Kingfisher Premium Lager
United Breweries - UB Group

Kingfisher Premium LagerKingfisher Premium Lager
Beer Geek Stats | Print Shelf Talker
From:
United Breweries - UB Group
 
India
Style:
European Pale Lager
Ranked #333
ABV:
4.8%
Score:
66
Ranked #28,286
Avg:
2.8 | pDev: 22.5%
Reviews:
386
Ratings:
983
Status:
Active
Rated:
Mar 03, 2024
Added:
Mar 06, 1998
Wants:
  22
Gots:
  184
No description / notes.
View: More Beers
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Ratings by BlackHaddock:
Photo of BlackHaddock
Reviewed by BlackHaddock from England

1.71/5  rDev -38.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5
Green bottle, 330ml, best before Sept 2007, drank 1st Feb 2007.

This Kingfisher was brewed under licence by Sheppard Neame (of Spitfire fame), the UK version is 4.8%, but you would never guess it.

Very light in colour, a pale golden yellow, as most lagers are, so appearance is OK. The white head just disappeared in my 0.4 litre Berliner Kindl straight sleeved glass, by wifes, which was poured into a Hoegaarden Grand Cru glass, stayed longer and the neck around the edge of the glas stayed until she finished the beer. Maybe my manly odours killed the head on my glass.

Lagers don't have great aroma's, well I don't think so, anyway. This one smells dry and boring.

The taste is also dry and boring, might be fine with a curry, but as a stand alone drink, it is poor.

What mouthfeel? There is no taste for a mouthfeel to be reviewed, all that was left after each drink was desire to have a beer, and stop drinking this.

I still have 2 of this 4 pack left, I hope someone I don't like visits soon.

New Bit:
Had on-tap at an Indian Curry House (Dec 2011), a lot better when taken with a hot dish, as I intimated in my original review. Not altered the scores, just letting anybody/everybody know it isn't as bad as my score indicates!
Feb 01, 2007
More User Ratings:
 
Rated: 3.33 by LifesAnesthesia from Virginia

Mar 03, 2024
 
Rated: 2.67 by LunchMoney from Minnesota

Feb 15, 2024
 
Rated: 3.01 by BillyNoonan from Ireland

Feb 11, 2024
Photo of Mugman8
Rated by Mugman8 from New York

2.52/5  rDev -10%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
Had this at a party. It was cold so it wasn't terrible but I would never drink again....
Dec 25, 2023
Photo of drdiesel9483
Reviewed by drdiesel9483 from Ohio

2.77/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75
Look - pale yellow with very slight rimming
Smell and taste - grainy and malty
Feel - light with a slight crisp carbonation
Overall - better than a bud
Nov 22, 2023
 
Rated: 2.64 by Eman17 from Illinois

Nov 15, 2023
 
Rated: 2.93 by siege06nd from Virginia

Oct 06, 2023
 
Rated: 2.84 by uncleotis from Illinois

Sep 28, 2023
Photo of NorsemanOne
Reviewed by NorsemanOne from Utah

2.41/5  rDev -13.9%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75
Purchased from local grocer for $2

No bottling/BB date

Poured at fridge temp into a pokal glass

Pours an attractive clear golden with little to no head/lacing 3.25

Very faint malt on the nose and not much else, even as it warmed. 2.75

Fairly seltzer/soda like with not much flavor, perhaps a touch of hops, aaaand that's it. 1.75

Biting carbo, but not overwhelming, light and lightly dry finish. 3

Overall a pretty and good feeling beer that misses big on aroma and taste, but hey, they can't all be spectacular! 2.75
Sep 24, 2023
 
Rated: 3 by BrisLoganite from Australia

Sep 18, 2023
Photo of Joseph_Dave
Reviewed by Joseph_Dave from India

4.94/5  rDev +76.4%
look: 5 | smell: 4.75 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 5
This is a refreshing beer. You can drink it anywhere and it blends in with spicy food. Overall, this Beer has the perfect malty taste and at the same time it gives a flavor of dried orange peels. This beer shall be marketed all over the world. Its richness in malt and flavor makes it so drinkable. Thank you.
Aug 31, 2023
 
Rated: 2.85 by Catalinmunteanu from Romania

Jul 25, 2023
 
Rated: 4.44 by beerrat from Virginia

Jul 02, 2023
Photo of edthehead
Reviewed by edthehead from Maryland

3.34/5  rDev +19.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5
Clear light golden appearance with sparse lazy film of surface head. Grass, arugula, herb, peat. Light to medium body, light carbonation. Some off flavors that I’m having a hard time identifying.
Jun 02, 2023
 
Rated: 2.78 by RPBeerdude from Colorado

Apr 19, 2023
 
Rated: 2.5 by TheItalianStallion from New York

Apr 01, 2023
Photo of Thunderduck22
Rated by Thunderduck22 from Ireland

2.94/5  rDev +5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
Middle of the road lager.
Feb 18, 2023
 
Rated: 2.72 by dschwartz13 from Tennessee

Nov 28, 2022
Photo of Sigmund
Reviewed by Sigmund from Norway

2.62/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
May 2003: (330 ml bottle, brewed by Shepherd Neame, England). I have probably used this beer to wash down some Indian food in England, had to buy it again in Norway to rate it without food (by special order, it's normally sold only in our Indian restarants). Besides being wet and thus fit to help you survive a hot curry, this beer has nothing "Indian" or any other quality that should put it on a beer geek's wish list. Light golden colour, low head, Heineken-like aroma, uninteresting flavour but at least a hint of bitterness. Typical mediocre lager, not good, but not as bad as I expected.
Aug 22, 2022
Kingfisher Premium Lager from United Breweries - UB Group
Beer rating: 66 out of 100 with 983 ratings