1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Buffalo Belgian Stout - Brouwerij Van den Bossche

Not Rated.
Buffalo Belgian StoutBuffalo Belgian Stout

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

187 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 187
Reviews: 119
rAvg: 3.61
pDev: 15.79%
Wants: 12
Gots: 7 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Van den Bossche visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Belgian Strong Dark Ale |  9.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Todd on 03-01-2005)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 187 | Reviews: 119 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by ViveLaChouffe:
Photo of ViveLaChouffe
4.3/5  rDev +19.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

The name is the same and so is the brewery. But for some mysterious reason, this beer clocks in 50% stronger than its little brother. Odd that there's no distinction on the label...

Pours pitch black with a voluminous light brown head. So big that I was afraid I had an infected bottle. But the head fades to a a thin wisp in several minutes. Aroma contains sweet dark malt and milk chocolate notes with a touch of fresh coffee.

Taste is the same, a bit more bitter chocolate than milk though and persistent hints of espresso. Nicely balanced. Full bodied, no real hint of alcohol given its strength. Nice bitter chocolate in the finish and aftertaste with some sweetness to offset the bite.

Very tasty. Nicely balanced and well-crafted.

More User Reviews:
Photo of RoyalT
3.65/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Appearance - This is a very dark ale in color, almost pure black, with a blackish-white head that rose up handsomely on an easy pour and left a pool of film in the center of the liquid.

Smell - This BSDA has a lot of roasted malt in the nose along with some baker's chocolate and maybe black coffee. It is very very dark with little to sweeten the aroma and quite pleasing to whiff.

Taste - Yes, this is very dark. The malts are roasted, almost burnt, and the black coffee buries most of the chocolate from the nose.

Mouthfeel - This is on the lighter side of medium-bodied with some rather fizzy carbonation. This was probably the only aspect of the beer that I didn't care for.

Drinkability - This is not a typical BSDA jumping with sugary complexity and yeasty undertones, but it is actually billed on the label as a "Belgian Stout". I enjoyed it overall but, again, thought the mouthfeel was lacking.

Photo of orbitalr0x
3.43/5  rDev -5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a dark brown with ruby red highlights. A small eggshell head appears and becomes a ring around the glass. A bit light in color. Aromas start with slightly roasted malts and a touch of coffee. Earthy yeast tones underneath. A bit of cocoa but overall the aroma isn't very pronounced.

First sip brings mellow roasted malts upfront with a hint of cocoa and coffee that moves into earthy, estery Belgian yeast flavors. A bit of an odd fruity tone midway through the sip. It flows down with a touch of alcohol and some peppery licorice on the end. Interesting brew.

Mouthfeel is medium bodied and light for a stout, but pretty much spot on for the Belgian stout category. Goes down smooth with good carbonation. This beer didn't really grab me and I doubt I'd grab it again, just not my style.

Photo of lordofthewiens
3.93/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A 750ml bottle poured into a tulip glass. It had been in my cellar for six months. There was an illegible date stamped on the label. The beer was dark brown with red highlights and a medium-sized tan head. A dark fruit aroma, with root beer and a little chocolate. Sweet fruity taste, still some root beer apparent in the taste. Did not think the alcohol was too noticeable. Very smooth, but I don't think I could drink too much of it at a time. It's a little too sweet.

Photo of Billolick
3.83/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Enjoyable to see this one on tap at the Blind Tiger in NYC. Not sure whats up with this seemingly emerging "Belgian Stout " style, but this one was pretty tasty. Also it was quite low carbonation in opposition to several of the bottled version reviews. Darkest shades of mahogany, next to no head and no lacing,fruity, slightly earthy nose. Dark malts and medium roasty. Ripe fruits, raisins, figs, decent complexity and interest here. Perhaps a wee bit thin in the body department. Nice on tap, if you can find it....Nice going Alan and the BTAH crew;.

Photo of Marius
3.5/5  rDev -3%

Photo of chickenm
3.75/5  rDev +3.9%

Photo of williamjbauer
3.5/5  rDev -3%

Photo of ADR
2.6/5  rDev -28%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Large corked bottle, clearly marked as 9% ABV...

Dark brown, lets some light through. Lots of tan puffy head, over an inch of it in height. Laces, however, are pretty scant. Slightly plummy aroma, oddly perfumed and fruity. Thin mouthfeel, very gassy and carbonated. Flavor doesn't work well at all for a Stout, bright and detergent sharp, green chlorophyll qualities with a strange tinny fruit taste and way under-powered in body. A little papery in the aftertaste as well. I am definitely not a fan of this rendition of a Stout idea, not a lot of positives in any category in my opinion.

Photo of chefpeet
3.75/5  rDev +3.9%

Photo of Blackwolf
3.03/5  rDev -16.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Served on tap into a flute.

First off the restaurant was decent (The Back Abby in Claremont CA)
They had a great selection of Belgian's but a few I wanted on tap were not available =/

As for this belgian-stout, I was expecting a lot more than what I got, judging by their excellent belgian collection I would think that any different style of beer would be just as tasty.

A- By far the "best" characteristic was the color in my opinion. A darkened hazeled almost deep brown hue. The head was almost dissipated by the time it arrived to my table, but from what I caught, it was a light LIGHT, very milk chocolate head. NO lacing at all out of my glass.

S- Light fruits, a fair yeast and a caress of lightly balanced alcohol in it. Not a strong point in this "stout."

T- Again, sweet light fruits, not as malty as I would want from a stout... A sweet/sour finish with a tad bit of alcohol spice in it. Not too impressive for the style, but decent.

MF- Light body with a medium-light carbonation. Yet again nothing interesting here. Even the alcohol finish bottomed out quickly from my palate.

O- For the price I paid on this I expected a just above average beer. This could be described as an average attempt on a belgian-stout to a just below average taste that I would DEFINITELY not spend 8 bucks on a flute for again. This may be a beer you would like to try for a reasonable price. And considering the history on it I was very intrigued, but again, for an affordable price it is considerable, not even a must. Even if you are a fan of belgians and stouts... Still... Just considerable.

Photo of ste5venla
3.25/5  rDev -10%

Photo of ONovoMexicano
3/5  rDev -16.9%

Photo of Calico
3.83/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On tap in a tulip glass at the Old Toad.

Appearance - barely any head, clear mahogany in color. Some lace.

Aroma - slight lactic sourness mixed with caramel and raisin notes.

Taste - I'm not getting the nutty roasted flavors I'd expect in a stout. There is some maltiness, but what stands out is a mild lactic sourness, surrounded by dark fruit flavors. Not as sour as a Flanders sour red, but sour enough to pucker the mouth a little.

Mouthfeel - thin body (again, not what I'd expect in a stout), finishes pleasantly crisp.

This beer is a bit more like a Baltic porter than like any kind of stout I've had. It feels more like the 6.5% abv stated on the brewery's website than the 9% mentioned in some of the other reviews. I imagine if I had more than 11 ounces of this I'd be able to determine how strong it is, but it does not feel strong. I could drink another one of these. An odd, but pleasant, brew.

Photo of Metalmonk
2.65/5  rDev -26.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

A tremendously powerful "pop!" as the cork is pulled, and no surprise about the wealth of bubbles and resulting thick head. It's beige on top and glassy black below, which is not the darkest black I've seen on a beer, but it is impressive.

It might look alive in appearance, but there's almost nothing happening in the aroma. Faint toffee and dark berries hide behind a mellow metallic sheen. It doesn't even try to smell like anything. Not so much bad as boring. Hopefully there's more happening in the flavor.

Err...not much. Faint dark fruits (fig, plum, berry) work their way into the incredibly mild flavor. Insanely minuscule flashes of milk chocolate/smoke blow by without much presence. Slight tartness shows up in the finish. None of this is helped by the over-carbonated texture, which would've been okay on a beer with any flavor, but it doesn't do anything for this bland offering.

Subtle flavors and stealthy complexities are very much appreciated in a wide variety of beers. This one has neither. It limps past the tastebuds and takes up space in the gut. It's not that it's awful, it just doesn't even try. Best Before date on the label is Jun. 27 '08, so it's not expired. Stout enthusiasts should stay away, as it's anything but a stout, and Belgian beer fanatics in general will probably come away disappointed. One of the least remarkable brews from Belgium that I know of.

Photo of Mar02x
2.63/5  rDev -27.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A - A clear brown beer with a light beige head that starts out strong an good, but retracts to a thin layer. The is some carbonation visible that races up.

S - A fresh and fruity smell with some yeast tones. I am missing the stout smell, there is some chocolate tone however.

T - Different! Almost a crossing between an light stout and a double ale with some chocolate, spices and fruit. Not enough sweetness and a light bitter finish.

M - To much carbonation in consideration with the taste. Therefore the taste is to thin. In the end the beer is light sticky and bitter.

O - It is not a dirty beer, but it doesn't fit the style. The high carbonation presence kills this beer.

Photo of mattfancett
2.5/5  rDev -30.7%

Photo of Sammy
3.63/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Very dark brown with a white bubbly head. Lacey. Aroma some roast, and very mild yeast. The taste does not live up,but it is complex. Medium mouthfeel. Some sugar, roast, yeast in the taste. A shwartzbier with some Belgian yeast and sugar. A little sourness in finish.

Photo of NorthCoastPranqster
2.5/5  rDev -30.7%

Photo of dirtylou
3.73/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

on tap at the malt house.

cell phone notes

appearance: served in a buffalo tulip, dark mahongany body, light tan cap with decent retention

smell: smoky, dark fruit, light notes of chocolate

taste: this one cant decide if its a stout or a belgian strong...falls a little flat in both categories. smoky with nice roasted malt notes, dull chocolate, plum and other dark fruit. just not very well rounded and lacking any showcase flavors

mouthfeel: smoky and thinner

drinkability: fine

Photo of Ciocanelu
3.5/5  rDev -3%

Photo of cjgator3
2.4/5  rDev -33.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Corked and caged 750ml bottle poured into a tulip glass. Pours a dark black color with a large light tan head with really good retention and lacing. The aroma is pretty underwhelming that is fruity and malty with just a touch of roastiness as well. The taste much like the aroma for the most part is a disappointment. The taste is in need of more malt and more roasted characteristics for me to even consider it a "stout". The mouthfeel is light and highly carbonated. Overall, I am disappointed with this offering, I was expecting a little more. It is not horrible, but I would not purchase it again.

Photo of StephRai
3.5/5  rDev -3%

Photo of jmccraney
3.75/5  rDev +3.9%

Photo of MiScusi
3.4/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured a dark brown, but could see through towards the edges so it appeared fairly clear in its highlights. Not much of a head except some off white suds laced on top. Smell was a little roasty along with a belgian yeast sort of metallic note. The taste had some sharp alcohol and roasted malts- much more so than I've noticed for other belgian dark ales that come across a little more subtle in their dark malt character. There also seemed to be a bit of a hop character at the end, in bitterness and taste, to go along with the roastiness. Moutfeel is ok, a little lighter and less chewy than most belgian dark ales.

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Buffalo Belgian Stout from Brouwerij Van den Bossche
82 out of 100 based on 187 ratings.