in Frankenmuth, Michigan.

Appearance: Somewhat hazy yellow color with a huge head... spilled all over the place during the pour.

Smell: Well, it's a Tripel. Banana, crackery, a slight "Belgian" aroma.

Taste: Quite good. I haven't had TOO many Tripels, but this one's pretty good. The downfall with this one, I think, is that it's just too "warm." I've had Tripels with considerably higher ABVs that haven't felt so warming... this almost feels like 10% or higher. If it weren't for that significant warming, I'd give it a higher rating. As it is though, it's still a Tripel worth trying.

Serving type: bottle

05-19-2013 17:55:57 | More by Alextricity
Photo of BuckeyeSlim
BuckeyeSlim

Ohio

3.75/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 4.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.75

11.2 oz. bottle poured into a Duvel tulip.

A - Pours a very pale yellow. Two-and-a-half finger head of loose, fluffy eggshell white foam sets up like meringue and then slowly falls, leaving generous lace rings around the glass. Held to a full-spectrum light, the beer is a light goldenrod in color and moderately opaque, with lots of effervescence rising from the bottom throughout the glass. Half way through the glass and there's still a fine covering of very tight bubbles solidly across the surface.

S - Honey, pears, bubblegum, lemongrass. A touch of white pepper sneaks into the nose. Light and pleasant, but easy to acquire. After warming, malts move forward along with a touch of light caramel.

T - A bit darker than the nose, but consistent with it. Apples, white raisins, and apricots with a dash of lemon. Light malts and yeast. In the middle, hints of banana and clove appear, reminiscent of solid German hefeweizen. Black pepper and a touch of cinnamon along with herbs that suggest thyme, caraway, and oregano mix together in the back end to provide a bitter balance to the fruits. ABV is very well-integrated and hidden, almost dangerously so.

M - Rather fizzy but easy to drink. Nice body - somewhat on the light side, almost delicate, but not at all watery thin. Components are well-integrated. Finish is fairly dry, rather short, and clean. Over the length of the glass, the spices, especially the pepper, start to accumulate and linger, and this becomes unpleasant.

O - I like the nose more than the taste, as I found the spices and herbs in the back end to be somewhat distracting from what I most enjoy about Tripels: their malts and fruits. If the taste would have been truer to its nose, this would be a winner. Towards the end of the glass, the pepper and cinnamon started to echo in the finish, like a ringing in the ears after a very loud concert. If that sounds like something you'd enjoy, by all means, try this, because it's made from quality ingredients and quite tasty. Personally, however, I need to follow this with something that will turn off the spices that have accumulated and aren't going away on their own.

Serving type: bottle

04-30-2013 08:30:25 | More by BuckeyeSlim
Photo of StoutHunter
StoutHunter

Michigan

3.95/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4

I picked up a bottle of Palm's Steenbrugge Tripel last week for $2.79 at The Lager Mill. I was looking for some Tripel's that I haven't tried before and the price was right so I decided to give it a chance, so lets see how it goes. Best before 3/16/15. Poured from a 11.2oz brown bottle into a Belgian tulip.

A- The label looks nice, its got that old school and trapist like look to it, it looks classy. It poured a nice and hazy golden yellow color that took on some orange hues when held to the light with over four fingers worth of fluffy creamy white head that died down to a thin layer that stayed till the end and it left a tons of lacing behind. This is a very good looking beer, the color was good and the head and lacing were very good, I have no complaints at all.

S- The aroma starts off with a higher amount of medium sweetness that had a candied sugar like aroma and was followed by a very earthy and grassy aroma that reminded me of straw and wet hay, with a real slight barn yard funk like aroma. There's also some lemon peel aromas with some yeasty esters coming through with a real slight bubblegum like aroma. On the finish there's some more earthy aromas and a pretty noticeable herbal aromas. The aroma is nice, but isn't very Tripel like, it remind me of Orval, or a funky saison that I once had, it's nice but it's pretty unusual for a Tripel.

T- The taste seems to be a lot different from the aroma and much truer to style, it starts off with a higher amount of medium sweetness that had a slight candied sugar like taste to it and was followed by a good amount of malts that impart some bready and sweet malt flavors followed by some earthy and slightly herbal flavors. Up next comes a nice medium banana flavor with some yeasty esters and a really slight amount of bubblegum. On the finish there's a slight lemon and herbal flavor, with a lower amount of bitterness and it had a sweet and yeasty aftertaste. This was a good tasting Tripel, it was fairly true to the style even with the absence of hops, the light herbal flavors worked well in this beer and the alcohol was hidden nicely.

M- Fairly smooth, a little dry, medium bodied with a medium amount of carbonation. The mouthfeel was nice, but it didn't have that slightly fizzy carbonation that a lot of Tripels seem to have.

Overall I thought this was a nice beer and a good example of the style, it didn't feel like that when I got to the aroma of this beer, but everything else seemed pretty in line for the style. This beer had good drinkability, it was fairly smooth, not filling, the alcohol was hidden well and the flavors did a good job at holding my attention, I think one bottle would be the right amount for me, the flavors might start to wear on me if I drink another one in a row. What I liked the most about this beer was the flavor and the appearance, they were both pretty good and were the highlights of this beer. What I liked the least about this beer was the aroma, it wasn't bad, but it seemed a little out of place and it wasn't true to style. I would buy this beer again when looking for a nice and affordable Tripel, it was priced really well and I would recommend anybody that likes Tripels give this beer a try. All in all, i was happy with this beer, I got a little worried when I saw that this was a gruit and had no hops, and I got even more worried when I smelled it, but when I got to the taste it came together nicely and it had most of the flavors that I expected. Good job Palm, you guys can be hit or miss for me but this one was pretty solid and it has sparked an interest to try some of the other Steenbrugge bee. It's not a favorite Tripel but it's far from my least favorite.

Serving type: bottle

04-16-2013 03:53:09 | More by StoutHunter
Photo of HabiMendes
HabiMendes

Rhode Island

3.84/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

This clear, golden Tripel has an extremely fruity aroma, with tones of orange, apple, and banana, with background floral tones. I thought that the banana smell dominated all the others, showing itself as excessive. The hops are not present in the aroma, but the alcohol is. The fruitness is also apparent in the taste, and the hops could be more evident to harmonize better with the fruitness. The aftertaste, displaying European hops, is too short. Unbalanced Tripel, that goes reasonably with style (see grades), but not impressive.

Serving type: bottle

04-06-2013 03:32:03 | More by HabiMendes
Photo of micromaniac129
micromaniac129

Pennsylvania

4/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25

Appearance is honey amber. A tall head that pours quite dense and loosens as it fades leaving a good amount of lace.
Aroma I feel is the weak point because though there is a nice nose it isn't very pronounced.
Malts, spices yeast and a bit of hops come through but barely.
Drinks thin over the palate with effervescent giddiness. Flavored with malts, yeast and some spicy hops. Finishes dry and semi-bitter.
A good tripel and excels nicely.

Serving type: bottle

03-30-2013 11:35:26 | More by micromaniac129
Photo of Chrysostom
Chrysostom

Ohio

4.24/5  rDev +8.7%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.75 | overall: 4.5

I just had a $15 of Koningshoeven Quadupel Oak Aged before this - or, more like half of one - which was severely disappointing, bordering on undrinkable, and a Chimay "Special 2012" Blue Label before that. I'm still mostly sober, and this review is live - not from notes of any sort, but puzzled out as I drink the potable in question.

This is my first ever bottle of this beer. It goes without saying my ratings are subject to revision upon additional bottles being consumed. I've been disappointed with new beers recently.

(As with all my reviews, contra some sites and some guidelines, I review according to style, ala BJCP, modified by personal preferences [contra BJCP], not according solely to personal taste.)

Without my normal, customary little introductory anecdote/story, without further ado, a review:

Presentation: 750mL bottle, corked and caged and wrapped in foil like champagne, poured in to a Chimay goblet/chalice. Served chilled, around 40-45ºF, warming as I write the review and sip. Bought around July through August of last year. $8.99 for a 750mL bottle. Thank you to Blacklick Wine and Spirits in Columbus, Ohio.

A: Bright golden colour, very clear for the style with the slightest haze (the yeast has settled nicely in to the bottom after I've aged this for nearly a year), with an absolutely ridiculously massive, fluffy head indicative of extreme carbonation, even on a gentle pour. The slightest bit of vigour on the pour giveth a head which be larger than the liquid beer. It looks like a Champagne the colour of apple juice, and, frankly, delicious. Lacing is non-existent even on a massive, three-finger head. Some white lees present in the transparent beer on the last pour.

S: Some barnyard funk and wet dog right off the bat, strongly reminiscent of Orval, with pretty strong undercurrents of bread and yeast, surprising for such a clear beer. There is absolutely, and I repeat absolutely, no alcohol character whatsoever present in the nose, which is surprising, again, for an 8.7% beer, especially served strongly chilled, bordering on cold. Some earthy hop, but little malt, is present in the nose.

T: This surprises me with how good it is. Light spicy flavours, reminiscent, again, of Orval: veritably savouring of Orval. Strong funk, again, like Orval. The spice is similar to that present in a Rochecfort, although here much attenuated. Huge amounts of bread and toast, yet again surprising me, for the fifth time (?) in this review, due to the clarity of the beer. Has notes of the ill-defined "Saison" style, just as Orval has.

Citrus on the front of the palate, an extremely dry, toasty (as in toasted bread or croutons) back-palate, which is quite refreshing. As is standard with Belgians, neither malt nor hops are the dominant flavour (even if the dominant ingredients), but the malt on this is by far predominant over the hops - although the hops are not meek, and make their presence known. Hoppier than most Tripels.

Mild floral (lilac and lavender) notes throughout. There is no alcohol whatsoever noticeable on the palate. This may be the least alcoholic-tasting high-ABV beer I've ever had. Moderately complex. Not as complex as a St Bernardus, or an Orval, but still pretty complex. I think I've teased out the main threads of taste, but not nearly all of them.

M: High carbonation. Astringent, yet dry and smooth. Clean. Champagne-like. The mouthfeel is the highlight of this surprisingly-good beer. Somewhere between 4.75 and 5 on the mouthfeel. It blends well with everything else.

D: Moderate. Complex, yet refreshing, yet again still high in alcohol. One could drink too many of these without becoming (too) tired of the taste, but it would be inadvisable. Not compulsively drinkable like a Chimay or St Bernardus, but quite above-average drinkability for a brew of comparable complexity and flavour.

O: This is a good, close to great, beer. As you have observed, the words "reminiscent of Orval" and "surprised" run throughout my review. For what it is (and, of course, it is what it is), Orval and surprise are my general take-away from this.

It hits the "Tripel" style on the head, with the addition of funky characteristics such as are present in Orval and some other Trappists. There seems to be a bit of a funky Saison-like character to this beer, as well. It's not as clean as the Tripel offerings from St Bernardus, Chimay, or Westmalle; all of the aforementioned are complex, but none have the Orval-like funk of this beer. It far exceeded my expectations. 90/100 for the style.

One and three-quarters thumbs up (I'm a bit more reserved than Siskel and Ebert), with a definite and enthusiastic "buy" recommendation from me, especially for $8.99/750mL. This beer could be sold for the standard "Trappist price" of $11.99/750mL and gather no untoward gazes. It's worth a try, especially if you like this style, Saison, or Orval.

Serving type: bottle

03-17-2013 11:19:14 | More by Chrysostom
Photo of MUSHROOMCLOUD
MUSHROOMCLOUD

Texas

3.64/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Golden and clear with a 2 inch persistent head - good lace.
Bananas, faint bubble gum, spice, yeast all in the nose.
Fruity (banana again), hot, spice, finishes dry.
Medium bodied, smooth, mid to high carbonation.
Overall a good beer - true to the style and enjoyable.

Serving type: bottle

01-12-2013 04:01:10 | More by MUSHROOMCLOUD
Photo of Mitchster
Mitchster

Michigan

1.93/5  rDev -50.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Purchased as part of a mixed 12 pack for $20 at BevCo. "Ale brewed with spices, refermentation in the bottle" 8.7% ABV.

Pours out to a clear pale straw golden, forming a voluminous white soapy head with very good retention and lacing no thanks in part to it's very brisk carbonation, ~3.5 carbs. Aroma of nail polish remover immediately hits the nose, followed by DMS. Mouthfeel is effervescent , exploding upon the tongue and filling the mouth with foam. Medium bodied likely due to lots of cane sugar. The taste is not good. Acetone, tons of banana (isoamyl acetate) and either DMS or actual corn. Boozy. Poorly fermented. I'm not getting any distinct spices but coriander is the most common in a triple. Finishes bone dry with a firm bitterness, which is peculiar for a triple....more along the lines of a Golden Strong. The aftertaste is of saccharin, nail polish remover and corn tortillas. Ugh.

Not a very good triple in my book. Boozy, loaded with fusels, DMS, wierd bitterness. Probably the worst tripel I've had in a long time. I definitely wouldn't buy it again, and I'll be giving these other bottles away to friends.

Serving type: bottle

12-20-2012 04:34:56 | More by Mitchster
Photo of superspak
superspak

Michigan

4/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

750 ml bottle into chalice, best before 4/1/2014. Pours fairly crystal clear golden amber color with a nice 1-2 finger fluffy white head with fantastic retention, that reduces to a nice cap that lasts. Nice spotty foamy lacing clings to the glass, with a nice amount of streaming carbonation; this is a great looking tripel. Aromas of big apple, pear, grape, honey, apricot, clove, light pepper, herbal, floral, candi sugar, bread, and light yeast spiciness. Damn nice aromas with good complexity and balance. Taste of apple, pear, apricot, grape, clove, light pepper, grass, floral, earth, honey, bread, candi sugar, and yeast spiciness. Lingering notes of light fruits, clove, pepper, honey, bread, herbal, floral, earth, honey, candi sugar, and yeast spiciness on the finish for a good bit. Very nice flavor complexity; with a great malt and spicy yeast ester balance; and zero cloying flavors present after the finish. Medium-high carbonation and medium-full bodied; with a fairly slick and foamy mouthfeel that is nice. Alcohol is very well hidden with hardly any warming noticed after the finish. Overall this is a damn nice Tripel! Great flavor balance and complexity; very smooth and easy to sip on. A very enjoyable offering; and very much in line to what I like to see in the style.

Serving type: bottle

12-17-2012 04:10:31 | More by superspak
Photo of dbrauneis
dbrauneis

North Carolina

3.85/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Pours a slightly hazy medium golden yellow with light amounts of visible carbonation and just a small amount of visible white yeast sediment. The beer has a finger tall foamy white head that slowly reduces to a thin film covering the majority of the surface of the beer and a thick ring at the edges of the glass. Moderate amounts of lacing are observed.

S: Aromas of pale malts with candi sugar, light fruits (pear), and spices (pepper and clove). Additionally there is just a hint of vanilla.

T: The taste of this beer is similar to the smell, there is a moderate presence of pale malts with some light fruit sweetness (green apple, white grape, and pear) along with some candi sugar. After that, there are note of pepper and clove spices along with just a hint of vanilla. Light notes of lemon that leads into a light to moderate amount of bitterness.

M: Medium bodied with moderate amounts of carbonation. Light amounts of dryness in the finish.

O: Enjoyable and easy to drink, the fairly high ABV is well hidden. Not the greatest example of the style but still an enjoyable brew. This beer was a nice distraction in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, when we had no power so beer reviews could only be done during daylight (and not entered until after the fact).

Serving type: bottle

11-01-2012 19:31:20 | More by dbrauneis
Photo of smakawhat
smakawhat

Maryland

3.93/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from the bottle into a tulip glass. Bottle notching indicates good till April 2014?

A very soapy white head is poured and produced, lots of large bubbles with some surprising retention. Body is a crystal clear orange pale amber, rising column of bubbles coming up in the middle, this is very nice looking, with the body being the most impressive.

Bouquet is quite mild. Soft sugary Belgian candy, light malts, a nice touch of clove like sweetness. Kind if subtle, almost reminds me of Leffe territory, but I can dig this.

A real sharp sweetness, hits the palate in the middle, combining with a real nice tight carbonation. Good sparkling quality, and a mild sense of sweetness on the finish. VEry crisp and dry for a tripel, but a good richness of malt and alcohol sweet without boozy character.

A pretty solid tripel, quite unexpected to me for this one.

Serving type: bottle

10-12-2012 23:47:38 | More by smakawhat
Photo of jtd1969
jtd1969

North Carolina

4.25/5  rDev +9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - A slighty cloudy golden with an amber tint. Good carbonation with no lacing

S - Yeast and grape

T - Sweet, tart, some light clove, citrus.

M- Medium body with good carbonation for style.

O - Delicious and highly drinkable triple. It really is a pleasant tripel.

Serving type: bottle

10-04-2012 02:07:40 | More by jtd1969
Photo of Ryan011235
Ryan011235

Ohio

3.18/5  rDev -18.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Poured into an Orval chalice on 9/25/12

Best before 03 14

The color is a lightly hazed medium shade of amber. Foam is smooth and fairly dense, but reaches only a half a finger. The head drops a tad, but retention is very impressive; it holds the entire time. Lace does catch until halfway through the glass, but, when it does, the foam leaves solid sheets.

Lots of light fruits in the aroma, some ripe and some fermented. Apple, pear, orange and lemon pie. I don't believe I've encountered gruut before, but it's very strong here; it kind of strikes me as a cross between pepper, clove, prairie grass, herbs, tea and cinnamon. Toasty, lightly buttered grains peak out from time to time.

The gruut is in fine form in working the palate. White pepper, a myriad of grassy tones and spices are all over from start to finish. The middle finds a decent helping of toasted grains and some buttery notions. Faintly sweet. Fruit is less apparent than I might have imagined, adding only a modest, tangy element to the underside of the beer. Earthy, musty overtones emerge with warmth. Pepper lingers as alcohol builds on the finish.

Everything about the feel of this beer is ridiculously smooth. The body is a delicately-moving medium with a mild silkiness; carbonation is robust and fluffy nearly to the point of hilarity. Silly as it may sound, my first though was, this is like drinking air (or a cloud). Letting the beer meander about finds a more pointed feel; quick sips, though, retain the initial, smooth feel.

Overall, this is pretty enjoyable. It's not the best Tripel, but easy enough to drink and has some interesting things going on. This is on my list to revisit sooner than later. Worth checking out.

Serving type: bottle

09-26-2012 06:22:57 | More by Ryan011235
Photo of BlurryVisi0n
BlurryVisi0n

New York

4/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Served in a tulip glass.

Appearance: A dark gold, light bubbles, (white) head was monstrous at first well over two fingers.

Smell: Yeast to the fullest.

Taste: Like the smell, it scream yeast. Not too complex but done just right where you truly enjoy drinking this beer.

Mouth: Medium to heavy, sharp texture.

Overall: Well done, seriously this beer does not disappoint. Bought it locally and seriously surprised me, Salud!

Serving type: bottle

05-16-2012 03:22:27 | More by BlurryVisi0n
Photo of CrazyDavros
CrazyDavros

Australia

3.38/5  rDev -13.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours amber with a large, lasting, white head.
Nose shows doughy yeast, wheat, faint lemon and soft funky notes. Somewhat plain.
Similar flavours, with the addition of some soft booze. Pretty drinkable stuff.
Nice high carbonation suits the beer well.

Serving type: bottle

04-27-2012 02:08:00 | More by CrazyDavros
Photo of Vixie
Vixie

Illinois

3.48/5  rDev -10.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a copper color with a thick off white head. A bit more orange than most triples I have seen, but a nice looking beer.

Smell is fruity with a bit of yeast. Seems to be hint of lemon, and the yeast gives it a smell like bread.

Taste has a bit of citrus in it, not surprising from the smell. There is a hint of pepper as well, and finishes with a bit of hops at the finish.

Little thin for the style, but decent.

A decent triple, but not a great one. Goes down very easy, and is a nice beer. I picked up a 750ml bottle at a bargain basement price, but would not have complained if I had paid full price.

Serving type: bottle

04-23-2012 01:31:20 | More by Vixie
Photo of Douberd
Douberd

Netherlands

3.93/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Bottle of 330 ml, bought in a bar where the stupid barman didn't want to sell me the bottle unless he opened it first. Anyway, I brought it home and had it here.
Colour is honey like, with two finger head.
Aroma is fruity, bananas, apples.
Taste is sweet and fruity also, the high alcohol bites pleasantly on the tongue.
Average carbonation, medium thickness on the body.

Serving type: bottle

04-21-2012 19:06:33 | More by Douberd
Photo of smcolw
smcolw

Massachusetts

3.88/5  rDev -0.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Surprisingly available at a little Italian restaurant in Newton, MA.

Straw-gold color with a mild chill haze. Moderate head that settles in a few minutes. Leaves little lace.

Relatively dry smell for a tripel. There's a touch of alcohol and no notable hop.

Classic tripel flavors. A definite yeast presence but no bite. The swallow features warming alcohol with a short aftertaste. Full bodied. Nothing extreme about this one, but it would be easy to drink this regularly.

Serving type: bottle

04-03-2012 11:50:46 | More by smcolw
Photo of Kromes
Kromes

Georgia

4.15/5  rDev +6.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A: A hazy gold with a thick white head that dies down to nothing and leaves laces down the glass.

S: Cirtus, tropical fruit, Belgian yeast, a little bit of raisin.

T: Much like the aroma, tropical fruit, citrus, alcohol, a little peach and a nice alcohol burn in the finish.

M: Medium body with a less than normal tripel carbonation. There's still a bit of peppery feel to it, but less that others.

O: A very good tripel. Good flavors, nice aroma, decent feel. Definitely a solid tripel.

Serving type: bottle

03-27-2012 01:44:42 | More by Kromes
Photo of SickGnar
SickGnar

Pennsylvania

3.4/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Caged cork, huge pop (I flinched), lots of snap, crackle, & pop to the giant white head that falls super fast. Rich golden with a touch of peach, bright and clear with lots & lots of rising bubbles. It keeps a rig but leaves just a few random splats of lace. A touch of haze from the second pour out the bomber.

S: Broad range of fruit ( but not all that strong) – banana, ripe apples & pears, hints of citrus and tropical fruit, and a background note of something tart like cherry. Hint of spice & background bit of sweet pils malt. Unfortunately, all of this is overwhelmed by a brothy, meaty, & nutty yeast note that is only a ghost bit funky. I don’t see a layer of dead yeast, it is clear, & it is well with the best by date. Weird, distracting, and not attractive. A touch of honey arrives, and the meat fades, as this warms.

T: This is a bit better. Sugar cookie pils with hints of biscuit & toasty grain, and some faint dough way in the background on the back end. Fruits are more apples & pears – especially the skins – and less banana. Citrus and tropical fruit are pretty much gone except for a hint of mango. Phenolics are stronger – cloves and a bit earthy & peppery. Odd yeast note is more earthy with a hint of barnyard, but the meaty character is still present. Some spice from alcohol, but otherwise it is pretty much not apparent. Grassy & herbal hops, but not all that bitter nor forward in character. This would be a 4.0 if I did not have to try and ignore the chicken soup aspect.

M: Just a hair over medium body. It may actually be bigger, but the firm & active carbonation lightens and livens it a bit. A hint of sugary sweetness, but it is really quite attenuated and dry. Spicy alcohol and background hops provide a drying finish. Ghost hint of warming. Lingering feel is both astringent & dry, and a touch coating and soapy.

D: Okay, but is would be a whole lot better without the brothy aspect. Even for that it is still fairly drinkable. And the alcohol hits quick and strong from all the carbonation – like champagne. Other than the strange chicken soup character this is very good. It’s alright, but I’m not impressed. Maybe I need to try a younger bottle, but this one says good until 6/9/12.

Serving type: bottle

03-22-2012 19:05:26 | More by SickGnar
Photo of jeremy13586
jeremy13586

Pennsylvania

3.73/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

750ml bottle poured in to a goblet. No bottle date.

Cloudy gold color. One finger of bubbly head that dissapeared quickly. No lacing left behind.

Very sweet banana and bubblegum. Sweet malt, toffee, and some yeasty esters.

Toffee and honey. Fruit, like clementines and pineapple. Bread, bubblegum and cotton candy. Yeasty bitterness and a bit of booze. A bit overly sweet.

Pretty heavy in body for a tripel. The mouthfeel is kind of syrupy but there is a and mild carbonation that broke up the consistency, though it did feel a bit under carbonated. Finishes with a sweet and syrupy coating in the mouth.

The bottle was pretty cheap (around $8 for the 750ml) and drinkable, but the mouthfeel and the sweetness kind of took away from the things I liked about the beer. Worth the try and I'll probably try it again, but not anytime soon.

Serving type: bottle

03-12-2012 05:52:23 | More by jeremy13586
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Steenbrugge Tripel from Brouwerij Palm NV
87 out of 100 based on 207 ratings.