1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Heavy Seas - Siren Noire Imperial Chocolate Stout - Heavy Seas Beer

Not Rated.
Heavy Seas - Siren Noire Imperial Chocolate StoutHeavy Seas - Siren Noire Imperial Chocolate Stout

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
83
good

340 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 340
Reviews: 181
rAvg: 3.69
pDev: 14.36%
Wants: 27
Gots: 20 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Heavy Seas Beer visit their website
Maryland, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial Stout |  8.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: oberon on 02-20-2010)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 340 | Reviews: 181 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Huhzubendah
Huhzubendah

District of Columbia

3.63/5  rDev -1.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On cask at Evening Star in Alexandria, Virginia.

The beer is dark brown with just a few bubbles of carbonation present. Both the aroma and flavor are dominated by a huge chocolate presence. The beer tastes like chocolate Yoohoo and melted chocolate candy bars. While the beer is decent for what it is, I find it quite one dimensional. The feel is medium bodied and smooth, as is typical of a cask ale. Overall, a decent chocolate stout.

Serving type: cask

01-30-2011 15:23:56 | More by Huhzubendah
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

3.73/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

First thoughts about the label, why do these mermaids look like trannies? Pours a dark black body with a khaki tan head fine even layers of lacing left behind. Aroma is cocoa powder malted milk balls and one dimensional chocolate, not a bad thing if you dig chocolate. Flavor is weird there's a wave of chocolate then some awkward fruitiness and a bit of strong booziness that shouldn't be around when your imperial chocolate stout is only 8% abv. Sharp sweet malted chocolae, hershey's syrup with an acrid dark roasted finish. Mouthfeel is medium bodied carbonation is pretty soft, this just a weird feeling. Hard to explain why each sip is rough around the edges. It doesn't pull of Choklat caliber chocolate beer but for the price it really is decent split it with a female they will probably enjoy this more than the average imperial stout drinker.

Serving type: bottle

01-30-2011 06:39:11 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of rudzud
rudzud

Massachusetts

3.03/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Picked up on a whim at Julio's. Another let down from not doing any sluething. Been 10 days since I had a really good brew, and I cant remember the last time I bought a random beer that turned out to be really good.

A - Nice good typical stout appearance. Poured into my Duvel tulip a rich black pour with light tan one finger head that slowly fades leaving nice heavy lacing on the brew but minimal side lacing.

S - Kinda strange. Getting your usual stout aromas, not much chocolate but it is there. That being said, there is some dark ale like aromas. Dark fruits and figs are present.

T - Just like the nose, this is somewhat odd. Not really a fan of this. I'm not getting any of that nice typical roasty malt that one becomes oh so fond of when drinking a stout. Instead, I get some belgian type funky things going on. Dark fruits and funk here along with a little bit of chocolate.

M - Normal run of the mill mouthfeel though a bit on the thin side. Personally, I like my stouts, let alone imperial ones, to be nice and thick.

D - Its not that bad of a stout but the addition of some belgian qualities is unexpected and not exactly wanted from me. Much better stouts out there.

Serving type: bottle

01-27-2011 05:59:11 | More by rudzud
Photo of mwrecording
mwrecording

Maryland

4.15/5  rDev +12.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Was excited to pick this up.

Poured a typical stout color, dark black.
Smell is very chocolately - sweet. It isn't an overpowering one, but a solid one.

Taste...first sip was a treat, the reviews of this aren't overwhelmingly positive, so I expected this to be a bit flat or light.
Big chocolate taste, big roasty malts taste. Not really any bite but I don't know that I should really be expecting it as this isn't a hoppier stout.

Mouthfeel is probably the only drawback of this, on one hand its nice that its easy to drink and eases you into doing more than sipping it but on the other hand its sort of...watery. real thin.

Drinkability - I could probably have 2 of these on a winter evening. Don't taste the 8%. Easy to drink.

For $5.50 a bomber, this is a solid beer.

Serving type: bottle

01-27-2011 04:01:30 | More by mwrecording
Photo of Chaney
Chaney

District of Columbia

3.3/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Dark, dark Hershey's chocolate brown, with about a 1/2 finger beige head that stuff around as a ring around the brew for quite a while.

S: Smells like "Cocoa Puffs" wrapped up inside some charred maple syrup infused dates. Dark fruit sugar for sure.

T: I like the initial taste, but the back end is a bit too funky for my tastes. It tastes almost Belgiany, which I generally like in many settings, but not in a chocolate stout.

M: Nice and thick, fairly low on the carbonation end, but once again, I'm not particularly fond of this brand of sweetness. However, the booze is well hidden.

D: For my tastes, not very. I think I'll criticize this based on what I wish it was: a chocolate stout.

Serving type: bottle

01-25-2011 17:30:33 | More by Chaney
Photo of Ambiorix
Ambiorix

Kentucky

4/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On tap at Galaxy Hut, Arlington, VA.

A: Black pour, fine tan head, decent lacing. Nothing spectacular, but solid.

S: Chocolate, coffee, a bit of roastiness.

T: Dry cocoa powder, roasted malt, slight alcohol. Decent hop bitterness to finish. Well balanced.

M: Substantial mouthfeel. Soft palate, gently carbonated.

D: Decent, drinkable. Doesn't feel very imperial, but it is a very enjoyable brew.

Serving type: on-tap

01-24-2011 01:06:01 | More by Ambiorix
Photo of jcparke
jcparke

Connecticut

2.45/5  rDev -33.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Had this on tap and didn't care for it. Smelled and tasted like a liquid tootsie roll. This is not what stout should be. I had high hopes for it but was disappointed. I enjoy stouts but will not try this again. Are there any good chocolate stouts? The mind boggles.

Serving type: on-tap

01-23-2011 22:41:31 | More by jcparke
Photo of 9InchNails
9InchNails

New Jersey

3.9/5  rDev +5.7%
look: 5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Cask Conditioned Ale of the Week at The Gaslight Brewery

The look is awesome. Looks incredibly creamy and delicious looking. I would say it's opaque.

Slight cocoa smell. Not really strong. Some booze in the aroma. Smells okay.

Taste and Mouth: Very smooth and creamy. Thick-full body. Chocolate some cherry, vanilla and booze in taste but mixes well. Dark malts and some bitterness at the end. Slightly dry.

Since it's quite thick don't think I could have another. This is truly a sipper.

Serving type: cask

01-18-2011 05:32:50 | More by 9InchNails
Photo of claspada
claspada

New Jersey

3.7/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Aromas of dark roasted malts mixed with light sweet chocolate notes; slightly earthy and herbal.

The taste is roasted malts lightly astringent, some good coffee/espresso flavors, with an odd but not off-putting sour characteristic. Faint dark fruits notes. For a chocolate stout kind of expecting more chocolate and less conflicting tastes. Espresso notes and bitter hops blend well together.

Mouthfeel is only medium which is also little strange for a big stout, carbonation little peppy. Needs more body.

Drinkability is alright not really bad, would be nice regular stout seems lacking for a double though, except in ABV of course. Quite tasty and worth a try because of the reasonable price point.

Serving type: bottle

12-31-2010 01:38:37 | More by claspada
Photo of LilBeerDoctor
LilBeerDoctor

New York

2.98/5  rDev -19.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Reviewed on 3/13/2010. Bottle. Pours black with a thick light tan head. Aroma of roasted malt, bitter chocolate. Flavor of roasted malt, parmesean cheese, a touch of bitter hops. Lots of sweet malt, some medicinal notes. Meh, I could continue to drink this but it wouldn't be very enjoyable.

Serving type: bottle

12-23-2010 19:46:54 | More by LilBeerDoctor
Photo of JayS2629
JayS2629

Alabama

3.53/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A- Dark black with thin white head that fades fast and leaves little lace.

S- Bold Dark chocolate with smokey toasted notes, bit of an ashy burnt hint, and some earthy bitter notes.

T- Pure dark chocolate, cocoa, and hints of vanilla. Earthy, smokey notes with some bitter ntoes and burn. A definite sipper. Strong chocolate and rich. Slight bitter medicinal hop breath that lingers in the after taste.

M- Not syrupy or cloying, but with a sweet edge and milky substance. A little thin and chalky for its style.

D- Definite robust sipper. Rich. One to share.

Serving type: bottle

12-12-2010 06:09:49 | More by JayS2629
Photo of njbcmatt
njbcmatt

New Jersey

3.23/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

22 oz, poured into a chalice

A- Thick viscous black. No visible head, just a little tan lacing around the top.

S- Typical chocolatey and roast notes, some weird fruity notes can't tell if it's from the yeast

T- Too cold at first, not much coming through, had to really let it warm up to bring it out. Get that same weird fruitiness. Reminds me of really high cacao % dark chocolate which is interesting, but doesn't seem right in this beer.

M- Feels rather thin for it's size, was expecting more viscosity, but then again, it's on the low end for imperial stouts these days ABV wise.

D- Didn't hate it, didn't love it. At the end of the day, that weird fruitiness turned me off a little.

Serving type: bottle

11-23-2010 15:15:11 | More by njbcmatt
Photo of JamnesCameron
JamnesCameron

Illinois

3.98/5  rDev +7.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured into a snifter.

Pours a deep dark black. Absolutely no light gets through this brew. About a finger of tan head, but it does not last very long.

Aromas of roasted malt, cocoa, and anise. No hops evident in aroma.

First sip is of cocoa, dark roast coffee, and a hint of alcohol.

Mouthfeel is thin, but not watery. For a big beer, I would expect a little more mouthfeel.

Drinkability is good. Very pleasant over all.

Serving type: bottle

11-22-2010 01:36:31 | More by JamnesCameron
Photo of jampics2
jampics2

Ohio

3.93/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

22oz bottle into a snifter. This was an extra from a kind trader, and something I've never tried before.

The beer pours a black with off-white head. There are touches of brown and red in the mix. The head quickly subsides and doesn't leave much lace.

The beer smells strongly of bakers chocolate with a touch of coffee and even some dark fruit. There's also some noticeable booze, but it's nothing horrible. I'm also getting a touch of sourness, but this isn't infected - more of an acidity from the roast.

The taste is really strong roast with some nuanced complimentary flavors and a bit of booze. There's a nice touch of hop bitterness as well. But the focus is on the chocolate and coffee flavors, backed up with a sweet malt base. There are some notes of fig and prune, plus some licorice that give this depth.

The beer has a thick body and low carb, resuling in it coming across as a touch syrupy. There is some lingering roast in the finish and some sweetness. This beer is decent and enjoyable, but Southern Tier Choklat blows it out of the water.

Serving type: bottle

11-19-2010 18:53:14 | More by jampics2
Photo of Thorpe429
Thorpe429

Illinois

4.25/5  rDev +15.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Reviewed from notes.

Poured into a snifter. Appearance is ebony with a light brown head. Initial several-finger head dies down somewhat quickly. A bit of lacing. Nose is strong chocolate and roasted malt. Chocolate really pervades throughout, but has a nice presence. Taste is chocolate and a bit of roast. Good feel from the slightly-bitter chocolate. Drinks quite well and is one of the better chocolate beers I've had.

Serving type: bottle

11-09-2010 02:29:54 | More by Thorpe429
Photo of Brent
Brent

Kentucky

4.22/5  rDev +14.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Nicely executed - somewhere in the American/Russian Imperial Stout middleground. Tarry black pour with distinct chocolate notes in the aroma. Semi to bittersweet chocolate flavor in well intertwined with a darkly roasted malt notes. Moderate sweetness compliments the chocolate, but bittering moves in toward the finish. Only detraction - why can't the brewery hire a real artist for the labels on this series?

Serving type: bottle

10-18-2010 15:51:26 | More by Brent
Photo of kgrober
kgrober

North Carolina

3.75/5  rDev +1.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from a bomber into a tulip

Dark as pitch with a thin creamy head that dissipated quickly with minimal lacing. Carbonation concentrated in the center of the pour which was nice visually.

Taste was cola, with hints of currants & blackberries. Subtle maltiness with a nice bittersweet chocolate finish. Chocolate is nicely balanced with other flavors.

Nice mouthfeel and very drinkable because the alcohol is disguised well for an imperial stout.

Serving type: bottle

10-14-2010 04:54:59 | More by kgrober
Photo of HURTemHIZZY
HURTemHIZZY

Virginia

3.15/5  rDev -14.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a deep brown with a good amount of red and golden highlights easily noticeable. Not as dark or opaque as I would prefer. One and a half finger tan head takes a while to dissipate but leaves no lacing. Smell is bittersweet chocolate, coffee, burnt grains, and some bitterness from hops that I wasn't expecting.

Taste is pretty weak on the malt side, with thin bittersweet chocolate being the main player, and coffee and toasted grains being noticed slightly. Slight hop bitterness. Disappointing. Mouthfeel is far too thin for the style. Easily drinkable, but not all that easily enjoyable.

Serving type: bottle

10-11-2010 15:13:18 | More by HURTemHIZZY
Photo of biglite351
biglite351

Pennsylvania

3.35/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

A - considerable red.around the edges, very fast falling head.

S - bitter roasted malts with some chocolate and coffee, not very inviting though.

T - strong dark chocolate base. Roasted malts through the finish. Mild coffee influence.

M - solid coating with good tingle on front, top and sides of tongue. You know that you are drinking something solid here.

D - the taste and feel do overpower the poor scent and look. I would by this at the bar.

Serving type: bottle

10-11-2010 00:24:22 | More by biglite351
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

2.6/5  rDev -29.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Hershey bar brown with generous orange-gold highlights along the bottom edge of the glass. Far from a black hole. The upper third is filled with khaki colored foam that looks pretty good after the pour and slightly better as it melts. No lace is a no-no.

The nose has a fruity tanginess that shouldn't be present. The basics of a Belgian cocoa nib-added Imperial stout are there, but SNICS doesn't smell like it will be a malt bomb by any means. Nor is it very hoppy. This is setting up to be a disappointing member of the Heavy Seas Mutiny Series.

Calling Siren Noire average is being kind... and the taste score may not be able to cling to the 3.0 once the middle portion of the bomber is breached. There are many 5.0% stouts that contain more malt than this. Besides, the chocolate has an odd, extract-like quality that is inexcusable.

Specifics include watery cocoa, an unripe fig tartness, and a small splash of cold coffee. Very few malt sugars and even fewer alpha acids add up to a lackluster performance on both sides of the sweet-bitter seesaw. Maybe that's why sour is able to barge in the front door and get comfortable on the couch.

The mouthfeel is a sad excuse for an Imperial <anything>. It's devoid of expansiveness, creaminess, hang-on, silkiness, slickness... anything that would make me think big beer (or even good beer). In a word... pathetic.

Siren Noire Imperial Chocolate Stout is just short of being an unmitigated disaster. Did the brewers actually taste test this stuff before letting it leave the premises? This offering is a head-scratcher because Clipper City, while not outstanding, is usually able to deliver fairly solid beer across a wide range of styles. Not recommended.

Serving type: bottle

10-09-2010 12:19:54 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of kbutler1
kbutler1

Minnesota

2.68/5  rDev -27.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle.
Dark brown color with a very slight head. More roast coffee flavor in the nose than anything and I get really no chocolate notes. The taste is farily smooth with some milk chocolate notes but very minimal at best. More roast coffee with some sweetness and dark fruit flavors. Medim mouthfeel. Nothing extremely special and I would be upset if I wanted a strong chocolate beer and I got this instead. Zero real alcohol taste.

Serving type: bottle

09-20-2010 13:00:10 | More by kbutler1
Photo of mothman
mothman

United Kingdom (Wales)

1.7/5  rDev -53.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Poured into ccb snifter

Pours 1/2 finger of light tan head. Color pours a copper brown, but settles black.

Aroma: Roasted malts and dark chocolate. Heavy roast here with some hints of coffee. Notes of vanilla as well.

Taste: I really can't tell this is a stout. It has so many off flavors. It seems infected but it isn't fizzy like infected beers are. Chocolate and burnt malts. Cherry like infection notes. Not good at all.

Mouthfeel: Roasted, a bit fizzy, and dry. Medium to full bodied with a decent amount of carbonation. Ends dry and sour.

Overall, I think this is infected or something. It isn't good at all. I can't find anything I like about it. I don't know if I will be able to finish half of this bottle.

Serving type: bottle

09-19-2010 03:46:21 | More by mothman
Photo of Xul
Xul

California

4.05/5  rDev +9.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

A: Pours almost pitch black, capped by one finger of creamy pale beige head. Retention is moderate as it slowly recedes to scattered lacing atop the beer.

S: Cocoa and semi-sweet chocolate up front, followed by some roasted coffee and dark malts, dark fruits, caramel and vanilla. Aroma is very well integrated.

T: Cocoa up front again, with vanilla and some sweeter chocolate arriving on the mid-palate. Dark cherries and roasted malts come in near the backend, leading to a blend of coffee, semisweet chocolate, and dark fruits on the finish.

M: A little bit less than medium bodied with moderate carbonation, a bit too thin for the style. Still not bad per se, just not optimal.

D: Incredibly balanced and well-integrated, goes down far too easy for what it is.

Serving type: bottle

09-10-2010 05:37:11 | More by Xul
Photo of jjboesen
jjboesen

Maryland

4.22/5  rDev +14.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This Imperial Chocolate Stout is part of the Heavy Seas Mutiny Fleet "Big Beer Series," whatever this portends. In any case, I purchased a bomber of this black beauty; it pours a thick beige froth, one that slowly subsides into a tar-black body wearing an imperial crown of foam.

There is a strikingly powerful miasma of cocoa powder that hits the nose; concurrently, the poor palate is beseiged by a chocolate syrup blanket imbedded with a sweet and toasty fade.

This is heavy as per the style - not so in comparison with Old Rasputin. Its complexity lies in the temperature. Do not drink it cold; let it warm up. Then do battle. Another fine presentation from the folks at Clipper City - ahem, Heavy Seas.

Serving type: bottle

08-29-2010 23:59:03 | More by jjboesen
Photo of Metalmonk
Metalmonk

North Carolina

3.1/5  rDev -16%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Head is a super-creamy tan thing, which takes awhile to transform to a crown. Liquid is the expected opaque black, although not the most abyss-like dark black of some other imperial stouts.

Aroma is...not what I expected. Dusty cocoa, even Quik chocolate milk mix further back, maybe a little black licorice and some alcohol snapping at the nostril hairs...but by far, the most prominent smell is a mineral/creek-pebble sorta deal. Stony, stiff and literally quite rocky.

Flavor is little better than the aroma. Elements of sweet cream sneak in, and the chocolate is of the bittersweet dark/baking variety...still hampered by too much mineral. Lots of roast, like a so-so variety of dark-roasted coffee bean. Lacking the depth and gooey oomph of other stouts in this general category.

Texturally, this isn't helped by the too-present carbonation, although there's a slickness and something approaching roundness that I like. But it's not the stuff of truly great double/imperial stouts.

A letdown, especially as I've tended to enjoy Clipper City's Heavy Seas series. Just not what I want out of a double/imperial stout, chocolate or no chocolate, and the chocolate fails here as well. It's not a total disaster, and there are some things being done right, but for the money and calories, there are many better options...

Serving type: bottle

08-27-2010 22:51:32 | More by Metalmonk
Heavy Seas - Siren Noire Imperial Chocolate Stout from Heavy Seas Beer
83 out of 100 based on 340 ratings.